RESUMEN
Metformin is the first-line medication for type 2 diabetes. It is effective and safe, provided some caution is taken in specific populations. In patients with chronic kidney disease, metformin may provide long-term benefits, and it is a first-line therapy for diabetes, but the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) must be assessed regularly, to minimize the risk for metformin accumulation. When eGFR is 30-60 mL/min/1.73m2, the dose should be reconsidered, and sick-days education provided. Metformin should be discontinued when eGFR falls below 30 mL/min/1.73m2. Metformin accumulation may increase the risk for lactic acidosis if concomitant risk factors for hyperlactataemia (liver or respiratory insufficiency, sepsis, acute heart failure) are present; in these conditions, metformin is contraindicated, even although the available evidence is reassuring. Patients on metformin often complain of gastrointestinal side effects (mainly diarrhoea and nausea) during therapy initiation, but they may sometimes occur after years of stable therapy. These usually resolve if the dose is carefully titrated, or by switching to the extended-release formulation. Patients with obesity may benefit from the significant, although modest, metformin-associated weight loss and appetite reduction. During pregnancy, metformin is associated with a reduction of pregnancy complications, especially in obese women, but some concern remains, because metformin crosses the placenta, and it is associated with a significantly lower mean birth weight than insulin. In the elderly, gastrointestinal tolerability and renal function must be reassessed more often. Vitamin B-12 should be screened regularly in long-time metformin users because metformin may induce clinical vitamin B-12 deficiency.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hipoglucemiantes , Metformina , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Metformina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Femenino , Embarazo , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/efectos de los fármacos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Masculino , Acidosis Láctica/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
AIM: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to investigate whether there is an association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) treatment and thyroid cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this meta-analysis of RCTs, we included studies comparing a GLP-1RA with any comparator, lasting at least 52 weeks, and reporting the incidence of adverse events independently of the principal endpoint and population. All cases of thyroid cancer were collected. RESULTS: We retrieved 64 trials, 26 of which reported at least one incident case of thyroid cancer. GLP-1RA treatment was associated with a significant increase in the risk of overall thyroid cancer (Mantel-Haenzel odds ratio [MH-OR] 1.52 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.01, 2.29]; P = 0.04, I2 = 0%), with a fragility index of 1, and a 5-year number needed to harm of 1349. The association remained significant when including only trials lasting at least 104 weeks (MH-OR 1.76 [95% CI 1.00, 3.12]; P = 0.05). No significant association was found for papillary thyroid cancer (MH-OR 1.54 [95% CI 0.77, 3.06]; P = 0.22) or medullary thyroid cancer (MH-OR 1.44 [95% CI 0.23, 9.16]; P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that GLP-1RA treatment could be associated with a moderate increase in relative risk for thyroid cancer in clinical trials, with a small increase in absolute risk. Studies of longer duration are required to assess the clinical implications of this finding.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Agonistas Receptor de Péptidos Similares al Glucagón , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: To verify the prevalence of positive Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score, a screening test for metabolic-associated liver disease, in a large population-based sample in the Tuscany Italian Region, and to identify sub-populations at higher risk which could be targeted by specific screening programs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Population-based survey performed in the Italian region of Tuscany, with Tuscany health informative system's administrative data. We included 594,923 subjects, of which 32% had available data for the FIB-4 calculation. The overall proportion of subjects with an FIB-4 value > 1.3, was 41.6% of those with available exams, and 12,8% of the whole population, whereas 5.4% and 1.7% had FIB-4 >2.67. In those younger than 80 years, FIB >1.3 had a 33.1% and 9.4%. People with diabetes mellitus had higher figures (52.8.% and 28.9% for FIB>1.3). Among subjects aged 70 years or over, 74.9% of those with available data and 38.4% of the general population had a FIB-4>1.3, whereas 32% and 16% had a FIB-4 > 2. CONCLUSIONS: The relevant proportion of FIB-4 positivity in the general population poses a significant burden for further screening with liver elastography. Targeting people with diabetes, excluding people older than 80 years and/or adopting a FIB-4 threshold of 2 in those aged more than 70 years could increase the cost-effectiveness of the screening procedures.
