The impact of prostate-specific antigen persistence after radical prostatectomy on the efficacy of salvage radiotherapy in patients with primary N0 prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in patients with lymph node negative (N0) prostate cancer is equally effective with persistent prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA rising from the undetectable range (<0.1 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed post-SRT PSA progression-free survival (PFS) in 555 patients with prostate cancer. The entire cohort was compared with a risk-adjusted subgroup of 112 patient pairs with matching pre-RP PSA level (±10 ng/mL), Gleason score (≤6 vs 7 vs ≥8), and pre-SRT PSA level (±0.5 ng/mL). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 6.1 years. After RP, PSA was undetectable in 422 and persistent in 133 patients. PSA persistence and a pre-SRT PSA level of ≥0.5 ng/mL reduced Kaplan-Meier rates of PFS significantly. In multivariate analysis of the entire cohort and after risk adjustment, the pre-SRT PSA level but not post-RP PSA persistence was a significant parameter. In the matched cohort's subgroup with early SRT at a PSA level of <0.5 ng/mL, a trend towards a worse outcome with post-RP PSA persistence was observed. Delayed SRT with a PSA level ≥0.5 ng/mL led to a PFS of <30%, irrespective of the post-RP PSA level. CONCLUSION: In patients with N0 prostate cancer with post-RP PSA persistence, early SRT at a PSA level <0.5 ng/mL seems to be less effective than in recurrent patients with post-RP undetectable PSA. They might benefit from intensified therapy, but larger case numbers are required to substantiate this conclusion. In patients with a PSA level ≥0.5 ng/mL and higher-risk features associated with post-RP PSA persistence, SRT alone is unlikely to provide long-term freedom from further progression.

Prostate-specific antigen after salvage radiotherapy for postprostatectomy biochemical recurrence predicts long-term outcome including overall survival.

BACKGROUND: For patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP), salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is a second chance of cure. However, depending on risk factors, 40-70% of the patients experience further progression. With a focus on the pre- and post-SRT serum level of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA), we assessed the determinants of the long-term outcome after SRT. PATIENT AND METHODS: Between 1997 and 2011, 464 patients received 3D-conformal SRT with median 66.6 Gy. The median PSA level before SRT was 0.31 ng/ml. In our retrospective analysis, post-SRT progression was defined as either a rising PSA >0.2 ng/ml above the nadir, or the application of anti-androgens or clinical recurrence. A PSA <0.1 ng/ml was termed undetectable. We analyzed the data with the Kaplan-Meier method (Logrank test) and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 5.9 years. Overall, 178 patients had recurrence, 13 developed distant metastases and 30 died. Univariate, a pre-RP PSA <10 ng/ml, pathological stage pT <3, Gleason score <8, positive surgical margins, a pre-SRT PSA <0.2 ng/ml and a post-SRT PSA nadir <0.1 ng/ml correlated with fewer and later second recurrences. In a multivariable Cox model, pT, Gleason score, margin status and pre-SRT PSA were significant covariates of progression. If the post-SRT PSA response was included in the regression analysis, then a nadir ≥0.1 ng/ml was the strongest risk factor. Initiating SRT at a PSA <0.2 ng/ml correlated with a post-SRT PSA <0.1 ng/ml. Men who achieved an undetectable post-SRT PSA nadir also had lower rates of metastases and a better overall survival. However, there were too few events for Cox regression analysis of these two endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Early SRT at a PSA <0.2 ng/ml correlates with re-achieving an undetectable PSA, which predicts improved freedom from progression and metastases and better overall survival.

Defining biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and timing of early salvage radiotherapy : Informing the debate.

BACKGROUND: The optimal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after radical prostatectomy (RP) for defining biochemical recurrence and initiating salvage radiation therapy (SRT) is still debatable. Whereas adjuvant or extremely early SRT irrespective of PSA progression might be overtreatment for some patients, SRT at PSA >0.2 ng/ml might be undertreatment for others. The current study addresses the optimal timing of radiation therapy after RP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohort 1 comprised 293 men with PSA 0.1-0.19 ng/ml after RP. Cohort 2 comprised 198 men with SRT. PSA progression and metastases were assessed in cohort 1. In cohort 2, we compared freedom from progression according to pre-SRT PSA (0.03-0.19 vs. 0.2-0.499 ng/ml). Multivariable Cox regression analyses predicted progression after SRT. RESULTS: In cohort 1, 281 (95.9%) men had further PSA progression ≥0.2 ng/ml and 27 (9.2%) men developed metastases within a median follow-up of 74.3 months. In cohort 2, we recorded improved freedom from progression according to lower pre-SRT PSA (0.03-0.19 vs. 0.2-0.499 ng/ml: 69 vs. 53%; log-rank p = 0.051). Patients with higher pre-SRT PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml were at a higher risk of progression after SRT (hazard ratio: 1.8; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The vast majority of patients with PSA ≥0.1 ng/ml after RP will progress to PSA ≥0.2 ng/ml. Additionally, early administration of SRT at post-RP PSA level <0.2 ng/ml might improve freedom from progression. Consequently, we suggest a PSA threshold of 0.1 ng/ml to define biochemical recurrence after RP.

Impact of Dose Escalation on the Efficacy of Salvage Radiotherapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer-A Risk-Adjusted, Matched-Pair Analysis.

Previous randomized trials have not provided conclusive evidence about dose escalations and associated toxicities for salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in prostate cancer. Here, we retrospectively analyzed whether dose escalations influenced progression-free survival in 554 patients that received salvage radiotherapy for relapses or persistently elevated prostate cancer antigen (PSA) after a radical prostatectomy. Patients received SRT between 1997 and 2017 at two University Hospitals in Germany. We compared patient groups that received radiation doses <7000 cGy (n = 225) or ≥7000 cGy (n = 329) to analyze the influence of radiation dose on progression-free survival. In a second matched-pair analysis of 216 pairs, we evaluated prognostic factors (pT2 vs. pT3−4, Gleason score [GS] ≤ 7 vs. GS ≥ 8, R0 vs. R1, and pre-SRT PSA <0.5 vs. ≥0.5 ng/mL). After a median follow-up of 6.8 (4.2−9.2) years, we found that escalated doses significantly improved progression-free survival (p = 0.0042). A multivariate analysis indicated that an escalated dose, lower tumor stages (pT2 vs. pT3/4), and lower GSs (≤7 vs. 8−10) were associated with improved progression-free survival. There was no significant effect on overall survival. Our data suggested that escalating the radiation dose to ≥7000 cGy for SRT after a prostatectomy significantly improved progression-free survival. Longer follow-ups are needed for a comprehensive recommendation.

Salvage Radiotherapy versus Observation for Biochemical Recurrence following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Matched Pair Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) improves oncologic outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa) patients who develop biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, evidence on hard clinical endpoints is scarce. We compare long-term oncologic outcomes of SRT versus no radiotherapy (noRT) in patients with BCR after RP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within a multi-institutional database, we identified patients with BCR after RP between 1989 and 2016 for PCa. Patients with lymph node invasion, with adjuvant radiotherapy, or with additional androgen deprivation therapy at BCR were excluded. In all patients with SRT, SRT was delivered to the prostatic bed only. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to account for differences in pathologic tumor characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression models tested the effect of SRT versus no RT on metastasis-free (MFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 1832 patients with BCR, 32.9% (n = 603) received SRT without ADT. The median follow-up was 95.9 months. Median total SRT dose was 70.2 Gy. After 1:1 PSM, at 15 years after RP, MFS and OS rates were 84.3 versus 76.9% (p < 0.001) and 85.3 versus 74.4% (p = 0.04) for SRT and noRT, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression models, SRT was an independent predictor for metastasis (HR: 0.37, p < 0.001) and OS (HR: 0.64, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: This is the first matched-pair analysis investigating the impact of SRT versus observation only in post-RP recurrent PCa. After compensating for established risk factors, SRT was associated with better long-term MFS and OS. These results on clinical endpoints underline the curative potential of SRT.

