Oncologic Safety of Close Margins in Patients With Low- to Intermediate-Grade Major Salivary Gland Carcinoma.

Importance: Postoperative radiation therapy for close surgical margins in low- to intermediate-grade salivary carcinomas lacks multi-institutional supportive evidence. Objective: To evaluate the oncologic outcomes for low- and intermediate-grade salivary carcinomas with close and positive margins. Design, Setting, and Participants: The American Head and Neck Society Salivary Gland Section conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2019 at 41 centers. Margins were classified as R0 (negative), R1 (microscopically positive), or R2 (macroscopically positive). R0 margins were subclassified into clear (>1 mm) or close (≤1 mm). Data analysis was performed from June to October 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were risk factors for local recurrence. Results: A total of 865 patients (median [IQR] age at surgery, 56 [43-66] years; 553 female individuals [64%] and 312 male individuals [36%]) were included. Of these, 801 (93%) had parotid carcinoma and 64 (7%) had submandibular gland carcinoma, and 748 (86%) had low-grade tumors and 117 (14%) had intermediate-grade tumors, with the following surgical margins: R0 in 673 (78%), R1 in 168 (19%), and R2 in 24 (3%). Close margins were found in 395 of 499 patients with R0 margins (79%), for whom margin distances were measured. A total of 305 patients (35%) underwent postoperative radiation therapy. Of all 865 patients, 35 (4%) had local recurrence with a median (IQR) follow-up of 35.3 (13.9-59.1) months. In patients with close margins as the sole risk factor for recurrence, the local recurrence rates were similar between those who underwent postoperative radiation therapy (0 of 46) or observation (4 of 165 [2%]). Patients with clear margins (n = 104) had no recurrences. The local recurrence rate in patients with R1 or R2 margins was better in those irradiated (2 of 128 [2%]) compared to observed (13 of 64 [20%]) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.24). Multivariable analysis for local recurrence found the following independent factors: age at diagnosis (HR for a 10-year increase in age, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06-1.67), R1 vs R0 (HR, 5.21; 95% CI, 2.58-10.54), lymphovascular invasion (HR, 4.47; 95% CI, 1.43-13.99), and postoperative radiation therapy (HR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.04-0.29). The 3-year local recurrence-free survivals for the study population were 96% vs 97% in the close margin group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with low- and intermediate-grade major salivary gland carcinoma, postoperative radiation therapy for positive margins was associated with decreased risk of local recurrence. In isolation from other risk factors for local recurrence, select patients with close surgical margins (≤1 mm) may safely be considered for observation.

Assessing the Impact of Changes to USMLE Step 1 Grading on Evaluation of Neurosurgery Residency Applicants in the United States: A Program Director Survey.

BACKGROUND: Neurosurgery (NS) is among the most selective specialties in the United States. As the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 transitions to a binary pass/fail score, residency programs face unclear challenges in screening and evaluating applicants. The aim of this study is to provide insights into the perceived impact of changes to the USMLE Step 1 grading in the applicant selection process. METHODS: We created a survey using questions regarding NS program demographics, the perceived predictive abilities of Step 1 and Step 2 clinical knowledge (CK), and several factors that programs consider when assessing applicants. We queried program directors (PDs), program coordinators (PCs), and assistant PDs at 117 NS residency programs. Respondents were asked to rank these factors in order of importance for selection at their respective training program. We used descriptive statistics and a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test to evaluate the effects of these changes using STATA 17. RESULTS: A total of 35 (30%) residency programs responded with 26 (74%) completing the factor ranking questions. 86% (95% confidence interval, 71.5%-94.3%) disagreed that the changes will better prepare students clinically. USMLE Step 2 CK scores, class rank, and away rotations saw significant increases in priority in the absence of a graded Step 1, whereas letters of recommendation and surrogates for research productivity saw notable, but not significant, changes after adjusting for multiple testing. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting binary Step 1 grades marks a significant shift in assessing applicants for NS residency by emphasizing Step 2 CK, class rank, and research productivity.