The Surgical Approach Impacts Component Selection in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Study of 7,460 Hips.

BACKGROUND: A higher risk of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported for the posterior approach (PA) compared to the anterior approach (AA). Dual mobility implants, larger head sizes, and elevated or face-changing liners can reduce the risk for dislocation. It remains unclear whether the component selection is influenced by the surgical approach. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 7,048 patients who underwent 7,460 primary THA with either AA or PA for primary hip osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis of the femoral head between 2019 and 2021. A propensity score model based on age, body mass index, height, and American Association of Anesthesiologists Score was applied. There were 2,502 AA-THA matched with 4,958 PA-THA (2,456 1:2, and 46 1:1). Groups were compared with multiple linear regression analyses/multivariate logistic regressions after controlling for American Association of Anesthesiologists Score and body mass index. In a second step, only hips operated by surgeons using both approaches were matched 1:1 (1,204 PA and AA, respectively). The same statistics were performed after controlling for "surgeon". RESULTS: The PA was associated with a more frequent use of dual mobility implants, elevated liners, face-changing liners, as well as heads with 36 mm or larger diameters, and the implanted cups were significantly larger (P < .001, respectively). These findings were consistent for both matched cohorts. CONCLUSION: The surgical approach impacts the component selection in THA. Patients undergoing PA-THA are more likely to receive implants with larger head size or stabilizing features compared to AA-THA.

Does radiolucency really predict loose components in revision shoulder arthroplasty?

OBJECTIVE: The number of shoulder arthroplasties is increasing along with the need for revision surgeries. Determining the stability of the implant is crucial in preoperative planning. This study aims to investigate whether radiolucent lines (RLL) in preoperative radiographs predict component loosening. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative radiographs of 93 cases in 88 patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty revision were evaluated regarding the presence of RLL. Correlation analyses were performed for radiographic findings and demographic factors (age, gender, BMI, prior surgeries) compared to intraoperative findings. RESULTS: The presence of RLL around the humeral component correlated with loosening (p < 0.001, Phi 0.511), and the distal zones 3 and 5 showed the strongest correlation (Phi 0.536). While RLL in only one zone did not predict loosening (p = 0.337), RLL present in two or more zones showed correlation with loosening (p < 0.001). Risk factors associated with loosening were a higher age at the time of revision surgery (p = 0.030) and the number of zones with RLL (p < 0.001). The glenoid component was loose in 39.0% of the cases; 5.5% of the glenoid components with RLL were stable. Nevertheless, the presence of RLL was highly associated with loosening (p < 0.001, Phi 0.603). A longer time between implantation and revision correlated with loosening of the glenoid component (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: While RLL do not predict loosening of the implant in general, occurrence in more than one zone correlates with loosening. If located in distal zones and with increasing number of zones with RLL, the correlation becomes even stronger and loosening is more likely.

Does high activity after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty increase the risk for aseptic revision?

INTRODUCTION: It has been suggested that high activity might negatively impact implant survival following total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (TKA/UKA) and many surgeons advise their patients to only participate in moderate level sport activities. To date, it remains unclear whether such restraints are necessary to assure longevity of the implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on 1906 knees (1745 TKA, 161 UKA) in 1636 patients aged 45-75 years who underwent primary arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. Lower extremity activity scale (LEAS) at a two year follow-up was assessed to define the activity level. Cases were grouped in low (LEAS ≤ 6), moderate (LEAS 7-13) and high activity (LEAS ≥ 14). Cohorts were compared with Kruskal-Wallis- or Pearson-Chi2-Test. Univariate logistic regression was conducted to test for association between activity level at two years and later revisions. Odds ratio was reported and converted to predicted probability. A Kaplan-Meier curve was plotted to predict implant survival. RESULTS: The predicted implant survival for UKA was 100.0% at two years and 98.1% at five years. The predicted implant survival for TKA was 99.8% at two years, 98.1% at five years. The difference was not significant (p = 0.410). 2.5% of the UKA underwent revision, one knee in the low and three knees in the moderate activity group, differences between the moderate and high activity group were not significant (p = 0.292). The revision rate in the high activity TKA group was lower than in the low and moderate activity groups (p = 0.008). A higher LEAS two years after surgery was associated with a lower risk for future revision (p = 0.001). A one-point increase in LEAS two years after surgery lowered the odds for undergoing revision surgery by 19%. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that participating in sports activity following both UKA and TKA is safe and not a risk factor for revision surgery at a mid-term follow-up. Patients should not be prevented from an active lifestyle following knee replacement.

Predictors for activity following total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Functional demands of patients undergoing knee arthroplasty are increasing. However, it remains unclear which patient-specific factors have an impact on postoperative activity and whether there is a difference between total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (TKA/UKA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 1907 knees with TKA (n = 1746) or UKA (n = 161), implanted for primary osteoarthritis. Pain and activity (lower extremity activity scale, LEAS) were assessed 2 years after surgery. High activity was defined as LEAS ≥ 14. Cohorts were compared using Kruskal-Wallis or Pearson-Chi-square test. A generalized least squares model was used to predict LEAS scores between cohorts adjusted for age, sex, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, ASA score, and preoperative LEAS. RESULT: There was no difference in pain 2 years after surgery between UKA and TKA (p = 0.952). Preoperative LEAS was similar for UKA and TKA (p = 0.994), and both groups showed significant (p < 0.001 respectively) and similar improvements after surgery (p = 0.068). LEAS 2 years after surgery was 11.1 (SD 3.2) for TKA and 11.9 (SD 3.5) for the UKA group (p = 0.004). After adjusting for preoperative LEAS, age, sex, BMI, CCI and ASA, the difference was not significant (p = 0.225). Male sex, lower BMI, higher preoperative LEAS, and younger age were associated with higher postoperative LEAS (p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients can achieve a high level of activity following both TKA and UKA. While the postoperative activity level did not depend on the type of the procedure, younger age, male sex, lower BMI, and a higher preoperative activity level were associated with a higher postoperative activity level.

Individual Phenotype Does Not Impact the Outcome of Mechanical Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasties for Valgus Osteoarthritis.

Background and Objectives: There is an ongoing discussion about the best alignment targets in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mechanical alignment has been the standard in TKA for years. Alongside the development of various classification systems to describe the native alignment of the knee (knee phenotype), kinematic alignment restoring the individual phenotype of the knee has been advocated more recently. Alignment in TKA becomes even more challenging in knees with preoperative deformities such as valgus osteoarthritis. Materials and Methods: The study retrospectively evaluated 158 knees in 135 patients who underwent TKA with a mechanical alignment target for valgus osteoarthritis. Pre- and postoperative hip knee angle, lateral distal femur angle, and medial proximal tibial angle/tibial plate angle (pre-/postoperative) were measured on standing hip-to-ankle radiographs. Knees were grouped according to the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion and patient-related outcome measures (WOMAC, UCLA, SF-12, pain) were assessed. Results: There was no difference in outcome for mechanically aligned TKA between the different CPAK phenotypes, suggesting that mechanical alignment is an appropriate target for the different phenotypes analyzed in the study. Remaining valgus alignment was associated with decreased postoperative UCLA scores and decreased improvement in SF-12 scores (p = 0.011/p = 0.028). Within CPAK III, mechanical aligned TKA showed better postoperative UCLA Scores than TKA with valgus alignment (p = 0.015). The individual knee phenotype in patients with valgus osteoarthritis did not influence the outcome of mechanical aligned TKA operated with standardized soft-tissue release.