Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 42
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Palliat Care ; 23(1): 65, 2024 Mar 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38433194

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bereaved relatives of intensive care unit (ICU) patients are at increased risk of psychological complaints. Aftercare might help them cope with processing the ICU admission and their loved one's death. There is little (qualitative) evidence on how bereaved relatives experience aftercare. Also, the COVID-19 pandemic likely impacted aftercare provision. We aim to examine how many relatives in Dutch ICUs received aftercare before and during the pandemic and to qualitatively describe their experiences and needs regarding aftercare. METHODS: A mixed-methods study among relatives of patients who died in an ICU before or during the COVID-19 pandemic. Bereaved relatives in six ICUs completed a questionnaire (n = 90), including two items on aftercare. These were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-squared tests. Subsequently, both relatives that received and relatives that did not receive aftercare were interviewed about their experiences and needs regarding aftercare. The interviews were thematically analyzed. RESULTS: After the passing of a loved one, 44% of the relatives were asked by a healthcare professional from the hospital how they were doing, and 26% had had a follow-up conversation. Both happened more often during the first wave of the pandemic than during the second wave or before the pandemic. The most common reason for not having had a follow-up conversation was not knowing about this option (44%), followed by not feeling a need (26%). Regarding the latter, interviewed relatives explained that this would not revive their loved one or that they had already discussed everything they wanted. Relatives who wanted a follow-up conversation, wanted this because this would help them realize the severity of their loved one's illness, to exchange personal experiences, and/or to thank the ICU team. Those with a follow-up conversation said that they had reviewed the medical course of the admission and/or discussed their (mental) well-being. CONCLUSIONS: ICU healthcare professionals may play a vital role in addressing aftercare needs by asking relatives how they are doing in the weeks following the death of their loved one and offering them a follow-up conversation with an ICU physician. We recommend to include aftercare for bereaved relatives in ICU guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Posteriores , COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cuidados Críticos
2.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ; 24(1): 46, 2024 Feb 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38347583

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the intensive care unit (ICU) relatives play a crucial role as surrogate decision-makers, since most patients cannot communicate due to their illness and treatment. Their level of involvement in decision-making can affect their psychological well-being. During the COVID-19 pandemic, relatives' involvement probably changed. We aim to investigate relatives' involvement in decision-making in the ICU before and during the pandemic and their experiences and preferences in this regard. METHODS: A mixed-methods study among relatives of ICU patients admitted to an ICU before or during the COVID-19 pandemic. Relatives in six ICUs completed a questionnaire (n = 329), including two items on decision-making. These were analysed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses. Subsequently, relatives (n = 24) were interviewed about their experiences and preferences regarding decision-making. Thematic analysis was used for analysing the qualitative data. RESULTS: Nearly 55% of the relatives indicated they were at least occasionally asked to be involved in important treatment decisions and of these relatives 97.1% reported to have had enough time to discuss questions and concerns when important decisions were to be made. During the first COVID-19 wave relatives were significantly less likely to be involved in decision-making compared to relatives from pre-COVID-19. The interviews showed that involvement varied from being informed about an already made decision to deliberation about the best treatment option. Preferences for involvement also varied, with some relatives preferring no involvement due to a perceived lack of expertise and others preferring an active role as the patient's advocate. Discussing a patient's quality of life was appreciated by relatives, and according to relatives healthcare professionals also found this valuable. In some cases the preferred and actual involvement was in discordance, preferring either a larger or a smaller role. CONCLUSIONS: As treatment alignment with a patient's values and preferences and accordance between preferred and actual involvement in decision-making is very important, we suggest that the treatment decision-making process should start with discussions about a patient's quality of life, followed by tailoring the process to relatives' preferences as much as possible. Healthcare professionals should be aware of relatives' heterogeneous and possibly changing preferences regarding the decision-making process.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cuidados Críticos , Familia/psicología , Toma de Decisiones
3.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 22, 2024 01 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38178030

