Mechanical intestinal cleansing and antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing bacterial translocation during the Pringle maneuver in rabbits.

PURPOSE: We investigated the effectiveness of mechanical intestinal cleansing and antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing bacterial translocation (BT) during the Pringle maneuver in rabbits. METHODS: Forty-eight rabbits were allocated to one of the following four groups: a control group (group 1); an antibiotic group, given 100 mg/kg intravenous ceftizoxime (group 2); a mechanical intestinal cleansing group, given a Fleet enema (group 3); and a mechanical intestinal cleansing plus antibiotic group (group 4). After performing laparotomy, we dissected the portal region and turned the portal triad, using tape. Pringle maneuver was applied for 30 min in all groups. Blood samples were collected from the portal vein for blood culture before the Pringle maneuver. All groups underwent relaparotomy 30 min after the Pringle maneuver, to obtain portal blood, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs), and splenic tissue for culture. RESULTS: All cultures from the portal vein specimens taken before the Pringle maneuver were negative. The rate of bacterial isolation in the portal vein (P < 0.001), MLNs (P < 0.01), and splenic (P < 0.001) cultures was significantly lower in group 4 than in the other groups. It was also lower in group 3 than in groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of mechanical intestinal cleansing and preoperative broad-spectrum antibiotics was most effective for preventing BT during the Pringle maneuver.

Effects of platelet rich plasma on colonic anastomosis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on tissue maturation and wound healing in experimental colonic anastomosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty Sprague Dawley rats were divided into three groups of 10 rats each. Group I (control group) was subjected to colon anastomosis only. Group II (PRP group) was subjected to colon anastomosis and topical PRP was applied. Group III (Bioglue group) was subjected to colon anastomosis and topical tissue sealant was applied (Bioglue; Cryolife, Kennesaw, GA). The rats were sacrificed on postoperative day 7, and the bursting pressure of the anastomosis and tissue hydroxyproline levels were measured; histopathological changes on the anastomosis line were also examined. RESULTS: The bursting pressure was statistically higher in the PRP group than in the control and Bioglue groups (P < 0.05). The hydroxyproline levels were also statistically higher in the PRP group than in the control and Bioglue groups (P < 0.05). Histopathologically, there was less inflammatory cell infiltration, intensive fibroblast development, and rich collagen production in the PRP group. CONCLUSION: PRP may be used in colon anastomosis, especially in patients with impaired wound healing, to obtain a better anastomotic strength.