Diabetes knowledge, self-efficacy and dietary, psychological and physical health barriers: Comparing young and usual-onset type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: Young-onset (21-39 years old) type 2 diabetes (YOD) is associated with high complication rates and glycaemic levels, and poor self-management plays a significant role. Knowledge, skills and barriers influence self-management behaviours considerably. Therefore, this study assessed diabetes knowledge, self-efficacy and barriers (situational dietary barriers, physical health, mental health and diabetes-related distress) between participants with young and usual-onset (40-59 years old) (UOD) diabetes. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Differences between YOD and UOD were analysed using bivariate analysis and effect sizes were estimated with Cohen's d. Differences were further adjusted by demographic factors (gender, ethnicity, marital status, educational level, income level) and diabetes duration. RESULTS: A total of 409 (97 YOD, 312 UOD) participants were recruited. Participants with YOD had lower self-efficacy levels (adjusted B = -0.19, CI -0.35 to -0.03) and higher dietary barriers (adjusted B = 3.6, CI 2.1-5.1), lower mental health scores (adjusted B = -3.5, CI -5.7 to -1.4) and higher diabetes-related distress levels (adjusted B = 0.2, CI 0.2-0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that participants with YOD faced more challenges with adapting to life with diabetes when compared with UOD. More effective self-management programmes are needed to support the multifaceted needs of adults with YOD.

Identifying barriers and facilitators to self care in young adults with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: There is a rising trend of young-onset type 2 diabetes (YOD) occurring before the age of 40 years. Lower adherence to self care behaviours (diet, physical activity and taking medication) contributed to poorer glycaemic control and higher risk of complications. Young adults with YOD face unique challenges, and our study aimed to identify the main barriers and facilitators of self care behaviours in this population. METHODOLOGY: A qualitative study was conducted in the National Healthcare Group Polyclinics, Singapore, using in-depth semi-structured interviews. Maximal variation sampling was employed to include participants with YOD of varied age, ethnicity, educational levels and marital status. Thematic analysis was conducted, and barriers and facilitators were identified and mapped to domains of the theoretical domains framework. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants aged 22-39 years were interviewed. We found patterns of intentions, self care behaviours and mindsets that were associated with different barriers and facilitators. Four patterns were identified and were named according to mindsets: avoidant, indifferent, striving and activated. In addition, experience of stigma and self-blame from having type 2 diabetes in young adulthood was common across all mindsets, contributing to poorer self care behaviours and increased psychological burden. CONCLUSION: Our study identified key barriers and facilitators of diet, physical activity and medication adherence in young adults with type 2 diabetes. Understanding barriers and facilitators, as related to mindsets, intentions and behaviours, will support a more individualised care approach.

Prevalence and risk factors of depression and anxiety in primary care.

Introduction: Anxiety and depressive disorders are highly prevalent mental health conditions worldwide. However, little is known about their specific prevalence in primary care settings. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of depression and anxiety in the primary care population and identify associated patient characteristics. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional study using stratified sampling by age with a self-administered questionnaire survey in Singapore's National Health-care Group Polyclinics from December 2021 to April 2022. A total score of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) ≥10 represents clinical depression, and a total score of Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) ≥10 indicates clinical anxiety. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with depression and anxiety. Results: A total of 5694 patients were approached and 3505 consented to the study (response rate=61.6%). There was a higher prevalence of coexisting clinical depression and anxiety (DA) (prevalence=5.4%) compared to clinical depression only (3.3%) and clinical anxiety only (1.9%). The odds of having DA were higher among those aged 21-39 years (odds ratio [OR] 13.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.41-33.64) and 40-64 years (OR 2.28; 95% CI 1.03-5.03) compared to those ≥65 years. Women had higher odds of having DA (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.54-3.50) compared to men. Respondents with diabetes had higher odds of having DA (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.07-2.94) compared to those without diabetes. Conclusion: Coexisting clinical depression and anxiety are significantly present in the primary care setting, especially among younger individuals, patients with diabetes and women. Mental health screening programmes should include screening for both depression and anxiety, and target these at-risk groups.

Impact of COVID-19 on mental health and social service provision in Singapore: Learnings from a descriptive mixed-methods study for future resource planning.

Introduction: COVID-19 restrictions and lockdown measures have led to impact on the mental health and social service delivery, including the rapid adoption of digital solutions to mental healthcare delivery in Singapore. This study aims to rapidly document the quantitative and qualitative impact of the pandemic restrictions on mental health and social services. Method: This descriptive mixed-methods study consisted of a survey arm and a qualitative arm. Providers and clients from eligible mental health organisations and social service agencies were recruited. The respondents completed a survey on changes to their service delivery and the extent of impact of the pandemic on their clients. In-depth interviews were also conducted with representatives of the organisations and clients. Results: There were 31 organisation representatives to the survey, while 16 providers and 3 clients participated in the in-depth interviews. In the survey arm, all representatives reported pivoting to remote means of delivering care during the lockdown. An increase in new client referrals and more domestic violence were reported from primary and community health partners respondents who made up 55.5% of health partners respondents. Three distinct response themes were recorded in the in-depth interviews: impact on clients, impact on service provision and impact on mental health landscape. Conclusion: Two key findings are distilled: (1) mental health and social services have been challenged to meet the evolving demands brought about by the pandemic; (2) more societal attention is needed on mental health and social services. The findings indicate a necessary need for extensive studies on COVID-19 that can inform policies to build a more pandemic-resilient nation.

Psychiatry in primary care and training: a Singapore perspective.

Proactive steps have been taken by the public healthcare sector in Singapore to bring about awareness of mental health in terms of mental health promotion, early recognition and seeking help, with an increasing focus on making mental healthcare accessible and delivering it within the community setting where possible. Examples are the Mental Health General Practitioner Partnership Programme, National Mental Health Blueprint and Community Mental Health Masterplan. The current challenge is to train and involve more primary care doctors in the care of persons with mental health conditions. This paper describes the goals of psychiatric training in primary care and the avenues for training that are available to family medicine residents and family physicians.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related psychiatric and posttraumatic morbidities and coping responses in medical staff within a primary health care setting in Singapore.

BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a major new infectious disease of this century that is unique in its high morbidity and concentration in health care settings. We aimed to determine the level of psychological impact and coping styles among the medical staff in a primary health care setting. METHOD: Using a structured questionnaire, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of the doctors and nurses working within a public, primary health care setting in mid-July 2003. The main outcome measures were rates of psychiatric morbidity, level of posttraumatic stress symptoms, and coping strategies. RESULTS: The response rate was 92.0%. Of the 277 respondents (91 doctors and 186 nurses), psychiatric morbidity and posttraumatic morbidity were found in 20.6% and 9.4%, respectively. Both psychiatric and posttraumatic morbidities were associated with higher scores on coping efforts including self-distraction, behavioral disengagement, social support, venting, planning, and self-blame (all p <.001), but not with direct exposure factors such as contact with suspected SARS patients or working in fever rooms/tentages. Multivariate analysis showed that psychiatric morbidity was associated with post-traumatic morbidity (p =.02) and denial (p =.03), whereas posttraumatic morbidity was associated with younger age (p =.007), being married (p =.02), psychiatric morbidity (p =.02), self-distraction (p =.02), behavioral disengagement (p =.01), religion (p =.003), less venting (p =.04), less humor (p =.04), and less acceptance (p =.02). CONCLUSION: SARS-related psychiatric and posttraumatic morbidities were present in the medical staff within a primary health care setting. Specific coping efforts, age, and marital status, not direct exposure factors, were associated with psychological morbidity. These findings provide possible foci for early identification and psychological support.