Comorbidity-dependent changes in alpha and broadband electroencephalogram power during general anaesthesia for cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Age and comorbidities are reported to induce neurobiological transformations in the brain. Whilst the influence of ageing on anaesthesia-induced electroencephalogram (EEG) changes has been investigated, the effect of comorbidities has not yet been explored. We hypothesised that certain diseases significantly affect frontal EEG alpha and broadband power in cardiac surgical patients. METHODS: We analysed the frontal EEGs of 589 patients undergoing isoflurane general anaesthesia from a prospective observational study. We used multi- and uni-variable regression to analyse the relationships between comorbidities and age as independent with peak and oscillatory alpha, and broadband power as dependent variables. A score of comorbidities and minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) was built to interrogate the combined effect of age and score on alpha and broadband power. RESULTS: At the univariable level, many comorbidities were associated with lower EEG alpha or broadband power. Multivariable regression indicated the independent association of numerous comorbidities and MAC with peak alpha (R2=0.19) and broadband power (R2=0.31). The association with peak alpha power is markedly reduced when the underlying broadband effect is subtracted (R2=0.09). Broadband measures themselves are more strongly correlated with comorbidities and MAC (R2=0.31) than age (R2=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities and age are independently associated with decreasing frontal EEG alpha and broadband power during general anaesthesia. For alpha power, the association is highly dependent on the underlying broadband effect. These findings might have significant clinical consequences for automated computation for depth of anaesthesia in comorbid patients, because misclassification might pose the risk of under- or over-dosing of anaesthetics. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02976584.

Dreaming and electroencephalographic changes during anesthesia maintained with propofol or desflurane.

BACKGROUND: Dream recall is reportedly more common after propofol than after volatile anesthesia, but this may be due to delayed emergence or more amnesia after longer-acting volatiles. The electroencephalographic signs of dreaming during anesthesia and the differences between propofol and desflurane also are unknown. The authors therefore compared dream recall after propofol- or desflurane-maintained anesthesia and analyzed electroencephalographic patterns in dreamers and nondreamers and in propofol and desflurane patients for similarities to rapid eye movement and non-rapid eye movement sleep. METHODS: Three hundred patients presenting for noncardiac surgery were randomized to receive propofol- or desflurane-maintained anesthesia. The raw electroencephalogram was recorded from induction until patients were interviewed about dreaming when they became first oriented postoperatively. Using spectral and ordinal methods, the authors quantified the amount of sleep spindle-like activity and high-frequency power in the electroencephalogram. RESULTS: The incidence of dream recall was similar for propofol (27%) and desflurane (28%) patients. Times to interview were similar (median 20 [range 4-114] vs. 17 [7-86] min; P = 0.1029), but bispectral index values at interview were lower (85 [69-98] vs. 92 [40-98]; P < 0.0001) in propofol than in desflurane patients. During surgery, the raw electroencephalogram of propofol patients showed more and faster spindle activity than in desflurane patients (P < 0.001). The raw electroencephalogram of dreamers showed fewer spindles and more high-frequency power than in nondreamers in the 5 min before interview (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Anesthetic-related dreaming seems to occur just before awakening and is associated with a rapid eye movement-like electroencephalographic pattern.