RESUMEN

The aims of this qualitative research were (1) to gain more insight in the diagnostic and treatment history of patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain; (2) to get a deeper understanding of possible factors that are involved in the possible delay in setting a TMD-pain diagnosis and receiving appropriate treatment; and (3) to get a deeper understanding of the perspectives and experiences of chronic TMD-pain patients on the possible improvement of various aspects of their diagnostic and treatment journey.MethodsIn this narrative research, semi-structured interviews took place with patients who experienced chronic orofacial pain (OFP) for at least three years before getting diagnosed with, and treated for, TMD pain by an OFP specialist in an interprofessional setting.ResultsIn total, ten patients were interviewed in-depth. Patients experienced their chronic OFP in different ways, but all reported a significant impact of their pain on their quality of life. All patients visited numerous health care professionals before their TMD diagnosis was set. Among others, they underwent anti-neuropathic pain medication therapies and invasive surgeries, which did not significantly reduce their chronic OFP. The interprofessional TMD-pain treatment reduced the suffering of the chronic OFP substantially, also 6 months after the start of therapy, and improved the quality of life for all patients. In most of them, the OFP intensity was also decreased.ConclusionChronic TMD-pain patients with a history of neuropathic pain treatment may experience a long journey until receiving the appropriate diagnosis and treatment. This stresses the need to improve the implementation of chronic TMD-pain guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Neuralgia , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Dolor Facial/diagnóstico , Dolor Facial/etiología , Dolor Facial/terapia , Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Neuralgia/terapia , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/complicaciones , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/terapia
4.
Pain Pract ; 24(2): 288-295, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37823480

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients with anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) often require a step-up treatment strategy including abdominal wall injections, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) or a neurectomy. Long-term success rates of PRF and surgery are largely unknown. The aim of the current study was to report on the long-term efficacy of PRF and neurectomy in ACNES patients who earlier participated in the randomized controlled PULSE trial. METHODS: Patients who completed the PULSE trial were contacted about pain status and additional treatments in the following years. Treatment success was based on numerical rating scale (NRS) following IMMPACT recommendations and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores. RESULTS: A total of 44 of the original 60 patients were eligible for analysis (73.3%). Median follow-up was 71.5 months. One patient (4.3%) was still free of pain after a single PRF session, and five additional patients (21.7%) were free of pain by repetitive PRF treatments. By contrast, 13 patients (61.9%) in the neurectomy group were still free of pain without additional treatments. All pain recurrences and therefore primary re-interventions occurred in the first 2 years after the initial treatment. CONCLUSION: Approximately one in five ACNES patients undergoing PRF treatment reports long-term success obviating the need of surgical intervention. Surgery for ACNES is long-term effective in approximately two of three operated patients. Recurrent ACNES beyond 2 years after either intervention is rare.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa , Tratamiento de Radiofrecuencia Pulsada , Humanos , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Desnervación/métodos , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
5.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 763, 2023 Jul 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37464434

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Support for relatives is highly important in the intensive care unit (ICU). During the first COVID-19 wave  support for relatives had to be changed considerably. The alternative support could have decreased the quality and sense of support. We aimed to evaluate how support for relatives in Dutch ICUs was organised during the first COVID-19 wave and how this was experienced by these relatives in comparison to relatives from pre-COVID-19 and the second wave. Additionally, we aimed to investigate which elements of support are associated with positive experiences. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional multicentre cohort study in six Dutch ICUs in the Netherlands. Written questionnaires were distributed among relatives of ICU patients from pre-COVID-19, the first wave and the second wave. The questionnaire included questions on demographics, the organisation of support, and the experiences and satisfaction of relatives with the support. RESULTS: A total of 329 relatives completed the questionnaire (52% partner, 72% woman and 63% ICU stay of 11 days or longer). Support for relatives of ICU patients during the first COVID-19 wave differed significantly from pre-COVID-19 and the second wave. Differences were found in all categories of elements of support: who, when, how and what. Overall, relatives from the three time periods were very positive about the support. The only difference in satisfaction between the three time periods, was the higher proportion of relatives indicating that healthcare professionals had enough time for them during the first wave. Elements of support which were associated with many positive experiences and satisfaction were: fixed timeslot, receiving information (e.g. leaflets) on ≥ 2 topics, discussing > 5 topics with healthcare professionals, and being offered emotional support. CONCLUSIONS: Although, support for relatives in the ICU changed considerably during the COVID-19 pandemic, relatives were still positive about this support. The altered support gave insight into avenues for improvement for future comparable situations as well as for normal daily ICU practice: e.g. daily contact at a fixed timeslot, offering video calling between patients and relatives, and offering emotional support. ICUs should consider which elements need improvement in their practice.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Estudios de Cohortes , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
6.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 153, 2022 05 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35590236

