Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 102
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845460

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy is a procedure used to connect the stomach and dilated afferent loop using a stent under endoscopic ultrasound for afferent loop syndrome. However, the actual efficacy and safety of this procedure remain unclear. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using a laser-cut-type fully covered self-expandable metallic stent and an anchoring plastic stent for afferent loop syndrome. METHODS: Technical and clinical success rates, adverse events, recurrent intestinal obstruction rates, time to recurrent intestinal obstruction, and technical and clinical success rates of re-intervention were evaluated in intended patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy for afferent loop syndrome from October 2018 to August 2022. RESULTS: In 25 intended patients with afferent loop syndrome who intended endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy, the technical success rate was 100% (25/25), whereas the clinical success rate was 96% (24/25). Two patients experienced grade ≥ 3 early adverse events, including one with intra-abdominal abscess and one with hypotension. Both events were attributed to intestinal fluid leakage. No late adverse events were observed. The recurrent intestinal obstruction rate was 32% (8/25), and the median time to recurrent intestinal obstruction was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval: 2.8-not available). The technical and clinical success rates of re-intervention were both 100% (8/8). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy using a fully covered self-expandable metallic stent and an anchoring plastic stent is effective and safe as a treatment procedure for afferent loop syndrome.

2.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 109, 2023 Jan 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36721103

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) has long been used for hemostasis of traumatic or postoperative hemorrhage and embolization of tumors. Previous retrospective studies of TAE for painful bone metastases showed 60%-80% pain reduction with a median time to response of 1-2 days. Compared with radiotherapy and bisphosphonates, time to response appeared earlier than that of radiotherapy or bone-modifying agents. However, few prospective studies have examined TAE for this indication. Here, we describe the protocol for a confirmatory study designed to clarify the efficacy and safety profile of TAE. METHODS: This study will be a multicenter, single-arm confirmatory study (phase 2-3 design). Patients with painful bone metastases from any primary tumor are eligible for enrollment. TAE will be the main intervention. Following puncture of the femoral artery under local anesthesia and insertion of an angiographic sheath, angiography will confirm that the injected region includes tumor vasculature. Catheter position will be adjusted so that the embolization range does not include non-target tissues. Spherical embolic material will then be slowly injected into the artery to embolize it. The primary endpoint (efficacy) is the proportion of subjects with pain relief at 72 h after TAE and the secondary endpoint (safety) is the incidence of all NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 Grade 4 adverse events and Grade ≥ 3 necrosis of the central nervous system. DISCUSSION: If the primary and secondary endpoints are met, TAE can be a treatment choice for painful bone metastases. Trial registry number is UMIN-CTR ID: UMIN000040794. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is ongoing, and patients are currently being enrolled. Enrollment started in March 2021. A total of 36 patients have participated as of Aug 2022. PROTOCOL VERSION: Ver1.4, 13/07/2022.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas , Embolización Terapéutica , Manejo del Dolor , Humanos , Arterias , Neoplasias Óseas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Óseas/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Dolor/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Manejo del Dolor/métodos
3.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 29(11): 7047-7058, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35691957

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Splenic artery (SpA) involvement heralds poor prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) of the body and tail but is not included in the resectability criteria. This study evaluated the prognostic impact of radiological SpA involvement in PDAC of the body and tail. METHODS: Preoperative computed tomography images of patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy for resectable PDAC of the body and tail (n = 242) at our hospital between 2004 and 2018 were graded according to splenic vessel involvement status as clear, abutment, or encasement. Clinicopathological prognostic factors and overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were compared between the three groups. The prognostic value of radiological involvement status was assessed using Harrell's concordance statistic (C-index) and time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis and compared with pathological findings. RESULTS: The diagnostic concordance rate was 0.87 (weighted κ statistic). Prognosis worsened with progression from clear, abutment, to encasement status. SpA encasement (hazard ratio [HR] 1.97, p = 0.04) predicted poor OS in multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis. SpA abutment (HR 1.77, p = 0.017) and encasement (HR 1.86, p = 0.034) independently predicted poor RFS. Splenic vein abutment and encasement were not significant predictors of poor OS or RFS. SpA encasement without adjuvant chemotherapy had the poorest prognosis because of early distant metastasis. The prognostic value was higher for radiological SpA involvement than for pathological SpA invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Radiological SpA involvement status is a meaningful and reproducible prognostic indicator that can be used preoperatively for determining the treatment strategy in PDAC of the body and tail.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirugía , Humanos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pronóstico , Arteria Esplénica/diagnóstico por imagen , Tasa de Supervivencia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
4.
Curr Oncol Rep ; 24(8): 1035-1044, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35362826