Dose escalation for patients with decreasing PSA during radiotherapy for elevated PSA after radical prostatectomy improves biochemical progression-free survival: results of a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The optimal dose for salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is still not defined. It should be at least 66 Gy. In the present study, the suitability of PSA regression as a selection criterion for an SRT dose escalation to 70.2 Gy was examined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1997 and 2007, 301 prostate cancer patients received SRT after RP at the Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin. None of the patients had antihormone therapy prior to SRT. A total of 234 patients received 66.6 Gy. From 2002 on, 67 patients with a PSA decrease during SRT were irradiated with 70.2 Gy. The influence of this selection and dose escalation on freedom from biochemical progression (bNED) was analyzed. RESULTS: The median follow-up of the whole group was 30 months, the median pre-SRT PSA was 0.28 ng/ml. Of the patients, 27% (82/301) developed biochemical progression, 31% from the 66.6 Gy cohort (73/292) and 13% from the 70.2 Gy cohort (9/67) (p = 0.01). The calculated 2-years bNED was 74% for the whole group, 88% vs. 71% after 70.2 Gy and 66.6 Gy, respectively (p = 0.01). In a multivariate analysis, the total dose (p = 0.017), the re-achievement of an undetectable PSA after SRT (p = 0.005), and the infiltration of the seminal vesicles (p = 0.049) were independent parameters of bNED. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that patient selection during SRT for a dose escalation to 70.2 Gy can improve the freedom from biochemical progression in patients with SRT after RP.

Lead-time bias does not falsify the efficacy of early salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: In prostate cancer (PCa) recurring after radical prostatectomy (RP), salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is recommended to be given at PSA <0.5 ng/ml. It has been speculated, that the advantage from early SRT is mainly caused by lead-time bias: Calculating from time of SRT, earlier treatment would per-se result in longer time to event/censoring compared with later treatment, but not extend the interval from RP to post-SRT failure. METHODS: In 603 consecutive PCa patients receiving SRT between 1997 and 2017, we compared outcomes, calculating from time of irradiation vs. time of surgery. RESULTS: In multivariable analysis, tumor stage pT3-4, pathological Gleason score GS ≤6 vs. GS 7 vs. GS ≥8, post-RP PSA persistence (nadir ≥0.1 ng/ml), and the pre-SRT PSA (continuous or with cutoff 0.4 ng/ml) were significant risk-factors for biochemical progression (BCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) post-SRT and post-RP. A pre-SRT PSA <0.4 ng/ml was a significant discriminator for Kaplan-Meier rates of BCR and PFS. The Cox model for overall survival (OS) included age at RP (continuous), pT2 vs. pT3-4, and pre-SRT PSA (continuous) as significant predictors. However, no significant cutoff for the pre-SRT PSA could be identified to differentiate Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS, possibly because there were too few events, as 88% of the patients were still alive at last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-SRT PSA has a significant impact on BCR, PFS and potentially on OS, calculating either from RP or from SRT to event/censoring, respectively. This contradicts the hypothesis of lead-time bias falsifying the advantage from early SRT.

Effect of early salvage radiotherapy at PSA < 0.5 ng/ml and impact of post-SRT PSA nadir in post-prostatectomy recurrent prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: For patients with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP), salvage radiotherapy (SRT) offers a second chance of cure. European guidelines (EAU) recommend SRT at a PSA < 0.5 ng/ml. We analyze the efficacy of SRT given according to this recommendation and investigate the predictive power of the post-SRT PSA nadir. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2013, 301 patients of two university hospitals received SRT at a PSA < 0.5 ng/ml (median 0.192 ng/ml, IQR 0.110-0.300). Patients, who previously received androgen deprivation therapy, were excluded. All patients had 3D-conformal RT or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT, n = 59) (median 66.6 Gy). The median follow-up was 5.9 years. Progression and overall survival were the endpoints. RESULTS: After SRT, 252 patients re-achieved an undetectable PSA. In univariate analysis, pre-RP PSA ≥ 10 ng/ml, pT3-4, Gleason score (GS) 7-10 or 8-10, negative surgical margins, post-RP PSA ≥ 0.1 ng/ml, pre-SRT PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml and post-SRT PSA nadir ≥ 0.1 ng/ml correlated unfavorably with post-SRT progression. In a multivariable Cox model, pT3-4, GS 7-10, negative margins and a pre-SRT PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/ml were significant risk factors. If the post-SRT PSA was added to the analysis, it dominated the outcome (HR = 9.00). Of the patients with a pre-SRT PSA < 0.2 ng/ml, only 9% failed re-achieving an undetectable PSA. Overall survival in these patients was 98% after 5.9 years compared to 91% in patients with higher pre-SRT PSA (Logrank p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: SRT at a PSA < 0.2 ng/ml correlates significantly with achieving a post-SRT undetectable PSA (<0.1 ng/ml) and subsequently with improved freedom from progression. Given these overall favorable outcomes, whether additional androgen deprivation therapy is required for these men requires further study.

