Factors predictive of the status of sentinel lymph nodes in melanoma patients from a large multicenter database.

BACKGROUND: Numerous predictive factors for cutaneous melanoma metastases to sentinel lymph nodes have been identified; however, few have been found to be reproducibly significant. This study investigated the significance of factors for predicting regional nodal disease in cutaneous melanoma using a large multicenter database. METHODS: Seventeen institutions submitted retrospective and prospective data on 3463 patients undergoing sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for primary melanoma. Multiple demographic and tumor factors were analyzed for correlation with a positive SLN. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 3445 analyzable patients, 561 (16.3%) had a positive SLN biopsy. In multivariate analysis of 1526 patients with complete records for 10 variables, increasing Breslow thickness, lymphovascular invasion, ulceration, younger age, the absence of regression, and tumor location on the trunk were statistically significant predictors of a positive SLN. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the predictive significance of the well-established variables of Breslow thickness, ulceration, age, and location, as well as consistently reported but less well-established variables such as lymphovascular invasion. In addition, the presence of regression was associated with a lower likelihood of a positive SLN. Consideration of multiple tumor parameters should influence the decision for SLN biopsy and the estimation of nodal metastatic disease risk.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

The timing of sentinel node biopsy in the setting of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer is controversial. Sentinel node biopsy performed after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy may save patients with a nodal response the morbidity of an axillary lymph node dissection. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data compared sentinel node biopsies performed after patients had received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy with patients who had not received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Demographic factors, tumor characteristics, and the results of the sentinel node biopsies and completion lymph node dissections (when applicable) were compared. A total of 231 axillary procedures (224 patients) were evaluated. The patients who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NEO; N=52) were younger, had higher grade tumors, were more likely to have a mastectomy, and were more likely to have ER-negative and HER-2/neu positive tumors than the patients who did not receive neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NON; N=179). The mean clinical tumor size in the neo-adjuvant group was 4.5cm (±1.8) prior to chemotherapy; the post-chemotherapy pathologic size was 1.4cm (±1.3). A sentinel node was identified in all cases. There were no significant differences between the groups in the mean number of sentinel nodes removed (NEO=3.3; NON=3.1; p=0.545), the percentage of positive axillae (NEO=24%; NON=21%; p=0.776) or the mean number of positive sentinel nodes (NEO=1.3; NON=1.5; p=0.627). There was no difference in the percentage of completion lymph node dissections with additional positive nodes (NEO=20%; NON=35%; p=0.462); there was a difference in the number of nodes removed in the completion lymph node dissections (mean NEO=12.0; NON=16.4; p=0.047). Sentinel node biopsy performed after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy appears to be an oncologically sound procedure and may save some patients the morbidity of a complete lymph node dissection.

Effect of intraoperative radiocolloid injection on sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative injection of radiocolloid before a sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is painful for patients with breast cancer. Injection after anesthesia eliminates this discomfort but allows less time for radiocolloid migration. Our goal was to validate the efficacy of intraoperative injection. METHODS: In this retrospective study of prospectively collected data, patients underwent periareolar dermal injection of technetium sulfur colloid. Patients in the preoperative injection (PO) group were injected by radiologists in the breast imaging center. Patients in the intraoperative injection (IO) group were injected by surgeons after induction of anesthesia. Consecutive cases were evaluated for radioactive "hotspots," time elapsed before incision, number of SLNs removed, number of positive SLNs, and percentage of positive biopsies. RESULTS: Two hundred fourteen breasts were evaluated (PO = 102; IO = 112). The mean time from injection to incision was significantly shorter by 107 minutes for the IO group. There were no differences in the percentage of positive biopsies (PO: 20.6%; IO: 19.6%; P = 0.863), the number of SLNs removed (PO: 3.3; IO: 3.0; P = 0.091), or the number of positive SLNs (PO: 1.4; IO: 1.4; P = 0.657). CONCLUSIONS: There are no significant differences in the principal results of SLN biopsy between PO and IO injection methods. Dermal radiocolloid injection after induction of anesthesia seems to be an oncologically sound procedure and may be a preferable technique.

Method of biopsy and incidence of positive margins in primary melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The staging of patients with primary melanoma is dependent on adequate sampling of the tumor thickness. Initial biopsies with a positive deep margin suggest inadequate sampling, potentially limiting accurate staging and affecting treatment decisions. METHODS: To determine the efficacy of shave biopsy to adequately sample the tumor, we retrospectively reviewed our pathology database for original pathology reports of primary melanomas accessioned between 01/01/04 and 6/30/05. The biopsies were evaluated by technique, the presence of tumor at the margins of the specimen, and specimen thickness. RESULTS: We identified 240 cases of primary melanoma; 223/240 were analyzable. The specimens were divided by biopsy technique (excisional, n = 51; punch, n = 44; and shave, n = 128). Shave and punch specimens had a significantly higher percentage of positive margins than excisional specimens (50, 68, and 16%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Shave specimens had a significantly higher percentage of positive deep margins than punch or excisional specimens (22, 7, and 2%, respectively; P = 0.0009). For melanomas