Contribution of Xpert MTB/RIF to clinical diagnosis in adolescents with tuberculosis in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

SETTING: Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, a high tuberculosis (TB) burden city.OBJECTIVE: To compare the sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, care process indicators (CPIs) and treatment outcomes among adolescents with pulmonary TB (PTB) and those with PTB + extrapulmonary TB (EPTB), who underwent testing with Xpert® and sputum culture.DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of data from three national databases from 2014 to 2016 of adolescents (aged 10-18 years) residing and notified in Rio de Janeiro City. Three groups were identified according to their Xpert and culture results: Group 1, Xpert- and culture-positive; Group 2, Xpert-positive and culture-negative; and Group 3, Xpert- and culture-negative. Study CPIs were as follows: the time between 'sample collection and Xpert result release', 'sample collection and treatment initiation' and 'notification and treatment outcome'.RESULTS: Of 258 adolescents included in the study, 223 (86.4%) were in Group 1, 20 (7.8%) in Group 2 and 15 (5.8%) in Group 3. Groups 1 and 2 had a similar profile. Compared to Group 1, Group 3 had a higher proportion of HIV-positive cases (21.4% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.016), adolescents with a hospital diagnosis (53.3% vs. 7.6%, P < 0.001), and PTB + EPTB cases (20% vs. 0.4%; P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in CPIs or treatment outcomes.CONCLUSION: The clinical diagnosis was decisive in more critical or complex patients, despite Xpert-negative results.

Community DOT for tuberculosis in a Brazilian favela: comparison with a clinic model.

SETTING: Rio de Janeiro City, Brazil. OBJECTIVE: To compare community-based directly observed treatment (DOT) for tuberculosis (TB), using community health workers (CHWs), with clinic-based DOT. DESIGN: In a longitudinal study in a cohort of TB patients in a region of Rio de Janeiro city, we evaluated treatment modalities and outcomes in 1811 patients diagnosed with TB between 1 January 2003 and 30 December 2004. Patients were offered DOT when they presented to out-patient clinics for an initial diagnosis. DOT was provided in the clinic or in the community, using CHWs, for patients living in a large favela. Outcomes of treatment were assessed using treatment registry databases. RESULTS: Of the 1811 TB patients, 1215 (67%) were treated under DOT; among these, 726 (60%) received clinic-based treatment and 489 (40%) community-based treatment. Patients offered community-based treatment were more likely to accept DOT (99%) than those offered clinic-based treatment (60%, P<0.001). Treatment success rates for new smear-positive and retreatment TB cases were significantly higher among those treated with community-based DOT compared to clinic-based DOT. CONCLUSION: We conclude that using CHWs to deliver DOT in the community may improve TB treatment outcomes in selected areas such as urban slums.

Improvements in treatment success rates with directly observed therapy in Rio de Janeiro City.

SETTING: Rio de Janeiro City, Brazil. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of directly observed therapy (DOT) on treatment success, by comparing the treatment success rates between patients treated under DOT with those who received self-administered therapy (SAT). DESIGN: A longitudinal study in a cohort of tuberculosis (TB) patients. Of 9929 new pulmonary TB cases, 1190 (12%) were treated under DOT and 8739 (88%) under SAT. All patients received a three-drug regimen consisting of rifampicin (RMP), isoniazid (INH) and pyrazinamide for 2 months followed by 4 months of RMP and INH. RESULTS: Patients under DOT were more likely to convert to sputum-negative at the end of the second month than those treated under SAT (86.3% vs. 61.9%, P < 0.001). DOT alone was significantly associated with successful treatment (OR 1.6, 95%CI 1.37-1.86, P < 0.001), even when controlled by sex, age and positive smear or culture at enrollment (OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.33-1.82, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This pilot DOTS implementation phase showed that DOT is highly effective and feasible in a large urban centre of a developing country.

Tuberculosis control in a socially vulnerable area: a community intervention beyond DOT in a Brazilian favela.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the population-based impact of a comprehensive intervention to strengthen tuberculosis (TB) control in Rocinha, the largest urban slum in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. DESIGN: In July 2003, 40 lay persons were hired and trained as community health workers to supervise treatment, implement educational activities and establish a supportive social network for anti-tuberculosis treatment. Between July 2005 and June 2008, a door-to-door active case finding campaign was conducted. Data were obtained from the Brazilian National Reporting System, which collects information from the TB notification form for every reported case. RESULTS: Between January 2001 and December 2008, 2623 TB cases were reported, 852 before and 1771 after the start of the program. Following the intervention, treatment success rates increased (67.6% vs. 83.2%, P < 0.001) and default rates dropped (17.8% vs. 5.5%, P < 0.001). Compared to the pre-intervention period, the TB case rate declined by an average of 39 cases per 100,000 population per 6 months (P = 0.003) in the post-intervention period, although this may have been due to secular trends already in place at the start of the intervention. Case rates declined from 591/100,000 in 2001 to 496/100,000 in 2008. CONCLUSION: With proper planning and effective community involvement, a successful intervention can lead to high cure rates and may contribute to a decrease in TB notification rates.

Controlled trial of active tuberculosis case finding in a Brazilian favela.

SETTING: A large, impoverished squatters' settlement (favela), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. OBJECTIVE: To assess the community impact of active case finding for tuberculosis (TB) compared to an enhanced case-finding strategy. DESIGN: A pair-matched, cluster-randomized trial comparing household symptom screening and spot sputum collection (Arm 1) vs. distribution of an educational pamphlet (Arm 2) was performed in a large Brazilian favela. We compared TB case-notification rates, time from symptom onset to treatment start and treatment completion proportions between arms. Fourteen neighborhoods (estimated population 58,587) were pair-matched by prior TB case rates and randomly allocated to one of two interventions. TB was diagnosed using acid-fast bacilli smears. New TB cases were interviewed and clinic records were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 193 TB cases were identified in the 14 study neighborhoods (incidence proportion 329 per 100,000 population). The case identification rate in Arm 1 was 934/100,000 person-years (py) vs. 604/100,000 py in Arm 2 (RR 1.55, 95%CI 1.10-1.99). No significant differences were found in time from cough onset to treatment start or proportion completing treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A door-to-door case-finding campaign was more effective (while ongoing) at detecting prevalent cases and influencing people to come for care than leafleting, but no differences were seen in time to treatment start or treatment completion.