The PSA-response to salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy correlates with freedom from progression and overall survival.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In a retrospective analysis, we examined factors influencing the outcome of prostate cancer (PCa) patients receiving salvage radiotherapy (SRT) for PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 306 patients received 3D-conformal SRT at a median pre-SRT PSA of 0.298 ng/ml. Post-SRT progression was defined as PSA ⩾0.2 ng/ml above nadir and rising further, or hormone treatment, or clinical recurrence. Data were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Application of SRT at a PSA <0.2 ng/ml correlated significantly with achieving a post-SRT PSA nadir <0.1 ng/ml and with improved freedom from progression (median follow-up 7.2 years). The post-SRT nadir <0.1 ng/ml correlated significantly with less recurrences and with better overall survival. In multivariable Cox analysis restricted to pre-SRT parameters, a pre-SRT PSA ⩾0.2 ng/ml had the strongest impact (hazard ratio 2.4) on progression. If the post-SRT PSA nadir was included in the model, then failing the nadir was the most important risk factor (hazard ratio 8.1). CONCLUSIONS: Early SRT at a PSA <0.2 ng/ml is a favorable treatment option for post-RP biochemical recurrence. It correlated with a post-SRT PSA-nadir <0.1 ng/ml which was associated with improved freedom from progression and overall survival.

Open-label simultaneous radio-chemotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme with topotecan in adults.

BACKGROUND: Due to its radioresistance, the prognosis of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains poor. Therefore, we investigated the impact of simultaneous radio-chemotherapy with topotecan (Hycamtin) on clinical outcome, tolerability and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter trial, 60 patients (19 females, 41 males) with histologically proven (5x biopsy, 31x subtotal resection, 24x total resection) GBM were included. Radio-Chemotherapy was performed with daily doses of 2.0 Gy (total, 60 Gy), and 0.5 mg (absolute dose) of topotecan intravenously 1 h prior to irradiation. Toxicity was assessed using common toxicity criteria (CTC). General condition and quality of life were assessed at baseline, at the end of therapy, and 6 weeks post-therapy. Local control and length of survival were compared with an historical control group of 67 patients only treated with postoperative radiotherapy following stereotactic biopsy (15x), subtotal resection (39x), or total resection (13x). RESULTS: 57 patients completed the therapy. Median radiation dose was 60 Gy (range 16-76 Gy). Median cumulative topotecan dose was 15 mg (range 7.5-18.5 mg). CTC toxicity grade 3 was observed in six patients and grade 4 toxicity in two patients (three events). Two patients died of septic disease. Mean Karnofsky index was 87% at baseline, 81% at the end of therapy, and 80% at 6 weeks post-therapy. Median survival time was 15 months, significantly longer than the 11 months seen in the control group (P < 0.002). Extent of tumour resection or patient age did not have a significant effect on survival. CONCLUSION: This multimodal approach is well tolerated, and quality of life remains preserved. The relatively long median survival time is promising but a further randomised double blind placebo controlled parallel designed clinical trial should be performed to confirm these results.

Prostate-specific antigen persistence after radical prostatectomy as a predictive factor of clinical relapse-free survival and overall survival: 10-year data of the ARO 96-02 trial.

