Trifluridine/tipiracil+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan+BEV as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: This open-label, multicentre, phase II/III trial assessed the noninferiority of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab vs. fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab (control) as second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS: Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive FTD/TPI (35 mg/m2 twice daily, days 1-5 and days 8-12, 28-day cycle) plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg, days 1 and 15) or control. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The noninferiority margin of the hazard ratio (HR) was set to 1.33. RESULTS: Overall, 397 patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. Median OS was 14.8 vs. 18.1 months (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control; HR 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.93; Pnoninferiority = 0.5920). In patients with a baseline sum of the diameter of target lesions of <60 mm (n = 216, post hoc analyses), the adjusted median OS was similar between groups (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control, 21.4 vs. 20.7 months; HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.55-1.55). Grade ≥3 adverse events (FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab vs. control) included neutropenia (65.8% vs. 41.6%) and diarrhoea (1.5% vs. 7.1%). CONCLUSIONS: FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab did not demonstrate noninferiority to fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan plus bevacizumab as second-line treatment for mCRC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-173618, jRCTs031180122.

The Phase II Study of Panitumumab in Chemotherapy-Naïve Frail or Elderly Patients with RAS Wild-type Colorectal Cancer: OGSG 1602 Final Results.

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the response rate of a phase II OGSG1602 study on panitumumab in chemotherapy-naive frail or elderly patients with RAS wild-type unresectable colorectal cancer (CRC) [Terazawa T, Kato T, Goto M, et al. Oncologist. 2021;26(1):17]. Herein, we report a survival analysis. METHODS: Patients aged ≥65 years and considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy or aged ≥76 years were enrolled. Primary tumors located from the cecum to the transverse colon were considered right-sided tumors (RSTs); those located from the splenic flexure to the rectum were considered left-sided tumors (LSTs). RESULTS: Among the 36 enrolled patients, 34 were included in the efficacy analysis, with 26 and 8 having LSTs and RSTs, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.0 [95% CI, 5.4-10.0] and 17.5 months (95% CI, 13.8-24.3), respectively. Although no significant differences existed in PFS between patients with LST and RST {6.6 (95% CI, 5.4-11.5) vs. 4.9 months [95% CI, 1.9-not available (NA), P = .120]}, there were significant differences in OS [19.3 (95% CI, 14.2-NA) vs.12.3 months (95% CI, 9.9-NA), P = .043]. CONCLUSION: Panitumumab showed favorable OS in frail or elderly patients with RAS wild-type CRC and no prior exposure to chemotherapy. Panitumumab may be optimal for patients with LSTs (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry Number UMIN000024528).

Relationship between Chemotherapy-Induced Diarrhea and Intestinal Microbiome Composition.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Fluoropyrimidines (FPs) are key drugs in many chemotherapy regimens; however, recipients are often prone to diarrhea due to gastrointestinal toxicity. Disruption of the intestinal epithelial barrier function by FPs leads to dysbiosis, which may exacerbate intestinal epithelial cell damage as a secondary effect and trigger diarrhea. However, despite studies on chemotherapy-induced changes in the intestinal microbiome of humans, the relationship between dysbiosis and diarrhea is unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between chemotherapy-induced diarrhea and the intestinal microbiome. METHODS: We conducted a single-center prospective observational study. Twenty-three patients who received chemotherapy, including FPs as first-line chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, were included. Stool samples were collected before the start of chemotherapy and after one cycle of treatment to analyze intestinal microbiome composition and perform PICRUSt predictive metagenomic analysis. RESULTS: Gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in 7 of 23 patients (30.4%), diarrhea was observed in 4 (17.4%), and nausea and anorexia were observed in 3 (13.0%). In 19 patients treated with oral FPs, the α diversity of the microbial community decreased significantly following chemotherapy only in the diarrheal group. At the phylum level, the diarrheal group showed a significant decrease in the abundance of Firmicutes and a significant increase in the abundance of Bacteroidetes with chemotherapy (p = 0.013 and 0.011, respectively). In the same groups, at the genus level, Bifidobacterium abundance was significantly decreased (p = 0.019). In contrast, in the non-diarrheal group, Actinobacteria abundance increased significantly with chemotherapy at the phylum level (p = 0.011). Further, Bifidobacterium, Fusicatenibacter, and Dorea abundance significantly increased at the genus level (p = 0.006, 0.019, and 0.011, respectively). The PICRUSt predictive metagenomic analysis revealed that chemotherapy caused significant differences in membrane transport in KEGG pathway level 2 and in 8 KEGG pathway level 3, including transporters and oxidative phosphorylation in the diarrhea group. CONCLUSION: Organic-acid-producing bacteria seem to be involved in diarrhea associated with chemotherapy, including FPs.

