A 2-Year Observational Study in Patients Suffering from Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis and Treated with Pirfenidone: A French Ancillary Study of PASSPORT.

BACKGROUND: The European observational, prospective PASSPORT study evaluated the long-term safety of pirfenidone under real-world conditions in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), over up to 2 years following its initiation. OBJECTIVES: The FAS (French Ancillary Study) assessed the clinical outcomes of IPF patients participating in PASSPORT (n = 192). METHODS: Efficacy data were collected retrospectively and prospectively. The primary efficacy endpoints were: change in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and change in the distance travelled during the 6-min walk test (6MWD). RESULTS: The mean baseline FVC was 71.7% of predicted value. The mean absolute change in the percentage of predicted FVC was -2.4% and -3.8% at months 12 and 24. The mean change in 6MWD was 8.6 and 3.1 m at months 12 and 24, with a range of 23.4-51.7 m. Acute IPF exacerbation and pulmonary hypertension occurred in 20.0 and 8.4% of patients, respectively. The most common reasons for prematurely discontinuing PASSPORT were adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to pirfenidone (31.3%), death (11.5%), and disease progression (10.9%). The median progression-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI 12.9, not estimable). The median exposure was 16.3 months (0.5-28.5). The most frequently reported ADRs leading to pirfenidone discontinuation were decreased weight (4.2%), rash (4.2%), and photosensitivity reactions (3.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy data of FAS are consistent with the efficacy results of published phase III clinical trials in IPF. Approximately one third of IPF patients treated with pirfenidone in real-life settings were still under treatment 2 years after initiation. Safety data are consistent with the known safety profile of pirfenidone.

Comparison of antidepressant classes and the risk and time course of suicide attempts in adults: propensity matched, retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Placebo-controlled clinical trials have led to concern over possible increased risk of suicide-related events in some populations exposed to antidepressants. AIMS: To evaluate the risk of suicide attempts by antidepressant drug class and the presence or absence of depression. METHOD: A retrospective propensity-matched new-user cohort study was used to compare participants with incident depression classified by antidepressant treatment with each other and with the general population. RESULTS: Among the treated group, the suicide attempt rate peaked in the month prior to diagnosis then decreased steadily over the next 6 months. Among the pharmacologically untreated group, the highest rate was seen in the second month after diagnosis. Cohorts with depression had significantly higher suicide attempt risk than the general population, but the treated group did not differ significantly from the untreated group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients on antidepressants did not have significantly higher risk compared with untreated patients. No significant differences were observed for patients treated with individual serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or by class (SSRI v. SNRI cohorts).

Treatment with duloxetine in adults and the incidence of cardiovascular events.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular events are inconclusively associated with duloxetine use in clinical trials and spontaneous reports. This analysis of cardiovascular events in relation to duloxetine use within a large health insurance database provides further data on the association. METHODS: This cohort study was conducted within a population with commercial health insurance. Adults with depression who initiated duloxetine were matched to separate cohorts of initiators of venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), along with untreated patients with depression, and enrollees without depression. The cohorts were followed for cardiovascular events (acute myocardial infarction, sudden death, hypertensive crisis, arrhythmia, and coronary revascularization), which were identified through health insurance claims and confirmed upon review of underlying medical records. Proportional hazards and Poisson regression models were used for comparisons. RESULTS: There were approximately 64,000 person-years of follow-up among all cohorts (including 17,386 person-years among 21,457 duloxetine initiators), yielding 279 cardiovascular events. Relative to duloxetine initiators, those without depression had lower rates of combined events (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.81) and coronary revascularizations (IRR, 0.51; 95% CI 0.29-0.89). The IR of each of the cardiovascular outcomes did not differ across the other cohorts, even accounting for time since last duloxetine dispensing. CONCLUSION: The incidence of cardiovascular events did not differ among duloxetine initiators relative to other antidepressant comparators or those with untreated depression but was higher than those without depression, suggesting that depression itself (or associated morbidities) may affect the risk of cardiovascular events.

Duloxetine for depression and the incidence of hepatic events in adults.

Elevated hepatic enzyme levels and hepatic injuries have been associated with duloxetine use in clinical trials and spontaneous reports, but the association of duloxetine with a broad spectrum of hepatic outcomes has not been assessed observationally. This cohort study of adult duloxetine initiators between 2004 and 2006 based on the Ingenix Research Data Mart involved 6 matched comparator cohorts, including 4 antidepressant initiator groups (venlafaxine, nefazodone, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and tricyclic antidepressants), depressed but untreated patients, and individuals without depression. The cohorts were followed up for hepatic events, and proportional hazards regression compared duloxetine initiators with comparator cohorts, whereas Poisson regression compared duloxetine usage categories to account for changed therapy during follow-up. Approximately 64,000 person-years among 21,457 duloxetine initiators and comparator cohorts yielded 51 hepatic outcome events. Venlafaxine initiators (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.95) and the cohort without depression (IRR = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.10-0.93) had lower incidences of combined hepatic events than duloxetine initiators, whereas no other differences in hepatic events were observed for duloxetine initiators relative to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, and untreated depressed patients. In as-treated analyses, relative to nonuse, current (IRR = 4.30; 95% CI, 1.45-12.81) and recent (IRR = 5.93; 95% CI, 1.63-21.55) duloxetine use was associated with greater incidence of less severe hepatic outcomes but not hepatic-related death and potential acute hepatic failure. Although duloxetine does not seem to increase the risk of hepatic-related death or acute hepatic failure, it may be associated with an increased risk of certain less severe hepatic events.