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With the remarkable progress in cancer precision medicine, the demand for biopsy has been increasing, and the role of biopsy has been changing. In this review, we discuss the current state and recent advances in the role of image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB) in facilitating precision medicine. RECENT FINDINGS: Biopsies are useful not only in the diagnosis of cancer and histological sub-type but also in the analysis of its molecular characteristics for targeted treatments. PNB specimens have been shown to provide high DNA yields for genomic analysis. Liquid biopsy is an emerging technology but is under development; therefore, PNB is the current standard of practice and is performed complimentarily with liquid biopsy. In the age of precision medicine, interventional oncologists play a key role in optimal tissue collection for adequate genomic analysis. Effective PNB may improve its diagnostic utility and help optimize precision medicine.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Medicina de Precisión , Biopsia con Aguja , Genómica , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Support Care Cancer ; 30(1): 775-784, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34383113

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study investigated the experience of palliative care physicians (PCPs) and their knowledge and recognition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in clinical practice as well as the need to provide palliative care services for patients after ICI treatments. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey with self-administered questionnaires was conducted between February and April 2020. A total of 759 questionnaires were sent to PCPs in Japan. The changes in the PCPs' knowledge and recognition of ICIs and irAEs due to the increased experiences of treating patients after ICI treatments were analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred ninety-two responses (64.8%) were analyzed. Only 15.0% of respondents had no experience of patients after ICI treatments, while 53.9% had experience of more than six patients. On the other hand, 40% of respondents had no experience of patients with suspected irAEs, while only 13.4% had experience of more than six patients. Respondents with more experience of patients after ICI treatments or those with suspected irAEs had extensive knowledge of ICIs and irAEs, were more confident in treating these patients, and tended to consider irAEs as therapeutic indications. The majority of respondents required guidelines and efficient consultation systems with oncologists. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that PCPs with experience had extensive knowledge and confidence of ICIs and irAEs and tended to recognize irAEs as therapeutic indications. The establishment of a more intimate relationship between PCPs and oncologists is important for providing better treatment for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Médicos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Japón , Cuidados Paliativos
6.
Surg Endosc ; 36(12): 9001-9010, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35817882

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the number of patients with hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures has increased. Balloon dilation and placement of multiple plastic stents have proven effective for hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures. However, for refractory strictures, there is often a need for repeated endoscopic procedures within a short period. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the new saddle-cross technique, which uses two fully covered self-expandable metallic stents. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 20 patients with benign hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures who underwent placement of two fully covered self-expandable metallic stents at the National Cancer Center, Japan, from November 2017 to June 2021. RESULTS: The technical and clinical success rates were 100% (20/20). The median time of the procedure was 61 (range 25-122) min. The scheduled stent removal rate was 70% (14/20). Spontaneous dislodgement of the stent was observed on computed tomography in five patients (25.0%). The non-restenosis rate 12 months after the saddle-cross technique was 88.2% (15/17). Procedure-related early adverse events included mild ascending cholangitis in three patients (15.0%) and sepsis in one patient (5.0%). Procedure-related late adverse events included mild ascending cholangitis in three patients (15.0%) and bile duct hyperplasia in one patient (5.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The saddle-cross technique performed using two fully covered self-expandable metallic stents resulted in promising long-term stricture resolution with a high technical success rate. Based on these findings, the saddle-cross method can be considered an option for the standard procedure for benign hepaticojejunostomy anastomotic strictures.


Asunto(s)
Colangitis , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Humanos , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Constricción Patológica/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents/efectos adversos , Colangitis/etiología , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/efectos adversos
7.
BMC Palliat Care ; 21(1): 166, 2022 Sep 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36154936

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cancer pain may be refractory to standard pharmacological treatment. Interventional procedures are important for quality of analgesia. The aim of the present study was to clarify the availability of four interventional procedures (celiac plexus neurolysis/splanchnic nerve neurolysis, phenol saddle block, epidural analgesia, and intrathecal analgesia), the number of procedures performed by specialists, and their associated factors. In addition, we aimed to establish how familiar home hospice physicians and oncologists are with the different interventional procedures available to manage cancer pain. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey using a self-administered questionnaire was conducted. Subjects were certified pain specialists, interventional radiologists, home hospice physicians, and clinical oncologists. RESULTS: The numbers of valid responses/mails were 545/1,112 for pain specialists, 554/1,087 for interventional radiology specialists, 144/308 for home hospice physicians, and 412/800 for oncologists. Among pain specialists, depending on intervention, 40.9-75.2% indicated that they perform each procedure by themselves, and 47.5-79.8% had not performed any of the procedures in the past 3 years. Pain specialists had performed the four procedures 4,591 times in the past 3 years. Among interventional radiology specialists, 18.1% indicated that they conduct celiac plexus neurolysis/splanchnic nerve neurolysis by themselves. Interventional radiology specialists had performed celiac plexus neurolysis/splanchnic nerve neurolysis 202 times in the past 3 years. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of patients seen for cancer pain and the perceived difficulty in gaining experience correlated with the implementation of procedures among pain specialists. Among home hospice physicians and oncologists, depending on intervention, 3.5-27.1% responded that they were unfamiliar with each procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Although pain specialists responded that the implementation of each intervention was possible, the actual number of the interventions used was limited. As interventional procedures are well known, it is important to take measures to ensure that pain specialists and interventional radiology physicians are sufficiently utilized to manage refractory cancer pain.


Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer , Plexo Celíaco , Neoplasias , Dolor Intratable , Dolor en Cáncer/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Dolor Intratable/terapia , Fenoles , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
J Orthop Sci ; 27(2): 448-455, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33531215

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Image-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy (CNB) has been an important diagnostic procedure for musculoskeletal lesions. Here we surveyed the variety of diagnostic strategies available and assessed the clinical usefulness and limitations of image-guided CNB carried out by a multidisciplinary team comprising specialists in various fields. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 284 image-guided CNBs among 1899 consecutive biopsy procedures carried out at our institution for musculoskeletal tumorous conditions, focusing on their effectiveness including diagnostic accuracy and utility for classification of specimens according to malignant potential and histological subtype as well as their correlation with biopsy routes. RESULTS: Among the 284 studied biopsies, 252 (88.7%) were considered clinically "effective". The sensitivity for detection of malignancy was 94.0% (110/117) and the specificity was 95.3% (41/43). The diagnostic accuracy for detection of malignancy was 94.4% (151/160) and that for histological subtype was 92.3% (48/52). The clinical effectiveness of the procedure was correlated with the complexity of the biopsy route (P = 0.015); the trans-pedicular, trans-retroperitoneal and trans-sciatic foramen approaches tended to yield ineffective results. Repeat biopsy did not have a significant impact on the effectiveness of image-guided CNB (P = 0.536). CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic accuracy rates of image-guided CNB performed at multidisciplinary sarcoma units were usable even for patients who have variety of diagnostic biopsy procedures. It is important to establish and implement diagnostic strategies based on an understanding that complicated routes, especially for spine and pelvic lesions, may be associated with ineffectiveness and/or complications.


Asunto(s)
Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/métodos , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología
9.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 32(10): 1464-1469, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34363940

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous ultrasound (US)-guided direct puncture of a reconstructed gastric conduit after esophagectomy for performing a percutaneous radiologic gastrojejunostomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2014 and 2020, 26 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer (mean age, 70 years ± 8.3) with a total of 27 attempts of percutaneous radiologic gastrojejunostomy for postsurgical enteral feeding at the National Cancer Center Hospital were included in this study. One patient required a repeat procedure because of persistent anorexia after the removal of the first tube. All patients except 1 had a gastric conduit reconstructed via a retrosternal route. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia with moderate sedation and analgesia. A gastric conduit was directly punctured with an 18-gauge needle under ultrasonographic guidance, followed by feeding tube insertion into the proximal jejunum. Technical details of the procedures, technical success (defined as adequate tube placement), procedure-related complications, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: The mean procedure time was 25 minutes ± 15, and technical success was obtained in every attempt. Minor complications included mild local pain (n = 7), unintentional tube removal (n = 2), local abdominal wall hematoma (n = 1), and superficial cellulitis (n = 1); no major complications were observed. During a mean follow-up period of 118.3 days ± 85.8, 13 patients resumed oral intake, and the feeding tube could be removed in 4 patients. No procedure-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The US-guided direct puncture technique is feasible for percutaneous gastrojejunal tube insertion in postsurgical patients with esophageal cancer with gastric conduit reconstruction.


Asunto(s)
Esofagectomía , Yeyuno , Anciano , Nutrición Enteral , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Yeyuno/diagnóstico por imagen , Yeyuno/cirugía , Punciones , Estómago/diagnóstico por imagen , Estómago/cirugía
10.
Acta Haematol ; 144(6): 641-648, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34139685

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Excisional biopsy (EB) is considered the gold standard for lymphoma diagnosis. Although recent advances in interventional radiology enable sampling with core-needle biopsy (CNB), only few studies evaluated the utility of CNB compared to that of EB. METHODS: We analyzed patients with lymphoma who had a diagnostic biopsy at the National Cancer Center Hospital during 2002-2017. We investigated the clinical and pathological characteristics of CNB in 2017. RESULTS: The proportion of CNB utility in total biopsy procedures had increased from 11 to 48% during the 15 years. In 2017, CNB was opted more frequently than EB for a biopsy of superficial, abdominal, or anterior mediastinal lesions. Only one out of 72 patients who had CNB required re-biopsy with EB because of insufficiency. The incidence of complications was comparable between CNB and EB: 2 (4%) cases of minor bleeding with CNB and 1 (8%) case of minor bleeding with EB. The median time from the first visit to biopsy was significantly shorter with CNB (5.5 days) than with EB (15 days). CONCLUSION: There is an increasing trend in the utility of CNB. CNB is a less invasive method with shorter time to biopsy and can be considered an alternative to EB.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa , Biopsia/métodos , Linfoma/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ , Linfadenopatía/patología , Linfoma/patología , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Oncology ; 98(5): 267-272, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32092755

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is a feasible treatment for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with unresectable liver metastases. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess HAIC of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in patients with unresectable liver metastases from CRC refractory to standard systemic chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 137 patients (85 men, 52 women; median age, 62 years; with KRAS mutation, n = 57) were recruited from seven institutions from September 2008 to December 2015. These patients were refractory to systemic chemotherapy including three cytotoxic agents (fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) with two molecular-targeted agents (bevacizumab and epidermal growth factor receptor antibody [cetuximab or panitumumab]). All patients underwent HAIC of continuous 5FU for unresectable liver metastases. Overall survival time, time to treatment failure, objective response rate, disease control rate, and incidence of adverse events to HAIC were assessed retrospectively. RESULTS: The median overall survival time was 4.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-5.7 months), whereas time to treatment failure was 2.4 months (95% CI, 2.0-2.8 months). The objective overall response rate and disease control rate were 12.4 and 64%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed in 2.9% of the patients (hyperbilirubinemia in 2, liver abscess in 1, and myelosuppression in 1). CONCLUSIONS: There were few incidences of severe adverse events to HAIC of 5FU for liver metastases from CRC refractory to standard systemic chemotherapy. Therefore, it might present as a treatment option as last-line chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Arteria Hepática/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Gynecol Oncol ; 157(2): 398-404, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32063274

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of ascitic fluid cell block (ACB) with that of core needle biopsy (CNB) or the CA125/CEA ratio in diagnosing primary tubo-ovarian cancer in female patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) with ascites. METHODS: This retrospective study examined female patients with PC with ascites who had available results for ACB, peritoneal tumor CNB, and the CA125/CEA ratio. Several measures of the accuracy of ACB and the CA125/CEA ratio were calculated and compared, with CNB as the reference standard. RESULTS: Of 81 patients with available results, 57 were clinically diagnosed with primary tubo-ovarian cancer. Overall, 52, 47, and 64 patients were diagnosed via CNB, ACB, and CA125/CEA ratio > 25, respectively. CNB and ACB identified the cancer origin in 91.4% and 82.7% cases, respectively. The concordance ratio of the immunohistochemical findings between ACB and CNB was 93.6%. Two patients with inconclusive CNB results were diagnosed with primary tubo-ovarian cancer via ACB. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and positive likelihood ratio were 86.5%, 93.1%, 95.7%, 79.4%, and 12.5, respectively, for ACB and 94.2%, 48.3%, 76.6%, 82.4%, and 1.82, respectively, for CA125/CEA ratio > 25. CONCLUSIONS: ACB is not inferior to CNB in diagnosing primary tubo-ovarian cancer; the two methods complement each other. ACB can substitute CNB in diagnosing primary tubo-ovarian cancer in selected PC patients. ACB is superior to a CA125/CEA ratio of >25 in diagnosing primary tubo-ovarian cancer. ACB is effective, reliable, and convenient for diagnosing primary tubo-ovarian cancer in PC patients with ascites.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Líquido Ascítico/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/patología , Adenocarcinoma/sangre , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia/métodos , Antígeno Ca-125/sangre , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Proteínas de la Membrana/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/sangre , Neoplasias Ováricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/sangre , Neoplasias Peritoneales/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(6): 1000-1004, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32376172

RESUMEN

Transhepatic placement of a metallic biliary stent for internal drainage of persistent liver abscesses was performed in 9 patients (males; median age, 65 years; range, 57-82 years) with refractory liver abscess. The median follow-up period was 2.8 months (range, 0.4-50.3 months). Technical success was achieved in all cases without any major complications. Clinical success, defined as the removal of the drainage tube without recurrent symptoms of infection, was achieved in 8 cases. Median duration until removal of the drainage tube from stent placement was 7 days (range, 0-36).


Asunto(s)
Conductos Biliares , Drenaje/instrumentación , Absceso Hepático/terapia , Stents , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Remoción de Dispositivos , Drenaje/efectos adversos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Absceso Hepático/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 31(3): 478-481, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31982314

RESUMEN

Twelve patients who had undergone esophageal reconstruction because of cancer and in whom conventional percutaneous radiologic or endoscopic gastrostomy was considered difficult are reported. These patients underwent placement of a percutaneous gastrojejunostomy catheter through the reconstructed gastric tube using a slow-leak balloon that had been developed for percutaneous transesophageal gastrotubing. Retrospective evaluation showed successful outcomes without severe complications in all patients. Eight (66.6%) were able to resume oral intake, which allowed gastrojejunostomy catheter withdrawal in 3 (25%). This technique is feasible with acceptable clinical outcomes for patients who have undergone gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Esofagectomía , Esófago/cirugía , Derivación Gástrica/instrumentación , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Remoción de Dispositivos , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Intervencional , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
15.
Radiographics ; 40(3): 667-683, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32216704

