Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Stroke ; 55(6): 1601-1608, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38690658

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A coordinated network of circulating inflammatory molecules centered on the pleotropic pro-atherogenic cytokine interleukin-18 (IL-18) is linked to cerebral small vessel disease. We sought to validate the association of this inflammatory biomarker network with incident stroke risk, cognitive impairment, and imaging metrics in a sample of the Framingham Offspring Cohort. METHODS: Using available baseline measurements of serum levels of IL-18, GDF (growth and differentiation factor)-15, soluble form of receptor for advanced glycation end products, myeloperoxidase, and MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) from Exam 7 of the Framingham Offspring Cohort (1998-2001), we constructed a population-normalized, equally weighted log-transformed mean Z-score value representing the average level of each serum analyte to create an inflammatory composite score (ICS5). Multivariable regression models were used to determine the association of ICS5 with incident stroke, brain magnetic resonance imaging features, and cognitive testing performance. RESULTS: We found a significant association between ICS5 score and increased risk for incident all-cause stroke (hazard ratio, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.05-2.08]; P=0.024) and ischemic stroke (hazard ratio, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.03-2.21]; P=0.033) in the Exam 7 cohort of 2201 subjects (mean age 62±9 years; 54% female) aged 45+ years with an all-cause incident stroke rate of 6.1% (135/2201) and ischemic stroke rate of 4.9% (108/2201). ICS5 and its component serum markers are all associated with the Framingham Stroke Risk Profile score (ß±SE, 0.19±0.02; P<0.0001). In addition, we found a significant inverse association of ICS5 with a global cognitive score, derived from a principal components analysis of the neuropsychological battery used in the Framingham cohort (-0.08±0.03; P=0.019). No association of ICS5 with magnetic resonance imaging metrics of cerebral small vessel disease was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating serum levels of inflammatory biomarkers centered on IL-18 are associated with an increased risk of stroke and cognitive impairment in the Framingham Offspring Cohort. Linking specific inflammatory pathways to cerebral small vessel disease may enhance individualized quantitative risk assessment for future stroke and vascular cognitive impairment.


Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores , Inflamación , Interleucina-18 , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Biomarcadores/sangre , Accidente Cerebrovascular/sangre , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Persona de Mediana Edad , Interleucina-18/sangre , Anciano , Inflamación/sangre , Estudios de Cohortes , Incidencia , Factores de Riesgo , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Disfunción Cognitiva/sangre , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico por imagen
2.
Clin Exp Nephrol ; 24(4): 349-355, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31900728

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Causes of non-resuming peritoneal dialysis (PD) after complicated peritonitis requiring peritoneal catheter (PC) removal remain poorly studied. METHODS: We reviewed all peritonitis episodes in our center between 1997 and 2017. Patients who restarted PD after PC removal (Group 1) were compared to those who did not (Group 2), identifying the causes. RESULTS: Of 284 peritonitis episodes, PC was removed in 48 patients (16.9%). In 18 (37.5%) patients PC was reinserted, and PD successfully resumed in all, with a median duration of PD afterwards of 14.1 months. In other 30 (62.5%) reinsertion of PC was not attempted. Causes of non-reinsertion were: transfer to hemodialysis 76.6% (n = 23), death 16.7% (n = 5) and transplantation 6.7% (n = 2). Hemodialysis switch was due to non-medical reasons in 47.8% (n = 11) including fear of peritonitis, family decision and social dependence. Group 1 was younger (p = 0.041), with lower Charlson index (p = 0.045) and higher men proportion (p = 0.049). Group 1 had a better patient survival than group 2 (survival at 24 months: 67% and 53%, respectively; log-rank test p: 0.01). There were no differences in survival between groups when adjusted for significant basal characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Resuming PD after severe peritonitis requiring PC removal is feasible but a high proportion of patients do not restart PD for non-medical reasons, usually older patients with higher Charlson index. A properly structured interview would be a useful tool that could improve return to technique in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Remoción de Dispositivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Peritoneal/instrumentación , Peritonitis , Anciano , Catéteres , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Peritoneal/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA