CCS/CHFS Heart Failure Guidelines Update: Defining a New Pharmacologic Standard of Care for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

In this update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society heart failure (HF) guidelines, we provide comprehensive recommendations and practical tips for the pharmacologic management of patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Since the 2017 comprehensive update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines for the management of HF, substantial new evidence has emerged that has informed the care of these patients. In particular, we focus on the role of novel pharmacologic therapies for HFrEF including angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, sinus node inhibitors, sodium glucose transport 2 inhibitors, and soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators in conjunction with other long established HFrEF therapies. Updated recommendations are also provided in the context of the clinical setting for which each of these agents might be prescribed; the potential value of each therapy is reviewed, where relevant, for chronic HF, new onset HF, and for HF hospitalization. We define a new standard of pharmacologic care for HFrEF that incorporates 4 key therapeutic drug classes as standard therapy for most patients: an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (as first-line therapy or after angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker titration); a ß-blocker; a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; and a sodium glucose transport 2 inhibitor. Additionally, many patients with HFrEF will have clinical characteristics for which we recommended other key therapies to improve HF outcomes, including sinus node inhibitors, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, hydralazine/nitrates in combination, and/or digoxin. Finally, an approach to management that integrates prioritized pharmacologic with nonpharmacologic and invasive therapies after a diagnosis of HFrEF is highlighted.

Oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy and peripheral arterial disease.

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease is associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death from cardiovascular causes. Antiplatelet drugs reduce this risk, but the role of oral anticoagulant agents in the prevention of cardiovascular complications in patients with peripheral arterial disease is unclear. METHODS: We assigned patients with peripheral arterial disease to combination therapy with an antiplatelet agent and an oral anticoagulant agent (target international normalized ratio [INR], 2.0 to 3.0) or to antiplatelet therapy alone. The first coprimary outcome was myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes; the second coprimary outcome was myocardial infarction, stroke, severe ischemia of the peripheral or coronary arteries leading to urgent intervention, or death from cardiovascular causes. RESULTS: A total of 2161 patients were randomly assigned to therapy. The mean follow-up time was 35 months. Myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 132 of 1080 patients receiving combination therapy (12.2%) and in 144 of 1081 patients receiving antiplatelet therapy alone (13.3%) (relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.16; P=0.48). Myocardial infarction, stroke, severe ischemia, or death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 172 patients receiving combination therapy (15.9%) as compared with 188 patients receiving antiplatelet therapy alone (17.4%) (relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.12; P=0.37). Life-threatening bleeding occurred in 43 patients receiving combination therapy (4.0%) as compared with 13 patients receiving antiplatelet therapy alone (1.2%) (relative risk, 3.41; 95% CI, 1.84 to 6.35; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with peripheral arterial disease, the combination of an oral anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy was not more effective than antiplatelet therapy alone in preventing major cardiovascular complications and was associated with an increase in life-threatening bleeding. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00125671 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

The Status of Specialized Ambulatory Heart Failure Care in Canada: A Joint Canadian Heart Failure Society and Canadian Cardiovascular Society Heart Failure Guidelines Survey.

This joint Canadian Heart Failure Society and the CCS Heart Failure guidelines report has been developed to provide a pan-Canadian snapshot of the current state of clinic-based ambulatory heart failure (HF) care in Canada with specific reference to elements and processes of care associated with quality and high performing health systems. It includes the viewpoints of persons with lived experience, patient care providers, and administrators. It is imperative to build on the themes identified in this survey, through engaging all health care professionals, to develop integrated and shared care models that will allow better patient outcomes. Several patient and organizational barriers to care were identified in this survey, which must inform the development of regional care models and pragmatic solutions to improve transitions for this patient population. Unfortunately, we were unsuccessful in incorporating the perspectives of primary care providers and internal medicine specialists who provide the majority of HF care in Canada, which in turn limits our ability to comment on strategies for capacity building outside the HF clinic setting. These considerations must be taken into account when interpreting our findings. Engaging all HF care providers, to build on the themes identified in this survey, will be an important next step in developing integrated and shared care models known to improve patient outcomes.

Ce rapport conjoint des lignes directrices de la Société canadienne d'insuffisance cardiaque et de la Société canadienne de cardiologie (SCC) sur l'insuffisance cardiaque a été élaboré pour fournir un aperçu pancanadien de l'état actuel des soins ambulatoires de l'insuffisance cardiaque (IC) en clinique au Canada, en se référant spécifiquement aux éléments et aux processus de soins associés à des systèmes de santé très performants et de qualité. Il comprend les points de vue de personnes ayant une expérience vécue de l'IC, de prestataires de soins aux patients et d'administrateurs. Il est impératif de s'appuyer sur les thématiques identifiées dans cette enquête, en y engageant tous les professionnels de la santé, pour développer des modèles de soins intégrés et partagés qui permettront de meilleurs pronostics pour les patients. Plusieurs obstacles relatifs aux patients et organisationnels dont il faudra se soucier ont été identifiés dans cette enquête, qui doit servir de base à l'élaboration de modèles de soins régionaux et de solutions pragmatiques pour améliorer les transitions pour cette population de patients. Malheureusement, nous n'avons pas réussi à intégrer les points de vue des prestataires de soins primaires et des spécialistes en médecine interne qui fournissent la majorité des soins en IC au Canada, ce qui limite notre capacité à commenter les stratégies de renforcement des capacités en dehors du cadre des cliniques d'IC. Ces considérations doivent être prises en compte lors de l'interprétation de nos conclusions. L'engagement de tous les prestataires de soins de santé en IC à s'appuyer sur les thématiques identifiées dans cette enquête constituera une prochaine étape importante dans le développement de modèles de soins intégrés et partagés connus pour améliorer le pronostic des patients.

CCS/CHFS Heart Failure Guidelines: Clinical Trial Update on Functional Mitral Regurgitation, SGLT2 Inhibitors, ARNI in HFpEF, and Tafamidis in Amyloidosis.

In this update, we focus on selected topics of high clinical relevance for health care providers who treat patients with heart failure (HF), on the basis of clinical trials published after 2017. Our objective was to review the evidence, and provide recommendations and practical tips regarding the management of candidates for the following HF therapies: (1) transcatheter mitral valve repair in HF with reduced ejection fraction; (2) a novel treatment for transthyretin amyloidosis or transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis; (3) angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition in patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); and (4) sodium glucose cotransport inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of HF in patients with and without type 2 diabetes. We emphasize the roles of optimal guideline-directed medical therapy and of multidisciplinary teams when considering transcatheter mitral valve repair, to ensure excellent evaluation and care of those patients. In the presence of suggestive clinical indices, health care providers should consider the possibility of cardiac amyloidosis and proceed with proper investigation. Tafamidis is the first agent shown in a prospective study to alter outcomes in patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis. Patient subgroups with HFpEF might benefit from use of sacubitril/valsartan, however, further data are needed to clarify the effect of this therapy in patients with HFpEF. Sodium glucose cotransport inhibitors reduce the risk of incident HF, HF-related hospitalizations, and cardiovascular death in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. A large clinical trial recently showed that dapagliflozin provides significant outcome benefits in well treated patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%), with or without type 2 diabetes.

Successful management of left ventricular free wall rupture.

Cardiac rupture is a complication of myocardial infarction with an exceedingly high mortality rate. Imaging modalities, such as echocardiography, have facilitated premortem diagnosis, thus increasing chances of survival. A review of pertinent literature is accompanied by a case report that details an episode of left ventricular free wall rupture and its successful outcome.

2017 Comprehensive Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure.

Since the inception of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society heart failure (HF) guidelines in 2006, much has changed in the care for patients with HF. Over the past decade, the HF Guidelines Committee has published regular updates. However, because of the major changes that have occurred, the Guidelines Committee believes that a comprehensive reassessment of the HF management recommendations is presently needed, with a view to producing a full and complete set of updated guidelines. The primary and secondary Canadian Cardiovascular Society HF panel members as well as external experts have reviewed clinically relevant literature to provide guidance for the practicing clinician. The 2017 HF guidelines provide updated guidance on the diagnosis and management (self-care, pharmacologic, nonpharmacologic, device, and referral) that should aid in day-to-day decisions for caring for patients with HF. Among specific issues covered are risk scores, the differences in management for HF with preserved vs reduced ejection fraction, exercise and rehabilitation, implantable devices, revascularization, right ventricular dysfunction, anemia, and iron deficiency, cardiorenal syndrome, sleep apnea, cardiomyopathies, HF in pregnancy, cardio-oncology, and myocarditis. We devoted attention to strategies and treatments to prevent HF, to the organization of HF care, comorbidity management, as well as practical issues around the timing of referral and follow-up care. Recognition and treatment of advanced HF is another important aspect of this update, including how to select advanced therapies as well as end of life considerations. Finally, we acknowledge the remaining gaps in evidence that need to be filled by future research.

Prognostic use of echocardiography 1 year after a myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) function are known predictors of morbidity and mortality after an acute myocardial infarction (MI). However, the prognostic use of a late evaluation of cardiac function after an MI remains unclear. METHODS: We analyzed echocardiograms obtained 1 year after MI in patients with LV dysfunction at baseline (ejection fraction [EF] < or = 40%) from 291 patients enrolled in the SAVE echocardiographic substudy who did not develop heart failure (HF) or a recurrent MI during this first year. Left ventricular EF and RV fractional area change were assessed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 22 months after the 1-year echocardiogram, a low LVEF (< 30%) at 1 year was associated with an increased risk of death and/or HF (hazards ratio [HR] 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.3). Presence of RV dysfunction was also associated with an increased risk of death (HR 8.9, 95% CI 3.5-22.1), development of HF (HR 7.1, 95% CI 3.4-15.0), and the composite end point of death or HF (HR 7.6, 95% CI 4.1-14.2). In multivariate analyses, both low LVEF and RV dysfunction remained independently predictive of the composite end point of death or HF. Patients with biventricular dysfunction were at the greatest risk of death and/or HF (HR 19.4, 95% CI 8.2-46.0) in follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In a stable population of survivors of MI, impaired LV and RV function at 1 year after MI are independently and additively predictive of increased risk of HF or death.

The 2014 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Heart Failure Management Guidelines Focus Update: anemia, biomarkers, and recent therapeutic trial implications.

The 2014 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Heart Failure Management Guidelines Update provides discussion on the management recommendations on 3 focused areas: (1) anemia; (2) biomarkers, especially natriuretic peptides; and (3) clinical trials that might change practice in the management of patients with heart failure. First, all patients with heart failure and anemia should be investigated for reversible causes of anemia. Second, patients with chronic stable heart failure should undergo natriuretic peptide testing. Third, considerations should be given to treat selected patients with heart failure and preserved systolic function with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist and to treat patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction with an angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor, when the drug is approved. As with updates in previous years, the topics were chosen in response to stakeholder feedback. The 2014 Update includes recommendations, values and preferences, and practical tips to assist the clinicians and health care workers to best manage patients with heart failure.

Antecedent hypertension and the effect of captopril on the risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes after acute myocardial infarction with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: Insights from the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Trial.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a well-established risk factor for myocardial infarction (MI), but its prognostic importance in survivors of an acute MI is less clear. METHODS: We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine the risk of any major cardiovascular event (cardiovascular death, heart failure, recurrent MI, or stroke)-combined or individual components-and all-cause death and evaluate the efficacy of captopril in 906 patients with hypertension and 1325 patients without hypertension in the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) clinical trial. All patients had survived an acute MI with resultant left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, but without overt heart failure, and were randomized within 3 to 16 days after the index MI to receive either captopril or placebo. The mean (+/- SD) follow-up period was 42 +/- 10 months. RESULTS: After adjustment for known risk factors, medication use at enrollment, and baseline systolic blood pressure, patients with hypertension had a significant increase in the risk of experiencing a combined cardiovascular event (47.7% vs 31.3%; hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.28-1.74), cardiovascular death (23.4% vs 15.9%; HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.12-1.74), heart failure (27.7% vs 15.5%; HR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.34-2.02), and all-cause death (27.4 vs 19.3%; HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02-1.53), and a similar but statistically non-significant increase in the risk of non-fatal or fatal recurrent MI (17.4% vs 10.9%; HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.98-1.65), and non-fatal or fatal stroke (5.0% vs 3.6%; HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 0.81-2.09). Captopril resulted in similar benefits for both patients with and patients without hypertension. The number of combined cardiovascular events prevented for every 100 patients treated with captopril was 7.0 (95% CI, 0.5-13.5) in patients with hypertension and 7.5 (95% CI, 2.6-12.5) in patients without hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: In survivors of an acute MI with LV systolic dysfunction, antecedent hypertension was associated with a greater risk of subsequent adverse cardiovascular events, not directly explained by elevated blood pressure levels. Captopril use was beneficial in both patients with and patients without hypertension.

The 2013 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Heart Failure Management Guidelines Update: focus on rehabilitation and exercise and surgical coronary revascularization.

The 2013 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Heart Failure Management Guidelines Update provides focused discussions on the management recommendations on 2 topics: (1) exercise and rehabilitation; and (2) surgical coronary revascularization in patients with heart failure. First, all patients with stable New York Heart Association class I-III symptoms should be considered for enrollment in a tailored exercise training program, to improve exercise tolerance and quality of life. Second, selected patients with suitable coronary anatomy should be considered for bypass graft surgery. As in previous updates, the topics were chosen in response to stakeholder feedback. The 2013 Update also includes recommendations, values and preferences, and practical tips to assist the clinicians and health care workers manage their patients with heart failure.

The 2012 Canadian Cardiovascular Society heart failure management guidelines update: focus on acute and chronic heart failure.

The 2012 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Heart Failure (HF) Guidelines Update provides management recommendations for acute and chronic HF. In 2006, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society HF Guidelines committee first published an overview of HF management. Since then, significant additions to and changes in many of these recommendations have become apparent. With this in mind and in response to stakeholder feedback, the Guidelines Committee in 2012 has updated the overview of both acute and chronic heart failure diagnosis and management. The 2012 Update also includes recommendations, values and preferences, and practical tips to assist the medical practitioner manage their patients with HF.

The 2011 Canadian Cardiovascular Society heart failure management guidelines update: focus on sleep apnea, renal dysfunction, mechanical circulatory support, and palliative care.

The 2011 Canadian Cardiovascular Society Heart Failure (HF) Guidelines Focused Update reviews the recently published clinical trials that will potentially impact on management. Also reviewed is the less studied but clinically important area of sleep apnea. Finally, patients with advanced HF represent a group of patients who pose major difficulties to clinicians. Advanced HF therefore is examined from the perspectives of HF complicated by renal failure, the role of palliative care, and the role of mechanical circulatory support (MCS). All of these topics are reviewed from a perspective of practical applications. Important new studies have demonstrated in less symptomatic HF patients that cardiac resynchronization therapy will be of benefit. As well, aldosterone receptor antagonists can be used with benefit in less symptomatic HF patients. The important role of palliative care and the need to address end-of-life issues in advanced HF are emphasized. Physicians need to be aware of the possibility of sleep apnea complicating the course of HF and the role of a sleep study for the proper assessment and management of the conditon. Patients with either acute severe or chronic advanced HF with otherwise good life expectancy should be referred to a cardiac centre capable of providing MCS. Furthermore, patients awaiting heart transplantation who deteriorate or are otherwise not likely to survive until a donor organ is found should be referred for MCS.