RESUMEN
Importance: Increases in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during exercise reduce pulmonary artery (PA) compliance, increase pulsatile right ventricular (RV) afterload, and impair RV-PA coupling in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The effects of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin on pulmonary vascular properties and RV-PA coupling are unknown. Objective: To test the effect of dapagliflozin on right ventricular performance and pulmonary vascular load during exertion in HFpEF. Design, Setting, and Participants: Evaluation of the Cardiac and Metabolic Effects of Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (CAMEO-DAPA) randomized clinical trial demonstrated improvement in PCWP at rest and exercise over 24 weeks with dapagliflozin compared with placebo with participants recruited between February 2021 and May 2022. This secondary analysis evaluates the effects of dapagliflozin on pulsatile pulmonary vascular load and RV-PA coupling using simultaneous echocardiography and high-fidelity invasive hemodynamic testing with exercise. This was a single-center study including patients with hemodynamically confirmed HFpEF with exercise PCWP of 25 mm Hg or greater. Interventions: Dapagliflozin or placebo for 24 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pulsatile pulmonary vascular load (PA compliance and elastance) and right ventricular performance (PA pulsatility index, RV systolic velocity [s']/PA mean) during rest and exercise. Results: Among 37 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 67.4 [8.5] years; 25 female [65%]; mean [SD] body mass index, 34.9 [6.7]; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), there was no effect of dapagliflozin on PA loading or RV-PA interaction at rest. However, with exercise, dapagliflozin improved PA compliance (placebo-corrected mean difference, 0.57 mL/mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.11-1.03 mL/mm Hg; P = .02) and decreased PA elastance (stiffness; -0.17 mm Hg/mL; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.07 mm Hg/mL; P = .001). RV function during exercise improved, with increase in PA pulsatility index (0.33; 95% CI, 0.08-0.59; P = .01) and increase in exercise RV s' indexed to PA pressure (0.09 cm·s-1/mm Hg; 95% CI, 0.02-0.16 cm·s-1/mm Hg; P = .01). Improvements in pulsatile RV load and RV-PA coupling were correlated with reduction in right atrial (RA) pressure (PA elastance Pearson r = 0.55; P =.008; RV s'/PA elastance Pearson r = -0.60; P =.002) and PCWP (PA elastance Pearson r = 0.58; P <.001; RV s'/PA elastance Pearson r = -0.47; P = .02). Dapagliflozin increased resistance-compliance time (dapagliflozin, median [IQR] change, 0.06 [0.03-0.15] seconds; placebo, median [IQR] change, 0.01 [-0.02 to 0.05] seconds; P =.046), resulting in higher PA compliance for any exercise pulmonary vascular resistance. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial reveal that treatment with dapagliflozin for 24 weeks reduced pulsatile pulmonary vascular load and enhanced dynamic RV-PA interaction during exercise in patients with HFpEF, findings that are related to the magnitude of PCWP reduction. Benefits on dynamic right ventricular-pulmonary vascular coupling may partially explain the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in HFpEF. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04730947.
RESUMEN
AIMS: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) combined with exercise echocardiography (CPETecho) allows simultaneous assessments of cardiac, pulmonary, and ventilation in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study sought to determine whether simultaneous assessment of CPET variables could provide additive predictive value over exercise stress echocardiography in patients with dyspnoea. METHODS AND RESULTS: CPETecho was performed in 443 patients with suspected HFpEF (240 HFpEF and 203 controls without HF). Patients with HFpEF were divided based on peak oxygen consumption (VO2, ≥10 or <10 ml/min/kg) or the slope of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production (VE vs. VCO2 slope ≥45.0 or <45.0). The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, unplanned hospital visits requiring intravenous diuretics, or intensification of oral diuretics. During a median follow-up of 399 days, the composite outcome occurred in 57 patients. E/e' ratio during peak exercise was associated with adverse outcomes. Patients with HFpEF and lower peak VO2 had increased risks of the composite event (hazard ratio [HR] 5.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.65-9.62, p < 0.0001 vs. controls; HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.69-5.84, p = 0.0003 vs. HFpEF with higher peak VO2). Elevated VE versus VCO2 slope was also associated with adverse events in HFpEF. The addition of either the presence of abnormal peak VO2 or VE versus VCO2 slope increased the predictive ability over the model based on age, sex, atrial fibrillation, left atrial volume index, and exercise E/e' (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These data provide new insights into the role of CPETecho in patients with HFpEF.
