Time Differences From Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening to Colposcopy Between Insurance Statuses.

OBJECTIVE: Screening and diagnostic follow-up to prevent cervical cancer are influenced by socioeconomic and systemic factors. This study sought to characterize intervals from abnormal cervical cancer screening to colposcopy between practices differing by insurance status at a large, urban academic center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 21-65 who presented for colposcopy between January 1, 2021, and January 1, 2022, at the resident and faculty gynecology practices of a single large urban academic medical center. Patient characteristics were compared using t tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests for continuous measures and χ 2 or Fisher exact tests for categorical measures. Intervals from abnormal cervical cancer screening to colposcopy were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and linear regression analysis with multivariable models adjusted for age, cervical cytology result, human papillomavirus result, and HIV status. RESULTS: Resident practice patients were publicly insured and more likely to be Black or Hispanic ( p < .0001); rates of high-risk human papillomavirus and smoking were similar. Resident practice patients had longer intervals from abnormal cervical cancer screening to colposcopy compared with faculty practice patients (median 79.5 vs 34 d, p < .0001). On adjusted analysis, resident practice patients faced a 95% longer interval ( p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Publicly insured patients of a resident-based practice faced significantly longer intervals from abnormal cervical cancer screening to colposcopy than faculty practice patients at a single urban academic center. Effort to address these differences may be an area of focus in improving health disparities.

Intra-Sonographer Correlation Between Transabdominal and Transvaginal Cervical Length Measurements and Associated Patient Demographics.

OBJECTIVES: To assess transvaginal (TV) and transabdominal (TA) cervical length (CL) measurements' variability and patient factors associated with TA CL accuracy. We hypothesized that patient factors would affect the accuracy of TA CL. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. During anatomy ultrasound, TA and TV CL measurements were obtained, distance from placental edge to internal cervical os assessed, and demographic questionnaires completed. Patients between 18 to 22 weeks and 6 days were included and those <18 year old or with a twin gestation were excluded. TA CL >0.5 cm different from TV length was considered inaccurate. RESULTS: A total of 530 patients were included. Exactly 18.7% had a prior cesarean, 9.8% a preterm birth, and 2.2% a cervical procedure. Mean age and BMI were 31.1 years and 27.8 kg/m2 . Median number of living children was one. Median TA and TV CL were 3.42 and 3.53 cm. Exactly 36% (95% CI: 32-40%) of TA CL measurements were inaccurate. CL of 3.4 cm corresponded to a mean difference of zero between TA and TV CL. TA ultrasound had a sensitivity of 25% and a specificity of 98.5% to detect TV CL <2.5 cm. On multivariable analyses, Hispanic ethnicity was associated with inaccurate TA measurement (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.24-0.96, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: On average, TA CL underestimates TV CL when TV CL >3.40 cm and overestimates TV CL when TV CL <3.40 cm. Additional co-variates did not impact accuracy. TA ultrasound has low sensitivity to predict short cervix. Relying solely on TA CL to identify those who need intervention may miss diagnoses. It may be reasonable to develop protocols in which TV CL is used for TA CL <3.4 cm.