Evaluation of Efficacy of Adding Aprepitant to Palonosetron and Dexamethasone in Carboplatin and Etoposide Therapy.

Although carboplatin (CBDCA) is classified as a moderately emetogenic agent, the majority of guidelines recommend the use of a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist in addition to a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 receptor antagonist with dexamethasone (DEX) for CBDCA-containing chemotherapy because of its higher emetogenic risk. However, the additional efficacy of aprepitant (APR) in CBDCA-containing treatment remains controversial, and data on multiple-day treatments are limited. Etoposide (ETP) was administered on days 1-3 in the CBDCA + ETP regimen, and it is important to evaluate suitable antiemetic therapy for the regimen. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of additional APR in CBDCA + ETP. Patients were divided into two groups and retrospectively evaluated. One was the control group, which was prophylactically administered palonosetron (PALO) and DEX, and the other was the APR group, which received APR orally with PALO and DEX. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR) between the groups. The overall CR rates were 75.0 and 76.4% in the control and APR groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 1.00). In the acute phase, it was 88.9 and 97.2%, respectively, and 86.1 and 79.2% in the delayed phase, respectively, without significant differences (p = 0.10 and 0.38, respectively). The incidence and severity of nausea, vomiting, and anorexia were not significantly different between the two groups in the acute and delayed phases. Our findings suggest that combining APR with PALO and DEX does not improve the CR rate in CBDCA + ETP therapy.

Evaluation of the risk factors for the failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs for irinotecan-induced cholinergic symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: Irinotecan (IRI) is an anticancer drug that is frequently used to treat colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic cancers. Its side effects include cholinergic symptoms, such as diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, and hyperhidrosis. Anticholinergic medicines are frequently used for treatment or prophylaxis; however, the risk factors for the failure of a single prophylactic anticholinergic administration remain unclear. Moreover, an appropriate anticholinergic drug for prophylaxis remains unknown. Thus, we aimed to identify the risk factors associated with the failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs for IRI-induced cholinergic symptoms and to evaluate the usefulness of multiple prophylactic doses of anticholinergic drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent IRI treatment for colorectal, gastric, or pancreatic cancer and received prophylactic anticholinergic drugs for IRI-induced cholinergic symptoms (n = 135) were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs. We also evaluated the efficacy of multiple prophylactic anticholinergic drug administration. RESULTS: Based on univariate and multivariate analyses, colorectal cancer, female sex, and prophylactic use of scopolamine butyl bromide were identified as risk factors for failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs. The efficacy of multiple prophylactic doses was confirmed to be 95% of the patients who had a single prophylactic failure due to temporary effect but symptom appearance after a certain period of time (wearing-off). CONCLUSION: We determined that colorectal cancer, female sex, and prophylactic use of scopolamine butyl bromide were risk factors associated with the failure of a single prophylactic dose of anticholinergic drugs, and that multiple prophylactic doses for wearing-off can be a promising method.

Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer in elderly patients: analysis of the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan.

BACKGROUND: Whether concurrent chemotherapy with radiotherapy (CRT) is effective for elderly patients with head and neck cancer is a controversial topic. This study aimed to analyze the effectiveness of CRT vs. radiation therapy (RT) among elderly patients in Japan. METHODS: Data from the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan were extracted and analyzed. Patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx who received definitive CRT or RT between 2011 and 2014 were included. RESULTS: CRT was administered to 78% of the 1057 patients aged ≥ 70 years and 67% of the 555 patients aged ≥ 75 years. For the patients aged ≥ 75 years, the overall survival (OS) rate was significantly better in the CRT group than in the RT group (P < 0.05), while the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was not significantly different (P > 0.05). The add-on effect of CRT was significantly poor in elderly patients (P < 0.05), and it was not a significant factor in the multivariate analysis for patients aged ≥ 75 years. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the OS and PFS rates between the patients aged ≥ 70 years and those aged ≥ 75 years (all, P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Although aggressive CRT is administered to elderly patients in Japan, its effectiveness is uncertain. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to verify whether CRT is superior to RT alone for elderly patients.