Aflibercept with FOLFIRI in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a post-marketing surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Safety and effectiveness of aflibercept with 5-fluorouracil/levofolinate/irinotecan have not been reported in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS: This post-marketing surveillance enrolled patients with un-resectable advanced or recurrent mCRC who were prescribed aflibercept from December 2017 to June 2019 in Japan. Data, collected up to 1 year from starting treatment, included patient background, safety, and effectiveness assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 or physician's evaluation. RESULTS: Of 261 patients registered from 64 centers, 235 [53.2% male with a median age of 67 years (range 28-84)] received treatment and were included in the safety analysis. Aflibercept was received at 1st, 2nd, and ≥ 3rd line in 1.3%, 48.1%, and 50.2% of patients, respectively. Median number of treatment cycles was 6 (range 1-22) and relative dose intensity was 75.4% (range 14.3-101.8%). Adverse events (all grades) were reported in 88.5% of patients, including neutropenia (34.5%), proteinuria (24.7%), hypertension (17.0%), diarrhea (17.0%), and decreased appetite (15.3%). Three treatment-related deaths occurred by perforation of the digestive tract, pneumonia and gastrointestinal bleeding, and sudden death. The effectiveness analysis included 198 patients. Overall response rate was 6.1% (1st line, 0%; 2nd line, 10.1%; ≥ 3rd line, 2.1%) and disease control rate was 47.5% (1st line, 100%; 2nd line, 58.6%; ≥ 3rd line, 34.4%). CONCLUSION: No new risks of aflibercept were identified in real clinical practice. Effectiveness in patients at the 2nd line was consistent with previous reports.

Three-Year Outcomes of a Phase II Study of Perioperative Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Therapy for Clinical SS/SE N1-3 M0 Gastric Cancer (OGSG 1601).

BACKGROUND: We previously reported the good feasibility and favorable efficacy of perioperative capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in patients (pts) with clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1-3 M0 gastric cancer (GC) in a phase II study in which the pathological response rate, the primary endpoint, of 54.1% was demonstrated. Here, we report 3-year follow-up data. METHODS: The eligibility criteria included clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1-3 M0 GC according to the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma-3rd English Edition (JCGC). Three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx (capecitabine, 2000mg/m2 for 14 days; oxaliplatin, 130mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) were administered, followed by 5 cycles of adjuvant CapeOx after D2 gastrectomy. Three-year overall survival and relapse-free survival are presented here, and analyzed by cohorts based on pathologic response rate (pRR). RESULTS: Thirty-seven pts were enrolled from July 2016 to May 2017, and fully evaluated for efficacy and toxicity. Thirty-three pts (89.2%) completed the planned three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx and underwent gastrectomy, with an R0 resection rate of 78.4% (n = 29). The overall survival (OS) rate and relapse-free survival (RFS) rate at 3 years was 83.8% (95% CI, 72.7-96.5%) and 73.0% (95% CI, 60.0-88.8%), respectively. Further, the 3-year OS rate in pts with pathological response of grade 1a (n = 13) and grade 1b or higher (n = 20) was 69.2% (95% CI: 48.2-99.5%) and 100.0%, respectively, based on JCGC. Pathological response rate was classified according to JCGC as follows: grade 0, the tumor was not affected; grade 1a, less than one-third of the tumor was affected; grade 1b, one to two thirds of the tumor was affected; grade 2, greater than or equal to two thirds was affected; and grade 3, no residual tumor. A pathological response was defined as grade 1b or greater. CONCLUSION: Perioperative CapeOx showed good feasibility and favorable prognosis, especially in pts with pathological response of grade 1b or higher and was found to be useful in predicting prognosis. The data obtained using this novel approach warrant further investigation (Trial ID: UMIN000021641, jRCTs051180109).

Neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin and S-1 therapy for the patients with large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer (OGSG1902): protocol of a multi-center, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Large type 3 and type 4 gastric cancers have extremely poor prognoses. To address this, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be a promising approach. The phase III JCOG0501 study, conducted to confirm the superiority of neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin followed by D2 gastrectomy over upfront surgery, showed no survival benefit for neoadjuvant S-1 plus cisplatin. In Korea, the PRODIGY study, which was a phase III study of neoadjuvant docetaxel plus oxaliplatin plus S-1 (DOS) followed by surgery and adjuvant S-1 versus surgery and adjuvant S-1 for gastric cancer of T2-3N+ or T4Nany, showed that progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly superior in the neoadjuvant DOS arm. Therefore, DOS therapy may be a promising candidate for preoperative chemotherapy for large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer. METHODS: Preoperative docetaxel 40 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 will be intravenously administered on day1 every three weeks. S-1 will be orally administered 80 mg/m2 on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle. Patients will receive three courses of treatment and gastrectomy with ≥D2 lymph node dissection. Postoperative S-1 plus docetaxel therapy (DS) will be administered according to the JACCRO GC-07 (START-2) study. The primary endpoint is the 3-year PFS rate. Secondary endpoints include PFS time, overall survival time, pathological response rate, response rate according to RECIST version1.1, proportion of completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, R0 resection rate, proportion of completion of surgery, proportion of completion of protocol treatment, proportion of negative conversion of CY, adverse event occurrence rate, and nutritional evaluation. The null hypothesis for the 3-year PFS rate is 45% and the expected value is 60%. The total sample size is 46 considering that the registration period and follow-up period are two and three years, respectively. DISCUSSION: This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, phase II trial assessing the efficacy and safety of preoperative DOS and postoperative DS for large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer. The results will inform future phase III trials and are expected to lead to new treatment strategies for large type 3 or type 4 gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered with Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on October 11, 2019 ( jRCTs051190060 ).

TRESBIEN (OGSG 2101): encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab for early recurrent stage II/III BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer.

The BRAF V600E mutation accounts for approximately 5% of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases and is an extremely poor prognostic factor. However, there are no clear recommendations regarding first-line therapy for patients with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. Recently, a novel combination of encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab, showed a higher response rate than standard chemotherapy in patients with BRAF V600E-mutated CRC. Here we describe our plan for the TRESBIEN study (OGSG 2101), which is an open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase II study designed to evaluate whether encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab are effective for patients with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer, during or after adjuvant chemotherapy. The planned number of subjects is 25.

An ongoing study to evaluate encorafenib, binimetinib and cetuximab for people with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer. BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer (CRC) is a type of cancer caused by change (mutation) in a gene called BRAF. It is one of the most difficult types of CRC to treat because currently available drugs do not effectively treat the disease. Recently, two novel treatments, encorafenib and cetuximab, have been approved for use together in several countries for the treatment of advanced or metastatic BRAF V600E-mutated CRC. In Japan, these drugs are also approved to be given with another treatment called binimetinib, an approach called triplet therapy. This article describes the ongoing TRESBIEN study that is looking at how effective and how safe triplet therapy is for the treatment of people with early recurrent BRAF V600E-mutated CRC, during or after they have additional (adjuvant) chemotherapy. This study is ongoing, and the researchers are currently recruiting new participants. TRESBIEN will evaluate the percentage of participants whose tumors shrink with triplet therapy. The study will also look at any side effects. Clinical Trial Registration: jRCTs051210152 (ClinicalTrials.gov) (Japan Registry of Clinical Trials https://jrct.niph.go.jp/search?language=en&page=1).

Phase II Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy in Chemotherapy-Naïve Frail or Elderly Patients with Unresectable RAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer: OGSG 1602.

LESSONS LEARNED: Panitumumab monotherapy showed favorable efficacy and feasibility in the treatment of frail or elderly patients with RAS wild-type unresectable colorectal cancer. It is especially effective for left-sided tumors; therefore, panitumumab as first-line treatment could be an additional therapeutic option for frail elderly patients, particularly in those who are unsuitable for upfront oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based combination regimens. BACKGROUND: First-line panitumumab monotherapy is expected to be well tolerated and improve survival in patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, its safety and efficacy in chemotherapy-naïve frail or elderly patients with unresectable RAS wild-type (WT) colorectal cancer (CRC) have not been studied. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of panitumumab as first-line treatment. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter phase II study on patients aged ≥76 years or ≥65 years considered unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy. Panitumumab 6 mg/kg of intravenous infusion was administered every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients (median age: 81 [range, 67-88] years) were enrolled between February 2017 and August 2018. Two patients were excluded from the analysis of efficacy: one from lack of image examination at baseline and the other from lack of a measurable lesion. Thirty-three (91.6%) patients had a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1, whereas two (5.6%) patients and one (2.8%) patient had a PS of 2 and 3, respectively. Twenty-eight patients (77.8%) had left-sided CRC, whereas eight (22.2%) had right-sided CRC. The RR was 50.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.4-67.6), including three patients (8.8%) who had complete responses. A total of 26.5% had stable diseases, resulting in a DCR of 76.5% (90% CI, 61.5-87.7). The RR of patients with left- and right-sided tumors was 65.4% (95% CI, 44.3-82.8) and 0.0% (95% CI, 0.0-36.9), respectively. Major grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicities were rash (n = 6, 16.7%), hypomagnesemia (n = 4, 11.1%), fatigue (n = 3, 8.3%), paronychia (n = 2, 5.6%), and hyponatremia (n = 2, 5.6%). The only grade 3 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (n = 1, 2.8%). CONCLUSION: Panitumumab monotherapy showed favorable efficacy and feasibility in frail or elderly patients with RAS WT unresectable CRC. Survival analysis including OS, PFS, and TTF is currently in progress.

Docetaxel plus S-1 versus cisplatin plus S-1 in unresectable gastric cancer without measurable lesions: a randomized phase II trial (HERBIS-3).

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin plus S-1 (CS) is the standard first-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in Japan. A previous phase III trial showed that docetaxel plus S-1 (DS) was effective for AGC without measurable lesions, but no studies have compared these two regimens. METHODS: Eligible patients had unresectable or recurrent HER2-negative AGC without measurable lesions. Patients were randomized to DS (docetaxel 40 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1 80-120 mg on days 1-14, every 3 weeks) or CS (cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 8, S-1 80-120 mg on days 1-21, every 5 weeks). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: All patients had unresectable primary disease. Sixty-one patients were randomly assigned to DS (n = 30) or CS (n = 31). One CS patient was ineligible due to HER2 positivity. The median number of cycles was 9.5 (range 2-49) with DS and 5.5 (range 1-10) with CS. There were no treatment-related deaths. The most common grade 3-4 non-hematological toxicity was fatigue (7% with DS, 13% with CS), followed by anorexia (3% with DS, 10% with CS) and diarrhea (3% with DS, 10% with CS). The 2-year OS rates were 43.3% with DS and 30.0% with CS (log-rank P = 0.113), with a hazard ratio of 0.617 (95% confidence interval 0.337-1.128), indicating non-inferiority of DS to CS with respect to OS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DS showed slightly but nonsignificantly less toxicity and higher efficacy than CS for AGC without measurable lesions. DS should be further investigated in phase III trials.

A phase II study of FOLFIRINOX with primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim for chemotherapy-naïve Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although FOLFIRINOX is currently one of the standard therapies for chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC), the high rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) presents a clinical problem. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim with FOLFIRINOX in Japanese MPC patients. METHODS: FOLFIRINOX (intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, levofolinate 200 mg/m2, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) bolus 400 mg/m2 and 5-FU 46 h infusion 2400 mg/m2) and pegfilgrastim 3.6 mg on day 4 or 5, every 2 weeks was administered to previously untreated MPC patients. The primary endpoint was the incidence of FN during the first 3 cycles. The planned sample size was 35 patients, but the trial was predefined to discontinue enrollment for safety if 4 patients developed FN. RESULTS: At the enrollment of 22 patients, 4 patients developed FN in the first cycle, resulting in an incidence of FN of 18% {95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-40.3%}, and enrollment was discontinued early. The incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia was 36.4%. Median relative dose intensities during the initial 3 cycles of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bolus 5-FU, infusional 5-FU, and levofolinate maintained high (100%, 89.0%, 100%, 66.0%, and 100%, respectively). Response rate and median overall survival were 54.5% (95% CI 32.7-74.9) and 15.7 months (95% CI 7.9-18.8), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study could not demonstrate any reduction in the incidence of FN, nevertheless some patients experience benefits for efficacy by maintaining dose intensity using prophylactic pegfilgrastim. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm , UMIN000017538. Date of registration: May/13/2015.

[Regorafenib versus S-1 plus Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer as Salvage Line-A Phase â ¡ Study (OGSG1301)].

BACKGROUND: Regorafenib(Rego)is the salvage line standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC), which often causes severe toxicities, such as hand-foot syndrome. Previously, we reported that in phase Ⅱ study, S-1 plus bevacizumab( Bev)(SB)showed favorable anticancer activity and feasibility as a salvage line. The aim of this study was to evaluate 2 treatments for mCRC as salvage line. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter phase Ⅱ study, the patients were randomly assigned(1:1)to the Rego or SB group. In the Rego group, Rego 160 mg/kg body weight was orally administered every 28 days for 21 days. In the SB group, S-1 was orally administered every 42 days for 28 days, according to body surface area, and Bev 5 mg/kg was administered by intravenous infusion on days 1, 15, and 29. Administration of S-1 every 21 days for 14 days and Bev 7.5 mg/kg on day 1 was also permitted. The primary endpoint was overall survival(OS), and the planned sample size was 86. RESULTS: This study was ended prematurely due to poor accrual. Overall, 8 patients were enrolled from 6 institutions between Oct 2013 and May 2015. Although 4 patients were assigned to each group, one patient in the Rego group was excluded after enrollment. The median OS in the Rego and SB groups was 30.2 months and 6.6 months, respectively(hazard ratio: 0.205, p=0.123). The median progression-free survival in the Rego and SB groups was 3.7 months and 1.6 months, respectively. The disease control rate in the Rego and SB groups was 100% and 75%, respectively. The Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were increased, including AST/ALT(n=1, 25%), hyponatremia(n=1, 25%), hand-foot syndrome(n=1, 25%), hypertension(n=1, 25%), and proteinuria(n=1, 25%)in the Rego group and colitis( n=1, 25%)in the SB group; the treatment was discontinued. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that data could only be collected from a small number of patients, SB is not recommended as salvage line for mCRC.

A Phase II Study of Perioperative Capecitabine plus Oxaliplatin Therapy for Clinical SS/SE N1-3 M0 Gastric Cancer (OGSG 1601).

LESSONS LEARNED: Perioperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) therapy showed favorable efficacy with sufficient pathological response. Small sample size limited the statistical power of this result. Perioperative CapeOx therapy showed good feasibility. Further studies with larger sample size are required to validate this novel approach. BACKGROUND: D2 gastrectomy followed by adjuvant S-1 is the standard therapy for patients (pts) with stage III gastric cancer (GC) in Japan; however, the outcome is not satisfactory. We examined the efficacy of perioperative capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) in pts with GC. METHODS: The eligibility criteria included confirmed clinical T3(SS)/T4a(SE) N1-3 M0 GC according to the Japanese Classification (JCGC; 3rd English Edition). Three cycles of neoadjuvant CapeOx (NAC; capecitabine, 2,000 mg/m2 for 14 days; oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks) were administered, followed by five cycles of adjuvant CapeOx (AC) after D2 gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was the pathological response rate (pRR) according to the JCGC (≥grade 1b). RESULTS: Thirty-seven pts were enrolled on CapeOx. An R0 resection rate of 78.4% (n = 29) and a pRR of 54.1% (n = 20, p = .058; 90% confidence interval [CI], 39.4-68.2) were demonstrated. Among 27 pts who initiated AC, 21 (63.6%) completed the treatment. Grade 3-4 toxicities during NAC included neutropenia (8%), thrombocytopenia (8%), and anorexia (8%) and during AC included neutropenia (37%), diarrhea (4%), and anorexia (4%). CONCLUSION: Perioperative CapeOx showed good feasibility and favorable efficacy with sufficient pathological response, although statistical significance at .058 did not reach the commonly accepted cutoff of .05. The data obtained using this novel approach warrant further investigations.

Phase Ib/II Study of Biweekly TAS-102 in Combination with Bevacizumab for Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies (BiTS Study).

LESSONS LEARNED: A biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV schedule in patients with heavily pretreated mCRC showed equivalent efficacy with less toxicity compared with the current schedule of TAS-102 plus BEV combination. Biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV combination could reduce unnecessary dose reduction of TAS-102, maintain higher doses, and possibly be effective even in cases without chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). The prespecified subgroup analysis of this study showed an obvious association between CIN within the first two cycles and prognosis of biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV. BACKGROUND: TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) plus bevacizumab (BEV) combination therapy has shown promising activity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the previously reported dose and schedule for the TAS-102 (70 mg/m2 /day on days 1-5 and 8-12, every 4 weeks) plus BEV (5 mg/kg on day 1, every 2 weeks) regimen is complicated by severe hematological toxicities and difficult administration schedules. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a more convenient biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV combination. METHODS: Patients with mCRC who were refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies were enrolled. Patients received biweekly TAS-102 (twice daily on days 1-5, every 2 weeks) with BEV (5mg/kg on day 1, every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 16 weeks (16-w PFS rate). RESULTS: From October 2017 to January 2018, 46 patients were enrolled. The recommended phase II dose was determined to be TAS-102 (70 mg/m2 /day). Of the 44 eligible patients, the 16-w PFS rate was 40.9% (95% confidence interval, 26.3%-56.8%), and the null hypothesis was rejected (p < .0001). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 4.29 months and 10.86 months, respectively. Disease control rate was 59.1%. Common grade 3 or higher adverse events were hypertension (40.9%), neutropenia (15.9%), and leucopenia (15.9%). CONCLUSION: Biweekly TAS-102 plus BEV showed promising antitumor activity with safety.

Endoscopic Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapeutic Efficacy in Gastric Cancer before Gastrectomy Might be as Useful as Histological Assessment after Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer is expected to improve prognoses. However, as there is no method to evaluate neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic efficacy before gastrectomy, some patients at high risk for a poor prognosis undergo gastrectomy. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether endoscopy could be useful for assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the data of 41 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy at our institution to investigate whether responsiveness to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as assessed with endoscopy, can serve as a surrogate marker for histological grades 1b or higher in the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (JCGC) scheme. RESULTS: There were 32 (78.0%) responders and 9 (22.0%) nonresponders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as observed in endoscopic evaluations. Among the endoscopic responders, 24 (75.0%) had cancer of histological grade 1b or higher, and 15 (46.9%) had cancer of grade 2 or higher. Among the endoscopic nonresponders, 1 (11.1%) patient had histological grade 1b cancer. Compared with endoscopic nonresponders, endoscopic responders were more likely to show a histological response (chi-square test: p = 0.0005 for JCGC grade 1b or higher; p = 0.0099 for JCGC grade 2 or higher). CONCLUSIONS: Most endoscopic responders showed JCGC histological responses. Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic efficacy by endoscopy in gastric cancer may be useful before gastrectomy. As this was a retrospective study, further investigations are required. The protocol was approved by the ethics review committee at Osaka Medical College (No. 2422) and was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000033088).

The Management of Recurrence within Six Months after Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Hepatectomy is currently recommended as the most reliable treatment for colorectal liver metastases. However, the association between the choice of treatment for recurrence and the timing of recurrence remains controversial. METHODS: Two-hundred ninety-five patients who underwent hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed for the risk factors and the outcomes for early recurrence within 6 months. The remnant liver volumes (RLVs) and laboratory data were measured postoperatively using multidetector computed tomography on days 7 and months 1, 2, and 5 after the operation. RESULTS: Early recurrence developed in 88/295 patients (29.8%). Colorectal cancer lymph node metastasis, synchronous liver metastasis, and multiple liver metastases were independent risk factors for the occurrence of early recurrence (p < 0.001, 0.032, and 0.019, respectively). Patients with early recurrence had a poorer prognosis than did patients who developed later recurrence (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent surgery or other local treatment had better outcomes. The changes in RLV and laboratory data after postoperative month 2 were not significantly different between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with early recurrence within 6 months had a poorer prognosis than did patients who developed later recurrence. However, patients who underwent repeat hepatectomy for recurrence had a better prognosis than did those who underwent other treatments, with good prospects for long-term survival.

[A Case of Remnant Gastric Cancer Occurring 12 Years after Surgery That Was Successfully Treated with Radiation Therapy].

A 59-year-old woman had a history of distal gastrectomy and D2 dissection in May 200X for advanced gastric cancer(GC) in the antrum area. The pathological stage was poorly differentiated, T2(SS), N2, H0, P0, CY0, M0, pStage ⅢA. After administration of S-1 for 1 year as adjuvant chemotherapy, the patient underwent surveillance with no recurrence. However, remnant GC was diagnosed in April 200X+12. Considering that there was no indication for curative resection due to severe invasion of the proper hepatic artery, gastrojejunostomy was performed for the anastomotic stenosis. Although the patient was administered 3 courses of S-1 plus oxaliplatin therapy as first-line treatment, partial response was not achieved. Therefore, chemoradiotherapy(CRT)with capecitabine was administered for local tumor control. Complete response was achieved, and the patient underwent surveillance with no recurrence 16 months after the recurrence. There were no serious acute adverse events(AEs)during CRT and late AEs after CRT. The patient was successfully treated with CRT for locally advanced remnant GC. Although there is no standard treatment for locally advanced remnant GC, this case showed the effectiveness of CRT.

Hepatectomy and liver regeneration in the results of treatment of colorectal liver metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: Hepatectomy is currently the most reliable treatment modality for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This paper describes and discusses the outcomes of initial versus repeat hepatic resection for CRLM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 2008 and December 2018, we retrospectively analyzed the data of 385 patients who underwent initial and repeat hepatic resection for CRLM at a single institution with respect to surgical outcomes and remnant liver regeneration. The remnant liver volume was postoperatively measured via computed tomography on postoperative day 7 and at 1, 2, 5, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The liver regeneration rate peaked at 1 week postoperatively, and gradually decreased thereafter. Remnant liver volume plateaued around 1-2 months postoperatively, when regeneration was almost complete. There was no difference in the rate of liver volume regeneration during the entire postoperative period between initial and repeat hepatic resection (p = 0.708, 0.511, 0.055, 0.053, 0.102, and 0.110, respectively). After 2 months postoperatively, the laboratory data showed recovery toward near normal levels, and none of the data exhibited significant differences. There were also no significant differences in morbidity rate, mortality rate, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival after hepatic resection (p = 0.488, 0.124, 0.071 and 0.387, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Initial and repeat hepatectomy showed similar outcomes of remnant liver regeneration and short- and long-term prognoses.

First-line single-agent panitumumab in frail elderly patients with wild-type RAS unresectable colorectal cancer: a phase II study protocol OGSG 1602.