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is the standard of care for small adrenal tumours. Both the transperitoneal lateral approach and posterior retroperitoneal approach are widely used and have been proven to be safe and effective. However, the prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain has not been specifically investigated in previous studies. The primary goal of this study was to identify the prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain after minimally invasive adrenalectomy. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed among all consecutive patients who had undergone minimally invasive adrenalectomy in a single university medical centre. The primary outcome was the prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of localized hypoesthesia, risk factors for the development of chronic postsurgical pain, and the Health-Related Quality of Life. Three questionnaires were used to measure the prevalence and severity of chronic postsurgical pain, hypoesthesia, and Health-Related Quality of Life. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for development of chronic postsurgical pain. RESULTS: Six hundred two patients underwent minimally invasive adrenalectomy between January 2007 and September 2019, of whom 328 signed informed consent. The prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain was 14.9%. In the group of patients with chronic postsurgical pain, 33% reported hypoesthesia as well. Young age was a significant predictor for developing chronic postsurgical pain. The prevalence of localized hypoesthesia was 15.2%. In patients with chronic postsurgical pain, Health-Related Quality of Life was significantly lower, compared to patients without pain. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain following minimally invasive adrenalectomy is considerable. Furthermore, the presence of chronic postsurgical pain was correlated with a significant and clinically relevant lower Health-Related Quality of Life. These findings should be included in the preoperative counselling of the patient. In the absence of evidence for effective treatment in established chronic pain, prevention should be the key strategy and topic of future research.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/cirugía , Adrenalectomía/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Hipoestesia/etiología , Hipoestesia/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Prevalencia , Calidad de Vida
7.
Semin Thromb Hemost ; 47(6): 735-744, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33971680

RESUMEN

Patients with a limited life expectancy have an increased risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications. Anticoagulants are often continued until death, independent of their original indication. We aimed to identify the opinions of physicians about the use of anticoagulants at the end of life. A mixed-method research design was used. A secondary analysis was performed on data from a vignette study and an interview study. Participants included general practitioners and clinical specialists. Physicians varied in their opinions: some would continue and others would stop anticoagulants at the end of life because of the risk of thromboembolic or bleeding complications. The improvement or preservation of patients' quality of life was a reason for both stopping and continuing anticoagulants. Other factors considered in the decision-making were the types of anticoagulant, the indication for which the anticoagulant was prescribed, underlying diseases, and the condition and life expectancy of the patient. Factors that made decision-making difficult were the lack of evidence on either strategy, uncertainty about patients' life expectancy, and the fear of harming patients. Which decision was eventually made seems largely dependent on the choice of the patient. In conclusion, there is a substantial variation in physicians' opinions regarding the use of anticoagulants in patients with a limited life expectancy. Physicians agree that the primary goal of medical care at end of life is the improvement or preservation of patients' quality of life. An important barrier to decision-making is the lack of evidence about the risks and benefits of stopping anticoagulants.


