RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) is one of the main causes of global neonatal mortality and morbidity, and initiation of early antibiotic treatment is key. However, antibiotics may be harmful. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of results from the Neonatal Procalcitonin Intervention Study, a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled intervention study. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of serial measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), and white blood count (WBC) within different time windows to rule out culture-positive EOS (proven sepsis). RESULTS: We analyzed 1678 neonates with 10 899 biomarker measurements (4654 CRP, 2047 PCT, and 4198 WBC) obtained within the first 48 hours after the start of antibiotic therapy due to suspected EOS. The areas under the curve (AUC) comparing no sepsis vs proven sepsis for maximum values of CRP, PCT, and WBC within 36 hours were 0.986, 0.921, and 0.360, respectively. The AUCs for CRP and PCT increased with extended time frames up to 36 hours, but there was no further difference between start to 36 hours vs start to 48 hours. Cutoff values at 16 mg/L for CRP and 2.8 ng/L for PCT provided a sensitivity of 100% for discriminating no sepsis vs proven sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Normal serial CRP and PCT measurements within 36 hours after the start of empiric antibiotic therapy can exclude the presence of neonatal EOS with a high probability. The negative predictive values of CRP and PCT do not increase after 36 hours.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis Neonatal , Sepsis , Biomarcadores , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Calcitonina , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Sepsis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUNDS: The large, international, randomized controlled NeoPInS trial showed that procalcitonin (PCT)-guided decision making was superior to standard care in reducing the duration of antibiotic therapy and hospitalization in neonates suspected of early-onset sepsis (EOS), without increased adverse events. This study aimed to perform a cost-minimization study of the NeoPInS trial, comparing health care costs of standard care and PCT-guided decision making based on the NeoPInS algorithm, and to analyze subgroups based on country, risk category and gestational age. METHODS: Data from the NeoPInS trial in neonates born after 34 weeks of gestational age with suspected EOS in the first 72 h of life requiring antibiotic therapy were used. We performed a cost-minimization study of health care costs, comparing standard care to PCT-guided decision making. RESULTS: In total, 1489 neonates were included in the study, of which 754 were treated according to PCT-guided decision making and 735 received standard care. Mean health care costs of PCT-guided decision making were not significantly different from costs of standard care (3649 vs. 3616). Considering subgroups, we found a significant reduction in health care costs of PCT-guided decision making for risk category 'infection unlikely' and for gestational age ≥ 37 weeks in the Netherlands, Switzerland and the Czech Republic, and for gestational age < 37 weeks in the Czech Republic. CONCLUSIONS: Health care costs of PCT-guided decision making of term and late-preterm neonates with suspected EOS are not significantly different from costs of standard care. Significant cost reduction was found for risk category 'infection unlikely,' and is affected by both the price of PCT-testing and (prolonged) hospitalization due to SAEs.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Duración de la Terapia , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Sepsis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Diagnóstico Precoz , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/sangre , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Up to 7% of term and late-preterm neonates in high-income countries receive antibiotics during the first 3 days of life because of suspected early-onset sepsis. The prevalence of culture-proven early-onset sepsis is 0·1% or less in high-income countries, suggesting substantial overtreatment. We assess whether procalcitonin-guided decision making for suspected early-onset sepsis can safely reduce the duration of antibiotic treatment. METHODS: We did this randomised controlled intervention trial in Dutch (n=11), Swiss (n=4), Canadian (n=2), and Czech (n=1) hospitals. Neonates of gestational age 34 weeks or older, with suspected early-onset sepsis requiring antibiotic treatment were stratified into four risk categories by their treating physicians and randomly assigned [1:1] using a computer-generated list stratified per centre to procalcitonin-guided decision making or standard care-based antibiotic treatment. Neonates who underwent surgery within the first week of life or had major congenital malformations that would have required hospital admission were excluded. Only principal investigators were masked for group assignment. Co-primary outcomes were non-inferiority for re-infection or death in the first month of life (margin 2·0%) and superiority for duration of antibiotic therapy. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were done. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00854932. FINDINGS: Between May 21, 2009, and Feb 14, 2015, we screened 2440 neonates with suspected early-onset sepsis. 622 infants were excluded due to lack of parental consent, 93 were ineligible for reasons unknown (68), congenital malformation (22), or surgery in the first week of life (3). 