Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Rheumatol Int ; 44(1): 165-172, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37837450

RESUMEN

To determine the scope of recommended vaccination uptake among patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) receiving biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic agents (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs, respectively) and to determine factors, which influence their decision and are subject to modification. A single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted including patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) on bDMARDs or tsDMARDs. Demographic, anthropometric, and clinical parameters were analyzed. Disease activity was determined using the validated indices DAS28-CRP and CDAI for RA and peripheral PsA, whereas BASDAI and ASDAS for AS and axial PsA. Patients completed a questionnaire with predefined response options assessing their vaccination status and attitudes about receiving a COVID-19 vaccination. A total of 201 patients with inflammatory joint diseases were included in the study, with a mean age of 54.6 (± 8.6) years and a disease duration of 11 (± 14.4) years. More than one-third of the study group had received full vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, with the majority (68.1%) receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine. The proportion of patients who had received recommended pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations and regular reimmunizations against diphtheria and tetanus was low, with only 13.9% (n = 28), 1.5% (n = 3), and 44.8% (n = 90), respectively. Patients who had a preceding discussions with a rheumatologist were more likely to get vaccinated. Considering the suboptimal vaccination rates and the prevalent uncertainty among individuals with IA in Bulgaria, there is an urgent need to devise novel strategies to promote vaccination uptake and enhance patient awareness. These strategies aim to educate patients about their autoimmune condition, as well as emphasize the safety and efficacy of vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Psoriásica , Artritis Reumatoide , Espondilitis Anquilosante , Vacunas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico
2.
Reumatologia ; 62(2): 134-141, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38799778

RESUMEN

Rapidly destructive coxopathy (RDC) is a rare type of coxarthritis marked by swift deterioration of the hip joint. Although its cause remains unclear, several pathophysiological mechanisms are proposed. To comprehensively analyze this poorly understood condition, a literature search was conducted focusing on associations of bilateral RDC and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The problem of long-standing RA, bilateral RDC with a febrile episode that preceded a rapid decline in mobility and severe hip pain, with radiological assessment confirmed bilateral hip destruction, was presented. Rapidly destructive coxopathy, especially when linked to RA, poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Our review confirmed by the clinical picture emphasizes the need for vigilance in RA patients with hip involvement and calls for further research to understand RDC's mechanisms and enhance clinical care.

3.
Rheumatol Int ; 43(5): 975-981, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36920514

RESUMEN

Takayasu's arteritis (TA) is a chronic granulomatous vasculitis that predominantly affects the aorta and its major branches. Despite advancements in the understanding of the pathogenic pathways of vascular inflammation, the etiology and predisposing factors of TA remain to be fully understood. In susceptible individuals, exposure to adjuvants may trigger, unlock or unmask an autoimmune disorder, presenting as non-specific constitutional symptoms or a fully developed autoimmune syndrome such as vasculitis. Here, we hypothesize that TA could be triggered by siliconosis, a subtype of the autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA). ASIA, also known as Shoenfeld syndrome, encompasses a wide range of autoimmune and immune-mediated diseases resulting from dysregulation of the immune response after exposure to agents with adjuvant activity. This case report describes the development of large artery vasculitis, TA, in an individual one year following the placement of silicone breast implants. The patient initially presented with non-specific symptoms, and multiple imaging methods were employed, including ultrasound diagnostics, CT angiography, and 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT. These techniques revealed vasculitic alterations in the carotid arteries and thoracic aorta. Initial treatment with glucocorticosteroids proved ineffective, prompting the addition of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents. Due to the distinct clinical symptoms, disease progression, implant-associated fibrosis, and resistance to therapy, the potential involvement of implants in the development of large-vessel vasculitis was considered, and a potential association with ASIA was postulated. Although there is limited evidence to support a direct link between adjuvants and the pathogenesis of TA, similarities in cellular immunity between the two conditions exist. The diagnosis of this complex and potentially debilitating condition requires a comprehensive clinical examination, laboratory evaluation, and instrumental assessment. This will aid in identifying potential contributing factors and ensuring successful treatment.