RESUMEN
AIMS: We aimed to clarify the extent to which cardiac and peripheral impairments to oxygen delivery and utilization contribute to exercise intolerance and risk for adverse events, and how this relates to diversity and multiplicity in pathophysiologic traits. METHODS AND RESULTS: Individuals with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and non-cardiac dyspnoea (controls) underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing and clinical follow-up. Haemodynamics and oxygen transport responses were compared. HFpEF patients were then categorized a priori into previously-proposed, non-exclusive descriptive clinical trait phenogroups, including cardiometabolic, pulmonary vascular disease, left atrial myopathy, and vascular stiffening phenogroups based on clinical and haemodynamic profiles to contrast pathophysiology and clinical risk. Overall, patients with HFpEF (n = 643) had impaired cardiac output reserve with exercise (2.3 vs. 2.8 L/min, p = 0.025) and greater reliance on peripheral oxygen extraction augmentation (4.5 vs. 3.8 ml/dl, p < 0.001) compared to dyspnoeic controls (n = 219). Most (94%) patients with HFpEF met criteria for at least one clinical phenogroup, and 67% fulfilled criteria for multiple overlapping phenogroups. There was greater impairment in peripheral limitations in the cardiometabolic group and greater cardiac output limitations and higher pulmonary vascular resistance during exertion in the other phenogroups. Increasing trait multiplicity within a given patient was associated with worse exercise haemodynamics, poorer exercise capacity, lower cardiac output reserve, and greater risk for heart failure hospitalization or death (hazard ratio 1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.79 for 0-1 vs. ≥2 phenogroup traits present). CONCLUSIONS: Though cardiac output response to exercise is limited in patients with HFpEF compared to those with non-cardiac dyspnoea, the relative contributions of cardiac and peripheral limitations vary with differing numbers and types of clinical phenotypic traits present. Patients fulfilling criteria for greater multiplicity and diversity of HFpEF phenogroup traits have poorer exercise capacity, worsening haemodynamic perturbations, and greater risk for adverse outcome.
Asunto(s)
Prueba de Esfuerzo , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Volumen Sistólico , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Tolerancia al Ejercicio/fisiología , Femenino , Masculino , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodos , Consumo de Oxígeno/fisiología , Fenotipo , Disnea/fisiopatología , Disnea/etiología , Hemodinámica/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUNDS: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) often have esophageal motility abnormalities and weak esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) barrier function, which causes proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory reflux esophagitis (RE). The aims of this study were to clarify the current management of RE and prevalence and risk factors of medication-refractory RE in patients with SSc in Japan. METHODS: A total of 188 consecutive patients with SSc who underwent both esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were reviewed. The presence of RE and grades of the gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) were assessed. Esophageal motility was assessed retrospectively according to the Chicago classification v3.0. When RE was seen on a standard dose of PPI or any dose of vonoprazan (VPZ), it was defined as medication-refractory RE. RESULTS: Approximately 80% of patients received maintenance therapy with acid secretion inhibitors regardless of esophageal motility abnormalities. Approximately 50% of patients received maintenance therapy with PPI, and approximately 30% of patients received VPZ. Medication-refractory RE was observed in 30 patients (16.0%). In multivariable analyses, the number of EGD and absent contractility were significant risk factors for medication-refractory RE. Furthermore, combined absent contractility and GEFV grade III or IV had higher odds ratios than did absent contractility alone. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with persistent reflux symptoms and those with absent contractility and GEFV grade III or IV should receive maintenance therapy with strong acid inhibition to prevent medication-refractory RE.
Asunto(s)
Esofagitis Péptica , Pirroles , Esclerodermia Sistémica , Sulfonamidas , Humanos , Esofagitis Péptica/tratamiento farmacológico , Esofagitis Péptica/epidemiología , Esofagitis Péptica/etiología , Japón/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Esclerodermia Sistémica/complicaciones , Esclerodermia Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , ManometríaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left atrial (LA) dysfunction is common in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction. However, data on the pathophysiologic impacts of impaired LA functional reserve remained limited. We sought to determine the association of abnormal LA dynamics during exercise with cardiovascular reserve, exercise capacity, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (n=231) and controls without HF (n=219) underwent exercise stress echocardiography with simultaneous expired gas analysis. LA function was assessed at rest and during exercise using speckle-tracking echocardiography. RESULTS: Patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction demonstrated less increase in LA reservoir and booster pump strain during exercise than those in controls. The degree of LA dilation was more closely related to exercise LA reservoir strain than to resting LA strain (Meng test, P=0.002). The presence of impaired LA reservoir strain during exercise was associated with poorer biventricular systolic reserve and cardiac output augmentation, more severe right ventricular-pulmonary artery uncoupling, and lower peak oxygen consumption. Patients with a lower exercise LA reservoir strain had a 2.7-fold increased risk of HF events (hazard ratio, 2.66 [95% CI, 1.32-5.38]; P=0.006). Among patients with follow-up echocardiography, initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy or atrial fibrillation ablation showed significant improvements in LA reservoir (P<0.001 and P=0.022) and booster pump strain (P=0.011 and 0.028) at rest and during exercise, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Impaired LA reservoir function during exercise in HF with preserved ejection fraction is associated with biventricular reserve limitations, exercise intolerance, and increased risks of HF events.