Long-term safety of pirfenidone: results of the prospective, observational PASSPORT study.

Real-world studies include a broader patient population for a longer duration than randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and can provide relevant insights for clinical practice. PASSPORT was a multicentre, prospective, post-authorisation study of patients who were newly prescribed pirfenidone and followed for 2 years after initiating treatment. Physicians collected data on adverse drug reactions (ADRs), serious ADRs (SADRs) and ADRs of special interest (ADRSI) at baseline and then every 3 months. Post hoc stepwise logistic regression models were used to identify baseline characteristics associated with discontinuing treatment due to an ADR. Patients (n=1009, 99.7% with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis) had a median pirfenidone exposure of 442.0 days. Overall, 741 (73.4%) patients experienced ADRs, most commonly nausea (20.6%) and fatigue (18.5%). ADRs led to treatment discontinuation in 290 (28.7%) patients after a median of 99.5 days. Overall, 55 (5.5%) patients experienced SADRs, with a fatal outcome in six patients. ADRSI were reported in 693 patients, most commonly gastrointestinal symptoms (38.3%) and photosensitivity reactions/skin rashes (29.0%). Older age and female sex were associated with early treatment discontinuation due to an ADR. Findings were consistent with the known safety profile of pirfenidone, based on RCT data and other post-marketing experience, with no new safety signals observed.

An Open-Label, Phase II Study of the Safety of Pirfenidone in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (PIPF-002).

INTRODUCTION: PIPF-002 was a phase 2, multicenter, open-label study of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or other types of pulmonary fibrosis (PF). PIPF-002 terminated after pirfenidone became commercially available in the United States. The goal of PIPF-002 was to characterize the long-term safety of pirfenidone in these patients. METHODS: Between August 2003 and September 2006, 83 patients (IPF: 81, PF: 2) enrolled. Patients received pirfenidone in three divided doses daily, with the maintenance dose and schedule determined by enrollment group assignment. Treatment continued until patient withdrawal or study termination (2015). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: At baseline, median age was 70 years, mean percent predicted forced vital capacity was 67.7%, 33.7% of patients had cardiac disorders, 51.8% had gastroesophageal reflux disease, and 63.9% were receiving concomitant prednisone. Median pirfenidone dose and exposure duration were 2400 mg/day and 3.0 years, respectively. Cumulative total exposure was 279.7 patient-exposure years (PEY). Most patients (98.8%) reported ≥ 1 TEAE, with an overall incidence rate of 460.5 per 100 PEY. The most frequent TEAEs (incidence rate per 100 PEY) were nausea (23.6), IPF progression (16.1), fatigue (11.8), dyspnea (11.4), upper respiratory tract infection (11.4), and cough (10.7). Serious TEAEs were reported in 49 patients; the most frequent serious TEAEs were IPF progression and pneumonia. The most common reason for discontinuation was TEAEs (35 patients; 12.5 patients per 100 PEY), most frequently IPF progression and nausea. Overall, 21 patients died (7.5 per 100 PEY); 16 deaths were IPF-related. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term safety and tolerability of pirfenidone findings in this study were consistent with the known safety profile of pirfenidone; no new safety signals were identified. These data support the continued use of pirfenidone in patients with IPF. FUNDING: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd./Genentech, Inc. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT00080223. Plain language summary available for this article.

Ecological studies of antidepressant treatment and suicidal risks.

Ongoing discussion of potential benefits and risks of antidepressant treatment with respect to suicidal behaviors includes many ecological, or population-based, correlational studies of temporal or regional trends in suicide rates and rates of usage of modern antidepressants including serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SRIs). Since this body of research has not been compiled and evaluated, we used computerized literature searching to identify 19 relevant published studies. They yielded heterogeneous findings: only 8/19 found significant inverse correlations between rising sales of modern antidepressants in the 1990 s and falling suicide rates not anticipated in the 1980s. Average reductions in suicide rates in the 1990 s (10.7%) and 1980s (10.0%) differed little in 11 studies with data from both eras. Reduction of suicide rates in the 1990 s was unrelated to geographic region, population size, units of analysis, publication year, or growth in antidepressant usage, but was greater with higher initial suicide rates, in men, and in older persons. In the same decade, suicides rates decreased in only half of 79 large countries. Overall, these findings yield limited and inconsistent support for the hypothesis that increased use of modern antidepressants might limit suicide risk, and no evidence that the risk increased. Suicidal risk is determined by complex factors, including access to clinical services, in general, and more comprehensive treatment of depression, in particular. Overall, as with findings from randomized trials and cohort or case-control studies, evidence of specific antisuicidal effects of antidepressant treatment from ecological analyses remains elusive.

Hepatic effects of duloxetine-II: spontaneous reports and epidemiology of hepatic events.

OBJECTIVE: Review spontaneous reports and epidemiology of hepatic events associated with duloxetine. METHODS: Spontaneous reports of adverse events potentially associated with hepatic injury were identified. Classification schemes were Clinical Significance and Etiologic Category relative to likelihood of being related to duloxetine. RESULTS: Duloxetine has been taken by an estimated 5,083,000 patients, representing approximately 1,551,000 person-years (PY) of worldwide exposure. In the Etiologic categorization of the 406 cases containing event terms potentially related to the liver that have been reported to the manufacturer, 26 were deemed Probable and 127 Possible. Because of scantly-reported information, 182 cases were considered Indeterminate. For Severe Hepatic Injury, the observed spontaneous reporting rate was 0.7/100,000 persons exposed. Of the 406 cases, 225 experienced enzyme elevations to values <500 U/L, most with concentrations well below this level. The calculated cumulative spontaneous reporting rate of all duloxetine hepatic-related events combined was 0.00799%, in the context of other drug-induced hepatic injury rates reported in the literature of 0.7 to 40.6 per 100,000 PY of observation. CONCLUSIONS: There were few cases of true hepatic injury possibly or probably related to duloxetine. The calculated cumulative reporting rate is consistent with very rarely reported per the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.

Hepatic effects of duloxetine-III: analysis of hepatic events using external data sources.

OBJECTIVE: Present results from two hepatic safety studies conducted within 20 months after duloxetine launch. METHODS: Signal detection based on spontaneous reports to the FDA adverse event reporting system (AERS) and on a comparison of duloxetine and venlafaxine in the i3 Drug Safety Aperio claims database, using measures of disproportionality and incidence rate ratio, respectively. RESULTS: In AERS all antidepressants had some degree of association with hepatic injury, in that at least one hepatic event was disproportionately represented for each drug. Signals were detected for duloxetine cases analyzed against full and antidepressant-only backgrounds. These signals corresponded to labeled events or events investigated during ongoing surveillance. Using a duloxetine fatal-case series, disproportional representation of clinically serious events was detected relative to both backgrounds, but the signals were refuted upon independent expert panel case review. The Aperio study showed no difference in hepatic injury between duloxetine and venlafaxine initiators after proper control for baseline risks, suggesting differential prescribing of duloxetine, perhaps preferentially as second-line therapy in some initiators. CONCLUSIONS: No new signals were identified in Aperio. New signals detected through AERS were refuted upon independently conducted case-level investigation. Hepatic signals arising from spontaneously reported data must be clarified through subsequent systematic investigation.

Answers to the most common questions about the hepatic safety profile of duloxetine.

Since its first FDA approval in 2004, duloxetine has been taken by more than 5 million patients. A small fraction of patients treated with duloxetine develop elevations in liver enzymes, which generally resolve spontaneously without any change in treatment. Very rare cases (estimated 1-2 per 100,000 exposures) of idiosyncratic hepatic toxicity have been reported in patients taking duloxetine, particularly in those with substantial alcohol use and/or preexisting liver disease. In the context of more than 23,000 patients exposed during clinical trials, and more than 1.5 million patient years of exposure subsequent to product launch, the hepatic risk after exposure to duloxetine appears to be within the range identified for other therapeutic agents. Therefore, it does not warrant hepatic enzyme monitoring. As with any medication, physicians should follow prescribing guidelines and educate patients on the risks and benefits of duloxetine.

Socioeconomic risk factors for breast cancer: distinguishing individual- and community-level effects.

BACKGROUND: Women are at higher risk of breast cancer if they have higher socioeconomic status (SES) or live in higher SES or urban communities. We examined whether women living in such communities remained at greater risk of breast cancer after controlling for individual education and other known individual-level risk factors. METHODS: Data were from a population-based, breast cancer case-control study conducted in Wisconsin from 1988 to 1995 (n = 14,667). Data on community SES and urbanicity come from the 1990 census, measured at the census tract and zip code levels. We evaluated relationships between individual- and community-level variables and breast cancer risk using multilevel logistic regression models with random community intercepts. RESULTS: After controlling for individual education and other individual-level risk factors (age, mammography use, family history of breast cancer, parity, age at first birth, alcohol intake, body mass index, hormone replacement use, oral contraceptive use, and menopausal status), women living in the highest SES communities had greater odds of having breast cancer than women living in the lowest SES communities (1.20; 95% confidence interval = 1.05-1.37). Similarly, the odds were greater for women in urban versus rural communities (1.17; 1.06-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: Community SES and urbanicity are apparently not simply proxies for individual SES. Future research should examine why living in such communities itself is associated with greater risk of breast cancer.