14 neonates were excluded as 100% data monitoring or retrieval was not feasible, and one neonate was excluded because their procalcitonin measurements could not be taken. 1710 neonates were enrolled and randomly assigned to either procalcitonin-guided therapy (n=866) or standard therapy (n=844). 1408 neonates underwent per-protocol analysis (745 in the procalcitonin group and 663 standard group). For the procalcitonin group, the duration of antibiotic therapy was reduced (intention to treat: 55·1 vs 65·0 h, p<0·0001; per protocol: 51·8 vs 64·0 h; p<0·0001). No sepsis-related deaths occurred, and 9 (<1%) of 1710 neonates had possible re-infection. The risk difference for non-inferiority was 0·1% (95% CI -4·6 to 4·8) in the intention-to-treat analysis (5 [0·6%] of 866 neonates in the procalcitonin group vs 4 [0·5%] of 844 neonates in the standard group) and 0·1% (-5·2 to 5·3) in the per-protocol analysis (5 [0·7%] of 745 neonates in the procalcitonin group vs 4 [0·6%] of 663 neonates in the standard group). INTERPRETATION: Procalcitonin-guided decision making was superior to standard care in reducing antibiotic therapy in neonates with suspected early-onset sepsis. Non-inferiority for re-infection or death could not be shown due to the low occurrence of re-infections and absence of study-related death. FUNDING: The Thrasher Foundation, the NutsOhra Foundation, the Sophia Foundation for Scientific research.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Calcitonina/sangre , Toma de Decisiones , Sepsis/sangre , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Biomarcadores/sangre , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/sangre , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Recién Nacido/tratamiento farmacológico , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Sepsis/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current strategies for risk stratification and prediction of neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) are inefficient and lack diagnostic performance. The aim of this study was to use machine learning to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of risk factors (RFs), clinical signs and biomarkers and to develop a prediction model for culture-proven EOS. We hypothesized that the contribution to diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers is higher than of RFs or clinical signs. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the prospective international multicenter NeoPInS study. Neonates born after completed 34 weeks of gestation with antibiotic therapy due to suspected EOS within the first 72 hours of life participated. Primary outcome was defined as predictive performance for culture-proven EOS with variables known at the start of antibiotic therapy. Machine learning was used in form of a random forest classifier. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred eighty-five neonates treated for suspected infection were analyzed. Biomarkers were superior to clinical signs and RFs for prediction of culture-proven EOS. C-reactive protein and white blood cells were most important for the prediction of the culture result. Our full model achieved an area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic-curve of 83.41% (±8.8%) and an area-under-the-precision-recall-curve of 28.42% (±11.5%). The predictive performance of the model with RFs alone was comparable with random. CONCLUSIONS: Biomarkers have to be considered in algorithms for the management of neonates suspected of EOS. A 2-step approach with a screening tool for all neonates in combination with our model in the preselected population with an increased risk for EOS may have the potential to reduce the start of unnecessary antibiotics.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores/sangre , Aprendizaje Automático , Sepsis Neonatal/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Proteína C-Reactiva/análisis , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Molybdenum cofactor (Moco) deficiency is a rare neurometabolic disorder, characterized by neurological impairment and refractive seizures, due to toxic accumulation of sulfite in the brain. Earlier it was suggested that in Moco-deficient humans maternal clearance of neurotoxic metabolites prevents prenatal brain damage. However, limited data are available about the time profile in which neurophysiologic deterioration occurs after birth. The amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a bedside method in neonates to monitor cerebral recovery after hypoxic-ischemic insults, detect epileptic activity, and evaluate antiepileptic drug treatment. We describe a chronological series of changes in aEEG tracings in a neonate with Moco deficiency. He presented with myoclonic spasms and hypertonicity a few hours after birth, however, the aEEG pattern was still normal. Within 2 days, the aEEG rapidly changed into a burst suppression pattern with repetitive seizures. After antiepileptic treatment, the aEEG remained abnormal. In this patient, the normal aEEG pattern at birth may have been due to maternal clearance of sulfite in utero. After birth, accumulation of sulfite causes progressive brain damage, reflected by the progressive depression of the aEEG tracings. This is in agreement with the results from a Moco-deficient mouse model, suggesting that maternal sulfite clearance suppresses prenatal brain damage. To our knowledge, this is the first case report describing the chronological changes in the aEEG pattern in a Moco-deficient patient. Insight into the time profile in which neurologic deterioration in Moco-deficient humans occurs is essential, especially when potential treatment strategies are being evaluated.