RESUMEN
AIMS: Whether to recommend specifically the glucose-lowering therapies with cardiovascular benefit only in secondary prevention, or also in patients with multiple risk factors (MRF) but without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), is controversial across the guidelines for diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of clinical trials with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as an outcome. RESULTS: The definitions of ASCVD and MRF were heterogeneous across trials; nevertheless, the incidence of MACE was 2.8-fold higher in people with ASCVD in trials with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), and 3.9-fold in trials with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA). Both SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA were associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of MACE in people with previous ASCVD [inverse variance-odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval (0.86: 0.97) for SGLT2i, Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval (0.81: 0.90) for GLP-1 RA], whereas no significant reduction was detected in those without; on the other hand, no significant difference in effect was found between the two groups as well. The sample of patients without ASCVD enrolled in clinical trials is insufficient to draw reliable conclusions in this population; however, even assuming the same benefit detected in people with ASCVD also in those with MRF, the number needed to treat would differ (35 for secondary, 99 for primary prevention of a MACE with a SGLT2i; 21 for secondary, 82 for primary prevention with a GLP-1 RA, respectively), given the difference in absolute cardiovascular risk at baseline. CONCLUSION: The distinction between patients with ASCVD and those without ASCVD and MRF appears therefore justified by available evidence.
Asunto(s)
Aterosclerosis , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Humanos , Aterosclerosis/prevención & control , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/uso terapéutico , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistas , Glucosa , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Prevención Secundaria , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIM: To compare different types of metabolic surgery with non-surgical therapy for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: The present network meta-analysis (NMA) includes randomized clinical trials (duration ≥ 52 weeks) comparing different surgery techniques with non-surgical therapy in diabetes patients. The primary endpoints were endpoint HbA1c, body mass index (BMI) and diabetes remission. The secondary endpoints included fasting plasma glucose, lipid profile, blood pressure, arterial hypertension and dyslipidaemia remission, quality of life and surgical adverse events. Indirect comparisons of different types of surgery were performed by NMA. Mean and 95% confidence intervals for continuous variables, and the Mantel-Haenzel odds ratio for categorial variables, were calculated. RESULTS: The types of surgical procedure included laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), bilio-pancreatic diversion (BPD), greater curvature plication (GCP), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and Duodeno-Jejunal bypass. Thirty-six trials were included. Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) was associated with a significantly higher reduction of HbA1c, diabetes remission and BMI compared with medical therapy. In the NMA, a significant reduction of HbA1c was observed with OAGB and SG. Complete diabetes remission significantly increased with all surgical procedures in comparison with non-surgical therapy, except for GCP. In addition, only BPD, RYGB and OAGB were associated with a significant reduction of BMI. CONCLUSIONS: MBS is an effective option for the treatment of T2D in patients with obesity. Further long-term trials of appropriate quality are needed for assessing the risk-benefit ratio in some patient cohorts, such as those with a BMI of less than 35 kg/m2 and aged older than 65 years.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Derivación Gástrica , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/cirugía , Gastrectomía/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Hemoglobina Glucada , Metaanálisis en Red , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIM: To assess whether intermittent fasting (IF) diets are associated with improvement in weight loss, metabolic parameters, and subjective well-being, in people with obesity. DATA SYNTHESIS: We performed a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials longer than 2 months, retrieved through an extensive search on MedLine, Cochrane CENTRAL Library, and Embase online databases, comparing weight loss with IF diets and control diets in people with Body Mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2. We retrieved 9 trials, enrolling 540 patients. IF was not associated with a significantly greater reduction of body weight or BMI at any time point with respect to controls or in respect to continuous restricted diets, with low-to moderate quality of evidence; no significant difference in efficacy between alternate day fasting and time restricted eating was found. Differences in fasting plasma glucose, total or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or blood pressure at any time point were not statistically significant, whereas a reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (MD -8.39 [-15.96, -0.81] mg/dl, P = 0.03; I2 = 0%) was observed at 2-4 months, but not in the longer term. Data on psychological parameters and overall well-being were insufficient to perform a formal meta-analysis, whereas a qualitative synthesis did not show any difference between IF and controls. CONCLUSIONS: IF is not associated with greater or lesser weight loss than non-intermittent fasting diets. Further data on psychological parameters and overall well-being are needed to properly assess the role of IF diets in the management of obesity.
Asunto(s)
Obesidad , Pérdida de Peso , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Obesidad/diagnóstico , Obesidad/terapia , Ayuno , HDL-ColesterolRESUMEN
AIMS: In order to better define the need for influenza vaccination in people with diabetes (DM), we collected all available evidence on the effect of DM as a risk factor for complications of both seasonal and pandemic influenza, and on the specific effectiveness of vaccines in patients with DM. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two distinct systematic searches on MEDLINE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov and Embase databases were performed, one for each metanalysis, collecting all observational studies and randomized clinical trials performed on humans up to May 31st, 2022. We retrieved 34 observational studies comparing risk for influenza complications in people with or without diabetes, and 13 observational studies assessing vaccine effectiveness on preventing such complications. Mortality for influenza and hospitalization for influenza and pneumonia resulted significantly higher in individuals with versus without DM, both when unadjusted and adjusted data are analyzed. In diabetic individuals vaccinated for influenza overall hospitalization, hospitalization for influenza or pneumonia and overall mortality are significantly lower in comparison with not vaccinated DM subjects, both when unadjusted and adjusted data were analyzed. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that: 1) influenza is associated with more severe complications in diabetic versus not diabetic individuals and 2) influenza vaccination is effective in preventing clinically relevant outcomes in adults with DM with a NNT (number needed to treat) of 60, 319, and 250 for all-cause hospitalization, specific hospitalization, and all-cause mortality, respectively. The identification of diabetic patients as the target of vaccination campaigns for influenza appears to be justified by available clinical evidence.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Adulto , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Riesgo , VacunaciónRESUMEN
AIM: To assess whether low-carbohydrate (LC) diets are associated with differences in weight loss and well-being in people with obesity, and their cardiovascular and renal safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials longer than 3 months, retrieved through an extensive search on MedLine and Embase databases, comparing weight loss with LC and control diets in people with body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2 , was conducted. RESULTS: We retrieved 25 trials. Compared with controls, LC diets were associated with significant reduction of body weight at 3-4 (MD -2.59 [-3.93, -1.25] kg) and 6-8 months (MD -2.64 [-4.32, -0.95]), but no difference at 10-14 and 18-30 months, and significantly greater BMI reduction at 3-4 months (-1.66 [-2.70, -0.61] kg/m2 ), but not at other time points. Because only four trials reported data on renal function and psychological variables, renal safety and impact on well-being could not be assessed. Differences in fasting plasma glucose at any time point were not statistically significant. No significant differences in total or LDL cholesterol or blood pressure were found in the long term, whereas a long-term reduction of triglycerides (23.26 [-45.53, -0.98] mg/dl at 18-30 months), and increase of HDL cholesterol (MD 4.94 [0.30, 9.57] mg/dl at 18-30 months), were observed. CONCLUSION: LC diets are associated with greater short-term weight loss than non-carbohydrate-restricted diets and a longer term favourable effect on cardiovascular risk factors. Further evidence on long-term efficacy and renal safety is needed before LC diets can be recommended as the preferred diets in obese people.
Asunto(s)
Dieta Baja en Carbohidratos , Dieta con Restricción de Grasas , Humanos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with a higher risk of Heart Failure; Left Ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction is often considered the first marker of Diabetic cardiomyopathy; however, early preclinical LV systolic dysfunction has also been observed by means of echocardiographic measurement of strain. This study is aimed at assessing determinants of impaired strain and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in patients with T2DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cross-sectional study, performed on a consecutive series of patients with T2DM aged 30-80 years, BMI<40 kg/m2, free of cardiovascular disease, assessing metabolic control, microvascular complications, echocardiographic measures. Out of 206 patients, 19.6% had GLS lower than 18. GLS showed a significant inverse correlation with HBA1c, (p = 0.016), BMI (p = 0.002), waist (p < 0.0001), and mean L:H Ratio (p = 0.019). In a multivariate regression for LV GLS including HbA1c, age, sex, BMI and mean RR SDNN index, only HbA1c retained statistical significance: (B = -0.050 [-0.091; -0.009], p = 0.01. Among markers of LV diastolic function, only the E/E' ratio was associated with HbA1c at a univariate analysis, and it retained statistical significance in a multivariate regression including HbA1c, age, sex and disease duration (B = 0.038 [0.03; -0.073], p = 0.032). No significant difference in any parameter of systolic or diastolic function was observed between patients with or without microalbuminuria or diabetic retinopathy. CONCLUSION: In patients with T2DM, a reduced left ventricular global longitudinal strain appears to be independently associated with impaired glucose control and autonomic neuropathy, regardless of microvascular complications.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda , Biomarcadores , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Control Glucémico , Humanos , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/etiología , Función Ventricular IzquierdaRESUMEN