Asunto(s)
Médicos , Tromboembolia , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Humanos , Esperanza de Vida , Calidad de Vida , Tromboembolia/tratamiento farmacológico , Tromboembolia/prevención & control
8.
BMC Palliat Care ; 20(1): 110, 2021 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34271885

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotics are frequently prescribed for patients with a limited life expectancy. In the last phase of life, when treatment is primarily focused on optimizing patients' quality of life, the use of antithrombotics should be reconsidered. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective review of 180 medical records of patients who had died of a malignant or non-malignant disease, at home, in a hospice or in a hospital, in the Netherlands. All medication prescriptions and clinical notes of patients using antithrombotics in the last three months of life were reviewed manually. We subsequently developed case vignettes based on a purposive sample, with variation in setting, age, gender, type of medication, and underlying disease. RESULTS: In total 60% (n=108) of patients had used antithrombotics in the last three months of life. Of all patients using antithrombotics 33.3 % died at home, 21.3 % in a hospice and 45.4 % in a hospital. In total, 157 antithrombotic prescriptions were registered; 30 prescriptions of vitamin K antagonists, 60 of heparins, and 66 of platelet aggregation inhibitors. Of 51 patients using heparins, 32 only received a prophylactic dose. In 75.9 % of patients antithrombotics were continued until the last week before death. Case vignettes suggest that inability to swallow, bleeding complications or the dying phase were important factors in making decisions about the use of antithrombotics. CONCLUSIONS: Antithrombotics in patients with a life limiting disease are often continued until shortly before death. Clinical guidance may support physicians to reconsider (dis)continuation of antithrombotics and discuss this with the patient.


Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos , Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Muerte , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
Neuromodulation ; 24(1): 112-125, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32969151

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: When neither pharmacological therapies nor alternative interventions provide sufficient pain relief, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can be used to treat Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS). Although it seems reasonable that quality of life (QoL)- and psychosocial-related factors contribute to the outcome of SCS since pain is a multidimensional experience, few qualitative studies have explored the expectations of SCS and experiences on SCS to treat FBSS from the patient perspective. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to qualitatively and quantitatively map the FBSS patients' experiences with SCS and the effects of SCS on low back pain caused by FBSS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A qualitative study with in-depth semi-structured interviews, assisted by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)-questionnaire. RESULTS: Seven themes regarding patients' experiences, subdivided into 15 categories, were identified, including an understudied theme within this field of research, Spiritual Well-Being. "Acceptance" and "coping" emerged as pre-eminent motifs throughout these themes. Moreover, the realization of patients' expectations were variable throughout the presented themes. According to the BPI Questionnaire, four out of 13 patients (31%) had significant pain relief (≥50%). Seven out of 13 (54%) reported a ≥50% increase regarding enjoyment of life. CONCLUSION: Multiple QoL- and psychosocial-related themes are related to SCS-outcomes. In order to improve SCS-outcomes for both short- and long-term, these themes should be implemented as a multidimensional approach, both prior to implantation as during follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Fracaso de la Cirugía Espinal Lumbar , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal , Síndrome de Fracaso de la Cirugía Espinal Lumbar/terapia , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor , Calidad de Vida , Médula Espinal , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Pain Pract ; 21(5): 513-522, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33301649

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Oxaliplatin often causes acute or chronic peripheral neuropathy in patients with an intestinal or pancreatic tumor, but in-depth insights in its influence on quality of life (QoL) are lacking. We explored the influence of acute oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) on daily QoL in these patients. METHODS: We performed semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of patients receiving oxaliplatin and possibly experiencing acute OIPN. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded by two researchers. Data were analyzed by using the constant comparative method for content analysis with ATLAS.ti software. RESULTS: After nine patients, saturation took place. In total, 11 patients were interviewed. Four themes were extracted from the data: (1) adverse effects, (2) physical (un)well-being, (3) emotional aspects, and (4) treatment aspects. All participants were suffering from acute OIPN to a certain extent, leading to restrictions in daily activities such as household chores, but also to a decrease in mobility and independency. Other adverse effects such as general malaise and gastrointestinal side effects also influenced the participants' well-being, as did the diagnosis and prognosis of their disease. CONCLUSION: Acute OIPN, together with other side effects of chemotherapeutic treatment and the difficulties that come with the diagnosis of cancer and its prognosis, largely influences patients' daily QoL. Managing expectations (by patient education) seems important.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico , Actividades Cotidianas , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Oxaliplatino/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso Periférico/inducido químicamente , Calidad de Vida
11.
Am J Transplant ; 19(10): 2825-2832, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30868731