Evaluation of Prediabetes in Cisplatin-induced Nephrotoxicity in the Short Hydration Method: A Subgroup Analysis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) is one of the most attention-requiring adverse effects. We have reported that diabetes mellitus significantly increases the incidence of CIN in a short hydration method in real-world lung cancer treatment. However, the effect of prediabetes on CIN development remains unclear. This study investigated whether patients with prediabetes exhibit CIN at a greater rate during real-world cisplatin-including treatments as a subgroup analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study enrolled patients with lung cancer receiving cisplatin treatment (≥75 mg/m2) from May 2014 to January 2021 (n=169). Patients were divided into a prediabetes group (baseline HbA1c 5.7-6.4%) and a control group (baseline HbA1c <5.7%). The primary endpoint of this study was the incidence of CIN in all treatment cycles between the two groups. We also assessed variations in serum creatinine (SCr) levels and creatinine clearance (CCr). RESULTS: CIN occurred in 4.7% of controls and 8.3% of patients with prediabetes in all cycles, with no significant difference (p=0.37). In contrast, variation of SCr levels and CCr was significantly worse in the prediabetes group [median variation level (range) 0.11 mg/dl (-0.11-0.46 mg/dl) and 0.12 mg/dl (-0.02-1.08 mg/d) in controls and prediabetes, p=0.04 for SCr; -12.9 ml/min (-54.1-4.9 ml/min) and -16.3 ml/min (-49.4-3.0 ml/min), p=0.02 for CCr, respectively]. These results were also confirmed during the first cycle of treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with prediabetes did not develop problematic CIN, although they exhibited significant increases in SCr and decreases in CCr.

Impact of adaptive radiotherapy on survival in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical significance of adaptive radiotherapy (ART) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy using IMRT. Planning computed tomography in ART was performed during radiotherapy, and replanning was performed. Since ART was started in May 2011 (ART group), patients who were treated without ART up to April 2011 (non-ART group) were used as the historical control. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate overall survival (OS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). LRFS for the primary tumor (LRFS_P) and regional lymph node (LRFS_LN) were also studied for more detailed analysis. Statistical significance was evaluated using the log-rank test for survival. RESULTS: The ART group tended to have higher radiation doses. The median follow-up period was 127 months (range, 10 to 211 months) in the non-ART group and 61.5 months (range, 5 to 129 months) in the ART group. Compared to the non-ART group, the ART group showed significantly higher 5-year PFS (53.8% vs. 81.3%, p = 0.015) and LRFS (61.2% vs. 85.3%, p = 0.024), but not OS (80.7% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.941) and DMFS (84.6% vs. 92.7%, p = 0.255). Five-year LRFS_P was higher in the ART group (61.3% vs. 90.6%, p = 0.005), but LRFS_LN did not show a significant difference (91.9% vs. 96.2%, p = 0.541). CONCLUSION: Although there were differences in the patient backgrounds between the two groups, this study suggests the potential effectiveness of ART in improving locoregional control, especially in the primary tumor.

A Phase 2 Study of Encorafenib in Combination with Binimetinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAF-Mutated Thyroid Cancer in Japan.

Background: Driver mutations at BRAF V600 are frequently identified in papillary thyroid cancer and anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC), in which BRAF inhibitors have shown clinical effectiveness. This Japanese phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a BRAF inhibitor, encorafenib, combined with an MEK inhibitor, binimetinib, in patients with BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer. Methods: This phase 2, open-label, uncontrolled study was conducted at 10 institutions targeted patients with BRAF V600-mutated locally advanced or distant metastatic thyroid cancer not amenable to curative treatment who became refractory/intolerant to ≥1 previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-targeted regimen(s) or were considered ineligible for those. The primary endpoint was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: We enrolled 22 patients with BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer: 17 had differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and 5 had ATC. At data cutoff (October 26, 2022), the median follow-up was 11.5 (range = 3.4-19.0) months. The primary endpoint of centrally assessed ORR was 54.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.2-75.6; partial response in 12 patients and stable disease in 10). The ORRs in patients with DTC and ATC were 47.1% (8 of 17) and 80.0% (4 of 5), respectively. The medians for DOR and PFS by central assessment and for OS were not reached in the overall population, the DTC subgroup, or the ATC subgroup. At 12 months, the rate of ongoing response was 90.9%, and the PFS and OS rates were 78.8% and 81.8%, respectively. All patients developed ≥1 adverse events (AEs): grade 3 AEs in 6 patients (27.3%). No patients developed grade 4-5 AEs. The most common grade 3 AE was lipase increased (4 patients [18.2%]). Those toxicities were mostly manageable with appropriate monitoring and dose adjustment. Conclusions: Treatment with encorafenib plus binimetinib met the primary endpoint criteria and demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer regardless of its histological type, such as DTC or ATC, with no new safety concerns identified. Encorafenib plus binimetinib could thus be a new treatment option for BRAF V600-mutated thyroid cancer. Clinical Trial Registration number: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCT2011200018.

Clinical outcomes for olfactory neuroblastoma.

Background: Olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is a rare malignant tumor arising from the olfactory neuroepithelium. The standard of care for ONB is surgical resection; however, detailed treatment protocols vary by institution. Our treatment protocol consists of endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) for endoscopically resectable cases and induction chemotherapy followed by craniotomy combined with ESBS for locally advanced cases, with postoperative radiotherapy performed for all cases. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is performed in unresectable cases. In this study, we evaluate our treatment protocol and outcomes for ONB. Methods: A retrospective review of patients with ONB was conducted. Outcomes included survival outcomes and perioperative data. Results: Fifteen patients (53.6%) underwent ESBS, 12 (42.9%) underwent craniotomy combined with ESBS, and 1 (3.6%) received CRT. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates for all patients were 92.9% and 82.5%, respectively, with a median follow-up period of 81 months. The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 77.3% and 70.3%, respectively, and the 5- and 10-year local control rates were 88.2% and 80.2%, respectively. Patients undergoing ESBS demonstrated a significantly shorter operating time, period from operation to ambulation, hospitalization period, and less blood loss than those undergoing craniotomy combined with ESBS. Conclusion: Our treatment protocol was found to afford favorable outcomes. Patients who underwent endoscopic resection showed lower complication rates and better perioperative data than those who underwent craniotomy combined with ESBS. With appropriate case selection, ESBS is considered a useful approach for ONB.

Clinical, genomic and immune microenvironmental determinants of nivolumab response in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Background: In view of improving biomarkers predicting the efficacy of immunotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC), this multicenter retrospective study aimed to identify clinical, tumor microenvironmental, and genomic factors that are related to therapeutic response to the anti- Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody, nivolumab, in patients with R/M HNSCC. Methods: The study compared 53 responders and 47 non-responders, analyzing formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples using 14-marker multiplex immunohistochemistry and targeted gene sequencing. Results: Of 100 patients included, responders had significantly lower smoking and alcohol index, higher incidence of immune related adverse events, and higher PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) expression in immune cells as well as PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) than non-responders. The frequency of natural killer cells was associated with nivolumab response in patients with prior cetuximab use, but not in cetuximab-naïve status. Age-stratified analysis showed nivolumab response was linked to high CPS and lymphoid-inflamed profiles in patients aged ≥ 65. In contrast, lower NLR in peripheral blood counts was associated with response in patients aged < 65. Notably, TP53 mutation-positive group had lower CPS and T cell densities, suggesting an immune-excluded microenvironment. Patients with altered tumor suppressor gene pathways, including TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 mutations, had lower CPS, higher smoking index, and were associated with poor responses. Conclusion: Nivolumab treatment efficacy in HNSCC is influenced by a combination of clinical factors, age, prior treatment, immune environmental characteristics, and gene mutation profiles.