Asunto(s)
Arteritis de Takayasu , Humanos , Arteritis de Takayasu/complicaciones , Arteritis de Takayasu/diagnóstico , Arteritis de Takayasu/tratamiento farmacológico , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Aorta/patología , Arterias Carótidas/patología , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos
4.
Rheumatol Int ; 42(6): 1073-1083, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35024943

RESUMEN

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in C1q gene cluster were previously linked to autoimmunity and SLE, but data are scarce for their association with RA. In the present study, we evaluated associations of five SNPs (rs665691, rs682658, rs172378, rs292001 and rs294179) in the C1q genetic region with RA and some of its clinical and immunologic characteristics. Fifty-eight RA patients and 67 age- and gender-matched healthy controls, all Caucasian, participated in the study. They were genotyped for the five SNPs using TaqMan allelic discrimination assay, and their C1q levels were estimated by ELISA. Rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies were measured (using latex agglutination and ELISA resp.) in the RA patients' group and relevant clinical information was collected. RA patients and healthy controls had similar frequencies of alleles and genotypes of rs665691, rs682658 and rs294179. Minor G-allele and GG genotype of rs172378 were associated with RA (OR = 2.80; 95% CI 1.62-4.81; p = 0.0002 and OR = 5.01; 95% CI 1.55-16.24; p = 0.007, resp.), as well as AA genotype of rs292001 (OR = 3.23; 95% CI 1.15-9.08; p = 0.026). C1q levels were significantly lower (still normal) in RA patients' group compared to healthy volunteers: 89 µg/ml (68-121) vs 114 µg/ml (60-169), p < 0.0001. Significant association was established between rs172378 and rs292001 and RA, in contrast to rs665691, rs682658 and rs294179. RA patients had lower C1q levels than healthy controls. Our findings correspond to the scientific knowledge so far and add additional clarity from a Bulgarian cohort.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Alelos , Artritis Reumatoide/genética , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Complemento C1q/genética , Frecuencia de los Genes , Genotipo , Humanos , Familia de Multigenes , Proyectos Piloto , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple
5.
Clin Rheumatol ; 42(10): 2651-2676, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36991244

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), with inflammation playing a key role. Biologic and targeted synthetic drugs used to treat RA can induce systemic immunomodulation and may have pleiotropic effects on vascular function, making it crucial to investigate their impact on CVD risk in RA patients. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted to investigate the impact of biologic and targeted synthetic treatments approved for RA on various cardiovascular markers, including endothelial function, arterial stiffness, and subclinical atherosclerosis. Our analysis included a search of the MedLine (via PubMed) and Web of Science databases using a pre-determined search strategy. We conducted a narrative synthesis of the included studies due to heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures. RESULTS: From an initial pool of 647 records, we excluded 327 studies based on their titles and abstracts, and we selected 182 studies for final examination. Ultimately, 58 articles met our inclusion criteria and were included in our systematic review. Our analysis of these studies revealed a positive effect of biologic and targeted synthetic therapies on vascular dysfunction associated with RA. However, the impact of these treatments on subclinical atherosclerosis was inconsistent. CONCLUSION: Overall, our systematic review provides important insights into the potential cardiovascular benefits of biologic and targeted synthetic treatments for RA by a still unknown mechanism. These findings can inform clinical practice and contribute to our understanding of their possible effects on early vascular pathology. Key Points • Great heterogeneity of methods are used to evaluate the endothelial function and arterial stiffness in patients with RA on biologic and targeted synthetic antirheumatic drugs. • Most studies have shown a considerable improvement in endothelial function and arterial stiffness with TNFi, despite some studies reporting only transient or no improvement. • Anakinra and tocilizumab may have a beneficial effect on vascular function and endothelial injury, as indicated by increased FMD, coronary flow reserve, and reduced levels of biomarkers of endothelial function, while the overall impact of JAKi and rituximab remains inconclusive based on the reviewed studies. • To fully comprehend the distinctions between biologic therapies, more long-term, well-designed clinical trials are necessary using a homogeneous methodology.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Productos Biológicos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Humanos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones
6.
Folia Med (Plovdiv) ; 62(1): 46-51, 2020 03 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32337896

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The European League Against Rheumatism updates the recommendations for managing rheumatoid arthritis. Again, it is not specified which DAS28 is there in view (with erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein). AIM: The aim of the study is to check whether Disease Activity Score-28 (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive protein) represent equally the activity of rheumatoid arthritis in the course of treatment with biological agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study we analyzed the database of real clinical practice over a 12-month period of biological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Disease Activity Score-28 (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and (C-reactive protein) are compared at the start and at the end of the study. RESULTS: The mean difference between the two variants of disease activity scores at baseline and at the end of the study is significant (p < 0.001). The Disease Activity Score-28 (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) represents a remarkably small proportion of patients with remission and low activity (<3.2) at baseline (18.46%) and at the end of the study (40.51%). Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive protein) represents a significantly high proportion of patients in remission and low activity (<3.2) at the end of the study (69.74%). Estimates of activity according to the two variants show significant discrepancy between each other and low level of agreement (kappa = 0.235-0.464). Discrepancies are not related to the type of biological drug (anti-TNF or not). CONCLUSION: The two DAS28 variants are not interchangeable with the same threshold for low activity in measuring the response to biological therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Proteína C-Reactiva/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/sangre , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Productos Biológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA