Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery early after drug-eluting stent implantation due to acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The evidence on performing minimally invasive coronary artery surgery early after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is limited. AIM: The study aimed to determine the safety and feasibility of this approach. METHODS: This registry included 115 (78% male) patients treated from 2013 to 2018, who underwent non-left anterior descending (LAD) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) due to ACS with contemporary DES implantation (39% diagnosed with myocardial infarction at baseline), followed by endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass (EACAB) surgery within 180 days, after temporary P2Y12 inhibitor discontinuation. Primary composite endpoint of MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events), defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular incident, and repeat revascularization was evaluated in long-term follow-up. The follow-up was collected via a telephone survey and in line with National Registry for Cardiac Surgery Procedures. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) time interval separating both procedures was 100.0 (62.0-136.0) days. Median (IQR) follow-up duration was 1338.5 (753.0-2093.0) days and was completed for all patients with regard to mortality. Eight patients (7%) died; 2 (1.7%) had a stroke; 6 (5.2%) suffered from MI, and 12 (10.4%) required repeat revascularization. Overall, the incidence of MACCE was 20 (17.4%). CONCLUSIONS: EACAB is a safe and feasible method of LAD revascularization in patients who received DES for ACS within 180 days before surgery despite early dual antiplatelet therapy discontinuation. The adverse event rate is low and acceptable.

One-stage hybrid coronary revascularization for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease- Periprocedural and long-term results from the "HYBRID-COR" feasibility study.

Background: The constant growth of interest in hybrid coronary artery revascularization (HCR) is apparent. Yet, few studies report outcomes of the one-stage HCR. Consequently, the status of such procedures is not adequately supported in clinical guidelines. The aim of this study was to report the safety, feasibility, and long term-outcomes of the one-stage HCR. Methods and results: Patients were enrolled in the prospective one-stage hybrid coronary revascularization program (HYBRID-COR). They underwent a one-stage hybrid revascularization procedure while on double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with Ticagrelor: endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass grafting (EACAB) for revascularization of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery and percutaneous intervention in non-LAD arteries with contemporary drug-eluting stents. The composite primary endpoint included MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events: death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeated revascularization) in long-term observation. The study cohort consisted of 30 patients (68% male) with stable coronary artery disease (26.7%) and unstable angina (73.3%). Procedural success was 100%. No death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke were observed in the perioperative period. One patient (3.3%) required chest revision and blood transfusion due to surgical bleeding. Kidney injury was noted in two patients (6.6%). In a long-term follow-up (median; IQR: 4.25; 2.62-4.69 years), two patients (6.6%) underwent repeated revascularization and one patient (3.3%) died due to MI. The overall primary endpoint rate was 9.9%. Conclusion: One-stage hybrid revascularization, on DAPT, is a feasible, safe, and efficient way of achieving complete revascularization in selected patients. The complication rate is low and acceptable. Further randomized trials are required.

Novel hematological biomarkers predict survival in renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The association between novel blood-based inflammatory indices and patient survival has been reported with reference to various cancers. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of preoperative platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with nephrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2003 to 2012, 455 patients who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy for RCC were enrolled in the study. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 70 months. Groups of patients with high levels of PLR, NLR and dNLR and a low level of LMR more often underwent radical nephrectomy, had a higher cancer stage in the TNM classification, and were more frequently diagnosed with tumor necrosis in histopathological examination. Both cancer-specific mortality and overall mortality were significantly higher in patients with high PLR, NLR and dNLR and low LMR. Multivariate analysis of CSS, adjusted for standard clinicopathological factors, identified only dNLR (p = 0.006) as an independent prognostic factor. PLR (p = 0.0002), dNLR (p = 0.0003) and NLR (p = 0.002), but not LMR (p = 0.1), achieved prognostic significance in multivariable analysis regarding OS. CONCLUSIONS: Only dNLR was an independent prognostic factor for CSS and OS. Nevertheless, our study indicates that all examined complete blood count-based biomarkers may be useful tools in managing RCC patients treated with a surgical approach.

Neutrophil-to-mean platelet volume ratio as a new predictor for overall and cancer-specific survival in patients with localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The present study investigated the prognostic value of neutrophil-to-mean platelet volume ratio (NMPVR) for overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients treated with nephrectomy for localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Medical records of 344 consecutive patients who underwent partial or radical nephrectomy for M0 ccRCC were retrospectively analyzed. Based on the median NMPVR, the study population was divided into two groups: the high NMPVR group with NMPVR higher than or equal to the median, and the low NMPVR group with NMPVR lower than the median. Comparisons of baseline characteristics and laboratory and pathological findings were performed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression model analysis were used to assess the prognostic value of the NMPVR. RESULTS: Patients with higher NMPVR values were more frequently diagnosed with advanced disease, tumor necrosis and higher tumor grade. The OS and CSS were significantly shorter in patients with NMPVR ≥ 0.41 compared to patients with NMPVR < 0.41. Inclusion of NMPVR in multivariable models of OS and CSS with other confounding variables determined categorized NMPVR as an independent prognostic factor for both endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment NMPVR ≥ 0.41 was associated with lower OS and CSS. NMPVR might be applied as a cheap and uncomplicated prognostic indicator in localized ccRCC patients treated with a primary surgical approach.