RESUMEN

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is a disregarded topic. In this cross-sectional study, all consecutive patients who underwent an LDN at the Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc; 2003-2016) were approached for participation. Five hundred twelve living kidney donors were included and asked to complete two questionnaires, including the McGill Pain Questionnaire and the RAND Short Form-36 Health Status Inventory (RAND SF-36) regarding their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The mean prevalence of CPSP following LDN was 5.7%, with a mean follow-up time of 6 years. Possible predictors of CPSP following LDN are severe early postoperative pain, previous abdominal surgery, and preexisting backache. The RAND SF-36 revealed an impaired HRQoL in patients with CPSP when compared to patients without CPSP. In conclusion, this study revealed that the prevalence of CPSP following LDN is substantial. Given the possible association between the presence of CPSP and impaired HRQoL scores, living kidney donors should be well informed in the preoperative phase about the risk of CPSP.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/epidemiología , Donadores Vivos/provisión & distribución , Nefrectomía/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo
12.
Ann Surg ; 269(5): 856-865, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29135493

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the relationship between postoperative pain and 30-day postoperative complications. BACKGROUND: Only scarce data are available on the association between postoperative pain and a broad range of postoperative complications in a large heterogeneous surgical population. METHODS: Having postoperative pain was assessed in 2 ways: the movement-evoked pain score on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-MEP) and the patients' opinion whether the pain was acceptable or not. Outcome was the presence of a complication within 30 days after surgery. We used binary logistic regression for the total population and homogeneous subgroups to control for case complexity. Results for homogeneous subgroups were summarized in a meta-analysis using inverse variance weighting. RESULTS: In 1014 patients, 55% experienced moderate-to-severe pain on the first postoperative day. The overall complication rate was 34%. The proportion of patients experiencing postoperative complications increased from 0.25 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.21-0.31] for NRS-MEP = 0 to 0.45 (95% CI = 0.36-0.55) for NRS-MEP = 10. Patients who found their pain unacceptable had more complications (adjusted odds ratio = 2.17 (95% CI = 1.51-3.10; P < 0.001)). Summary effect sizes obtained with homogeneous groups were similar to those obtained from the total population who underwent very different types of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Higher actual postoperative pain scores and unacceptable pain, even on the first postoperative day, are associated with more postoperative complications. Our findings provide important support for the centrality of personalized analgesia in modern perioperative care.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
13.
Pain Pract ; 19(7): 751-761, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31188514

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chronic abdominal pain can be due to entrapped intercostal nerves (anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome [ACNES]). If abdominal wall infiltration using an anesthetic agent is unsuccessful, a neurectomy may be considered. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) applies an electric field around the tip of the cannula near the affected nerve to induce pain relief. Only limited retrospective evidence suggests that PRF is effective in ACNES. METHODS: A multicenter, randomized, nonblinded, controlled proof-of-concept trial was performed in 66 patients. All patients were scheduled for a neurectomy procedure. Thirty-three patients were randomized to first receive a 6-minute cycle of PRF treatment, while the other 33 were allocated to an immediate neurectomy procedure. Pain was recorded using a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain possible]). Successful treatment was defined as >50% pain reduction. Patients in the PRF group were allowed to cross over to a neurectomy after 8 weeks. RESULTS: The neurectomy group showed greater pain reduction at 8-week follow-up (mean change from baseline -2.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] -3.9 to -1.7) vs. -1.5 (95% CI -2.3 to -0.6); P = 0.045) than the PRF group. Treatment success was reached in 12 of 32 (38%, 95% CI 23 to 55) of the PRF group and 17 of 28 (61%, 95% CI 42 to 72) of the neurectomy group (P = 0.073). Thirteen patients were withdrawn from their scheduled surgery. Adverse events were comparable between treatments. CONCLUSIONS: PRF appears to be an effective and minimally invasive treatment option and may therefore be considered in patients who failed conservative treatment options before proceeding to a neurectomy procedure. Anterior neurectomy may possibly lead to a greater pain relief compared with PRF in patients with ACNES, but potential complications associated with surgery should be discussed.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Desnervación/métodos , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/complicaciones , Síndromes de Compresión Nerviosa/terapia , Tratamiento de Radiofrecuencia Pulsada/métodos , Pared Abdominal , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Nervios Intercostales/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor , Ondas de Radio , Piel , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
BMC Neurol ; 18(1): 91, 2018 Jun 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29958535