The present meta-analysis is aimed at assessing the effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on all-cause mortality and differences across different trials and molecules of the class. We included all randomized clinical trials with a duration of treatment longer than 52 weeks, enrolling at least 100 patients in each arm, and comparing an SGLT2 inhibitor with any comparator or placebo. Out of 139, 235 and 145 items identified, 21 trials were selected, enrolling 39 593 and 30 771 patients in SGLT2 inhibitor and comparator arms, respectively, with a median duration of 104 weeks, and reporting 2474 and 2298 deaths for SGLT2 inhibitors and comparators, respectively. No relevant heterogeneity was found (I2 = 17%). Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (MH-OR [95% CI] 0.86 [0.81, 0.91] P < .00001). Meta-regression analyses found a significant direct association of treatment effect only with the proportion of Asian subjects enrolled, and an inverse correlation with the proportion of Caucasian patients. In conclusion, SGLT2 inhibitors reduce all-cause mortality in randomized controlled trials.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Simportadores , Compuestos de Bencidrilo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucosa , Glucósidos , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sodio , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a rare, life-threatening necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a Drug Safety Communication regarding the risk of FG associated with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), relying on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. To verify this association, we performed a meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials enrolling patients with type 2 diabetes, comparing SGLT2i with placebo or different therapies, collecting cases of FG reported as a serious adverse event. Risk of abscess, cellulitis and erysipela were secondary outcomes. We retrieved 84 trials enrolling 42 415 patients in the SGLT2i group and 27 158 patients in comparator groups. No difference was observed between SGLT2i and comparators in the risk of FG (Mantel-Haenzel odds ratio [MH-OR] 0.41 [0.09, 1.82]), abscess (MH-OR 0.94 [0.54, 1.65]), cellulitis (MH-OR 0.90 [0.71, 1.13] or erysipela (MH-OR 0.89 [0.45, 1.77]). The number of events was small, leading to a wide confidence interval that does not allow ruling out an increase in FG or skin and subcutaneous tissue infections.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Gangrena de Fournier/inducido químicamente , Gangrena de Fournier/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/efectos adversos , Anciano , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/epidemiología , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/etiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/inducido químicamente , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Agonistas Receptor de Péptidos Similares al Glucagón , Hipoglucemiantes , Humanos , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Agonistas Receptor de Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/uso terapéutico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Salud Mental , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
Background: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) has been associated with a higher Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) mortality, both in hospitalized patients and in the general population. A possible beneficial effect of metformin on the prognosis of COVID-19 has been reported in some observational studies, whereas other studies disagree. Methods: To investigate the possible effect of metformin on COVID-19 in-hospital mortality, we performed a retrospective study that included all SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with DM who were admitted to two Italian hospitals. In order to adjust for possible confounders accounting for the observed reduction of mortality in metformin users, we adopted the COVID-19 Mortality Risk Score (COVID-19 MRS) as a covariate. Results: Out of the 524 included patients, 33.4% died. A binomial logistic regression showed that metformin use was associated with a significant reduction in case fatality (OR 0.67 [0.45-0.98], p = 0.039), with no significant effect on the need for ventilation (OR 0.75 [0.5-1.11], p = 0.146). After adjusting for COVID-19 MRS, metformin did not retain a significant association with in-hospital mortality [OR 0.795 (0.495-1.277), p = 0.342]. Conclusions: A beneficial effect of metformin on COVID-19 was not proven after adjusting for confounding factors. The use of validated tools to stratify the risk for COVID-19 severe disease and death, such as COVID-19 MRS, may be useful to better explore the potential association of medications and comorbidities with COVID-19 prognosis.
RESUMEN
AIMS: To collect all available evidence on the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) as a risk factor for pneumococcal disease incidence and related complications, and on the efficacy/effectiveness of vaccines in patients with DM. METHODS: Two distinct systematic searches on MEDLINE, Cochrane, ClinicalTrials.gov and EMBASE databases were performed, one for each meta-analysis, collecting all observational (cohort and case-control) studies and randomized clinical trials performed on humans up to June 1st, 2023. RESULTS: We retrieved 36 observational studies comparing risk for pneumococcal disease and related complications in people with or without DM, and 11 studies (1 randomized clinical trial and 10 observational studies) assessing conjugated and polysaccaridic vaccines efficacy/effectiveness on preventing such outcomes. People with DM were at higher risk for Invasive Pneumococcal Disease (unadjusted OR 2.42 [2.00; 2.92]); Case-Fatality Rate (unadjusted OR 1.61 [1.25; 2.07], Pneumococcal pneumonia (unadjusted OR 2.98 [2.76; 3.22), and Intensive care unit admission for pneumococcal disease (unadjusted OR 2.09 [1.20; 3.66]). In diabetic individuals vaccinated with conjugated vaccine, incidence of pneumonia specific for vaccine type in a clinical trial (OR 0.237 [0.008; 0.704]), and hospitalization for overall pneumonia during the year following the polysaccharide vaccination in observational studies (unadjusted OR 0.63 [0.45-0.89]) were significantly lower in comparison with unvaccinated DM subjects, with no significant differences for other outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: People with diabetes mellitus are at higher risk for less favourable course of pneumococcal disease and should be therefore targeted in vaccination campaigns; more evidence needs to be collected on vaccination outcomes in people with diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Vacunación , Humanos , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/complicaciones , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The treatment of patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is extremely complex, requiring a comprehensive approach that involves a variety of different healthcare professionals. Several studies have shown that a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is useful to achieve good clinical outcomes, reducing major and minor amputation and increasing the chance of healing. Despite this, the multidisciplinary approach is not always a recognized treatment strategy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effects of an MDT approach on major adverse limb events, healing, time-to-heal, all-cause mortality, and other clinical outcomes in patients with active DFUs. The present meta-analysis was performed for the purpose of developing Italian guidelines for the treatment of diabetic foot with the support of the Italian Society of Diabetology (Società Italiana di Diabetologia, SID) and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (Associazione Medici Diabetologi, AMD). The study was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. All randomized clinical trials and observational studies, with a duration of at least 26 weeks, which compared the MDT approach with any other organizational strategy in the management of patients with DFUs were considered. Animal studies were excluded. A search of Medline and Embase databases was performed up until the May 1st, 2023. Patients managed by an MDT were reported to have better outcomes in terms of healing, minor and major amputation, and survival in comparison with those managed using other approaches. No data were found on quality of life, returning-to-walking, and emergency admission. Authors concluded that the MDT may be effective in improving outcomes in patients with DFUs.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Pie Diabético , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Humanos , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pie Diabético/terapia , Italia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
AIM: The risk for Herpes zoster (HZ) and its complications is higher in people with diabetes mellitus (DM). Our aim is to assess efficacy and effectiveness of the currently available live-attenuated zoster vaccine (LZV) and recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in adults with DM. METHODS: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of clinical trials and observational studies comparing incidence of HZ and its complications in vaccinated and unvaccinated people with DM was performed, on PubMed, Cochrane, Clinical Trials.gov and Embase databases, up to January 15th, 2023. Risk of bias was assessed through the Cochrane Collaboration tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO website (CRD42022370705). RESULTS: Only three observational studies reported LZV efficacy and effectiveness in people with DM. A lower risk for HZ infection (MH-OH Ratio 95% CI = 0.52 [0.49, 0.56] was observed, for unadjusted analysis, and 0.51 [0.46, 0.56] for adjusted analysis, both with P < 0.00001 and no heterogeneity). No data on LZV safety were reported. A pooled analysis of two trials comparing RZV and placebo, showed a reduced risk for HZ incidence: (95% CI Odds Ratio: 0.09 [0.04-0.19]), with no difference in severe adverse events and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our meta-analysis of three observational studies LZV showed a 48% effectiveness in reducing HZ incidence in adults with diabetes whereas in a pooled analysis of two RCTs, RZV showed a 91% efficacy. No data are available on the effects of vaccination on the incidence and severity of HZ-related complications among subjects with diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Humanos , Adulto , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/efectos adversos , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Vacunación , Incidencia , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Observacionales como AsuntoRESUMEN
This study aims to compare different types of metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) with lifestyle intervention/medical therapy (LSI/MT) for the treatment of overweight/obesity. The present and network meta-analysis (NMA) includes randomized trials. MBS was associated with a reduction of BMI, body weight, and percent weight loss, when compared to LSI/MT, and also with a significant reduction of HbA1c and a higher remission of diabetes. Meta-regression analyses revealed that BMI, a higher proportion of women, and a longer duration of trial were associated with greater effects of MBS. The NMA showed that all surgical procedures included (except greater curvature plication) were associated with a reduction of BMI. MBS is an effective option for the treatment of obesity. The choice of BMI thresholds for eligibility for surgery of patients with different complications should be performed making an evaluation of risks and benefits in each BMI category.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Femenino , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/cirugía , Cirugía Bariátrica/efectos adversos , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Pérdida de Peso , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/cirugíaRESUMEN
AIMS: Diabetic foot syndrome (DFS) and its complications are a growing public health concern. The Italian Society of Diabetology (SID) and the Italian Association of Clinical Diabetologists (AMD), in collaboration with other scientific societies, will develop the first Italian guidelines for the treatment of DFS. METHODS: The creation of SID/AMD Guidelines is based on an extended work made by 19 panelists and 12 members of the Evidence Review Team. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) methodology has been used to decide aims, reference population, and target health professionals. Clinical questions have been created using PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) conceptual framework. The definition of questions has been performed using a two-step web-based Delphi methodology, a structured technique aimed at obtaining by repeated rounds of questionnaires a consensus opinion from a panel of experts in areas wherein evidence is scarce or conflicting, and opinion is important. RESULTS: The mean age of panelists (26.3% women) was 53.7 ± 10.6 years. The panel proposed 34 questions. A consensus was immediately reached for all the proposed questions, 32 were approved and 2 were rejected. CONCLUSIONS: The areas covered by clinical questions included diagnosis of ischemia and infection, treatment of ischemic, neuropathic, and infected ulcers, prevention of foot ulceration, organization and education issues, and surgical management. The PICO presented in this paper are designed to provide indications for healthcare professionals in charge of diabetic foot treatment and prevention, primarily based on clinical needs of people with diabetic foot syndrome and considering the existing organization of health care.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Pie Diabético , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Consenso , Pie Diabético/etiología , Pie Diabético/terapia , Pie Diabético/diagnóstico , Italia/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
AIM: To assess the effect on glycaemic control of confinement due to lockdown measures, during COVID-19 pandemic, in people with type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM) diabetes. METHODS: Meta-analysis of observational studies reporting measures of glucose control and variability before and during and/or after periods of confinement caused by COVID-19 in 2020 and/or 2021. RESULTS: We included 27 studies on T1DM. No significant change in Hba1c was observed after lockdown (WMD - 1.474 [- 3.26; 0.31] mmol/mol, I2 = 93.9). TIR significantly increased during and after lockdown (WMD: 2.73 1.47; 4.23 %, I2 = 81% and 3.73 [1.13; 5.33] %, I2 = 85%, respectively).We retrieved nine studies on T2DM patients. No significant variation in HbA1c was detected (WMD - 1.257 - 3.91; 1.39 mmol/mol, I2 = 98.3%). HbA1c had a more favourable trend in studies performed in Asia than in Europe (p = 0.022 between groups). CONCLUSION: Lockdown showed no significant detrimental effect on HbA1c in either T1DM or T2DM. Conversely, home confinement led to a reduction in mean glucose and glucose variability in T1DM, although with a high heterogeneity of results.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Glucemia , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
AIMS: The Primary aim is to verify physicians' adherence to the 2016 Italian diabetes guidelines therapeutic targets, and their habits on deprescription in elderly persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Secondary aims are the assessment of the potential impact of the targets' changes in 2018 Italian guidelines, and the outcomes of deprescription in the management of T2DM. METHODS: Observational retrospective cohort study, enrolling persons with T2DM, aged > 75 years, who attended a visit throughout 2017, and a second visit 6 months later in our outpatient clinic. RESULTS: Of the 387 patients included, 336 (87, 8%) were on target, according to 2016 guidelines. Deprescription was advisable in 62% of patients on target. Among those, 22% were deprescribed. In patients undergoing deprescription, during the following 6 months, no severe hypoglycemia occurred (versus 5 cases in the prior 6 months). Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) increased (p < 0.05) from 47.0 [41.7-51.0] to 53.0 [45.4-59.5] mmol/mol). Applying to the sample the 2018 Italian Guidelines targets, 57.2% would have been on target, 18.5% above, and 24.3% below (needing deprescription). CONCLUSION: In our study, a minority of suitable patients received deprescription. Deprescription led to a significant reduction in severe hypoglycemia rate, whereas HbA1c remained on target in the majority of cases.