RESUMEN

Endoscopic US-guided biliary drainage (BD) is performed for various types of biliary obstruction and is mainly indicated for unsuccessful conventional transpapillary endoscopic retrograde cholangiodrainage. In endoscopic US BD, an extra-anatomic drainage route between the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and the biliary system is created with a covered metallic stent or plastic stent. Procedural types of endoscopic US BD include hepaticogastrostomy, hepaticojejunostomy (after gastrectomy), choledochoduodenostomy, hepaticoduodenostomy, and endoscopic US-guided gallbladder drainage. The technical and clinical success rates of endoscopic US BD are reported to be 94%-97% and 88%-100%, respectively. CT is crucial both in preprocedural assessment and postprocedural monitoring. CT is used to determine the indications for endoscopic US BD, which include the type of biliary obstruction, collateral vessels in the puncture route, ascites, the volume of the liver segment, the distribution of an intrahepatic tumor, and GI tract patency. After endoscopic US BD, common subclinical findings are a small amount of intraperitoneal gas, localized edematous change in the GI tract, a notch in the placed stent, and localized biliary dilatation caused by stent placement. Stent malfunction after endoscopic US BD is caused by impaction of debris and/or food, stent migration into the GI tract, or tumor overgrowth and/or hyperplasia. Complications that can occur include internal stent migration, intraperitoneal biloma, arterial bleeding or pseudoaneurysm, perforation of the GI tract, and portobiliary fistula. The incidence of clinical endoscopic US BD-related complications is 11%-23%. ©RSNA, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Colestasis/diagnóstico por imagen , Colestasis/cirugía , Drenaje/métodos , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Colestasis/etiología , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Stents
16.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(6): 2563-2569, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31494734

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the superiority of percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing over nasogastric tubing as palliative care for bowel obstruction in patients with terminal malignancy was conducted. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were patients with malignant bowel obstruction with no prospect of improvement, for whom surgery was not indicated and with a Palliative Prognostic Index of < 6. They were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing (PTEG group) or nasogastric tubing (NGT group). Their symptom scores (the worst 0 to no symptoms 10) were measured for a 2-week period after enrollment, and the areas under the curves for the two groups were compared. The EQ-5D and SF-8 were also used to assess overall quality of life. RESULTS: Forty patients were enrolled between October 2009 and January 2015, with 21 allocated to the PTEG group and 19 to the NGT group. The mean areas under the curves (95% confidence intervals) for the PTEG group and the NGT groups were 149.6 (120.3-178.8) and 44.9 (16.4-73.5), respectively, significantly higher for the NGT group (p < 0.0001). The secondary endpoints of quality of life as assessed by the EQ-5D and SF-8 scores were also significantly higher for patients in the PTEG group (p = 0.0036, p = 0.0020). There was no difference in survival between the groups. No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of quality of life, percutaneous transesophageal gastro-tubing was superior to nasogastric tubing as palliative care for patients with bowel obstruction due to terminal malignancy.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción Intestinal/terapia , Intubación Gastrointestinal/métodos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Adulto , Unión Esofagogástrica/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida
17.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 30(8): 1215-1222, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31202679

