Denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in patients with solid tumors and renal dysfunction: a multicenter, retrospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases are frequently observed in advanced cancer, and bone modifying agents are used to prevent or treat skeletal-related events. Zoledronic acid is contraindicated in patients with severe renal impairment (Ccr < 30 mL/min), but it is not completely known whether denosumab can be used in them. We aimed to determine the association between renal function and hypocalcemia development during denosumab treatment. METHODS: We included patients with solid cancer and bone metastases who started denosumab treatment between April 2017 and March 2019. They were classified into four groups based on creatinine clearance (Ccr; mL/min): normal (Ccr ≥ 80), mild (50 ≤ Ccr ˂80), moderate (30 ≤ Ccr ˂50), and severe (Ccr ˂30). Hypocalcemia was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (v5.0) based on the albumin-adjusted serum calcium levels; its incidence (stratified by renal function) and risk factors were investigated using a Chi-square test and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 524 patients (age: 69 ± 11 years; 303 men), 153 had a normal renal function and 222, 117, and 32 had mild, moderate, and severe renal dysfunction. The albumin-adjusted serum calcium level was higher than the measured (total) calcium level in most patients. The incidence of grade ≥ 1 hypocalcemia was 32.0% in the normal group and 37.4%, 29.9%, and 62.5% in the mild, moderate, and severe renal dysfunction groups, respectively. It was, therefore, higher in the severe renal dysfunction groups than in the normal group (P = 0.002). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 hypocalcemia did not differ significantly among the groups. Pre-treatment low serum calcium levels and severe renal dysfunction were risk factors for hypocalcemia. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating denosumab-induced hypocalcemia required albumin adjustment, and its incidence was high among patients with severe renal dysfunction. Reduced serum calcium levels and severely impaired renal function were associated with an elevated hypocalcemia risk.

Retrospective multicentre study on the effectiveness of first-line direct-acting antivirals against hepatitis C virus genotype-1.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: In Japan, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, elbasvir/grazoprevir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir are recommended as first-line treatments for patients with untreated hepatitis C virus genotype 1. Although they have demonstrated a high efficacy in clinical trials, there are no direct comparative studies. Clarification of their effectiveness and safety in real-world clinical practice is required. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective multicentre study on the effectiveness of these direct-acting antivirals in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical data of untreated patients with persistent HCV genotype 1 infection who started first-line treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, elbasvir/grazoprevir or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir between September 2015 and January 2019 at 11 medical institutions in Japan. The primary efficacy endpoint was a sustained virologic response after 12 weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoints included sustained virologic response after 24 weeks of treatment and end of treatment response. The safety endpoint was treatment completion rate. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: During the study, 420 patients (median age, 70 years; 181 males) received ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, 48 (median age 72, years; 29 males) received elbasvir/grazoprevir and 63 (median age 66, years; 35 males) received glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. For ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, elbasvir/grazoprevir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, the sustained virologic response after 12 weeks of treatment was 98.6%, 97.9% and 100%; the sustained virologic response after 24 weeks of treatment was 99.0%, 97.7% and 100%; the end of treatment response was 99.8%, 97.9% and 98.4%; and the treatment completion rate was 98.3%, 91.7% and 100% respectively. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: In real-world clinical practice, hepatitis C virus treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, elbasvir/grazoprevir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir was effective with safety.