RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Choosing Wisely (CW) recommends women age ≥70 y with cT1-2cN0 ER+/HER2-invasive breast cancer (BC) should forgo routine axillary staging with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLN) at the time of breast surgery. Despite this longstanding recommendation, acceptance of SLN omission has not been widely adopted. Genomic assays, such as MammaPrint (MP), may supplement the decision to apply CW. We hypothesized that having MP on BC core needle biopsy (CNB) meeting CW could provide additional information to aid in decision-making about the need for axillary staging with SLN. METHODS: A retrospective single-institution review was conducted for women with BC meeting CW criteria, who also had MP performed on CNB from 2020 to 2021. Categorical characteristics were compared using the chi-square test. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: MP was available on CNB for 238 BC meeting CW criteria: 70% low risk and 30% high risk. Axillary staging was performed in 195 (82%). Eighty-one percent were pathologically node-negative and 19% were pathologically node-positive. The MP score did not correlate with pathologic nodal stage (P = 0.52). The rate of high nodal burden (pN2) was extremely low (n = 1, 0.5%). The only significant correlation with pathological node positivity was older age (P = 0.03). Appropriately, high-risk MP was strongly associated with increased recurrence risk (n = 4, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Having MP on CNB does not provide clinically meaningful information about the pN stage and does not further refine which BC patients within CW could benefit from escalation to SLN or delineate a group more likely to be pathologically node-negative.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a large language artificial intelligence (AI) model which generates contextually relevant text in response to questioning. After ChatGPT successfully passed the United States Medical Licensing Examinations, proponents have argued it should play an increasing role in medical service provision and education. AI in healthcare remains in its infancy, and the reliability of AI systems must be scrutinized. This study assessed whether ChatGPT could pass Section 1 of the Fellowship of the Royal College of Surgeons (FRCS) examination in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery. METHODS: The UK and Ireland In-Training Examination (UKITE) was used as a surrogate for the FRCS. Papers 1 and 2 of UKITE 2022 were directly inputted into ChatGPT. All questions were in a single-best-answer format without wording alterations. Imaging was trialled to ensure ChatGPT utilized this information. RESULTS: ChatGPT scored 35.8%: 30% lower than the FRCS pass rate and 8.2% lower than the mean score achieved by human candidates of all training levels. Subspecialty analysis demonstrated ChatGPT scored highest in basic science (53.3%) and lowest in trauma (0%). In 87 questions answered incorrectly, ChatGPT only stated it did not know the answer once and gave incorrect explanatory answers for the remaining questions. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT is currently unable to exert the higher-order judgement and multilogical thinking required to pass the FRCS examination. Further, the current model fails to recognize its own limitations. ChatGPT's deficiencies should be publicized equally as much as its successes to ensure clinicians remain aware of its fallibility.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Ortopedia , Cirujanos , Humanos , Inteligencia Artificial , Becas , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Chondral injuries secondary to traumatic patella dislocation are common, and a subgroup of these are significant defects with fragments amenable to fixation. There is a paucity of published evidence assessing patients managed with combined acute patellofemoral stabilisation and osteochondral fixation. The purpose of this study is to report the outcomes of patients with osteochondral injuries secondary to acute traumatic patella dislocation treated with combined early fragment fixation and MPFL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon turndown technique which has distinct advantages for this cohort, including preventing chondral overloading and non-violation of the patella bone. METHODS: Patients who underwent combined quadriceps tendon MPFL reconstruction and osteochondral fixation were included. Patient demographics, defect characteristics, complications and reoperations were evaluated. Patients were assessed with Lysholm, Kujala, KOOS-PF scores and satisfaction scale at follow up. Pre-operative MRI was assessed for presence of radiological risk factors for patella dislocation and post-operative MRI was used to assess cartilage quality with MOCART 2.0 score. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients (63.2% female) were included. The mean age was 17.4 ± 4.8 years and patients were followed up at a mean 15.8 ± 5.1 months post-surgery. The mean defect size was 2.4 cm2 ± 1.3 cm2, with the most common defect location being the patella (13/19; 68.4%) followed by the lateral femoral condyle (5/19; 26.3%). At final follow up, the overall mean Lysholm, Kujala, and KOOS-PF scores were 84.9 ± 11.1, 89.7 ± 5.8 and 80.6 ± 13.6, respectively. Seventeen patients (89.5%) were satisfied with their outcome. The mean MOCART 2.0 score at final follow-up was 72.5. One patient required medial capsular plication with removal of a loose chondral body and microfracture and 3 knees required minor reoperations. CONCLUSION: Combined acute osteochondral fragment fixation and MPFL reconstruction using a quadriceps tendon graft offers good radiological and patient-reported outcomes with high satisfaction and low rates of recurrent patella dislocation. To our knowledge, this is currently the largest series of its kind in the literature and the results of this study provide a rationale for a combined approach using a quadriceps tendon graft for this cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
Asunto(s)
Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Luxación de la Rótula , Articulación Patelofemoral , Humanos , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Masculino , Articulación Patelofemoral/cirugía , Rótula/lesiones , Luxación de la Rótula/cirugía , Ligamentos Articulares/cirugía , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/etiología , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guideline-consistent treatment (GCT) for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), modified radical mastectomy (MRM), and radiation. We hypothesized that younger patients more frequently receive GCT, resulting in survival differences. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2004-2018), female patients with unilateral IBC (by histology code and clinical stage T4d) were stratified by age (< 50, 50-65, > 65 years). Factors associated with NAC, MRM, radiation, and "GCT" (defined as all three treatments) were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression identified predictors of overall survival. RESULTS: Of 3278 IBC patients, 30% were younger than 50 years, 44% were 50-65 years of age, and 26% were older than 65 years. The youngest group comprised the greatest proportion of non-White patients ([35%] vs. [29%] age 50-65 years and [23%] age > 65 years, p < 0.001) and was most often treated at academic facilities ([33%] vs. [28%] age 50-65 years; and [23%] age > 65, p < 0.001). Patients older than 65 years received NAC, MRM, and radiation less frequently, and only 35% underwent GCT (vs. [57%] age 50-65 years and [52%] age < 50 years; p < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, age older than 65 years independently predicted omission of NAC (odds ratio [OR], 0.36), MRM (OR, 0.56), and radiation (OR, 0.56) (all p < 0.001), and patients older than 65 years also were less likely to undergo GCT than patients 50-65 years of age (OR, 0.65; p = 0.001). GCT was associated with superior overall survival in all three age groups ([hazard ratio {HR}, 0.61] age < 50 years, [HR, 0.62] age 50-65 years, [HR, 0.53] age > 65 years; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Advanced age alone should not limit receipt of GCT for IBC. Multimodal care should be performed for IBC patients of all ages to improve oncologic outcomes for this aggressive breast cancer subtype.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Neoplasias Inflamatorias de la Mama , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Inflamatorias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias Inflamatorias de la Mama/terapia , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is considered more effective in downstaging hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer than neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET), particularly in node-positive disease. This study compared breast and axillary response and survival after NCT and NET in HR+ breast cancer. METHODS: Based on American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z1031 criteria, women age 50 years or older with cT2-4 HR+ breast cancer who underwent NET or NCT and surgery were identified in the National Cancer Database 2010-2016. Chi-square and logistic regression analysis determined differences between the NCT and NET groups and therapy response, including downstaging and pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/is and ypN0). RESULTS: Of 19,829 patients, 14,025 (70.7%) received NCT and 5804 (29.3%) received NET. The NET patients were older (mean age, 68.9 vs. 60.3; P < 0.001) and had greater comorbidity (1+ Charlson-Deyo score, 21% vs. 16%; P < 0.001). Therapy achieved T downstaging (any) for 58% of the patients with NCT versus 40.5% of the patients with NET, and in-breast pCR was achieved for 9.3% of the NCT versus 1.3% of the NET patients (P < 0.001). Approximately half of the mastectomy procedures could have been potentially avoided for the patients with in-breast pCR (53.6% of the NCT and 43.8% of the NET patients). For the cN+ patients, N downstaging (any) was 29% for the NCT patients versus 18.3% for the NET patients (P < 0.001), and nodal pCR was achieved for 20.3% of the NCT versus 13.5% of the NET patients (P < 0.001). Among those with nodal pCR, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) still was performed for 56% of the patients after NCT and 45% of the patients after NET. CONCLUSIONS: Although the response rates after NCT were higher, NET achieved both T and N downstaging and pCR. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy can be used to de-escalate surgery for patients who cannot tolerate NCT or when chemotherapy may not be effective based on genomic testing.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Hormonas , Humanos , Mastectomía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) downstages breast cancer and provides prognostic information. Males with breast cancer are known to receive less treatment overall and have poorer outcomes relative to females. We hypothesized that males would be less likely to receive NAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a primary diagnosis of cN1-3 breast cancer were identified in the National Cancer Database (2004-2016). Multivariable logistic regression determined the association between NAC utilization and sex, and the relationship between sex and NAC response, controlling for demographic and tumor factors. Overall survival was analyzed using a multivariable Cox model. RESULTS: In total, 196,027 patients (194,010 females, 2017 males) met inclusion criteria. A significantly greater proportion of males underwent mastectomy (80% vs. 60%, P < 0.001), and axillary lymph node dissection (76% vs. 74%, P = 0.022). Overall fewer men received chemotherapy than women (73% vs. 84%, P < 0.001); men also received NAC at a significantly lower rate (26% men vs. 45% women, P < 0.001). After accounting for demographic and oncologic factors including hormone receptor (HR) subtype, females remained more likely to undergo NAC (OR 1.84, P < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, sex was not associated with pathologic response or overall survival after NAC. CONCLUSIONS: Although oncologic outcomes after NAC were similar, males with node-positive breast cancer received less NAC and more aggressive surgery than females. These data suggest men achieve outcomes comparable to women with cN1-3 disease, and NAC should be used in appropriate male patients to downstage the breast and axilla.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Axila , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Masculino , Mastectomía , Terapia NeoadyuvanteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As an alternative to traditional wire localization, an inducible magnetic seed system can be used to identify and remove nonpalpable breast lesions and axillary lymph nodes intraoperatively. We report the largest single-institution experience of magnetic seed placement for operative localization to date, including feasibility and short-term outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent placement of a magnetic seed in the breast or lymph node were identified from July 2017 to March 2019. Imaging findings, core needle biopsy, surgical pathology results, and type of surgery were collected. Outcomes included procedural complications, magnetic seed and biopsy clip retrieval rates, and need for additional surgery. RESULTS: A total of 842 magnetic seeds were placed by nine radiologists in 673 patients and retrieved by six surgeons at six operative locations. The majority of breast lesions were malignant (395/659, 59.9%); 136 seeds were placed for lymph node localization. The overall magnetic seed retrieval rate was 98.6%, whereas the biopsy clip retrieval rate was 90.9%. Only six patients (0.7%) experienced a complication from magnetic seed placement. Reexcision was performed in 15.2% of patients with breast cancer; 9.6% of benign/high risk lesions were upgraded to malignancy at surgical excision. CONCLUSIONS: The magnetic seed technique is safe, effective, and accurate for localization of breast lesions and lymph nodes, and importantly uncouples surgery from the localization procedure. The high magnetic seed retrieval rate and low reexcision rate may reflect the accuracy of magnetic marker placement as a "second chance" localization procedure, especially in cases with biopsy clip migration.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Ganglios Linfáticos , Axila , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Hospitales , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Fenómenos MagnéticosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Prone positioning is deployed as a critical treatment for improving oxygenation in patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. This regimen is currently highly prevalent in the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has brought about increased concern about how best to safely avoid brachial plexus injuries when caring for unconscious proned patients. METHODS: A review of the published literature on brachial plexus injuries secondary to proning ventilated patients was performed. This was combined with a review of available international critical care guidelines in order to produce a succinct set of guidelines to aid critical care departments in reducing brachial plexus injuries during these challenging times. DISCUSSION: There is no one manner in which prone positioning an unconscious patient can be made universally safe. This paper provides 6 key steps to reducing the incidence of brachial plexus injuries while proning and suggests a safe and sensible management and referral pathway for the conscious patient in which a brachial plexus injury is identified. CONCLUSION: There is in truth no completely safe position for every patient and certainly there will be anomalies in anatomy that will predispose certain individuals to nerve injury. Thus the injury rate cannot be reduced to zero but an understanding of the principles of protection will inform those undertaking positioning.
Asunto(s)
Plexo Braquial/lesiones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Posicionamiento del Paciente/métodos , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Posición Prona , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Humanos , Pandemias , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/etiología , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most frequently occurring cancer in women of reproductive age, and systemic treatments may adversely affect childbearing plans. Use of assisted reproductive technologies and therapies for ovarian protection improve fertility prospects. We evaluated whether patients had a documented fertility discussion (FD) with their oncology physician prior to therapy, what options were chosen, and if pregnancy was achieved. METHODS: A retrospective chart review from 2006 to 2014 was performed to evaluate women aged 40 years and younger who were diagnosed with breast cancer and treated with chemotherapy and/or antihormonal therapy. Patient demographics, treatment regimens, presence or absence of FD, in vitro fertilization (IVF) consultation, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist use, and subsequent successful pregnancy were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 303 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 80 (26 %) had an FD with their physician documented; 71 of these 80 women (89 %) sought further fertility consultation and options. Sixteen (20 %) women were prescribed a GnRH agonist only for ovarian protection during chemotherapy, 50 (63 %) underwent IVF consultation only, and 5 (6 %) had both a GnRH agonist prescribed and an IVF consultation. The overall pregnancy rate was 7 % at a mean of 3 years post breast cancer treatment. Pregnancy after treatment was more common among those pursuing IVF consultation or prescribed a GnRH agonist. CONCLUSIONS: In treating young breast cancer patients, it is important to assess fertility desire, discuss treatment risks relating to fertility, and discuss preservation options. Although not every woman in this group desired pregnancy, 71/80 (89 %) women having a documented FD sought further fertility consultation and options.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/tratamiento farmacológico , Preservación de la Fertilidad , Fertilidad , Adulto , Comunicación , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Humanos , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is an aggressive disease that is treated with trimodality therapy consisting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, and post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). Traditionally, modified radical mastectomy without reconstruction has been the operation of choice for patients with IBC due to fears of high rates of margin positivity, risk of local recurrence, and the need for PMRT. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to evaluate women with IBC at our institution from 2006 to 2014 who completed trimodality therapy. Patients were identified as undergoing reconstruction or no reconstruction (NR), with reconstruction being further classified as immediate (IR) if reconstruction occurred at the initial surgery, or delayed (DR) if initial reconstruction occurred after PMRT. RESULTS: Sixty women with IBC were identified using inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 2.3 years (range 1.4-4.6). Patients with IR had a statistically significant increased risk (p = 0.006) in postoperative complication rates compared with DR (0 %) and NR (2.6 %). Two patients had positive skin margins on final pathology (one IR, one NR), with both eventually having recurrence. Time to PMRT was delayed 10 days in patients with IR compared with those without IR. No statistically significant difference in recurrence rates was observed (p = 0.86) when comparing patients with IR and those with NR, and no difference in survival was observed between patients who had reconstruction and those without (p = 0.91). CONCLUSION: Performing IR with mastectomy for IBC is associated with increased complications, but is not associated with decreased survival or increased recurrence in selected patients. IR in selected IBC patients can facilitate successful breast reconstruction.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Inflamatorias de la Mama/terapia , Mamoplastia , Márgenes de Escisión , Mastectomía Radical Modificada , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Adulto , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Mamoplastia/efectos adversos , Mastectomía Radical Modificada/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasia Residual , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Inpatient treatment for eating disorders is a scarce, expensive resource. We aimed to examine length of stay (LOS) in specialist Scottish inpatient units and to identify relationships between LOS, outcome measures and other factors. METHOD: Audit of 206 admissions (89 adolescents and 117 adults) between 2009 and 2011 to all seven inpatient units in Scotland that specialize in the treatment of eating disorders. Data was collected retrospectively from electronic database and patient case files. RESULTS: Physical and psychological eating disorder symptoms improved significantly during specialist inpatient admissions. Mean LOS for adolescents was 141.4 days and for adults 113.0 days. Patients gained weight during admission and increased LOS correlated with increased weight gain. Treatment under the Mental Health Act or with nasogastric feeding increased LOS in adolescents. CONCLUSION: Future efforts should be invested in prospective studies, including several years' post-discharge follow-up, to explore correlations with LOS and guide treatment decisions. PRACTITIONER MESSAGE: Inpatient treatment in specialist eating disorder units is associated with nutritional and psychological benefits in adults and adolescents. Treatment requiring legal detention or nasogastric feeding involves longer admission. Further research is needed to see whether benefits are lasting.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/epidemiología , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/terapia , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Estudios de Factibilidad , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Pacientes Internos/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Escocia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: At present, the only opportunity to omit axillary staging is with Choosing Wisely criteria for women ages >70 y with cT1 2N0 estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer. However, many women are diagnosed when pathologic node status-negative, raising the question of additional opportunities to omit sentinel lymph node biopsy. We sought to investigate the association between MammaPrint, a genomic test that estimates estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer recurrence risk, and pathologic node status, with the aim that low-risk MammaPrint could be considered for omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy if associated with pathologic node status-negative. METHODS: A single-institution database was queried for all women with cT1 2N0 estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative invasive breast cancer with breast surgery as their first treatment and MammaPrint performed from 2020 to 2021. Patient and tumor factors, including MammaPrint score, were compared with axillary node status for correlation. RESULTS: A total of 668 women met inclusion criteria, with a median age of 66 y. MammaPrint was low-risk luminal A in 481 (72%) and high-risk luminal B in 187 (28%). At the time of breast surgery, 588 (88%) had sentinel lymph node biopsy, 27 (4%) had axillary lymph node dissection, and 53 (7.9%) had no axillary staging. Most women in both the pathologic node status-negative and pathologic node status-positive cohorts had low-risk MammaPrint (355 [73.3%] pathologic node status-negative vs 91 [69.5%] pathologic node status-positive), and women with low-risk MammaPrint did not have a significantly lower risk of pathologic node status-positive (P = .377). CONCLUSION: Low-risk MammaPrint does not predict lower risk of pathologic node status-positive breast cancer. Based on our results, genomic testing does not appear to provide additional personalization for the ability to omit sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients outside of the Choosing Wisely guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Humanos , Femenino , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/metabolismo , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Axila/patologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to identify factors predicting surgery for de novo stage IV inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) and determine the association of surgery with overall survival (OS). METHODS: Female patients with unilateral AJCC clinical stage IV IBC treated 2010-2018 in the NCDB were identified. Logistic regression and multivariable proportional Cox hazards regressions determined factors associated with treatment and OS. RESULTS: Of 1049 patients, 29.1% underwent breast surgery (BS) and 70.9% had no surgery (NS). Increasing age and more recent treatment year were significantly associated with NS. 2-Year OS was superior in BS patients (71% vs 38% NS). Single-site and bone-only metastasis had no association with treatment type or OS. CONCLUSION: Contrary to guidelines, 1/3 of de novo stage IV IBC patients underwent BS, and had an independent OS benefit irrespective of extent or site of metastasis. Further research is needed to determine which patients with stage IV IBC should undergo BS.