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neuropathic pain is defined as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system and is a major therapeutic challenge. Several screening tools have been developed to help physicians detect patients with neuropathic pain. These have typically been validated in populations pre-stratified for neuropathic pain, leading to a so called "Catch-22 situation:" "a problematic situation for which the only solution is denied by a circumstance inherent in the problem or by a rule". The validity of screening tools needs to be proven in patients with pain who were not pre-stratified on basis of the target outcome: neuropathic pain or non-neuropathic pain. This study aims to assess the validity of the Dutch PainDETECT (PainDETECT-Dlv) in a large population of patients with chronic pain. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicentre design was used to assess PainDETECT-Dlv validity. Included where patients with low back pain radiating into the leg(s), patients with neck-shoulder-arm pain and patients with pain due to a suspected peripheral nerve damage. Patients' pain was classified as having a neuropathic pain component (yes/no) by two experienced physicians ("gold standard"). Physician opinion based on the Grading System was a secondary comparison. RESULTS: In total, 291 patients were included. Primary analysis was done on patients where both physicians agreed upon the pain classification (n = 228). Compared to the physician's classification, PainDETECT-Dlv had a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 55%, versus the Grading System it achieved 74 and 46%. CONCLUSION: Despite its internal consistency and test-retest reliability the PainDETECT-Dlv is not an effective screening tool for a neuropathic pain component in a population of patients with chronic pain because of its moderate sensitivity and low specificity. Moreover, the indiscriminate use of the PainDETECT-Dlv as a surrogate for clinical assessment should be avoided in daily clinical practice as well as in (clinical-) research. Catch-22 situations in the validation of screening tools can be prevented by not pre-stratifying the patients on basis of the target outcome before inclusion in a validation study for screening instruments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered prospectively in the Dutch National Trial Register: NTR 3030 .


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
Pain Pract ; 15(5): 447-54, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24661319

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute postoperative pain is still inadequately managed, despite the presence of acute pain services (APSs). This study aimed to investigate the existence, structure, and responsibilities of Dutch APSs and to review the implementation of the Dutch Hospital Patient Safety Program (DHPSP). METHODS: Information was gathered by a digital questionnaire, sent to all 96 Dutch hospitals performing surgical procedures. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were received from 80 hospitals (83%), of which 90% have an APS. Important duties of the APS are regular patient rounds, checking complex pain techniques (100%), supporting quality improvement of pain management (87%), pain education (100%), and pain research (21%). IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DHPSP: Regular in-hospital pain training is not provided in 46% of the hospitals. Thirteen percent of the hospitals offer no patient information about pain management. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all hospitals have an APS. They differ in both the way they are locally organized, along with the activities they employ. Future research needs to compare the effect of patient and nonpatient-related activities of APSs on outcomes related to pain management.


Asunto(s)
Clínicas de Dolor , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/diagnóstico
16.
Pain Pract ; 15(7): 671-87, 2015 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25229884