OBJECTIVE: The ARO 96-02 trial primarily compared wait-and-see (WS, arm A) with adjuvant radiation therapy (ART, arm B) in prostate cancer patients who achieved an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Here, we report the outcome with up to 12 years of follow-up of patients who retained a post-RP detectable PSA and received salvage radiation therapy (SRT, arm C). METHODS AND MATERIALS: For the study, 388 patients with pT3-4pN0 prostate cancer with positive or negative surgical margins were recruited. After RP, 307 men achieved an undetectable PSA (arms A + B). In 78 patients the PSA remained above thresholds (median 0.6, range 0.05-5.6 ng/mL). Of the latter, 74 consented to receive 66 Gy to the prostate bed, and SRT was applied at a median of 86 days after RP. Clinical relapse-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Patients with persisting PSA after RP had higher preoperative PSA values, higher tumor stages, higher Gleason scores, and more positive surgical margins than did patients in arms A + B. For the 74 patients, the 10-year clinical relapse-free survival rate was 63%. Forty-three men had hormone therapy; 12 experienced distant metastases; 23 patients died. Compared with men who did achieve an undetectable PSA, the arm-C patients fared significantly worse, with a 10-year metastasis-free survival of 67% versus 83% and overall survival of 68% versus 84%, respectively. In Cox regression analysis, Gleason score ≥8 (hazard ratio [HR] 2.8), pT ≥ 3c (HR 2.4), and extraprostatic extension ≥2 mm (HR 3.6) were unfavorable risk factors of progression. CONCLUSIONS: A persisting PSA after prostatectomy seems to be an important prognosticator of clinical progression for pT3 tumors. It correlates with a higher rate of distant metastases and with worse overall survival. A larger prospective study is required to determine which patient subgroups will benefit most from which treatment option.

Adjuvant radiotherapy versus wait-and-see after radical prostatectomy: 10-year follow-up of the ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95 trial.

BACKGROUND: Local failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) is common in patients with cancer extending beyond the capsule. Three prospectively randomized trials demonstrated an advantage for adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) compared with a wait-and-see (WS) policy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficiency of ART after a 10-yr follow-up in the ARO 96-02 study. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: After RP, 388 patients with pT3 pN0 prostate cancer (PCa) were randomized to WS or three-dimensional conformal ART with 60 Gy. The present analysis focuses on intent-to-treat patients who achieved an undetectable prostate-specific antigen after RP (ITT2 population)--that is, 159 WS plus 148 ART men. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary end point of the study was progression-free survival (PFS) (events: biochemical recurrence, clinical recurrence, or death). Outcomes were compared by log-rank test. Cox regression analysis served to identify variables influencing the course of disease. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up was 111 mo for ART and 113 mo for WS. At 10 yr, PFS was 56% for ART and 35% for WS (p<0.0001). In pT3b and R1 patients, the rates for WS even dropped to 28% and 27%, respectively. Of all 307 ITT2 patients, 15 died from PCa, and 28 died for other or unknown reasons. Neither metastasis-free survival nor overall survival was significantly improved by ART. However, the study was underpowered for these end points. The worst late sequelae in the ART cohort were one grade 3 and three grade 2 cases of bladder toxicity and two grade 2 cases of rectum toxicity. No grade 4 events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with WS, ART reduced the risk of (biochemical) progression with a hazard ratio of 0.51 in pT3 PCa. With only one grade 3 case of late toxicity, ART was safe. PATIENT SUMMARY: Precautionary radiotherapy counteracts relapse after surgery for prostate cancer with specific risk factors.

Phase 3 study of adjuvant radiotherapy versus wait and see in pT3 prostate cancer: impact of pathology review on analysis.

BACKGROUND: In a randomised trial, radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) was compared with RP alone in patients with pT3 pN0 prostate cancer with or without positive margin at local pathology (German Cancer Society trial numbers ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95). OBJECTIVE: A pathology review was performed on 85% of RP specimens of patients to investigate the influence of pathology review on the analysis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients post-RP (n=385) were randomised before achieving an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level to either wait and see (n=192) or 60Gy aRT (n=193). Of 307 patients with undetectable PSA after RP, 262 had pathology review. These results were included prospectively into the analysis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Agreement between local and review pathology was measured by the total percentage of agreement and by simple kappa statistics. The prognostic reliability for the different parameters was analysed by Cox regression model. Event-free rates were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis with a median follow-up of 40 mo for the wait-and-see arm and 38.5 mo for the aRT arm. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: There was fair concordance between pathology review and local pathologists for seminal vesicle invasion (pT3c: 91%; κ=0.76), surgical margin status (84%; κ=0.65), and for extraprostatic extension (pT3a/b: 75%; κ=0.74). Agreement was much less for Gleason score (47%; κ=0.42), whereby the review pathology resulted in a shift to Gleason score 7. In contrast to the analysis of progression-free survival with local pathology, the multivariate analysis including review pathology revealed PSMs and Gleason score >6 as significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Phase 3 studies of postoperative treatment of prostate cancer should be accomplished in the future with a pathology review. In daily practice, a second opinion by a pathologist experienced in urogenital pathology would be desirable, in particular, for high-risk patients after RP.

Salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy - what is the best time to treat?

PURPOSE: Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is applied routinely in patients with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy (RP). However, only ∼30% of these patients achieve a durable response after 10 years. As a standard, 66 Gy are given, ideally with a PSA below 0.5 ng/ml. We tried to determine more precisely the optimal PSA for starting SRT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 301 prostate cancer patients without hormonal treatment, we analysed the impact on the biochemical response (bNED) to SRT of two pre-SRT PSA levels, namely below or above the median of 0.28 ng/ml. RESULTS: The median follow-up time for the entire group was 30 months. In 151 patients, SRT commenced at a PSA ≤ 0.28 ng/ml, in 150 at > 0.28 ng/ml. Eighty-two patients (27%) developed biochemical progression during follow up. The calculated two-year bNED was 74% for the entire group, 78% versus 61% for a PSA ≤ or > 0.28 ng/ml, respectively. In multivariate analysis, pT(3b), resection status, pre-SRT PSA dichotomized at median, PSA post-SRT undetectable, and PSA doubling time were statistically significant independent predictors of progression after SRT. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that a PSA of ≤ 0.28 ng/ml improves bNED compared with a PSA before SRT of > 0.28 ng/ml.

Achieving an undetectable PSA after radiotherapy for biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy is an independent predictor of biochemical outcome--results of a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Salvage radiotherapy (SRT) is commonly used to treat patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy (RP). Retrospective series have demonstrated biochemical response in approximately 60-75% of patients, but only a significantly lower rate of patients achieves a response with a decrease of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) to a value below the limits of detectability. Therefore, long-term response at 10 years is only about 20-25% in all of these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine prognostic factors with impact on achieving the undetectable PSA range after SRT and to define the role of this end point. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1997 and 2004, 162 patients received SRT at the Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin. No patient had hormonal treatment before SRT and 90% of the patients (143) had a SRT dose of 66 Gy. We analyzed the impact of nine potential risk factors on achieving an undetectable PSA after RT and on biochemical relapse-free survival (bNED) after SRT. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 41.5 months and median PSA pre-RT was 0.33 ng/mL. Calculated bNED for 3.5 years was 54%. A total of 60% of the patients achieved an undetectable PSA after SRT. Univariate analysis demonstrated statistically significant predictors of biochemical progression after SRT: Gleason score (p = 0.01), PSA pre-SRT (p = 0.031), tumor stage (p = 0.047), and persistent detectable PSA after RT (p < 0.00005). In multivariate analysis, margin status (p = 0.017) and PSA pre-SRT (p = 0.002) were significant predictors of an undetectable PSA after SRT. The most significant independent predictor of bNED was "PSA undetectable after RT" (p < 0.0005) with a hazard ratio of 8.4, thus leading to a calculated bNED at 3.5 years of 75% compared with only 18% for those patients, who did not achieve an undetectable PSA after SRT. The rate of severe Grade 3-4 side effects was below 2.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The study represents one of the largest retrospective single-institution series of SRT for increasing PSA after RP in patients without any hormonal treatment before the initiation of SRT. Our findings suggest that achieving an undetectable PSA after RT is an important prognosticator for a high chance of cure and patients with a low PSA pre-SRT, positive surgical margins, and low tumor stage at the time of RP are best candidates for SRT.

Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen: ARO 96-02/AUO AP 09/95.

