Reducing Operating Room Turnover Time for Robotic Surgery Using a Motor Racing Pit Stop Model.

BACKGROUND: Operating room (OR) turnover time, time taken between one patient leaving the OR and the next entering, is an important determinant of OR utilization, a key value metric for hospital administrators. Surgical robots have increased the complexity and number of tasks required during an OR turnover, resulting in highly variable OR turnover times. We sought to streamline the turnover process and decrease robotic OR turnover times and increase efficiency. METHODS: Direct observation of 45 pre-intervention robotic OR turnovers was performed. Following a previously successful model for handoffs, we employed concepts from motor racing pit stops, including briefings, leadership, role definition, task allocation and task sequencing. Turnover task cards for staff were developed, and card assignments were distributed for each turnover. Forty-one cases were observed post-intervention. RESULTS: Average total OR turnover time was 99.2 min (95% CI 88.0-110.3) pre-intervention and 53.2 min (95% CI 48.0-58.5) at 3 months post-intervention. Average room ready time from when the patient exited the OR until the surgical technician was ready to receive the next patient was 42.2 min (95% CI 36.7-47.7) before the intervention, which reduced to 27.2 min at 3 months (95% CI 24.7-29.7) post-intervention (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Role definition, task allocation and sequencing, combined with a visual cue for ease-of-use, create efficient, and sustainable approaches to decreasing robotic OR turnover times. Broader system changes are needed to capitalize on that result. Pit stop and other high-risk industry models may inform approaches to the management of tasks and teams.

Ovarian resection in anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis: A comparison of surgical approaches.

Background: For patients with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis (NMDARE) and ovarian teratoma, "conservative" surgical approaches (complete or partial unilateral oophorectomy or bilateral partial oophorectomies) are associated with clinical improvement. "Aggressive" ovarian resections (complete bilateral oophorectomy or "blind" ovarian resections without pre-operative evidence of teratoma) are also reported, although the evidence supporting these approaches is unclear. Objective: To compare the one-year functional outcomes of patients with NMDARE who underwent conservative vs. aggressive ovarian resections. Methods: Patients with NMDARE undergoing ovarian resection between January 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2021 were retrospectively identified from three North American tertiary care centers. Primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 one year after ovarian resection. Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare demographic features, disease characteristics, and functional outcomes between the two surgical groups. A fixed-effects meta-analysis of studies reporting functional outcomes based on surgical approach was also performed. Results: Twenty-three patients were included. Eight underwent aggressive surgical management. There was a non-significant trend toward an association between aggressive surgical management and younger age-at-onset, higher baseline disease severity, and longer delays to treatment. There was no difference between "aggressive" (3/8, 38%) and "conservative" (11/15, 73%) management groups in achieving the primary outcome (OR95% = <0.1-1.9; p = 0.18). Findings were similar when considering data from 52 patients in two published studies (RR = 0.74; CI95% = 0.48-1.13; p = 0.16). Conclusions: Aggressive ovarian resection was not associated with improved outcomes in patients with NMDARE in this series. Group differences may have contributed, recognizing that patients who underwent aggressive resection tended to be sicker, with procedures performed later in the disease course. Based on available evidence, we advocate for function-sparing resection in patients with imaging-confirmed/suspected teratoma, and repeated multi-modal imaging in at-risk patients with NMDARE refractory to conventional treatment.

Risk Factors for Bowel Injury in Hysterectomy for Benign Indications.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and risk factors for bowel injury in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications from 2012 to 2016 at institutes participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including both inpatient and outpatient settings. Bowel injury was identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes as patients who underwent bowel repair at the time of hysterectomy or postoperatively within 30 days. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to control for patient clinical factors and perioperative factors. RESULTS: Bowel injury occurred in 610 of 155,557 (0.39%) included women. After bivariate analysis, factors associated with bowel injury included age, race, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, increased operative time, surgical approach, type of hysterectomy, lysis of adhesions, and operative indication. After adjusting for potential confounders, bowel injury was found associated with older age, surgical indication of endometriosis, and abdominal surgical approach. Compared with the surgical indication of endometriosis (n=63/10,625), the surgical indications of menstrual disorder (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.47; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.33, 95% CI 0.23-0.48; n=67/34,168), uterine leiomyomas (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.61-1.05; aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.59; n=243/51,232), and genital prolapse (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.20-0.45; aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.25-0.67; n=36/20,384) were each associated with lower odds of bowel injury. Compared with the vaginal approach to hysterectomy (n=27/27,434), the abdominal approach was found to have significantly increased odds of bowel injury (OR 10.80, 95% CI 7.31-15.95; aOR 10.49 95% CI 6.42-17.12; n=401/38,106); the laparoscopic approach had smaller but significantly increased odds (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.37-3.08; aOR 2.03 95% CI 1.24-3.34; n=182/90,017) as well. CONCLUSION: Increased risk of bowel injury is associated with endometriosis and the abdominal surgical approach to hysterectomy. These findings have implications for the surgical care of women with benign uterine disease.

The impact of endometrial ablation technique at a large university women's hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of ThermaChoice uterine balloon system on the practice patterns of endometrial ablations performed at a large university-based teaching hospital. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 226 patients who underwent endometrial ablation. Data were analyzed to determine any change in the type and rate of ablations performed since the introduction of second-generation technologies. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted risk factors for subsequent admission. RESULTS: A total of 72.1% of all cases were performed with the ThermaChoice uterine balloon. The postoperative admission rate was significantly higher after a balloon procedure (13.7% versus 3.1%, P=.02), with a 10.6% overall incidence of admission. Adjusting for confounding variables, more women were admitted after a balloon procedure, compared with women undergoing hysteroscopic ablation (odds ratio 5.0; 95% CI: 1.1, 22). CONCLUSION: Second-generation endometrial ablation technologies represent frequently utilized and proficient treatment modalities for dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Notwithstanding their facilitative design, clinicians should not lose sight of potential limitations of these new procedures.