BACKGROUND: A cytotoxic chemotherapeutic regimen is not routinely recommended for frail elderly patients with unresectable colorectal cancer (CRC) because of susceptibility to treatment. Panitumumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Use of panitumumab as first-line therapy is expected to be well tolerated and to improve survival rates, even in patients who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. However, the efficacy and safety of panitumumab as the first-line therapy for the frail elderly patients with unresectable CRC have not been yet studied. METHODS: We plan to conduct a prospective multi-center phase II study. Patients with wild-type RAS unresectable CRC aged ≥76 years or ≥ 65 who are not considered eligible for intensive chemotherapy will be included in the study. A total of 36 patients will be enrolled from Osaka Gastrointestinal Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group for over 2 years. Panitumumab 6 mg/kg IV infusion will be administered every 2 weeks. The purpose of this trial is to assess the efficacy of panitumumab as first-line therapy for patients with unresectable CRC. The primary endpoint is to determine the disease control rate. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, overall survival, response rate, time to treatment failure, and the incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities. DISCUSSION: This is a prospective phase II trial assessing the efficacy of panitumumab monotherapy in the elderly patients with wild-type RAS unresectable CRC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The ethics committee of the Osaka Medical College approved this study on November 7, 2016. The trial registration number of the government was UMIN000024528 on December 1, 2016. It was registered prospectively (the day of enrollment of the first participant was February 9, 2017).

Fluoropyrimidine-induced intestinal mucosal injury is associated with the severity of chemotherapy-related diarrhea.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although the fluoropyrimidines are effective chemotherapeutic agents for malignant gastrointestinal tumors, they sometimes cause enteritis with diarrhea. Severe treatment-related diarrhea may result in chemotherapy discontinuation. We investigated the relationship between diarrhea severity and fluoropyrimidine-induced small intestinal mucosal injury. METHODS: We performed small bowel capsule endoscopy in patients undergoing chemotherapy including fluoropyrimidine for a malignant tumor between May 2017 and June 2018 and analyzed the relationship between the endoscopic findings and diarrhea severity. We also performed a cross-sectional analysis of patient factors and routes of chemotherapy to identify risk factors of fluoropyrimidine-induced small intestinal injury. RESULTS: Small bowel capsule endoscopy was successfully completed in 16 eligible patients. The diarrhea grade (per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) was significantly correlated with the percentage of patients with a small intestinal mucosal break (grade 0, 16.7%; grade 1, 57.1%; grade 2, 100%; p = .016, Cochran-Armitage trend test). Compared to patients receiving intravenous therapy, those receiving an orally administered fluoropyrimidine had a significantly greater number of small intestinal mucosal breaks (median number of breaks [range]; intravenous 5-fluorouracil, 0 [0-13]; oral fluoropyrimidine, 6.5 [1-20]; p = .0162, Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with diarrhea caused by chemotherapy including fluoropyrimidine had small intestinal mucosal breaks. Additionally, small intestinal mucosal breaks were more severe in patients receiving a regimen of oral treatment than in those receiving a regimen of intravenous therapy. These outcomes have important implications for investigations of new strategies for preventing anti-cancer drug-induced diarrhea.

Feasibility of neoadjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin followed by surgery for resectable advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: In Japan, the administration of S-1 following D2 gastrectomy is a standard treatment for stage II/III gastric cancer (GC). However, the survival of stage IIIB/IIIC GC remains unsatisfactory. To improve this, we conducted a multicenter phase II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a neoadjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin regimen (SOX) followed by surgery targeted at stage III GC. METHODS: Oxaliplatin was administered intravenously (130 mg/m(2)) on day 1, and S-1 was administered orally (40 mg/m(2), twice a day) for 14 days followed by a seven-day rest period. After three cycles of therapy, D2 gastrectomy was performed. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients were enrolled and completed the protocol treatment. Grade 3/4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (21.4 %), anorexia (14.3 %), and diarrhea (7.1 %). Seven patients (50 %) underwent total gastrectomy, and seven patients underwent distal gastrectomy. Grade 3/4 surgical complications included pancreatic fistula (21.4 %) and lung infection (7.1 %). The pathological response rate was 85.7 %. CONCLUSION: Although our data are limited and preliminary, neoadjuvant SOX followed by surgery can be performed safely with a high pathological response rate in patients with resectable advanced GC. Further investigation of this neoadjuvant approach is warranted.