PURPOSE: Local failure after radical prostatectomy (RP) is common in patients with cancer extending beyond the capsule. Two randomized trials demonstrated an advantage for adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) compared with a wait-and-see policy. We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare RP followed by immediate RT with RP alone for patients with pT3 prostate cancer and an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after RP. METHODS: After RP, 192 men were randomly assigned to a wait-and-see policy, and 193 men were assigned to immediate postoperative RT. Eligible patients had pT3 pN0 tumors. Patients who did not achieve an undetectable PSA after RP were excluded from treatment according to random assignment (n = 78; 20%). Of the remaining 307 patients, 34 patients on the RT arm did not receive RT and five patients on the wait-and-see arm received RT. Therefore, 114 patients underwent RT and 154 patients were treated with a wait-and-see policy. The primary end point was biochemical progression-free survival. RESULTS: Biochemical progression-free survival after 5 years in patients with undetectable PSA after RP was significantly improved in the RT group (72%; 95% CI, 65% to 81%; v 54%, 95% CI, 45% to 63%; hazard ratio = 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.79; P = .0015). On univariate analysis, Gleason score more than 6 and less than 7, PSA before RP, tumor stage, and positive surgical margins were predictors of outcome. The rate of grade 3 to 4 late adverse effects was 0.3%. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant RT for pT3 prostate cancer with postoperatively undetectable PSA significantly reduces the risk of biochemical progression. Further follow-up is needed to assess the effect on metastases-free and overall survival.

Pelvic sidewall involvement in recurrent rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The lateral pelvic sidewall is an area not routinely dissected during standard operative procedures in surgery for rectal cancer in Western countries. This study analyzed data to evaluate the pattern of recurrence in rectal cancer with special emphasis on lateral tumor extension in a recently treated patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter retrospective study 123 patients were evaluated by our own CT-based three-dimensional datafile system and an extensive questionnaire. Patients had histological confirmation, clear bone destruction, a positive PET scan, and at least three minor criteria: progressive soft tissue mass, invasion of adjacent organs on follow-up CT or MRI, rising tumor markers, and typical appearance in cross-sectional imaging. Clinical or serological signs of inflammation were exclusion criteria. Initially 54% of the evaluated patients were N0, and the others were distributed evenly between N1 and N2; initial T stage was T1 in 2%, T2 in 24%, T3 in 60%, and T4 in 13%. RESULTS: . Recurrent tumors were situated mainly in the posterior part of the bony pelvis. The pelvic side wall was a rare site of recurrence and involved in fewer than 5%. When abdominoperineal resection was compared to low anterior resection as primary operation, there was a significant difference in extension of recurrent tumors in the inferior parts of the pelvis; no significant differences were found in superior or lateral parts of the pelvis. CONCLUSION: Because most tumor recurrences arise in the central pelvis, extending surgery to include dissecting the iliac vessels would probably offer only a moderate benefit, which must be balanced against potential side effects.

Recurrent rectal cancer within the pelvis. A multicenter analysis of 123 patients and recommendations for adjuvant radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recommendations for radiation ports in adjuvant radiation therapy for rectal cancer are mainly based on analysis of recurrence patterns. To evaluate whether changes in surgical technique have influenced this pattern of recurrence, a multicenter retrospective analysis was carried out on a patient population treated recently. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 123 patients were evaluated with the help of a CT-based self-developed 3-D data file system and an extensive questionnaire. Major inclusion criteria (one sufficient) for eligibility were: histological confirmation, clear bone destruction, and a positive PET scan, or at least three minor criteria: progressive soft tissue mass, invasion of adjacent organs on follow-up CT or MRI, rising tumor markers, and typical appearance in cross-sectional imaging. Clinical or serologic signs of inflammation were exclusion criteria. RESULTS: Initially, 54% of the evaluated patients were N0; in the remainder, N1 and N2 were distributed evenly. Initial T-category was T1 in 2%, T2 in 24%, T3 in 60%, and T4 in 13%, the male-to-female ratio was 2:1. Recurrent tumors were mainly situated in the posterior part of the bony pelvis as displayed in the figures. When abdominoperineal resection was compared to low anterior resection as primary operation, there was a significant difference in extension of recurrent tumors in the inferior parts of the pelvis (p<0.025 in all statistical tests applied), whereas no significant difference was found in the superior parts of the pelvis. CONCLUSION: Based on these results, a modest field size reduction in adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer seems feasible, offering the perspective of a reduction in acute and late side effects.