Asunto(s)
Función del Atrio Izquierdo , Ecocardiografía de Estrés , Tolerancia al Ejercicio , Atrios Cardíacos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Volumen Sistólico , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Ecocardiografía de Estrés/métodos , Atrios Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Atrios Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Función Ventricular Izquierda/fisiología , Prueba de EsfuerzoRESUMEN
AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a prospective study enrolling consecutively evaluated patients with HFpEF undergoing invasive haemodynamic exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography. Compared to HFpEF without MR (n = 145, 79.7%), those with mild or moderate MR (n = 37, 20.3%) were older, more likely to be women, had more left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, and more likely to have left atrial (LA) myopathy reflected by greater burden of atrial fibrillation, more LA dilatation, and poorer LA function. Pulmonary artery (PA) wedge pressure was higher at rest in HFpEF with MR (17 ± 5 mmHg vs. 20 ± 5 mmHg, p = 0.005), but there was no difference with exercise. At rest, only 2 (1.1%) patients had moderate MR, and none developed severe MR. Pulmonary vascular resistance was higher, and right ventricular (RV)-PA coupling was more impaired in patients with HFpEF and MR at rest and exercise. LV and LA myocardial dysfunction remained more severe in patients with MR during stress compared to those without MR, characterized by greater LA dilatation during all stages of exertion, lower LA emptying fraction and compliance, steeper and rightward-shifted LA pressure-volume relationships, and reduced LV longitudinal contractile function. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HFpEF and mild or moderate MR have more severe LV systolic dysfunction, LA myopathy, RV-PA uncoupling, and more severe pulmonary vascular disease. Mitral valve incompetence in this setting is a phenotypic marker of more advanced disease but is not a causal factor in development of HFpEF.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Hemodinámica , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Volumen Sistólico , Humanos , Femenino , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Masculino , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Hemodinámica/fisiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodos , Ecocardiografía , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Ejercicio Físico/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a heterogeneous syndrome requiring improved phenotypic classification. Previous studies have identified subphenotypes of HFpEF, but the lack of exercise assessment is a major limitation. The aim of this study was to identify distinct pathophysiologic clusters of HFpEF based on clinical characteristics, and resting and exercise assessments. METHODS: A total of 265 patients with HFpEF underwent ergometry exercise stress echocardiography with simultaneous expired gas analysis. Cluster analysis was performed by the K-prototype method with 21 variables (10 clinical and resting echocardiographic variables and 11 exercise echocardiographic parameters). Pathophysiologic features, exercise tolerance, and prognosis were compared among phenogroups. RESULTS: Three distinct phenogroups were identified. Phenogroup 1 (n = 112 [42%]) was characterized by preserved biventricular systolic reserve and cardiac output augmentation. Phenogroup 2 (n = 58 [22%]) was characterized by a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation, increased pulmonary arterial and right atrial pressures, depressed right ventricular systolic functional reserve, and impaired right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling during exercise. Phenogroup 3 (n = 95 [36%]) was characterized by the smallest body mass index, ventricular and vascular stiffening, impaired left ventricular diastolic reserve, and worse exercise capacity. Phenogroups 2 and 3 had higher rates of composite outcomes of all-cause mortality or heart failure events than phenogroup 1 (log-rank P = .02). CONCLUSION: Exercise echocardiography-based cluster analysis identified three distinct phenogroups of HFpEF, with unique exercise pathophysiologic features, exercise capacity, and clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía de Estrés , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Fenotipo , Volumen Sistólico , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Ecocardiografía de Estrés/métodos , Anciano , Pronóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tolerancia al Ejercicio/fisiología , Prueba de Esfuerzo/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether nitrite can enhance exercise training (ET) effects in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial conducted at 1 urban and 9 rural outreach centers between November 22, 2016, and December 9, 2021, patients with HFpEF underwent ET along with inorganic nitrite 40 mg or placebo 3 times daily. The primary end point was peak oxygen consumption (VO2). Secondary end points included Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall summary score (KCCQ-OSS, range 0 to 100; higher scores reflect better health status), 6-minute walk distance, and actigraphy. RESULTS: Of 92 patients randomized, 73 completed the trial because of protocol modifications necessitated by loss of drug availability. Most patients were older than 65 years (80%), were obese (75%), and lived in rural settings (63%). At baseline, median peak VO2 (14.1 mL·kg-1·min-1) and KCCQ-OSS (63.7) were severely reduced. Exercise training improved peak VO2 (+0.8 mL·kg-1·min-1; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.2; P<.001) and KCCQ-OSS (+5.5; 95% CI, 2.5 to 8.6; P<.001). Nitrite was well tolerated, but treatment with nitrite did not affect the change in peak VO2 with ET (nitrite effect, -0.13; 95% CI, -1.03 to 0.76; P=.77) or KCCQ-OSS (-1.2; 95% CI, -7.2 to 4.9; P=.71). This pattern was consistent across other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: For patients with HFpEF, ET administered for 12 weeks in a predominantly rural setting improved exercise capacity and health status, but compared with placebo, treatment with inorganic nitrite did not enhance the benefit from ET. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02713126.