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Chronic noncancer pain influences patient's quality of life and their ability to cope. Pain relieving medication and other specific treatments commonly integrated in biopsychosocial rehabilitation demonstrate modest benefits in pain relief and improved functioning of individuals. Spiritual care, covering the fourth dimension provides insight, inspires hope and purpose, and is thought to mediate mental and physical health for patients. This study explores the need for its inclusion in interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation and describes the requirements and test environment for evaluation. METHODS: Outcomes of spiritual care and interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation in follow-up studies of randomized controlled trials contained in systematic reviews were summarized. Pubmed, Cochrane, and PsycINFO were searched, citation tracking was applied, articles of follow-up studies therein were located. Literature was searched for insights pertaining to requirements for an assessment of including this fourth dimension. RESULTS: No systematic reviews for spiritual care were identified. Five systematic reviews of biopsychosocial rehabilitation containing 14 studies describing long-term outcomes were retrieved. The importance of coping in maintaining long-term outcomes was empirically illustrated. The required test environment is provided by a structured multidimensional care pathway separating spirituality from well-being and mental health, with measures of treatment outcome installed enabling a comparison with benchmarks. CONCLUSIONS: Active coping seems beneficial for maintaining positive long-term outcomes of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation Spiritual care may be conducive to active coping. Further research is warranted to explore the additive value of this spiritual care in the context of a multidimensional care pathway.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/tendencias , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Terapias Espirituales/tendencias , Terapias en Investigación/tendencias , Adaptación Psicológica , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/métodos , Terapias Espirituales/métodos , Terapias en Investigación/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Pain Pract ; 14(3): 260-70, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23615039

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Over the past 15 years, the number of ambulatory surgical procedures worldwide has increased continuously. Studies show that 30% to 40% of the patients experience moderate-to-severe pain in the first 48 hours. The objective of this observational study is to compare the percentage of moderate-to-severe pain, side effects, and the use of escape medication of two different analgesic regimes after ambulatory surgery. METHODS: In this observational study, at the day care center of the Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, patients were followed during the period from April 2010 till October 2011. At the day care center, a multimodal analgesic regime with paracetamol (1000), diclofenac (75), and tramadol (50) and an analgesic regime with a combination tablet tramadol/paracetamol (37.5/325) and diclofenac (75) were prescribed in different periods for ambulatory surgery. Prior to surgery and during the first 3 days after surgery, patients were asked to complete five questionnaires. In these questionnaires, they were asked about pain (NRS) at rest and when moving, experienced side effects, and the analgesic medication taken. RESULTS: A total of 375 patients participated in the study, of which 99 in the tramadol group and 138 in the combination tablet tramadol/paracetamol group. The percentage of patients with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain was 25% to 40%. In both the groups, an equal percentage of patients experienced moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Both analgesic regimes have a comparable analgesic effectiveness with each with its own specific advantages and disadvantages. On the first day after surgery, patients with the tramadol/paracetamol regime experienced more side effects (drowsiness and nausea) were less therapy compliant, but needed a smaller amount of escape medication than the patients from the tramadol group.


Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/efectos adversos , Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Diclofenaco/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Tramadol/uso terapéutico , Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Diclofenaco/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tramadol/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
18.
J Pain ; 24(10): 1886-1895, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37270141

RESUMEN

Globally, life expectancy is increasing, leading to more surgeries being performed in older patients. Postoperative pain is associated with complications after surgery. The aim of this study is to explore potential age-related risk factors for acute postoperative pain in older patients undergoing surgery. This was a prospective, single-center study. Patients ≥65 years, with and without disability, as defined by the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0, undergoing elective surgery, were compared. Primary outcome was the postoperative pain (ie, numeric rating scale (NRS) score) on the first postoperative day. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain and pain trajectories in patients with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI), frailty, preoperative opioid use, and new-onset disability after surgery. Between February 2019 and July 2020, 155 patients were enrolled. On the first day after surgery, postoperative pain did not differ between patients with and without disability. NRS scores differed between patients with-, and without MCI on the first (P = .01), and second postoperative day (P < .01). Patients who used opioids before surgery reported higher median NRS score on the first (P < .001) and second (P < .01) postoperative day. Out of a total of 1816 NRS scores, 2 pain clusters were identified. Acute postoperative pain did not differ between patients with or without preoperative disability and frailty in older patients undergoing surgery. Reduced postoperative pain in older patients with MCI warrants further investigation. The PIANO study (Comparison of Postoperative NeurocognitiveFunction in Older Adult Patients with and without Diabetes Mellitus) was registered with www.clinicaltrialregister.nl (search term: Which can predict memory problems after surgery better; blood sugar levels or memory before surgery?). PERSPECTIVE: This study explored risk factors for acute postoperative pain in older patients. No differences in postoperative pain were observed in patients with or without preexistent disability or frailty, however, patients with mild cognitive impairment experienced reduced pain. We suggest to simplify pain assessment in this group and take functional recovery into account.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Fragilidad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Fragilidad/complicaciones , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología
19.
PLoS One ; 18(1): e0280036, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36649221

RESUMEN

Pain is a prevalent and debilitating healthcare problem. Since pharmacological treatments have numerous side-effects, additional treatment could be beneficial. Music has been shown to affect the pain perception and the pain threshold. The objective of this observational study was to evaluate the effect of preferred music as opposed to disliked music on pain (tolerance) thresholds and perceived pain intensity in healthy volunteers. Pain thresholds were measured via quantitative sensory testing. The volunteers were randomly assigned to either handheld pressure algometry to assess the pressure pain threshold to or electrical measurements to assess the electrical pain tolerance threshold while listening to preferred and disliked music. The pain thresholds were administered on the dorsal side of the forearm. The perceived pain intensity was assessed via a numerical rating scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). In total 415 volunteers were included in this study. The pressure pain threshold was assessed in 277 volunteers and in the electrical pain tolerance threshold test 138 volunteers were entered. In both groups, preferred music yielded higher pain thresholds than disliked music (P<0.001) and lower perceived pain intensity during the stimulus (P = 0.003). Moreover, the highest pain thresholds of both pressure pain and electrical pain tolerance thresholds were obtained when the preferred music was preceded by disliked music. Listening to preferred music when receiving noxious stimuli leads to higher pain thresholds and lower perceived pain scores in comparison with disliked music. Preferred music could be beneficial for patients with pain or undergoing painful procedures.


Asunto(s)
Música , Umbral del Dolor , Humanos , Voluntarios Sanos , Presión , Dolor
20.
J Pain ; 24(7): 1298-1306, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36878384

RESUMEN

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a recommended therapy to treat failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). A trial period is practiced to enhance patient selection. However, its fundamental evidence is limited, especially concerning long-term benefit and therapy safety. We compared the long-term (5.3 ± 4.0 years) clinical outcome and therapy safety of a trialed and nontrialed implantation strategy, including multidimensional variables and pain intensity fluctuations over time. A multicenter cohort analysis was performed in 2 comparable groups of FBSS patients. Regarding eligibility, patients had to be treated with SCS for at least 3 months. While the Trial group comprised patients who underwent an SCS implantation after a successful trial, the No-Trial group encompassed patients who underwent complete implantation within 1 session. The primary outcome measures were pain intensity scores and complications. The Trial and No-Trial groups consisted of 194 and 376 patients (N = 570), respectively. A statistically but not clinically significant difference in pain intensity (P = .003; effect = 0.506 (.172-.839)) was found in favor of the Trial group. No interaction between a time dependency effect and pain intensity was noted. Whereas trialed SCS patients were more likely to cease opioid usage (P = .003; OR = .509 (.326-.792)), patients in the No-Trial group endured fewer infections (P = .006; proportion difference = .43 (.007-.083)). Although the clinical relevance of our findings should be proven in future studies, this long-term real-world data study indicates that patient-centered assessments on whether an SCS trial should be performed have to be investigated. According to the current ambiguous evidence, SCS trials should be considered on a case-by-case basis. PERSPECTIVE: The currently available comparative evidence, together with our results, remains ambiguous on which SCS implantation strategy might be deemed superior. An SCS trial should be considered on a case-by-case basis, for which further investigation of its clinical utility in certain patient populations or character traits is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Fracaso de la Cirugía Espinal Lumbar , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Síndrome de Fracaso de la Cirugía Espinal Lumbar/terapia , Síndrome de Fracaso de la Cirugía Espinal Lumbar/complicaciones , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal/métodos , Estudios Longitudinales , Estudios de Cohortes , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Médula Espinal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA