Long-term outcomes of additional surgery after endoscopic resection versus primary surgery for T1 colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: There is considerable concern about whether endoscopic resection (ER) prior to additional surgery (AS) for T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) has oncologically potential adverse effects. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes, including overall survival (OS), of patients treated with AS after ER versus primary surgery (PS) for T1 CRC using a propensity score-matched analysis from a large observational study. METHODS: This study investigated 6105 patients with T1 CRC treated with either ER or surgical resection between 2009 and 2016 at 27 high-volume Japanese institutions, with those undergoing surgery alone included in the PS group and those undergoing AS after ER included in the AS group. Propensity score matching was used for long-term outcomes of mortality and recurrence analysis. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 1219 of 2438 patients were identified in each group. The 5-year OS rates in the AS and PS groups were 97.1% and 96.0%, respectively (hazard ratio: 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-1.08), indicating the non-inferiority of the AS group. Moreover, 32 patients (2.6%) in the AS group and 24 (2.0%) in the PS group had recurrences, with no significant difference between the two groups (odds ratio: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.76-2.40, p = 0.344). DISCUSSION: ER prior to AS for T1 CRC had no adverse effect on patients' long-term outcomes, including the 5-year OS rate. ER is a viable first-line treatment option for endoscopically resectable T1 CRC.

Clinical features and images of malignant lymphoma localized in the pancreatic head to differentiate from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a case series study.

BACKGROUND: Pathological examination by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been reported to be useful in diagnosing pancreatic malignant lymphoma (ML), but some ML cases are difficult to be differentiated from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: This retrospective study included 8 patients diagnosed with ML that had a pancreatic-head lesion at initial diagnosis and 46 patients with resected PDAC in the pancreatic head between April 2006 and October 2021 at our institute. ML and PDAC were compared in terms of patients' clinical features and imaging examinations. RESULTS: The median tumor size was larger in ML than in PDAC (45.8 [24-64] vs. 23.9 [8-44] mm), but the median diameter of the caudal main pancreatic duct (MPD) was larger in PDAC (2.5 [1.0-3.5] vs. 7.1 [2.5-11.8] mm), both showing significant differences between these malignancies (both, P < 0.001). In the analysis of covariance, MLs showed a smaller caudal MPD per tumor size than PDACs, with a statistical difference (P = 0.042). Sensitivity and specificity using sIL-2R ≥ 658 U/mL plus CA19-9 < 37 U/mL for the differentiation of ML from PDAC were 80.0% and 95.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosing pancreatic ML using cytohistological examination through EUS-FNA can be difficult in some cases. Thus, ML should be suspected if a patient with a pancreatic tumor has a small MPD diameter per tumor size, high serum sIL-2R level, normal CA19-9 level. If the abovementioned features are present and still cannot be confirmed as PDAC, re-examination should be considered.

Efficacy of a Traction Device for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Using a Scissor-Type Knife: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Although safe, colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using a scissor-type knife has a slow resection speed. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a traction device to hasten the resection speed. METHODS: This multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted at 3 Japanese institutions. Patients with a 20-50-mm superficial colorectal tumor were enrolled and randomly assigned to a conventional-ESD (C-ESD) group or a traction-assisted ESD (T-ESD) group. The primary outcome was the resection speed. RESULTS: The C-ESD and T-ESD groups comprised 49 and 48 patients, respectively. Although the mean resection speed was not significantly different in the entire cohort between the groups (23.7 vs 25.6 mm 2 /min, respectively; P = 0.43), it was significantly faster with T-ESD than with C-ESD at the cecum (32.4 vs 16.7 mm 2 /min, respectively; P = 0.02). The mean resection speed of tumors ≥30 mm tended to be faster by T-ESD than by C-ESD (34.6 vs 27.8 mm 2 /min, respectively; P = 0.054). The mean procedure time of T-ESD was significantly shorter than that of C-ESD (47.3 vs 62.3 minutes, respectively; P = 0.03). The en bloc (100% vs 100%), complete (98.0% vs 97.9%), and curative resection (93.9% vs 91.7%) rates were similar between the 2 groups. Perforation and delayed hemorrhage occurred in only 1 patient each in the T-ESD group. DISCUSSION: Although the resection rates were sufficiently high and adverse event rates were extremely low in both the groups, the use of a traction device for ESD in the proximal colon and for large lesions may increase the resection speed.

Efficacy and safety comparison of scissor-type knives with needle-type knives for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a post-hoc propensity score-matched analysis (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Many knives have been developed to improve the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of scissor-type knives for colorectal ESD compared with needle-type knives. METHODS: We performed a post-hoc propensity score-matched analysis in an 11-facility study between August 2013 and December 2018. A total of 2330 patients (2498 lesions) who underwent colorectal ESD were divided into needle-type (1923 patients, 2067 lesions) and scissor-type (407 patients, 431 lesions) knife groups. Short-term outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Two-to-one propensity score-matched analysis identified 814 (709 patients) and 407 (386 patients) lesions in the needle- and scissor-type knife groups, respectively. The median resection speed was significantly faster in the needle-type group (18.3 mm2/min) than in the scissor-type group (13.2 mm2/min, P < .0001), whereas en-bloc and histologic complete resection rates were not significantly different between the needle- and scissor-type groups (96.8% [788/814] vs 98.3% [400/407], P = .1888 and 95.1% [774/814] vs 95.6% [389/407], P = .7763, respectively). The rate of lesions resected using a single knife was significantly higher in the scissor-type group (98.5% [401/407]) than in the needle-type group (43.9% [357/814], P < .0001). Rates of intraoperative perforation and delayed bleeding were significantly lower in the scissor-type group than in the needle-type group (.7% [3/407] vs 2.5% [20/814], P = .0431 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Scissor-type knives are safer for colorectal ESD. However, they are associated with slower resection speeds compared with needle-type knives. (Clinical trial registration number: UMIN000016197.).

Long-standing diabetes mellitus increases concomitant pancreatic cancer risk in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: When monitoring patients with an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), it is important to consider both IPMN-derived carcinoma and concomitant ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The latter is thought to have a poorer prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed the risk factors for concomitant PDAC in IPMN. METHODS: In total, 547 patients with pancreatic cysts, including IPMNs inappropriate for surgery on initial diagnosis, encountered from April 2005 to June 2019, were reviewed. We performed surveillance by imaging examination once or twice a year. RESULTS: Five IPMNs with high-grade dysplasia and one IPMN associated with invasive carcinoma were encountered. In comparison, 14 concomitant PDACs were encountered. The prognosis was very poor for concomitant PDACs. All 14 PDAC patients had IPMNs. In patients with IPMNs, long-standing diabetes mellitus was the only significant risk factor for concomitant PDAC in both univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). Furthermore, patients with IPMNs and diabetes mellitus had a high frequency of concomitant PDACs (9.5%, 9/95) in a median 48-month surveillance period. CONCLUSIONS: When monitoring IPMNs, the development of not only IPMN-derived carcinomas but also concomitant PDACs should be considered. During this period, it may be prudent to concentrate on patients with other risk factors for PDAC, such as long-standing diabetes mellitus.

Long-term outcomes of standardized colonic stenting using WallFlex as a bridge to surgery: Multicenter prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The oncological outcomes, especially high recurrence rate, of bridge-to-surgery (BTS) self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement remain concerning, emphasizing the necessity of standardized SEMS placement. However, its impact on long-term BTS outcomes is unknown. We investigated the long-term outcomes of BTS colonic stenting using standardized SEMS placement. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter cohort study conducted at 46 hospitals in Japan (March 2012 to October 2013) included consecutive patients with stage II and III obstructive colorectal cancer managed with BTS SEMS placement. The SEMS placement technique was standardized by information dissemination among the participating hospitals. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) after SEMS placement, and the secondary outcomes were relapse-free survival (RFS), recurrence, and short-term outcomes of SEMS placement and surgery. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 94.1%, 77.4%, and 67.4% (Kaplan-Meier), respectively, with high technical success (99.0%, 206/208) and low perforation (1.9%, 4/208) rates. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 81.6%, 65.6%, and 57.9% (Kaplan-Meier), respectively, and the overall recurrence rate was 31.0% (62/200). The RFS rate was significantly poorer in patients with perforation (n = 4) than in those without perforation (n = 196) (log-rank P = 0.017); moreover, perforation was identified as an independent factor affecting RFS (hazard ratio 3.31; 95% confidence interval 1.03-10.71, multivariate Cox regression). CONCLUSION: This large, prospective, multicenter study revealed satisfactory long-term outcomes of BTS colonic stenting using a standardized SEMS insertion method, which might be specifically due to the reduced perforation rate. (UMIN000007953).

A case of intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas in a branch duct: a rare case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Intraductal tubulopapillary neoplasm (ITPN) of the pancreas is a new disease concept defined by the World Health Organization in 2010. ITPN progresses with tubulopapillary growth in the pancreatic duct and is known to have a fair prognosis. Localization in the main pancreatic duct (MPD) is one characteristic. There are few case reports of ITPN in a branch of the pancreatic duct (BD). CASE PRESENTATION: We encountered a case of ITPN localized in BD. An 85-year-old man was followed after colonic surgery for rectal carcinoma. An abdominal computed tomography scan revealed a cystic mass in the pancreatic head and further examination was done. A T2 weighted intension picture in magnetic resonance imaging showed a 20 mm cystic lesion with an internal mass of 15 mm. Duodenal papilla were slightly open and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography revealed mild and diffuse dilatation of the main pancreatic duct and mucin in the MPD. In consideration with the image examinations, we diagnosed the tumor as an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with carcinoma because of its large mural nodule (> 10 mm in size) in a cyst. Consequently, a pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. Macroscopically, a white solid tumor sized 2.5 × 1.8 × 1.0 was identified in the head of the pancreas. The cut surface of the resected pancreas showed a side-branch type intraductal tumor with tubulopapillary architecture without mucin secretion. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for MUC1, and negative for MUC2 and MUC5AC. The final diagnosis was determined to be pancreatic ITPN from BD. At the time of this report (48 months post-surgery), the patient remains disease-free without evidence of recurrence. CONCLUSION: ITPNs localized in BD are rare and diagnosis prior to surgery is difficult. In our case, the shape was round, not papillary, and with little fluid. These characteristics are different from a branch duct type IPMN and can be a clue to suspect ITPN in BD.

Clinical significance of immunohistochemical lymphovascular evaluation to determine additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal T1 carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines indicate lymphovascular invasion-evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining-as a surgical requirement after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients; however, immunohistochemical evaluation may be superior. This study aimed to clarify the significance of immunohistochemical lymphovascular evaluation as an indicator for additional surgery of T1 CRC after ESD, and assessed the guidelines' adequacy, even when evaluating through immunostaining. METHODS: Patients with T1 CRC who underwent ESD were enrolled across three institutions between January 2012 and December 2017. Immunohistochemical lymphovascular evaluation was performed. Clinicopathological features, pathological evaluations, and surgery indications were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression identified risk factors for lymph node (LN) metastasis of T1 CRC after ESD. RESULTS: Among 370 patients with T1 CRC, recurrence, 5-year overall survival, and 5-year disease specific survival rates were 1.6%, 94.6%, and 99.5%, respectively. Six patients (1.6%) experienced recurrence, five of whom underwent additional surgery. Those with no risk factors did not exhibit recurrence. A total of 215 (58.1%) patients underwent additional surgery after ESD, 21 (9.7%) of whom exhibited LN metastasis. Among 16 patients who underwent additional surgery due to lymphovascular invasion, three (18.8%) had LN metastasis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified lymphatic invasion as a significant risk factor for LN metastasis (odds ratio 3.9, 95% confidence interval 1.0-14.6, P = 0.0421). CONCLUSIONS: The JSCCR guidelines have clinical validity, and immunohistochemical lymphatic evaluation findings potentially predict LN metastasis for T1 CRC after ESD.

[A case of Salmonella bacteremia in an otherwise healthy young man].

A 19-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of persistent fever of >38°C for 6 days and diarrhea for 4 days. Initially, he was treated for infectious enteritis, but on his second day in the hospital, the two sets of blood cultures came back positive. Cultures from the blood and stool yielded Salmonella sp. (Group O4). The patient's symptoms improved after treatment with fluoroquinolone-based antimicrobial agents for 14 days. Cases of nontyphoidal Salmonella bacteremia are rare;therefore, we reported this case with bibliographic consideration of the risk factors for Salmonella bacteremia.

Dual Red Imaging Maintains Clear Visibility During Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic lens becomes clouded and its visibility reduces during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), especially in cases with submucosal fatty tissue. Dual red imaging (DRI) is a novel image-enhanced endoscopic technique that improves endoscopic visibility. AIMS: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive factors of submucosal fatty tissue and the clinical usefulness of DRI in maintaining clear visibility during colorectal ESD. METHODS: The study participants included 586 consecutive patients with 645 colorectal tumors who underwent ESD between January 2014 and July 2017. First, the degree of submucosal fatty tissue was evaluated by reviewing recorded images, and the clinical characteristics of the patients and tumors related to severe submucosal fatty tissue were evaluated. Second, 34 tumors resected using DRI were propensity score-matched in a 1:1 ratio to other resected tumors using white light imaging (WLI), and the degree of endoscope lens cloudiness and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The proportion of tumors located in the right side of the colon, body mass index (≥ 25, BMI), and hemoglobin A1c (≥ 6.5%, HbA1c) were significantly higher in patients with severe submucosal fatty tissue. The visibility in the DRI group was significantly better than in the WLI group. Treatment outcomes in the DRI group were as good as those in the WLI group. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor location in the right side of the colon, BMI (≥ 25), and HbA1c (≥ 6.5%) are the predictive factors of severe submucosal fatty tissue. DRI is useful in maintaining clear visibility during colorectal ESD, especially with submucosal fatty tissue.

Diagnostic performance of Japan NBI Expert Team classification for differentiation among noninvasive, superficially invasive, and deeply invasive colorectal neoplasia.

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: The Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) classification is the first universal narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors. Considering each type in this classification, the diagnostic ability of Type 2B is the weakest. Generally, clinical behavior is believed to be different in each gross type of colorectal tumor. We evaluated the differences in the diagnostic performance of JNET classification for each gross type (polypoid and superficial) and examined whether the diagnostic performance of Type 2B could be improved by subtyping. METHODS: We analyzed 2933 consecutive cases of colorectal lesions, including 136 hyperplastic polyps/sessile serrated polyps, 1926 low-grade dysplasias (LGDs), 571 high-grade dysplasias (HGDs), and 300 submucosal (SM) carcinomas. We classified lesions as polypoid and superficial type and compared the diagnostic performance of the classification system in each type. Additionally, we subtyped Type 2B into 2B-low and 2B-high based on the level of irregularity in surface and vessel patterns, and we evaluated the relationship between the subtypes and histology, as analyzed separately for polypoid and superficial types. We also estimated interobserver and intraobserver variability. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of JNET classification did not differ significantly between polypoid and superficial lesions. Ninety-nine percent of Type 2B-low lesions were LGDs, HGDs, or superficial submucosal invasive (SM-s) carcinomas. In contrast, 60% of Type 2B-high lesions were deep submucosal invasive (SM-d) carcinomas. The results were not different between each gross type. Interobserver and intraobserver agreements for Type 2B subtyping were good, with kappa values of .743 and .786, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Type 2B subtyping may be useful for identifying lesions that are appropriate for endoscopic resection. JNET classification and Type 2B sub classification are useful criteria, regardless of gross type.

Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal tumors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective procedure for en bloc resection of superficial colorectal tumors regardless of tumor size or location. However, there are few reports on long-term outcomes for patients with superficial colorectal tumors after ESD. We therefore aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes after ESD for superficial colorectal tumors. METHODS: ESD was performed on 257 colorectal tumors in 255 consecutive patients at Hiroshima University Hospital between June 2003 and July 2010. We investigated the following variables: patient characteristics, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, tumor size, growth type, histology, en bloc resection rate, achievement of curative resection, procedure time, and adverse events. The 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS), local recurrence, and metachronous tumor occurrence were also analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 224 tumors in 222 patients who were confirmed dead or had follow-up data for more than 5 years. After a median follow-up of 79 months, 5-year OS and DSS rates were 94.6% and 100%, respectively. The local recurrence rate (1.5%) was significantly higher in patients undergoing piecemeal resection (9.1%) compared with en bloc resection (0.6%), in cases of histologic incomplete resection compared with complete resection, and in cases of non-R0 resection compared with R0 resection. The rates of total number of tumors (≥6 mm) and carcinoma metachronous tumors after ESD without additional surgical resection were 18.9% (38/201) and 4.0% (8/201), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes after ESD for superficial colorectal tumors are favorable. Patients should be surveyed for both local recurrence and metachronous tumors after ESD.

Clinical impact and characteristics of the narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) was established in 2011 and has proposed a universal narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the JNET classification for colorectal lesions. METHODS: We analyzed 2933 colorectal lesions, which were diagnosed by NBI magnifying observation before endoscopic treatment or surgery. The colorectal lesions consisted of 136 hyperplastic polyps/sessile serrated polyps (HPs/SSPs), 1926 low-grade dysplasia (LGD), 571 high-grade dysplasia (HGD), 87 superficial submucosal invasive (SM-s) carcinomas, and 213 deep submucosal invasive (SM-d) carcinomas. We evaluated the relationship between the JNET classification and the histologic findings of these lesions. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy of Type 1 lesions for the diagnosis of HP/SSP were, respectively, 87.5%, 99.9%, 97.5%, 99.4%, and 99.3%; of Type 2A lesions for the diagnosis of LGD were 74.3%, 92.7%, 98.3%, 38.7%, and 77.1%; of Type 2B lesions for the diagnosis of HGD/SM-s carcinoma were 61.9%, 82.8%, 50.9%, 88.2%, and 78.1%; for Type 3 lesions for the diagnosis of SM-d carcinoma were 55.4%, 99.8%, 95.2%, 96.6%, and 96.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Types 1, 2A, and 3 of the JNET classification were very reliable indicators for HP/SSP, LGD, and SM-d carcinoma, respectively. However, the specificity and positive predictive value of Type 2B were relatively lower than those of others. Therefore, an additional examination such as pit pattern diagnosis using chromoagents is necessary for accurate diagnosis of Type 2B lesions.

Clinicopathologic and endoscopic features of early-stage colorectal serrated adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Serrated adenocarcinoma (SAC) is a distinct colorectal carcinoma variant that accounts for approximately 7.5% of all advanced colorectal carcinomas. While its prognosis is worse than conventional carcinoma, its early-stage clinicopathologic features are unclear. We therefore aimed to clarify the clinicopathologic and endoscopic characteristics of early-stage SACs. METHODS: Forty consecutive early-stage SAC patients at Hiroshima University Hospital were enrolled; SACs were classified into epithelial serration (Group A, n = 17) and non-epithelial serration (Group B, n = 23) groups. Additionally, we classified serrated adenoma into 4 types: sessile serrated adenoma (SSA), traditional serrated adenoma (TSA), unclassified, and non-serrated adenoma type. RESULTS: There were significant differences between Groups A and B in terms of tumor size (27.6 vs. 43.1 mm), incidences of T1 carcinoma (71% vs. 13%), and having the same color as normal mucosa (47% vs. 17%), respectively (p <0.01). In SACs >20 mm, the incidence of T1 carcinoma in Group A (70%) was significantly greater than that in Group B (13%) (p <0.05). There were significant differences in 'Japan NBI Expert Team' type 3 and type V pit pattern classifications between the 2 groups. The average TSA-type tumor size (42.6 mm) was significantly larger than that of the SSA (17.2 mm) and non-serrated component types (18.3 mm). The incidences of submucosal invasion in SSA- (80%), unclassified- (100%), and non-serrated-type (100%) tumors were significantly higher than that in the TSA type (11%). CONCLUSIONS: Epithelial serration in the cancerous area and a non-TSA background indicated aggressive behavior in early-stage SACs.

Clinical impact of surveillance colonoscopy using magnification without diminutive polyp removal.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In Western countries, endoscopic removal of all adenomas during colonoscopy is recommended. The present study evaluates the usefulness of magnifying colonoscopy without removal of diminutive (≤5 mm) colorectal polyps. METHODS: Patients with diminutive polyps who were observed for over 5 years using magnification at Hiroshima University Hospital were selected retrospectively. Lesions ≥6 mm in size, depressed lesions, and lesions with type V pit pattern were indications for endoscopic resection. We investigated the characteristics of lesions indicated for endoscopic resection detected on surveillance colonoscopy and the risk factors for the incidence of lesions indicated for endoscopic resection. RESULTS: A total of 706 consecutive patients were enrolled. Sixty-eight lesions indicated for endoscopic resection were detected, averaging 9.0 ± 4.8 mm, and 33 (49%) lesions were located in the right colon. Pathological diagnoses were adenoma, Tis carcinoma, and T1 carcinoma in 58 (85%), eight (12%), and two (3%) lesions, respectively. Five lesions were considered to grow from previously detected diminutive polyps. Relative risks for the incidence of a lesion indicated for endoscopic resection were 1.76 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.004-3.23) for males compared with females, 3.76 (95% CI, 2.03-7.50) for more than three polyps at initial colonoscopy compared with one polyp, and 2.84 (95% CI, 1.43-5.24) for patients with carcinoma at initial colonoscopy compared with patients with no lesion indicated for endoscopic resection. Nine carcinomas were resected endoscopically. CONCLUSION: Diminutive low-grade adenomas detected by using magnifying colonoscopy may not necessarily require removal.

Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Long-term outcomes of patients with T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) treated by endoscopic resection (ER) or surgical resection are unclear in relation to the curative criteria in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the long-term outcomes among patients with T1 CRC in relation to the treatment methods. METHODS: We examined 322 T1 CRC cases treated between January 1992 and August 2008 at Hiroshima University Hospital. Patients who did not meet the curative criteria in the JSCCR guidelines were defined as "non-endoscopically curable" and classified into three groups: underwent ER alone (group A: 45 patients), underwent additional surgery after ER (group B: 106 patients), and underwent surgical resection alone (group C: 92 patients). RESULTS: Of the 322 T1 CRC patients, 79 were categorized as endoscopically curable and 243 as non-endoscopically curable. Among the endoscopically curable T1 CRC patients, recurrence and 5-year OS rates were 0 and 94.2%, respectively. In groups A, B, and C, recurrence rates were 4.4, 6.6, and 4.3%, and OS rates were 85.6, 95.1, and 96.3%, respectively (p < 0.05). Local recurrence or distant/lymph node metastasis was observed in 13 patients (group A: 2; group B: 7; group C: 4). Death due to primary CRC occurred in six patients (group B: 4; group C: 2). CONCLUSION: Long-term outcomes support the curative criteria according to the JSCCR guidelines. ER for T1 CRC did not worsen clinical outcomes in cases that required additional surgical resection.

Clinical significance and validity of the subclassification for colorectal laterally spreading tumor granular type.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Colorectal laterally spreading tumor granular type (LST-G) is generally divided into two subtypes based on morphology. Here, we retrospectively investigated the clinical significance of a concrete, objective LST-G subclassification. METHODS: This study examined 636 consecutive cases that were resected endoscopically or surgically. LST-G was subclassified as follows: Type 1, a lesion with homogenous uniform granules with uniform (<5 mm) nodules; Type 2, a lesion with granules and small nodules (≥5 mm, <10 mm); or Type 3, a lesion accompanied by large nodules (≥10 mm). For the validation study, 194 images were compiled from 97 cases investigated using conventional colonoscopy and chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye spraying. Images were distributed in a randomized order to students without prior endoscopy experience, less-experienced endoscopists (LEE group), and highly experienced endoscopists (HEE group). Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement were then evaluated. RESULTS: There was no submucosal invasion in Type 1 lesions. The incidence of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma was higher for Type 3 lesions than for Type 2 lesions. Interobserver agreement was good in each group. Diagnostic accuracy was higher in the HEE group than in the student and LEE groups. Chromoendoscopy had a higher accuracy rate than conventional colonoscopy in the LEE and HEE groups (LEE, 0.74 vs 0.69, P < 0.05; HEE, 0.84 vs 0.78, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This subclassification of LST-G according to the diameters of granules and nodules was both useful for choosing therapeutic strategies in the clinical setting and universally applicable.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for anorectal tumor with hemorrhoids close to the dentate line: a multicenter study of Hiroshima GI Endoscopy Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The lower rectum close to the dentate line has distinct characteristics, making endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of tumors challenging. We assessed clinical outcomes of ESD for such patients with hemorrhoids. METHODS: Sixty-four patients (mean age, 68 years) underwent ESD for anorectal tumors close to the dentate line. We divided patients into those with (Group A, 45 patients) and without hemorrhoids (Group B, 19 patients). We examined en bloc and histological en bloc resection rates, procedure time, complication rates, and postoperative prognosis after ESD. RESULTS: The mean tumor size was 43 mm. Histologic diagnoses were adenoma (42 %, 27/64), carcinoma in situ (44 %, 28/64), and T1 carcinoma (14 %, 9/64). There was no significant difference in en bloc resection (93 %, 42/45 vs. 95 %, 18/19) or postoperative bleeding rates (16 %, 7/45 vs. 11 %, 2/19) between Groups A and B, respectively. The mean procedural durations were 120 and 124 min, respectively, in Groups A and B. No perforations occurred. There was no significant difference in postoperative anal pain rate between Groups A (18 %, 8/45) and B (16 %, 3/19), and it resolved within a few days in all cases. There was one case of stricture in Group B. Two patients with T1 carcinoma underwent additional surgery, one underwent chemotherapy, and five had no additional treatment. No recurrence occurred during the follow-up period of 38 months. CONCLUSIONS: ESD is safe and effective for anorectal tumors close to the dentate line in patients with hemorrhoids.

Risk of lymph node metastasis in colorectal T1 (SM) carcinoma.

In this report, we reviewed risk factors for lymph node metastasis in colorectal T1 (SM) carcinoma in relation to the chronological trend of the management of T1 colorectal carci- noma after endoscopic treatment. Recently according to the accumulation of many cases and detailed pathologic evaluation, after complete endoscopic en bloc resection, if below all conditions are satisfied in histological examination, 1) submucosal invasion depth: less than 1,000 pm, 2)histologic grade: favorable, 3)no vessel involvement and 4)budding grade: low, it shows very low risk of lymph node metastasis. Also, in this report, we assess the conditions for additional surgery after endoscopic resection based on the risk stratification of lymph node metastasis.