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study compared the efficacy of absolute ethanol with that of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) in portal vein embolization (PVE) before partial hepatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2012 and February 2016, 61 patients (43 men, 18 women; median; 69 years of age) underwent PVE using absolute ethanol (January 2012 to January 2014; n = 27) or NBCA (February 2014 to February 2016; n = 34). The primary endpoint was increase in the nonembolized liver volume (NELV)-to-total functional liver volume (TFLV) ratio, and the secondary endpoints were changes in embolized liver volume (ELV) and NELV, changes in laboratory data, and adverse events. RESULTS: The increase in the NELV/TFLV ratio was significantly higher in the ethanol group than in the NBCA group (13.0% vs. 9.5%, respectively; P = 0.003). The decrease in ELV was significantly greater in the ethanol group (-191.9 vs. -99.2 mL, respectively; P = 0.001). The increase in NELV did not differ significantly (129.4 vs. 116.0 mL, respectively; P = 0.316). In the ethanol group, grade 3-4 transient elevation of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase occurred in 22 patients (81.5%) and 22 patients (81.5%) patients, respectively, whereas it occurred in 1 patient (3.0%) and 1 patient (3.0%), respectively, in the NBCA group. One patient in the ethanol group (3.7%) showed grade 2 hepatic necrosis, and 2 patients with grade 3 subcapsular biloma (5.9%) and 1 with grade 3 liver abscess (2.9%) occurred in the NBCA group (P = 0.696). CONCLUSIONS: PVE with ethanol conferred greater increase in the NELV/TFLV ratio than NBCA due to its severe atrophic effect in ELV, but no significant differences in NELV increase were found.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Enbucrilato/administración & dosificación , Etanol/administración & dosificación , Circulación Hepática , Vena Porta/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Enbucrilato/efectos adversos , Etanol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vena Porta/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(3): 1081-1088, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30112721

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Vena cava syndrome (VCS) from stenosis of the superior vena cava or inferior vena cava caused by compression from a malignant tumor is one of the typical clinical conditions in patients with advanced stage malignant disease. VCS is difficult to manage and painful, reducing patients' quality of life. Although several reports have investigated stent placement for VCS, this treatment has never been established as the standard because of the lack of evidence of the safety and efficacy. We conducted a phase II trial and a phase III randomized controlled trial to clarify the role of stent placement in managing patients with VCS. METHODS: In the phase II trial, 28 eligible patients were treated with stent placement. The efficacy of stent placement for VCS was evaluated based on the reduction of patients' symptom scores during 14 days following treatment. Technical success, technical feasibility, overall survival, recurrence of symptoms, and adverse events were evaluated. In the phase III trial, 32 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the test (n = 16) and control groups (n = 16). The area under the symptom score curve was compared between the groups. The EQ-5D, SF-8, and adverse events were evaluated until discontinuation of the protocol treatment or 28 days after enrollment. RESULTS: In the phase II trial, the median patients' symptom scores significantly decreased from 10.50 before the procedure to 3.00 after the procedure. Technical success and technical feasibility rates were 96.4% and 100%, respectively. The incidence of treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events was 14.3%. In the phase III trial, significant superiority of stent placement was observed in the test, compared to that in the control, group. There was no significant difference in most other evaluations between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Stent placement significantly improved the symptoms of VCS; thus, it might be accepted as the standard treatment to manage the symptoms of VCS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: JIVROSG-0402, JIVROSG-0807.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Stents , Síndrome de la Vena Cava Superior/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome de la Vena Cava Superior/etiología , Síndrome de la Vena Cava Superior/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Vasculares
19.
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol ; 28(1): 1-5, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29703107

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A steerable microcatheter provided with a mechanism on the handle for changing the direction of the catheter tip was developed by Sumitomo Bakelite and evaluated in a clinical trial before introduction into clinical use. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The steerable microcatheter has a 2.4F/2.9-F external diameter (distal/proximal portion) and a 0.021-inch internal diameter with a dial on the proximal portion for moving the tip. In patients scheduled to undergo selective transarterial procedures, selective arteriography of target arterial branches chosen by the evaluator was performed using the steerable microcatheter during the procedure. Efficacy was evaluated based on operability (technical success, procedure time, use of guidewire, usefulness of tip mobility), and safety was evaluated based on defects and adverse events. RESULTS: Between September 2013 and October 2013, 20 patients were enrolled at four institutions. The success rate for guidewireless insertion of the steerable microcatheter into the target vessels was 96.7%, and operability was judged as good in all 20 patients. Poor tip movement was identified as a defect of the steerable microcatheter in one patient. There were no adverse events associated with the use of the steerable microcatheter. CONCLUSION: This trial confirmed that the steerable microcatheter had the utility required for medical device approval. Thereafter, it obtained marketing approval.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía/métodos , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Catéteres , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA