RESUMEN
The independent effects of deceased donor kidney length and vascular plaque on long-term graft survival are not established. Utilizing DonorNet attachments from 4,480 expanded criteria donors (ECD) recovered between 2008 and 2012 in the United States with at least one kidney biopsied and transplanted, we analyzed the relationship between kidney length and vascular plaques and 10-year hazard of all-cause graft failure (ACGF) using causal inference methods in a Cox regression framework. The composite plaque score (range 0-4) and the presence of any plaque (yes, no) was also analyzed. Kidney length was modeled both categorically (<10, 10-12, >12 cm) as well as numerically, using a restricted cubic spline to capture nonlinearity. Effects of a novel composite plaque score 4 vs. 0 (HR 1.08; 95% CI: 0.96, 1.23) and the presence of any vascular plaque (HR 1.08; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.20) were attenuated after adjustment. Likewise, we identified a potential nonlinear relationship between kidney length and the 10-year hazard of ACGF, however the strength of the relationship was attenuated after adjusting for other donor factors. The independent effects of vascular plaque and kidney length on long-term ECD graft survival were found to be minimal and should not play a significant role in utilization.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos , Riñón , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) have transformed kidney transplantation by increasing the donor pool from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected donors and allowing HCV nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) donor-positive/recipient-negative (D+/R-) transplantation over the last 7âyears. Willingness to accept kidneys from HCV-infected donors and timing/duration of DAA therapy have been evolving. RECENT FINDINGS: By 2021, most of the HCV NAT+ kidneys (92.6%) were transplanted to HCV-naive recipients. Despite the availability of effective DAA therapy, the discard rate of HCV NAT kidneys has been stagnant around 25%. The proportion of wait-listed patients willing to accept a deceased donor kidney from HCV Ab+ and HCV NAT+ donors increased 20-fold between 2015 and 2022. Wait-listed time to receive HCV NAT+ kidneys has been rising and most of the kidneys are transplanted to HCV-naive recipients. The proportion of deceased donor kidney transplants performed in recipients with HCV seropositivity decreased from 5.1 to 2.8% during the same period. Relatively short courses of DAA therapy (7-8âdays) appear to be effective to decrease HCV transmission (<5%) and achieve sustained virological response at 12âweeks if administered prior to revascularization. SUMMARY: Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of HCV NAT D+/R- transplantation and the best course of DAA treatment.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Donantes de Tejidos , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Outcomes from simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLKT) when using kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) have not been studied. We studied 5344 SLKTs between May 1, 2007, and December 31, 2019, by using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry data supplemented with United Network for Organ Sharing-DonorNet data. Designating a donor as having AKI required by definition that the following criteria were met: (1) the donor's condition aligned with the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) international consensus guidelines and the terminal serum creatinine (Scr) level was ≥1.5 times the minimum Scr level for deceased donors before organ recovery and (2) the terminal Scr level was ≥1.5 mg/dL (a clinically meaningful and intuitive Scr threshold for defining AKI for transplant providers). The primary outcomes were liver transplant all-cause graft failure (ACGF; defined as graft failures and deaths) and kidney transplant death-censored graft failure (DCGF) at 1 year after transplant. The donors with AKI were young, had good organ quality, and had a short cold ischemia time. In the study cohort, 4482 donors had no AKI, whereas 862 had AKI (KDIGO AKI stages: 1, n = 521; 2, n = 202; and 3, n = 138). In the group with AKI and the group with no AKI, respectively, liver ACGF at 1 year (11.1% versus 12.9% [P = 0.13]; hazard ratio [HR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97-1.49) and kidney DCGF at 1 year (4.6% versus 5.7% [P = 0.18]; HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.95-1.70) did not differ in the full multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Selected kidneys from deceased donors with AKI can be considered for SLKT.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Hígado , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/cirugía , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Riñón/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Hígado , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de TejidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transplant patients have poor outcomes in coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19). The pandemic's effects on rural patients' overall care experience, attitudes to telemedicine, and vaccination are poorly understood. METHODS: We administered a cross-sectional survey to adult kidney transplant recipients in central Pennsylvania across four clinical sites between March 29, 2021 and June 2, 2021. We assessed the pandemic's impact on care access, telemedicine experience, attitudes toward preventive measures, vaccination, and variation by sociodemographic variables. RESULTS: Survey completion rate was 51% (303/594). Of these, 52.8% were rural residents. The most common impact was use of telemedicine (79.2%). Predominant barriers to telemedicine were lack of video devices (10.9%), perceived complexity (5.6%), and technical issues (5.3%). On a 0-10 Likert scale, the mean positive impression for telemedicine was 7.7; lower for patients with telephone-only versus video visits (7.0 vs. 8.2; p < .001), and age ≥60 years (7.4 vs. 8.1; p = .01) on univariate analyses. Time/travel savings were commonly identified (115/241, 47.7%) best parts of telemedicine and lack of personal connection (70/166, 42.2%) the worst. Only 68.9% had received any dose of COVID vaccination. The vaccinated group members were older (58.4 vs. 53.5 years; p = .007), and less likely rural (47.8% vs. 65.2%; p = .005). Common themes associated with vaccine hesitancy included concerns about safety (27/59, 46%), perceived lack of data (19/59, 32%), and distrust (17/59, 29%). At least one misconception about the vaccines or COVID-19 was quoted by 29% of vaccine-hesitant patients. CONCLUSIONS: Among respondents, the pandemic significantly impacted healthcare experience, especially in older patients in underserved communities. COVID-19 vaccination rate was relatively low, driven by misconceptions and lack of trust.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Internado y Residencia , Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Humanos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Vacunación , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: During the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, organ transplantation was classified a CMS Tier 3b procedure which should not be postponed. The differential impact of the pandemic on access to liver transplantation was assessed. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Disparities in organ access and transplant outcomes among vulnerable populations have served as obstacles in liver transplantation. METHODS: Using UNOS STARfile data, adult waitlisted candidates were identified from March 1, 2020 to November 30, 2020 (n = 21,702 pandemic) and March 1, 2019 to November 30, 2019 (n = 22,797 pre-pandemic), and further categorized and analyzed by time periods: March to May (Period 1), June to August (Period 2), and September to November (Period 3). Comparisons between pandemic and pre-pandemic groups included: Minority status, demographics, diagnosis, MELD, insurance type, and transplant center characteristics. Liver transplant centers (n = 113) were divided into tertiles by volume (small, medium, large) for further analyses. Multivariable logistic regression was fitted to assess odds of transplant. Competing risk regression was used to predict probability of removal from the waitlist due to transplantation or death and sickness. Additional temporal analyses were performed to assess changes in outcomes over the course of the pandemic. RESULTS: During Period 1 of the pandemic, Minorities showed greater reduction in both listing (-14% vs -12% Whites), and transplant (-15% vs -7% Whites), despite a higher median MELD at transplant (23 vs 20 Whites, P < 0.001). Of candidates with public insurance, Minorities demonstrated an 18.5% decrease in transplants during Period 1 (vs -8% Whites). Although large programs increased transplants during Period 1, accounting for 61.5% of liver transplants versus 53.4% pre-pandemic (P < 0.001), Minorities constituted significantly fewer transplants at these programs during this time period (27.7% pandemic vs 31.7% pre-pandemic, P = 0.04). Although improvements in disparities in candidate listings, removals, and transplants were observed during Periods 2 and 3, the adjusted odds ratio of transplant for Minorities was 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.96, P = 0.001) over the entire pandemic period. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19's effect on access to liver transplantation has been ubiquitous. However, Minorities, especially those with public insurance, have been disproportionately affected. Importantly, despite the uncertainty and challenges, our systems have remarkable resiliency, as demonstrated by the temporal improvements observed during Periods 2 and 3. As the pandemic persists, and the aftermath ensues, health care systems must consciously strive to identify and equitably serve vulnerable populations.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Hígado/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Work relative value unit (wRVU)-based fee schedules are predominantly used by both the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and private payers to determine the payments for physicians' clinical productivity. However, under the Affordable Care Act, CMS is transitioning into a value-based payment structure that rewards patient-oriented outcomes and cost savings. Moreover, in the context of solid organ transplantation, physicians and surgeons conduct many activities that are neither billable nor accounted for in the wRVU models. New compensation models for transplant professionals must (1) justify payments for nonbillable work related to transplant activity/procedures; (2) capture the entire academic, clinical, and relationship-building work effort as part of RVU determination; and (3) move toward a value-based compensation scheme that aligns the incentives for physicians, surgeons, transplant center, payers, and patients. In this review, we provide an example of redesigning RVUs to address these challenges in compensating transplant physicians and surgeons. We define a customized RVU (cRVU) for activities that typically do not generate wRVUs and create an outcome value unit (OVU) measure that incorporates outcomes and cost savings into RVUs to include value-based compensation.
Asunto(s)
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Cirujanos , Anciano , Humanos , Medicare , Escalas de Valor Relativo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) enables optimized ex-vivo preservation of a donor liver in a normal physiologic state. The impact of this emerging technology on donor liver utilization has yet to be assessed. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: NMP of the donor liver and ex-vivo enhancement of its function has been envisioned for decades, however only with recent technological advances have devices been suitable for transition to clinical practice. The present study examines the effect NMP on liver utilization in the United States. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried to identify deceased donor livers procured from 2016 to 2019 (n = 30596). Donor livers were divided by preservation method: standard cold-static preservation (COLD, n = 30,368) versus NMP (n = 228). Donor and recipient risk factors, liver disposition, and discard reasons were analyzed. The primary outcome was liver discard rate between 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 4037 livers were discarded. The NMP group had a 3.5% discard rate versus 13.3% in the COLD group (P < 0.001), and this was despite NMP donors being older (47.7 vs 39.5 years, P < 0.0001), more frequently donation after cardiac death (DCD) (18% vs 7%, P < 0.001), and having a greater donor risk index (1.6 vs 1.5, P < 0.05). The most common reasons for liver discard in the COLD group were biopsy findings (38%), DCD warm ischemic time (11%), and prolonged preservation time (10%). Survival analysis, following propensity score matching, found no significant difference in 1-year overall survival between recipients of NMP versus COLD livers. CONCLUSIONS: NMP reduces the discard rate of procured livers despite its use in donors traditionally considered of more marginal quality. NMP maintains excellent graft and patient survival. Broader application of NMP technology holds the potential to generate a significant number of additional liver grafts for transplantation every year, thus greatly reducing the nationwide disparity between supply and demand.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Fría/métodos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Donadores Vivos/provisión & distribución , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Perfusión/métodos , Isquemia Tibia/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Kidneys from deceased donors infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are underutilized. Most HCV virus-infected donors are designated as Public Health Service increased donors (PHS-IR). Impact of PHS and HCV designations on discard is not well studied. METHODS: We queried the UNOS data set for all deceased donor kidneys between January 2015 and December 2018. The final study cohort donors (n = 38 702) were stratified into three groups based on HCV antibody (Ab) and NAT status: (a) Ab-/NAT- (n = 35 861); (b) Ab+/NAT- (n = 973); and (c) Ab±/NAT+ (n = 1868). We analyzed utilization/discard rates of these organs, the impact of PHS-IR and HCV designations on discard using multivariable two-level hierarchical logistic regression models, forecasted number of HCV viremic donors/kidneys by 2023. RESULTS: During the study period, (a) the number of viremic donor kidneys increased 2 folds; (b) the multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models showed that, overall, the PHS labeling (OR 1.20, CI 95% CI 1.15-1.29) and HCV designation (OR 2.29; 95% CI 2.15-2.43) were independently associated with increased risk of discard; (c) contrary to the general perception, PHS-IR kidneys across all HCV groups, compared to PHS-IR kidneys were more likely to be discarded; (d) we forecasted that the number of kidneys from HCV viremic donor kidneys might increase from 1376 in 2019 to 2092 in 2023. CONCLUSION: Hepatitis C virus viremic kidneys might represent 10%-15% of deceased donor organ pool soon with the current rate of the opioid epidemic. PHS labeling effect on discard requires further discussion of the utility of this classification.
Asunto(s)
Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Riñón/virología , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/tendencias , Adulto , Cadáver , Selección de Donante/normas , Femenino , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos , United States Public Health Service , Viremia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The United States opioid use epidemic over the past decade has coincided with an increase in hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive donors. Using propensity score matching, and the Organ Procurement Transplant Network data files from January 2015 to June 2019, we analyzed the short-term outcomes of adult deceased donor kidney transplants of HCV uninfected recipients with two distinct groups of HCV positive donors (HCV seropositive, nonviremic n = 352 and viremic n = 196) compared to those performed using HCV uninfected donors (n = 36 934). Compared to the reference group, the transplants performed using HCV seropositive, nonviremic and viremic donors experienced a lower proportion of delayed graft function (35.2 vs 18.9%; P < .001 [HCV seropositive, nonviremic donors] and 36.2 vs 16.8% ; P < .001[HCV viremic donors]). The recipients of HCV viremic donors had better allograft function at 6 months posttransplant (eGFR [54.1 vs 68.3 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = .004]. Furthermore, there was no statistical difference in the overall graft failure risk at 12 months posttransplant by propensity score matched multivariable Cox proportional analysis (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.29 [HCV seropositive, nonviremic donors] and HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.96 [HCV viremic donors]). Further studies are required to determine the long-term outcomes of these transplants and address unanswered questions regarding the use of HCV viremic donors.
Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto , Hepatitis C/transmisión , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Viremia/transmisión , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C/virología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Viremia/tratamiento farmacológico , Viremia/virologíaRESUMEN
The number of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantations (SLKTs) and use of induction therapy for SLKT have increased recently, without much published evidence, especially in the context of maintenance immunosuppression containing tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolic acid (MPA). We queried the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network registry for SLKT recipients maintained on TAC/MPA at discharge in the United States for 2002-2016. The cohort was divided into 3 groups on the basis of induction type: rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG; n = 831), interleukin 2 receptor antagonist (IL2RA; n = 1558), and no induction (n = 2333). Primary outcomes were posttransplant all-cause mortality and acute rejection rates in kidney and liver allografts at 12 months. Survival rates were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. A propensity score analysis was used to control potential selection bias. Multivariate inverse probability weighted Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression models were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios. Among SLKT recipients, survival estimates at 3 years were lower for recipients receiving r-ATG (P = 0.05). Compared with no induction, the multivariate analyses showed an increased mortality risk with r-ATG (HR, 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.52; P = 0.002) and no difference in acute liver or kidney rejection rates at 12 months across all induction categories. No difference in outcomes was noted with IL2RA induction over the no induction category. In conclusion, there appears to be no survival benefit nor reduction in rejection rates for SLKT recipients who receive induction therapy, and r-ATG appears to increase mortality risk compared with no induction.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/cirugía , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Suero Antilinfocítico/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/complicaciones , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ácido Micofenólico/efectos adversos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Tacrolimus/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The practice of induction therapy with either rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) or interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2RA) is common among heart transplant recipients. However, its benefits in the setting of contemporary maintenance immunosuppression with tacrolimus/mycophenolic acid (TAC/MPA) are unknown. METHODS: We compared post-transplant mortality among three induction therapy strategies (r-ATG vs IL2-RA vs no induction) in a retrospective cohort analysis of heart transplant recipients maintained on TAC/MPA in the Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) database between the years 2006 and 2015. We used a multivariable model adjusting for clinically important co-morbidities, and a propensity score analysis using the inverse probability weighted (IPW) method in the final analysis. RESULTS: In multivariable IPW analysis, r-ATG (HR = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.05-1.46, P = 0.01) remained significantly associated with a higher mortality. There was a trend toward having a higher mortality in the IL2-RA (HR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.00-1.24, P = 0.06) group. Subgroup analyses failed to show a patient survival benefit in using either r-ATG or IL2-RA among any of the subgroups analyzed. CONCLUSION: In this contemporary cohort of heart transplant recipients receiving TAC/MPA, neither r-ATG nor IL2-RA were associated with a survival benefit. On the contrary, adjusted analyses showed a significantly higher mortality in the r-ATG group and a trend toward higher mortality in the IL2-RA group. While caution is needed in interpreting treatment effects in an observational cohort, these data call into question the benefit of induction therapy as a common practice and highlight the need for more studies.
Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Trasplante de Corazón/mortalidad , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Tacrolimus/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto/tratamiento farmacológico , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Pronóstico , Asignación de Recursos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the introduction of lung allocation score (LAS), increasingly sicker patients are undergoing lung transplantation (LT). This study was conducted to determine the time trends in need for dialysis after LT, identify variables independently associated with need for dialysis, and evaluate its association with 1- and 5-year mortality. METHODS: We queried the United Network of Organ Sharing database for adult patients undergoing LT between 1994 and 2014. We excluded patients with simultaneous dual organ transplantation and where data regarding the need for dialysis were not available. RESULTS: Time trends in the yearly incidence of the need for dialysis showed a gradual increase (P = .012). In the post-LAS era, ethnicity, underlying diagnosis, estimated GFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 and mean pulmonary pressures>35 mm Hg, ventilator or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support at LT, and >20% increase in serum creatinine between listing and match were independently associated with the need for dialysis. Patients with need for dialysis had significantly increased hazard of 1-year (n = 13 849; adjusted hazard ratio, 95% CI:7.23, 6.2-8.4, P < .001) and 5-year mortality (n = 7287; adjusted hazard ratio, 95% CI:3.96, 3.43-4.56, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There is a gradual increase in the incidence of the need for early dialysis after LT, and these patients have significantly worse early and late survival. Several pre-transplant recipient characteristics are independently associated with the need for dialysis.
Asunto(s)
Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Enfermedades Pulmonares/mortalidad , Trasplante de Pulmón/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Diálisis Renal/mortalidad , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Renal , Enfermedades Pulmonares/cirugía , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Pulmón/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: There is a lack of data regarding the independent association of pretransplant kidney function with early and late outcomes among lung transplant (LT) recipients. METHODS: We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing database for adult patients (≥18 years of age) undergoing LT between 1987 and 2013. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) and the Chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations. The study population was split into four groups (>90, 60-90, 45-59.9, and <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) based on the estimated GFR at the time of listing. RESULTS: Overall, there was a good correlation between the GFR estimated from the two equations (n=17884, Pearson r=.816, P<.001). There was a consistent and independent association of worse early and late outcomes with declining GFR throughout the spectrum including those above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P<.001 for overall comparisons). Although GFR<45 mL/min/1.73 m2 was associated with worse early and late survival, patients with GFR 45-59.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 do not appear to have survival advantage beyond 3 years post-transplant. CONCLUSION: There is a good correlation between GFR estimated using MDRD and CKD-EPI equations among patients being considered for LT. Early and late outcomes after LT worsen in a linear fashion with progressively lower pretransplant GFR.
Asunto(s)
Dieta , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Riñón/fisiopatología , Trasplante de Pulmón , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Renal , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infects >60% of adults and can pose an independent risk factor for allograft loss and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a nationwide implementation of CMV seromatching (donor/recipient: D-/R- and D+/R+) in the U.S. deceased donor kidney allocation system (KAS). Methods: Adult candidates on the U.S. kidney-only transplant waiting list and deceased donor kidneys offered to the U.S. transplant centers were considered. A discrete-event simulation model, simulating the pre-COVID-19 period from January 1, 2015, to January 1, 2018, was used to compare the performances of currently employed KAS-250 policy (without CMV matching) to various simulated CMV matching policies parameterized by calculated panel reactive antibody exception threshold. Outcomes included CMV serodistribution, waiting time, access to transplantation among various groups, transplant rate, graft survival, kidney discard rate, and antigen-mismatch distribution, stratified by CMV serostatus. Results: CMV matching policy with a calculated panel reactive antibody exception threshold of 50% (namely, the CMV">50%" policy) strikes a better balance between benefits and drawbacks of CMV matching. Compared with KAS-250, CMV">50%" reduced CMV high-risk (D+/R-) transplants (6.1% versus 18.1%) and increased CMV low-risk (D-/R-) transplants (27.2% versus 13.1%); increased transplant rate for CMV R- patients (11.54 versus 12.57) but decreased for R+ patients (10.68 versus 10.48), yielding an increase in aggregate (11.09 versus 10.94); and reduced mean time to transplantation (by 6 wk); and reduced kidney discard rate (25.7% versus 26.2%). Conclusions: Our findings underscore the feasibility and potential advantages of a nationwide CMV seromatching policy in kidney transplantation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The influence of center volume on kidney transplant outcomes is a topic of ongoing debate. In this study, we employed competing risk analyses to accurately estimate the marginal probability of graft failure in the presence of competing events, such as mortality from other causes with long-term outcomes. The incorporation of immunosuppression protocols and extended follow-up offers additional insights. Our emphasis on long-term follow-up aligns with biological considerations where competing risks play a significant role. METHODS: We examined data from 219,878 adult kidney-only transplantations across 256 U.S. transplant centers (January 2001-December 2015) sourced from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry. Centers were classified into quartiles by annual volume: low (Q1 = 28), medium (Q2 = 75), medium-high (Q3 = 121), and high (Q4 = 195). Our study investigated the relationship between center volume and 5-year outcomes, focusing on graft failure and mortality. Sub-population analyses included deceased donors, living donors, diabetic recipients, those with kidney donor profile index >85%, and re-transplants from deceased donors. RESULTS: Adjusted cause-specific hazard ratios (aCHR) for Five-Year Graft Failure and Patient Death were examined by center volume, with low-volume centers as the reference standard (aCHR: 1.0). In deceased donors, medium-high and high-volume centers showed significantly lower cause-specific hazard ratios for graft failure (medium-high aCHR = 0.892, p<0.001; high aCHR = 0.953, p = 0.149) and patient death (medium-high aCHR = 0.828, p<0.001; high aCHR = 0.898, p = 0.003). Among living donors, no significant differences were found for graft failure, while a trend towards lower cause-specific hazard ratios for patient death was observed in medium-high (aCHR = 0.895, p = 0.107) and high-volume centers (aCHR = 0.88, p = 0.061). CONCLUSION: Higher center volume is associated with significantly lower cause-specific hazard ratios for graft failure and patient death in deceased donors, while a trend towards reduced cause-specific hazard ratios for patient death is observed in living donors.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Receptores de Trasplantes , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Supervivencia de Injerto , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Rechazo de Injerto , Estados Unidos , AncianoRESUMEN
Kidney transplant is not only the best treatment for patients with advanced kidney disease but it also reduces health care expenditure. The management of transplant patients is complex as they require special care by transplant nephrologists who have expertise in assessing transplant candidates, understand immunology and organ rejection, have familiarity with perioperative complications, and have the ability to manage the long-term effects of chronic immunosuppression. This skill set at the intersection of multiple disciplines necessitates additional training in Transplant Nephrology. Currently, there are more than 250,000 patients with a functioning kidney allograft and over 100,000 waitlisted patients awaiting kidney transplant, with a burgeoning number added to the kidney transplant wait list every year. In 2022, more than 40,000 patients were added to the kidney wait list and more than 25,000 received a kidney transplant. The Advancing American Kidney Health Initiative, passed in 2019, is aiming to double the number of kidney transplants by 2030 creating a need for additional transplant nephrologists to help care for them. Over the past decade, there has been a decline in the Nephrology-as well Transplant Nephrology-workforce due to a multitude of reasons. The American Society of Transplantation Kidney Pancreas Community of Practice created a workgroup to discuss the Transplant Nephrology workforce shortage. In this article, we discuss the scope of the problem and how the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education recognition of Transplant Nephrology Fellowship could at least partly mitigate the Transplant Nephrology work force crisis.
Asunto(s)
Acreditación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Trasplante de Riñón , Nefrología , Humanos , Nefrología/educación , Nefrólogos/educación , Estados Unidos , BecasRESUMEN
Both type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease are associated with increased fracture risk, likely because of metabolic abnormalities that reduce bone strength. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is a treatment of choice for patients with both disorders, yet the effects of simultaneous pancreas-kidney and kidney transplantation alone on post-transplantation fracture risk are unknown. From the United States Renal Data System, we identified 11,145 adults with type 1 diabetes undergoing transplantation, of whom 4933 had a simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant and 6212 had a kidney-alone transplant between 2000 and 2006. Post-transplantation fractures resulting in hospitalization were identified from discharge codes. Time to first fracture was modeled and propensity score adjustment was used to balance covariates between groups. Fractures occurred in significantly fewer (4.7%) of pancreas-kidney compared with kidney-alone transplant (5.9%) cohorts. After gender stratification and adjustment for fracture covariates, pancreas-kidney transplantation was associated with a significant 31% reduction in fracture risk in men (hazard risk 0.69). Older age, white race, prior dialysis, and pre-transplantation fracture were also associated with increased fracture risk. Prospective studies are needed to determine the gender-specific mechanisms by which pancreas-kidney transplantation reduces fracture risk in men.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Fracturas Óseas/etiología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Páncreas , Adulto , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Incidencia , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Páncreas/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Riesgo , Caracteres SexualesRESUMEN
The effect of low titers of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) detected only by sensitive solid-phase assays (SPAs) on renal transplant outcomes is unclear. We report the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of rejection rates and graft outcomes for renal transplant recipients with such preformed DSAs, defined by positive results on SPA but negative complement-dependent cytotoxicity and flow cytometry crossmatch results. Our search identified seven retrospective cohort studies comprising a total of 1119 patients, including 145 with isolated DSA-SPA. Together, these studies suggest that the presence of DSA-SPA, despite a negative flow cytometry crossmatch result, nearly doubles the risk for antibody-mediated rejection (relative risk [RR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.89; P<0.001) and increases the risk for graft failure by 76% (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.13-2.74; P=0.01). These results suggest that donor selection should consider the presence of antibodies in the recipient, identified by the SPA, even in the presence of a negative flow cytometry crossmatch result.