Medication use among patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis before and after the initiation of advanced therapy.

BACKGROUND: Although various treatments help reduce abdominal pain, real-world pain medication utilization among patients with Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) receiving advanced therapies is poorly understood. The aim is to understand the utilization of pain medication 12 months before and after the initiation of advanced therapies among patients with newly diagnosed CD or UC. METHODS: This retrospective, observational cohort study used administrative medical and pharmacy claims data of patients with CD or UC from HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD®). The data from patients with use of pain medication over 12 months follow-up (after the initiation date of advanced therapies) were collected and analyzed. Differences in the use of pain medication 12 months before and after the initiation of advanced therapies were assessed using McNemar's and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: Prior to initiating advanced therapies, 23.1% of patients with CD (N = 540) received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 78.1% glucocorticoids, 49.4% opioids, and 29.3% neuromodulators; similarly, 20.9% of patients with UC (N = 373) received NSAIDs, 91.4% glucocorticoids, 40.8% opioids, and 29.5% neuromodulators. After receiving advanced therapies for 12 months, patients reported a reduction in the use of steroids (78.1% vs. 58.9%, P < 0.001 in CD; 91.4% vs. 74.3%, P < 0.001 in UC), opioids (49.4% vs. 41.5%, P = 0.004 in CD; 40.8% vs. 36.5%, P = 0.194 in UC), and NSAIDs (23.1% vs. 15.0%, P < 0.001 in CD; 20.9% vs. 15.8%, P = 0.035 in UC), while the use of neuromodulators significantly increased (29.3% vs. 33.7%, P = 0.007 in CD; 29.5% vs. 35.7%; P = 0.006 in UC). CONCLUSIONS: The use of pain medications such as NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, opioids, and neuromodulators was common among patients with CD or UC. These results highlight that patients with CD or UC continued to receive pain medications even after initiating advanced therapies.

Healthcare utilization and total costs of care among patients with advanced metastatic gastric and esophageal cancer.

Aim: Study first-line (1L) treatment patterns and economic outcomes among patients with advanced metastatic gastric cancer (GC) and esophageal cancer (EC). Materials & methods: Newly diagnosed patients with systemic GC and EC treatments were identified between 1 January 2011 and 31 July 2017; costs were presented as per patient per month (PPPM) basis. Results: Study included 392 GC and 436 EC patients. Most frequently used 1L regimens were: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) + oxaliplatin (22.5%) and epirubicin + cisplatin + 5-FU (ECF)/ECF modifications (21.9%) in patients with GC; and carboplatin + paclitaxel (29.6%) and 5-FU + oxaliplatin (11.5%) in EC patients. Mean all-cause costs were US$16,242 PPPM for GC, and $18,384 PPPM for EC during 1L treatment. Conclusion: GC and EC were resource intensive and costly. High costs and short treatment durations underscored a gap in care in 1L treatment.

Prevalence and burden of illness of treated hemolytic neonatal hyperbilirubinemia in a privately insured population in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence of hemolytic neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (NHB) is not well characterized, and economic burden at the population level is poorly understood. This study evaluated the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and economic burden of hemolytic NHB newborns receiving treatment in U.S. real-world settings. METHODS: This cohort study used administrative claims from 01/01/2011 to 08/31/2017. The treated cohort had hemolytic NHB diagnosis and received phototherapy, intravenous immunoglobulin, and/or exchange transfusions. They were matched with non-NHB newborns who had neither NHB nor related treatments on the following: delivery hospital/area, gender, delivery route, estimated gestational age (GA), health plan eligibility, and closest date of birth within 5 years. Inferential statistics were reported. RESULTS: The annual NHB prevalence was 29.6 to 31.7%; hemolytic NHB, 1.8 to 2.4%; treated hemolytic NHB, 0.46 to 0.55%, between 2011 and 2016. The matched analysis included 1373 pairs ≥35 weeks GA. The treated hemolytic NHB cohort had significantly more birth trauma and hemorrhage (4.5% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.003), vacuum extractor affecting newborn (1.9% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.014), and polycythemia neonatorum (0.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.001) than the matched non-NHB cohort. The treated hemolytic NHB cohort also had significantly longer mean birth hospital stays (4.5 vs. 3.0 days, p < 0.001), higher level 2-4 neonatal intensive care admissions (15.7% vs. 2.4, 15.9% vs. 2.8 and 10.6% vs. 2.5%, respectively, all p < 0.001) and higher 30-day readmission (8.7% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001). One-month and one-year average total costs of care were significantly higher for the treated hemolytic NHB cohort vs. the matched non-NHB cohort, $14,405 vs. $5527 (p < 0.001) and $21,556 vs. $12,986 (p < 0.001), respectively. The average costs for 30-day readmission among newborns who readmitted were $13,593 for the treated hemolytic NHB cohort and $3638 for the matched non-NHB cohort, p < 0.001. The authors extrapolated GA-adjusted prevalence of treated hemolytic NHB in the U.S. newborn population ≥ 35 weeks GA and estimated an incremental healthcare expenditure of $177.0 million during the first month after birth in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of treated hemolytic NHB was 4.6-5.5 patients per 1000 newborns. This high-risk hemolytic NHB imposed substantial burdens of healthcare resource utilization and incremental costs on newborns, their caregivers, and the healthcare system.

Roflumilast: Who Is Using It and How It Affects Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs.

OBJECTIVE: Compare baseline characteristics, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and associated costs of COPD patients treated with add-on roflumilast with those of other combination medications. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODOLOGY: Patients aged 40 years with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) between March 1, 2011, and Nov. 30, 2012, were identified from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database and classified as roflumilast or nonroflumilast combination-therapy cohorts. Baseline characteristics were compared for all patients. HCRU and costs were compared between matched (M) roflumilast and nonroflumilast cohorts, using propensity score as a partial balancing score and then complementing the score with exact matching on specifically important variables. Generalized linear model and Poisson regression were used to estimate the adjusted differences in total costs and hospitalization rates, respectively, between the 2 matched cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 695 roflumilast and 30,542 nonroflumilast combination therapy users were identified. At baseline, the roflumilast cohort had more complex COPD and a higher number of severe and moderate COPD exacerbations relative to the nonroflumilast cohort. After matching, the roflumilast (M) and nonroflumilast (M) cohorts (n = 328 in each) had similar mean age, gender distribution, and follow-up time. The roflumilast (M) cohort had significantly higher pharmacy-related, per-patient, per-month (PPPM) costs (P < .001) and similar total cost (P = .90). After adjusting for confounding variables, no difference was observed between the 2 cohorts in total costs (P = .86) and number of hospitalizations (P = .65). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that patients in the roflumilast cohort, relative to the nonroflumilast cohort, were more severely ill in the real-world setting. Despite higher pharmacy costs, the total cost for the roflumilast cohort was statistically similar to the nonroflumilast cohort. Future studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the long-term economic impact of roflumilast use.

Characteristics affecting oral anticoagulant therapy choice among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective claims analysis.

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran is one of the three newer oral anticoagulants (OACs) recently approved in the United States for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. The objective of this study was to identify patient, healthcare provider, and health plan factors associated with dabigatran versus warfarin use among NVAF patients. METHODS: Administrative claims data from patients with ≥ 2 NVAF medical claims in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database between 10/1/2009 and 10/31/2011 were analyzed. During the study intake period (10/1/2010 - 10/31/2011), dabigatran patients had ≥ 2 dabigatran prescriptions, warfarin patients had ≥ 2 warfarin and no dabigatran prescriptions, and the first oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription date was the index date. Continuous enrollment for 12 months preceding ("pre-index") and ≥ 6 months following the index date was required. Patients without pre-index warfarin use were assigned to the 'OAC-naïve' subgroup. Separate analyses were performed for 'all-patient' and 'OAC-naïve' cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression (LR) identified factors associated with dabigatran versus warfarin use. RESULTS: Of 20,320 patients (3,019 dabigatran and 17,301 warfarin) who met study criteria, 27% of dabigatran and 13% of warfarin patients were OAC-naïve. Among all-patients, dabigatran patients were younger (mean 67 versus 73 years, p < 0.001), predominantly male (71% versus 61%, p < 0.001), and more frequently had a cardiologist prescriber (51% versus 30%, p < 0.001) than warfarin patients. Warfarin patients had higher pre-index Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (mean: 4.3 versus 4.0, p < 0.001) and higher ATRIA bleeding risk score (mean: 3.0 versus 2.3, p < 0.001). LR results were generally consistent between all- and OAC-naïve patients. Among OAC-naïve patients, strongest factors associated with dabigatran use were prescriber specialty (OR = 3.59, 95% CI 2.68-4.81 for cardiologist; OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.65-2.97 for other specialist), health plan type (OR = 1.47 95% CI 1.10-1.96 for preferred provider organization), and prior ischemic stroke (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.06-1.90). Older age decreased the probability of dabigatran use. CONCLUSIONS: Beside patient characteristics, cardiology specialty of the prescribing physician and health plan type were the strongest factors associated with dabigatran use.

Holistic View of Autografting Patients by Percentage of Total Body Surface Area Burned: Medical Record Abstraction Integrated with Administrative Claims.

Aim: This retrospective observational study provides a holistic view of the clinical and economic characteristics of inpatient treatment of patients with thermal burns undergoing autografting, by integrating real-world data (RWD) from medical records from healthcare providers (HCPs) and administrative claims. Methods: We identified eligible patients between July 1, 2010, and November 30, 2019, from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database® (HIRD®) and obtained their medical records from HCPs. We abstracted data from medical records to describe patient demographics and clinical characteristics and obtained costs of treatment from claims. Results: Two hundred patients were stratified into cohorts based on the percentage of total body surface area (%TBSA) burned: minor (< 10%), moderate (10%-24%), and major (≥ 25%). Data obtained from medical records and administrative claims were comparable to previous findings from administrative claims data. This privately insured study cohort predominantly consisted of White men. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension were frequently reported in a relatively young population. Key clinical characteristics that could influence burn treatment decisions and long-term outcomes, such as body mass index, size of autograft donor site, and mesh ratio, were frequently underdocumented in patients' medical records. Conclusion: Evidence generated from 2 orthogonal RWD sources confirmed that patients with larger %TBSA burned required more intensive care, thereby incurring higher costs. This study highlights considerable incompleteness in many critical fields in medical records, which limits the ability to generate broader insights. More comprehensive documentation of clinical characteristics and outcomes of autografts and donor sites in the operative and medical notes is critical to appropriately evaluate their impact on outcomes of burn treatments in future research using RWD.

Real-world cost of care and site of care in patients with multiple sclerosis initiating infused disease-modifying therapies.

AIM: Evaluate the real-world costs over two years and costs by site of care for ocrelizumab (OCR), natalizumab (NTZ), and alemtuzumab (ATZ) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: This retrospective study used HealthCore Integrated Research Database and included continuously enrolled adults with MS initiating OCR, NTZ, and ATZ between April 2017 and July 2019 (i.e. patient identification period). Annual total cost of care (pharmacy and medical costs) was evaluated for the first- and second-year of follow-up, further stratified by site of care. Costs were measured using health plan allowed amount and adjusted to 2019 US dollars. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in patients who completed yearly dosing schedule according to Food and Drug Administration approved prescribing information. RESULTS: Overall, 1,058, 166, and 46 patients were included in OCR, NTZ, and ATZ cohorts, respectively. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) total cost of care during first- and second-year follow-up were $125,597 ($72,274) and $109,618 ($75,085) for OCR, $117,033 ($57,102) and $106,626 ($54,872) for NTZ, and $179,809 ($97,530) and $108,636 ($77,973) for ATZ. Infusible drug cost was the main driver in all three cohorts accounting for >78% of the total costs. Annual total cost of care increased substantially after patients started/switched to infusible DMTs. Across site of care, hospital outpatient infusion was common (OCR 58%, NTZ 37%, ATZ 49%) and expensive followed by physician office infusion (OCR 28%, NTZ 40%, ATZ 16%); home infusion was the least common (<10%) and least expensive. LIMITATIONS: The results were limited to commercially insured patients (specifically those with Anthem-affiliated health plans). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world costs increased after patients started/switched to infusible DMTs. Drug cost is the main driver for the total costs, which varied substantially by site of care. Controlling drug cost markups and using home setting for infusion can reduce costs in the treatment of MS patients.

Ocrelizumab (OCR), natalizumab (NTZ), and alemtuzumab (ATZ) are infusible drugs to treat patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). We did a study to understand the costs of these infusible MS drugs in real-world settings by analyzing a patients' pharmacy and medical claims database. A total of 1,058 patients were included. We found that the annual total costs increased substantially after patients started to use these infusible MS drugs. Specifically, the average first- and second-year total costs for patients were $125,597 and $109,618 for OCR, $117,033 and $106,626 for NTZ, and $179,809 and $108,636 for ATZ, respectively. We also found that the cost of the drug itself is the main driver for the overall healthcare spending, accounting for >78% of the total costs. Additionally, we found that the cost varies depending on where patients receive these infusible MS drugs, and generally speaking, infusions received from hospital outpatient settings would be more expensive than received from home settings. In summary, this study showed that the real-world costs of these infusible MS drugs are very high. Shifting patients away from more costly hospital outpatient departments or using MS drugs that do not require infusion resources (e.g. oral/self-injectable) may help reduce the overall healthcare spending on MS.

Incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw among users of bisphosphonates with selected cancers or osteoporosis.

PURPOSE: To quantify the incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) by bisphosphonate exposure among two cohorts of patients. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we identified cohort members via health insurance claim diagnosis codes and identified potential cases of ONJ that were confirmed with medical record review. One cohort included patients aged ≥40 years with breast or prostate cancer or multiple myeloma; the other cohort included men aged ≥60 years and women ≥50 years with osteoporosis. For each cohort, we calculated sex- and age-standardized incidence of ONJ by exposure to oral bisphosphonates and intravenous bisphosphonates. RESULTS: In the cancer cohort (n = 46 542), sex- and age-standardized incidence of ONJ (n = 26 probable or possible cases) adjusted for abstraction proportion was 0.29 per 1000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.07-0.52) among those unexposed to bisphosphonates and 5.3 (95%CI, 1.9-8.7) after intravenous bisphosphonate use. Controlling for covariates, the rate ratio for intravenous use versus no use was 8.8 (95%CI, 2.0-38). Patients with multiple myeloma had a rate 4.5 times that of patients with breast cancer. In the osteoporosis cohort (n = 31 244), sex- and age-standardized ONJ (n = 11 probable or possible cases) incidence was 0.26 per 1000 person-years (95%CI, 0.06-0.47) among those unexposed to bisphosphonate and 0.15 (95%CI, 0.00-0.36) after oral bisphosphonate use. CONCLUSION: Among patients with selected cancers, incidence of ONJ was higher among those with multiple myeloma and users of intravenous bisphosphonates.

Clinical and economic burden of first-line chemoimmunotherapy by risk status in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the trend in cytogenetic/molecular testing rate in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and assess the clinical and economic burden of first-line (1 L) treatment with chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) by risk status. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified patients with CLL from a U.S. managed care population. Medical records were obtained for eligible patients who initiated 1 L CIT between 1/1/2007 and 7/31/2019 and underwent prognostic testing to classify them as high risk (del(17p), TP53 mutation, del(11q), unmutated IGHV or complex karyotype) or as non-high risk by FISH only (non-del(17p) and non-del(11q)). Study outcomes included testing rate, time to next treatment (TTNT) or death, time to treatment failure (defined as time to change of therapy, non-chemotherapy intervention, hospice care or death), and total plan paid costs (medical + pharmacy) per patient per month (PPPM) in the 1 L period. Cox proportional hazard models and generalized linear models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratio or rate ratio. RESULTS: Among the 1,808 patients with CLL, 612 were FISH or IGHV tested and the rate of testing increased from 30% to 44% from 2007-2019. High-risk patients (n = 119) had 65% higher risk of next treatment or death (median time: 2.4 vs 3.7 years), 65% higher risk of treatment failure (median time: 3.0 vs 4.9 years), and 33% higher costs ($12,194 vs $9,055, p = 0.027) during 1 L treatment than non-high risk patients (n = 134). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk CLL patients treated with 1 L chemoimmunotherapy have poorer clinical and economic outcomes compared to non-high risk patients. Assessment of genetic risk remains suboptimal.

Healthcare resource utilization and cost of obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a US population.

Background: There are limited data evaluating all-cause and disease-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and cost of care for patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Methods: This was a retrospective study using US longitudinal medical and pharmacy claims data during 2012-2020. Adults with ≥2 oHCM diagnoses were identified, with the first diagnosis date used as the index date. HCRU and costs of care were reported for the year preindex (baseline) and at 1- and 2-year follow-ups. Results: We identified 1841 patients with oHCM (63 ± 15 years; 52% male). The mean number of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)-related outpatient and cardiology visits increased from baseline to 1-year follow-up (2.3 vs. 7.8 and 0.6 vs. 2.2, respectively). At baseline, 8% of patients had ≥1 HCM-related inpatient hospitalization (mean 0.11 visits, 5.4 days length of stay), increasing to 27% postdiagnosis (mean 0.42 visits, 5.9 days length of stay). Total HCM-related costs increased from $5968 to $20,290 at 1-year follow-up, largely driven by inpatient hospitalization costs ($3889 vs. $14,369) and surgical costs ($2259 vs. $7217). The proportion with ≥1 HCM-related prescription increased from baseline (69%; mean fills 5.3) to 1-year follow-up (82%; mean fills 7.8). Pharmacy costs were generally low but also increased ($449 vs. $752). Conclusions: This benchmark economic dataset for management and evaluation of patients with oHCM shows increased HCM-related costs over a 2-year period after oHCM diagnosis, driven by inpatient hospitalizations and surgical costs. Medication use was high, but costs were low, possibly reflecting use of generic multi-indication drugs for oHCM treatment.

Characteristics of Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Real-World Community-Based Cardiovascular Practices.

The clinical profile of patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHC) is not well characterized, with little evidence outside selected referral populations. Using longitudinal medical claims data from a United States nationwide database, we retrospectively identified adults who were newly diagnosed with oHC. Clinical characteristics were compared from 1 year before diagnosis and at the 2-year follow-up. Patients (N = 1,841) with oHC (age 63 ± 15 years; 52% were male) with geographic representation across the United States were identified. Most patients received care within community-based cardiovascular practices and 7% at referral hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) centers. Baseline diagnostic procedures included electrocardiogram (66%), echocardiogram (51%), magnetic resonance imaging (4%), and HC genetic testing (0.7%). Baseline co-morbidities were hypertension (59%), coronary artery disease (30%), diabetes (19%), and atrial fibrillation (19%). For all HC-related medications, use significantly increased after diagnosis. During follow-up, 144 patients (8%) received an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for sudden death prevention, 99 underwent septal myectomy (5%), and 24 underwent alcohol septal ablation (1%). By the 1-year follow-up, 2% of patients had sudden cardiac arrest and 26% had atrial fibrillation, and heart failure increased from 16% to 27%. In conclusion, in a community-based population of patients with oHC, patients' age at diagnosis of oHC was older than reported for referral populations and patients had a significant co-morbidity burden. Cardiovascular medication use was appropriate, but the rate of guideline-supported surgical procedures was low.

Costs and Healthcare Resource Utilization for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Septal Reduction Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) and severe refractory symptoms may require invasive septal reduction therapies (SRTs), either surgical septal myectomy (SM) or transcatheter alcohol septal ablation (ASA). The main objective of this study was to quantify all-cause and oHCM-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for patients receiving SM or ASA. METHODS: This retrospective study utilized medical and pharmacy claims submitted during 2012-2020. HCRU and costs for 119 adults with oHCM who had at least 1 SM (n = 95) or ASA (n = 24) were compared for baseline and follow-up periods. RESULTS: The mean inpatient hospitalization stay was longer for SM (8.3 days) than ASA (6.0 days). Postprocedure HCM-related medication usage was greater following SM (98%) than ASA (88%). The mean number of HCM-related outpatient visits increased from pre- to post procedure (12.2 vs 15.9 in the SM group; 7.2 vs 9.5 in the ASA group), with most patients having at least 1 cardiology visit post procedure (86% of the SM group; 83% of the ASA group). Total mean HCM-related costs (reported in United States currency) increased with both procedures ($27,045 vs $119,772 in the SM group; $11,278 vs $54,351 in the ASA group), driven by increased inpatient hospitalization ($10,325 vs $112,923 in the SM group; $5509 vs $47,450 in the ASA group) and surgical costs ($6665 vs $92,031 in the SM group; $52 vs $44,815 in the ASA group). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate increasing costs for patients undergoing SRT, driven by inpatient hospitalizations and surgical costs. Commercially insured and Medicare Advantage patients with oHCM experience high healthcare costs and economic burden attributable to SRT.

Clinical Diagnosis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Over Time in the United States (A Population-Based Claims Analysis).

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) is a common genetic heart disease. However, the number of gene mutation carriers who develop HC and manifest clinical symptoms is not well established. Our objective was to estimate annual prevalence and incidence rates of clinically diagnosed HC in the United States. Data from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD) were interrogated for years 2013-2019 to identify patients with ≥1 claim of HC International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification Ninth and Tenth Revision diagnosis codes. In 2013, among 16,243,109 patients, 8,526 were identified with HC, yielding an estimated prevalence of clinically diagnosed HC of 0.052% (0.035% for obstructive [oHC], 0.017% for nonobstructive [nHC]). This prevalence yielded an estimated 164,403 patients with clinical diagnosis of HC. For the same year, the incidence of new HC diagnoses was 0.030% (0.020% for oHC, 0.010% for nHC). Over the following 6 years, prevalence and incidence of HC increased by 0.005%/year (p <0.01) and 0.001%/year (p <0.01), respectively, with an estimated 262,591 patients with a clinical diagnosis of HC in 2019. Over this period, incidence of nHC increased (0.012% vs 0.026%, p <0.01), whereas incidence of oHC decreased (0.020% versus 0.015%, p <0.01). In conclusion, over 6 years, the number of patients with clinically diagnosed HC in the United States increased 1.5-fold to ∼262,591, primarily because of a rise in nHC diagnoses. These prevalence data support further investigation to better understand factors accounting for increasing clinical recognition of HC.

Pain Medication and Corticosteroid Use in Ankylosing Spondylitis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Rheumatoid Arthritis in the United States: A Retrospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE: We compared pain medication use in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) versus matched control over 2 years; a subgroup analysis assessed changes in pain medication use in patients who initiated a biologic during 12 months before and after. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational cohort study using an administrative claims database. Newly diagnosed adult patients with AS, PsA, or RA identified between 1/1/2014 and 7/31/2017 were included. Demographics, baseline characteristics, and pain medication use were described using descriptive statistics. Differences in pain medication use were assessed using McNemar's/Wilcoxon signed-rank test for categorical/continuous variables. RESULTS: The study included 2180 AS, 5681 PsA, and 34,047 RA patients to assess overall pain medication use over 2 years; 188 AS, 921 PsA, and 1599 RA patients were included to assess changes in pain medication use 12 months before and after initiation of biologic. Demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced. In the overall cohort, 74.6% AS, 75.0% PsA, and 83.0% RA patients used any pain medication at baseline versus matched control; pain medications use 2 years after diagnosis date was reported in 73.5% AS, 74.1% PsA, and 81.3% RA patients. Among AS, PsA, and RA patients, use of prescribed NSAIDs (AS: 68.1 vs. 51.1%; PsA: 51.1 vs. 42.5%; RA: 61.1 vs. 41.5%; P < 0.05), glucocorticoids (AS: 56.4 vs. 41.5%; PsA: 57.4 vs. 46.9%; RA: 88.2 vs. 75.3%; P < 0.05), and opioids (AS: 42.6 vs. 36.2% [non-significant]; PsA: 38.1 vs. 33.8%; RA: 52.0 vs. 40.4%; P < 0.05) significantly decreased 12 months after biologic initiation versus prior. CONCLUSIONS: Use of NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, and opioids are common among patients with AS, PsA, or RA, although the reported use of these co-medications after biologic initiation significantly decreases in the first year of treatment.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Healthcare Resource Utilization, and Costs for Patients with Newly Diagnosed Systolic versus Diastolic Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Although the significant burden of heart failure (HF) is well recognized, the relative contributions of systolic HF versus diastolic HF are less defined. OBJECTIVE: To explore the differential burden between patients with systolic and diastolic HF in terms of treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), costs, and mortality risk. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data from a large US commercial health insurer integrated with mortality data. Patients newly diagnosed with HF between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2016, were identified and grouped according to systolic HF or diastolic HF diagnosis and were followed up to 4 years after diagnosis. Treatment patterns, HCRU, costs, and mortality were compared between the 2 groups of patients. RESULTS: Overall, 46,885 patients with systolic HF and 21,854 with diastolic HF were identified and included in the study. Patients with systolic HF had less HCRU than those with diastolic HF during the first year after HF diagnosis, including hospital admissions (70.2% vs 82.4%, respectively; P <.001) and emergency department visits (30.5% vs 39.1%, respectively; P <.001). The average per-patient costs for patients with systolic HF during the 1-year follow-up were higher than for those with diastolic HF ($64,154 vs $59,652, respectively; P <.001), but lower during years 2 through 4 (approximately $23,000-$25,000 annually vs approximately $28,000-$29,000 annually; P <.001). Patients with diastolic HF had a higher adjusted hospitalization risk (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-1.69), but comparable adjusted costs (exponentiated estimate, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02) and slightly lower mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.93-0.99) versus patients with systolic HF. The number of HF-related medication classes received for other diagnoses during the year preceding an HF diagnosis was associated with lower risks for hospitalization, mortality, and lower costs, with a trend in benefits toward patients with systolic HF. Of note, 21.9% of patients with systolic HF and 25% of patients with diastolic HF filled no HF-related prescriptions in the year after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: This real-world analysis confirms a high disease burden associated with HF and provides insight across the systolic HF and diastolic HF phenotypes. HF-related medication use after diagnosis was suboptimal and underscores a gap in patient care.

Healthcare resource utilization, treatment patterns, and cost of care among patients with thermal burns and inpatient autografting in two large privately insured populations in the United States.

The current standard of care for severe burns includes autografting; however, there is scarce knowledge regarding the long-term economic burden associated with thermal burns and inpatient autografting. The objective of this study was to characterize healthcare resource utilization, treatment patterns, and cost of care for thermal burn patients in two large privately insured populations in the United States who underwent inpatient autografting between 01/01/2011 and 06/30/2016. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, healthcare resource utilization, and total cost were examined during baseline (one year before the initial hospitalization with autografting) and two-year evaluation period. There was a substantial economic burden on thermal burn patients who received inpatient autografts (HIRD® database [HIRD]: N=371, mean age=39.6 years, male=67.1%; MarketScan® database [MarketScan]: N=698, mean age=38.2 years, male=63.3%) in the year 1 evaluation period (HIRD: mean=$184,805; MarketScan: mean=$155,272), which was mainly driven by the initial hospitalization with autografting (HIRD: mean=$157,384 and MarketScan: mean=$131,470). The percentage of patients with burn-related healthcare resource utilization and average burn-related costs were considerably reduced in the year 2 evaluation period (HIRD: mean=$3020; MarketScan: mean=$1990). Consistent with previous studies, mean length of hospital stay (days) and mean total medical costs generally increased as the percentage of total body surface area burned increased.

Healthcare Utilization, Costs of Care, and Mortality Among Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Objectives: To understand treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs of care among patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Methods: SMA patients were identified from a large managed care population using administrative claims data from January 2006 to March 2016. Patients were classified into infantile, childhood-onset, and late-onset groups based on age of first SMA diagnosis. They were matched 1:1 to non-SMA patients based on age, gender, geography, and health plan type. Results: In the infantile group, 17.4% and 26.1% were treated with invasive and non-invasive ventilation, respectively. Uses of orthotics/orthoses and orthopedic surgery were frequent: 54.5% and 22.7% childhood group; 27.0% and 38.5% late-onset group. Mean per member per month costs in SMA vs. matched non-SMA patients was $25,517 vs. $406 (infantile); $6,357 vs. $188 (childhood-onset); $2,499 vs. $742 (late-onset). Conclusions: SMA patients, particularly with infantile onset, incurred significantly higher healthcare utilization and costs than the general population.

Effectiveness, treatment durability, and treatment costs of canagliflozin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes in the USA.

Introduction: This real-world study compared glycemic effectiveness, treatment durability, and treatment costs with canagliflozin 300 mg versus any dose of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the USA. Research design and methods: A retrospective cohort study using administrative claims and laboratory data (1 April 2012 to 28 February 2017) from the HealthCore Integrated Research Database were used to assess mean HbA1c at 3-month intervals, achievement of HbA1c thresholds (<7.0%, <8.0%, <9.0%), and treatment durability (ie, adherence, discontinuation, switching, treatment failure (ie, exceeding threshold (7.0%, 8.0%, 9.0%), having a prescription for a new antihyperglycemic agent)) in adults with T2DM who initiated canagliflozin 300 mg or any dose of a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Medication costs were calculated for adherent patients. Results: There were no significant differences in the primary outcome of HbA1c levels at 3-month intervals (≤12 months) in the canagliflozin 300 mg versus any dose GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort. The likelihood of achieving HbA1c<8.0% was not different (p=0.666), the likelihood of achieving HbA1c<7.0% was lower (p=0.016), and the likelihood of achieving HbA1c<9.0% was higher (p=0.020) in the canagliflozin 300 mg versus any dose GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort. The likelihood of treatment failure after reaching any HbA1c target was not different between cohorts. A higher proportion of patients were adherent to treatment (p<0.0001) and a lower proportion discontinued (p<0.0001) or switched medication (p=0.023) in the canagliflozin 300 mg versus any dose GLP-1 receptor agonist cohort. Over 1 year, medication costs were $1421 (p<0.001) lower with canagliflozin 300 mg than any dose of GLP-1 receptor agonists. Conclusions: This real-world, US-based study found that initiation of canagliflozin 300 mg versus any dose of a GLP-1 receptor agonist in patients with T2DM was not associated with significant differences in the primary outcome of HbA1c levels at 3-month intervals for up to 12 months after index, but showed better adherence, less discontinuation, and lower drug acquisition costs compared with initiation of any dose of a GLP-1 receptor agonist.

Healthcare Utilization, Costs of Care, and Mortality Among Psatients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

OBJECTIVES: To understand treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs of care among patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Methods: SMA patients were identified from a large managed care population using administrative claims data from January 2006 to March 2016. Patients were classified into infantile, childhood-onset, and late-onset groups based on age of first SMA diagnosis. They were matched 1:1 to non-SMA patients based on age, gender, geography, and health plan type. RESULTS: In the infantile group, 17.4% and 26.1% were treated with invasive and non-invasive ventilation, respectively. Uses of orthotics/orthoses and orthopedic surgery were frequent: 54.5% and 22.7% childhood group; 27.0% and 38.5% late-onset group. Mean per member per month costs in SMA vs. matched non-SMA patients was $25,517 vs. $406 (infantile); $6,357 vs. $188 (childhood-onset); $2,499 vs. $742 (late-onset). CONCLUSIONS: SMA patients, particularly with infantile onset, incurred significantly higher healthcare utilization and costs than the general population.

Cost of biologic treatment persistence or switching in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate total costs among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who persisted on or switched from newly initiated biologic therapy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective claims database analysis. METHODS: This analysis included adults in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database with RA who initiated treatment with a biologic for RA (abatacept, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab, rituximab, or tocilizumab) between January 2009 and November 2014. Total healthcare costs (plan- and patient-paid) were estimated for 1 year post index. Treatment persistence was defined as no discontinuation (ie, no refill gap >45 days) and no biologic switch. RESULTS: Of 7468 patients, 45.2% persisted on the index biologic for at least 1 year without a refill gap and 16.7% switched to another biologic in the first year; other patients discontinued the index biologic (23.2%) or restarted after a refill gap (15.0%). Mean 1-year total healthcare costs per patient were $41,901 (95% CI, $40,855-$42,947) among persistent patients and $44,244 (95% CI, $40,820-$47,668) among switchers. In a multivariable analysis of all patients, switchers had 5% higher postindex costs on average than persistent patients (exp(ß) = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08), and etanercept had the lowest postindex costs (exp(ß) ranged from 1.03 to 1.51 for other biologics relative to etanercept). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with RA who switched biologic therapy incurred higher 1-year total postswitch healthcare costs compared with patients who were persistent on the index biologic. Healthcare costs were lowest for patients who started on etanercept, particularly those who persisted on etanercept.