Muscle quality and not quantity as a predictor of survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is frequent in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), as a consequence of malnutrition related to risk factors or tumoral mass. Treatment is associated with toxicities that lead to reduced calories intake and muscle mass wasting. Sarcopenia has been negatively associated with tumor control and survival outcomes. PURPOSE: Our aim is to evaluate the prognostic impact of sarcopenia on overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in HNSCC patients undergoing chemoradiation therapy within a prospective clinical trial of chemoradiation vs induction chemotherapy followed by radiation and cetuximab (INTERCEPTOR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: On baseline CT or MRI, we investigated the association between OS and PFS with radiological markers of sarcopenia, measured at the third cervical vertebra level. We studied paravertebral skeletal muscles area (cm2), muscle density (HU), muscle index (cm2/m2), and intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) area (cm2). RESULTS: Imaging of 128 patients was evaluable. We found out that higher body mass index (BMI) was associated with better OS (p = 0.02), and PFS (p = 0.04). Skeletal muscle area (p = 0.02), and IMAT (p = 0.02) were negatively associated with PFS. IMAT was positively correlated with muscle area (Correlation coefficient 0.6, CI95% 0.47-0.7), and negatively associated with muscle density (Correlation coefficient -0.37, CI95% -0.53 - -0.18). CONCLUSIONS: IMAT can be used as predictor of PFS in HNC patients undergoing chemoradiation therapy. The amount of intermuscular fat deposits induces alterations of muscle quality, without alterations of muscle quantity, influencing patients' prognosis.

Metabolic emergencies.

Life-threatening metabolic complications observed in cancer patients are: hypercalcaemia, hyponatremia, hyperurcaemia, tumour lysis syndrome, hypoglycaemia, hyperuremia and hypercreatininemia secondary to renal failure, hyperammoniemia, lactic acidosis and adrenal failure. They may be associated with any kind of neoplastic disease causing dysfunction of vital organs, which can be determined by neoplastic spread, anti-cancer treatment or, more rarely, by paraneoplastic phenomena. The clinical presentation of metabolic complications is typically aspecific. Encephalopathy, raging from mild confusion to coma, is the most common and clinically most severe symptom. The severity of consciousness impairment is related to both the rate of onset and the magnitude of the metabolic disorder. The definitive diagnosis will be established by laboratory examination and radiological work-up. Cancer patients presenting metabolic should be referred to oncologic departments or intensive care units. The treatment of metabolic disorders include: prophylactic measures, emergency measures to preserve vital functions and to restore biological parameters and the treatment of the underlying primary.

Epidural spinal cord compression.

Spinal cord compression from epidural metastases (epidural spinal cord compression, ESCC) is the most common neurological complication of cancer after brain metastases. Extradural compression represents 97% of spinal cord metastatic lesions. ESCC usually occurs in patients with disseminated disease. The most common tumours associated with ESCC are lung and breast cancers, followed by lymphoma, myeloma, prostate cancer and sarcoma. ESCC represents a medical emergency because delayed treatment can be responsible for irreversible deficits, such as paralysis and loss of sphincter control. Patients with ESCC require a multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Clinical suspect is radiologically detected for confirmation. The median expected survival time from diagnosis usually ranges from 3 to 6 months. The nature of the primary tumour and the degree of the neurological deficit are the most important factors affecting survival. The lack of prospective randomized trials makes the optimal treatment of ESCC controversial and the decision is to be tailored to the individual. Treatment options include: bed rest, administration of corticosteroids, surgery followed by radiation therapy, radiotherapy alone and, to a limited extent, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy.

Hospital admission of cancer patients: avoidable practice or necessary care?

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients are frequently admitted to hospital due to acute conditions or refractory symptoms. This occurs through the emergency departments and requires medical oncologists to take an active role. The use of acute-care hospital increases in the last months of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We aimed to describe the admissions to a medical oncology inpatient service within a 16-month period with respect to patients and tumor characteristics, and the outcome of the hospital stay. RESULTS: 672 admissions of 454 patients were analysed. The majority of admissions were urgent (74.1%), and were due to uncontrolled symptoms (79.6%). Among the chief complaints, dyspnoea occurred in 15.7%, pain in 15.2%, and neurological symptoms in 14.5%. The majority of the hospitalizations resulted in discharge to home (60.6%); in 26.5% the patient died and in 11.0% was transferred to a hospice. Admissions due to symptoms correlated with a longer hospital stay and a higher incidence of in-hospital death. CONCLUSION: We suggest that hospital use is not necessarily a sign of inappropriately aggressive care: inpatient care is probably an unavoidable step in the cancer trajectory. Optimization of inpatient supportive procedures should be a specific task of modern medical oncology.

Antiemetic therapy.

The emetogenic potential of cancer chemotherapeutic agents varies according to the agent employed. Among the highly emetogenic agents, cisplatin has been the most studied. As for emesis induced by cisplatin, an optimal antiemetic schedule is effective in 70-90% of cases of acute emesis, in 60% of cases of delayed emesis, whereas acute emesis induced by moderately emetogenic agents can be prevented in over 90% of cases. The major risk factor in delayed emesis is the vomiting experienced during the previous chemotherapy cycles. Special situations are represented by high-dose chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Drugs and scheduling for emesis prevention in children are empirically derived from the regimens employed for adults, although some differences in the pharmacokinetics and in toxicity profiles have been reported.

Cancer of the nasopharynx.

Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is quite rare throughout Europe, accounting for an annual incidence rate below 1 per 100.000, whereas the highest risk area is South East Asia. A predominant occurrence in males is to be noted. NPC is an etiologically multifactorial disease, most probably involving viral, genetic and environmental factors. Carcinomas of the nasopharynx can be divided into two major histotypes: keratinizing squamous cell carcinomas (WHO-type 1) and non-keratinizing carcinomas (WHO-type 2). The histological type is a prognostic factor and it has a clear impact on the outcome of treatment. Standard therapeutic option for early stages of NPC is radiation, while an integration of radiation therapy and chemotherapy is indicated in more advanced stages.

Cancer of the anal region.

Cancer of the anal region represents 3-3.5% of all anorectal tumours. The peak incidence is between 58 and 64 years. Since 1960 an increased incidence among men younger than 45 years, and among women has been observed. The number of women diagnosed with anal canal cancer (7 per 1,000,000 person per years) is twice as much as that of men, while anal margins cancers are more frequent in men (4 per 1,000,000 person per years). Tumour extension determines the different treatment strategies, aiming at definite cure, with a conservative approach. Small tumours can be resected without mutilating surgery, while for larger tumours combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is the standard treatment, even though a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been recently introduced. Long-term quality of life (QOL) scores are acceptable, with the exception of patients who experience severe anal dysfunction.

Is the combination of Cetuximab with chemo-radiotherapy regimens worthwhile in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer? A review of current evidence.

The administration of Cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy and chemotherapy has shown clear survival improvements within the locally advanced and the relapsed/metastatic settings respectively. These results have provided the clinical rational for the inclusion of Cetuximab into chemo-radiation regimens. Trials assessing the combination of Cetuximab with induction chemotherapy, concomitant chemo-radiotherapy or both are reviewed. Taken together, their results suggest that the addition of Cetuximab is promising in trials of induction chemotherapy, showing almost uniformly response rates higher than historical controls. In combination with concomitant hyperfractionated radiotherapy and Cisplatin the results of the RTOG 0522 trial do not suggest any benefit. However a positive effect cannot be excluded with other schedules. Although feasibility has been universally suggested, adding Cetuximab implies some toxicity enhancement. Single local and systemic toxicities are more frequent and supposedly the overall treatment intensity is increased. Moreover the drug-specific toxicities are potentially severe and deserve timely recognition and management.