Asunto(s)
Ondas Encefálicas , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Coenzimas/deficiencia , Electroencefalografía , Epilepsia/diagnóstico , Errores Innatos del Metabolismo de los Metales/diagnóstico , Metaloproteínas/deficiencia , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Encéfalo/enzimología , Ondas Encefálicas/efectos de los fármacos , Coenzimas/genética , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/enzimología , Epilepsia/fisiopatología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Errores Innatos del Metabolismo de los Metales/enzimología , Errores Innatos del Metabolismo de los Metales/genética , Errores Innatos del Metabolismo de los Metales/fisiopatología , Metaloproteínas/genética , Cofactores de Molibdeno , Molibdoferredoxina/genética , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pteridinas , Sulfitos/metabolismo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND:: Medication use during pregnancy and lactation can be unavoidable, but knowledge on safety for the fetus or breastfed infant is limited among patients and healthcare providers. RESEARCH AIM:: This study aimed to determine (a) the prevalence of medication use in pregnant and lactating women in a tertiary academic center, (b) the types and safety of these medicines, and (c) the influence of medication use on initiation of breastfeeding. METHODS:: This study used a cross-sectional survey among women ( N = 292) who underwent high-risk or low-risk deliveries. Data about their use of prescribed, over-the-counter, and homeopathic medication during pregnancy were obtained through a structured interview, followed by a questionnaire during lactation. Safety was classified according to the risk classification system from the Dutch Teratological Information Service. RESULTS:: Overall, 95.5% of participants used medication. One third of participants used at least one medicine with an unknown risk for the fetus. Teratogenic medication was used by 6.5% of participants, whereas 29.5% used medication with a (suspected) pharmacological effect on the fetus. Lactation was initiated by 258 (88.7%) participants, of which 84.2% used medication while breastfeeding. In 3.8% of participants, this medication was classified unsafe, but none used medication with an unknown risk. One-third of the nonlactating participants decided not to initiate breastfeeding because of medication use. In 70% of participants, this decision was appropriate. CONCLUSION:: The prevalence of overall use of medication in Dutch pregnant and lactating women admitted to a tertiary center was high. There is an urgent need for pharmacometric studies for determination of the safe use of the most frequently used medicines during pregnancy or lactation.
Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Lactancia , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas/administración & dosificación , Atención Prenatal , Anomalías Inducidas por Medicamentos/prevención & control , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Entrevistas como Asunto , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Periodo Posparto , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacodynamics and safety of midazolam after intravenous infusion or oral administration in preterm infants. METHODS ]PATIENTS WERE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED TO INITIALLY RECEIVE MIDAZOLAM 0.1 MG/KG AS A 30-MINUTE INTRAVENOUS INFUSION OR AN ORAL BOLUS DOSE. IF PATIENTS STILL MET THE INCLUSION CRITERIA, THEY THEN RECEIVED MIDAZOLAM VIA THE ALTERNATE ROUTE (AFTER AN INTERVAL OF ≥72 HOURS). PHARMACODYNAMIC MEASUREMENTS CONSISTED OF A COMFORT® SCORE (A PREVIOUSLY VALIDATED SEDATION SCALE FOR PAEDIATRIC PATIENTS) AT BASELINE AND AT 0.5, 1, 2, 4 AND 6 HOURS POSTDOSE. MIDAZOLAM AND 1-OH-MIDAZOLAM CONCENTRATIONS WERE MEASURED AND VITAL SIGNS WERE RECORDED AT ALL PHARMACODYNAMIC MEASUREMENT TIMEPOINTS: RESULTS: A total of 24 infants were enrolled of whom seven received both intravenous and oral midazolam, 13 received only intravenous midazolam, and four received only oral midazolam. Overall, mean COMFORT® scores decreased (i.e. sedation increased) significantly within 30 minutes after intravenous (p S 0.05) and within 1 hour after oral (p = 0.003) midazolam administration. In 45% of patients the COMFORT® scores decreased little or not at all after midazolam, which was similar after both oral and intravenous administration. The sedative response to midazolam did not differ after intravenous or oral administration. No relationship was found between overall COMFORT® scores or change in COMFORT® score from baseline and midazolam, 1-OH-midazolam, or midazolam plus 1-OH-midazolam concentrations. Diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly after intravenous (approximately 11%) but not after oral midazolam administration. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Midazolam administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion or oral bolus dose appears to be effective and well tolerated in a small majority of preterm infants. However, a considerable number of neonates do not appear to respond to midazolam. The lack of response may be due to the fact that patients truly experienced therapeutic failure and/or consequent to the inability of the COMFORT® score to adequately reflect sedation uniformly in sick preterm infants.