RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIM: Retrospective studies show an association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). We investigate the relationship between PPI and SBP in decompensated cirrhotic patients in a large nationwide prospective study. METHODS: Seven hundred seventy patients with a diagnosis of decompensated cirrhosis were admitted consecutively in 23 hospitals in Argentina from March 2011 to April 2012; the patients were carefully investigated for PPI consumption in the previous 3 months. In total, 251 patients were excluded because of active gastrointestinal hemorrhage, antibiotic use during the preceding weeks, HIV-positive status and immunosuppressive therapy. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-six out of 519 patients (43.5%) had received PPI therapy within the last 3 months. In 135 patients, PPIs were administered for longer than 2 weeks. A bacterial infection was shown in 255 patients (49.1%). SBP was diagnosed in 95 patients out of 394 patients with ascites (24.7%). There was no significant difference in the rate of PPI consumption between the infected and the non-infected patients (44.3% vs. 42.8%) or between the SBP patients and the patients with ascites without SBP (46% vs. 42%). In the SBP patients, the duration of PPI administration did not influence the rate of SBP occurrence. The type of bacteria and the origin of SBP infection were similar in the patients with and without PPI. CONCLUSION: In the current large, multicenter, prospective study, PPI therapy, specifically evaluated at admission of consecutive cirrhotic patients, was not associated with a higher risk of SBP.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Bacterianas , Cirrosis Hepática , Peritonitis , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Adulto , Anciano , Argentina/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Bacterianas/epidemiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/etiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/terapia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrosis Hepática/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Hepática/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Peritonitis/diagnóstico , Peritonitis/epidemiología , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estadística como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Asunaprevir is a selective HCV NS3 protease inhibitor, active against genotypes 1, 4, 5, and 6 in vitro. We evaluated asunaprevir plus peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin (PegIFNα/RBV) for genotype 1 and 4 chronic HCV. METHODS: In this phase 2b, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, treatment-naive adults with genotype 1 (n=213) or 4 (n=25) were randomly assigned (3:1) to asunaprevir 200mg or placebo twice daily plus PegIFNα/RBV. Asunaprevir recipients, achieving protocol-defined response (HCV-RNA below quantification limit at week 4 and undetectable at week 10), were rerandomized at week 12 to continue asunaprevir-based triple therapy or receive placebo plus PegIFNα/RBV for weeks 13-24. Patients without protocol-defined response (PDR) and placebo recipients continued PegIFNα/RBV through week 48. Co-primary end points were undetectable HCV-RNA at week 4 and 12 (eRVR) and 24 weeks posttreatment (SVR24). RESULTS: Most patients were male (64.3%), white (83.6%), and had non-CC IL28B genotypes (71.3%). Among genotype 1 patients, eRVR rates (asunaprevir vs. placebo) were 67% (80% CI 62, 72) vs. 6% (80% CI 2, 10); corresponding SVR24 rates were 64% (80% CI 59, 68) vs. 44% (80% CI 36, 53). SVR24 among genotype 4 patients was 89% (asunaprevir) vs. 43% (placebo). Rates of rash and haematologic adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Five asunaprevir-treated patients had grade 4 alanine aminotransferase elevations that resolved following discontinuation (n=4) or with continued dosing (n=1). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of asunaprevir to PegIFNα/RBV in treatment-naive genotype 1- or 4-infected patients improves response rates and is well tolerated, with aminotransferase elevations that were manageable with appropriate monitoring. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01030432.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Interferón-alfa/uso terapéutico , Isoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Sulfonamidas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alanina Transaminasa/metabolismo , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/metabolismo , Hepatitis C Crónica/genética , Humanos , Hígado/enzimología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Up to 60% of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection do not have a sustained virologic response to therapy with peginterferon alfa plus ribavirin. METHODS: In this randomized, phase 3 trial, we evaluated the addition of telaprevir to peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection who had no response or a partial response to previous therapy or who had a relapse after an initial response. A total of 663 patients were assigned to one of three groups: the T12PR48 group, which received telaprevir for 12 weeks and peginterferon plus ribavirin for a total of 48 weeks; the lead-in T12PR48 group, which received 4 weeks of peginterferon plus ribavirin followed by 12 weeks of telaprevir and peginterferon plus ribavirin for a total of 48 weeks; and the control group (PR48), which received peginterferon plus ribavirin for 48 weeks. The primary end point was the rate of sustained virologic response, which was defined as undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after the last planned dose of a study drug. RESULTS: Rates of sustained virologic response were significantly higher in the two telaprevir groups than in the control group among patients who had a previous relapse (83% in the T12PR48 group, 88% in the lead-in T12PR48 group, and 24% in the PR48 group), a partial response (59%, 54%, and 15%, respectively), and no response (29%, 33%, and 5%, respectively) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Grade 3 adverse events (mainly anemia, neutropenia, and leukopenia) were more frequent in the telaprevir groups than in the control group (37% vs. 22%). CONCLUSIONS: Telaprevir combined with peginterferon plus ribavirin significantly improved rates of sustained virologic response in patients with previously treated HCV infection, regardless of whether there was a lead-in phase. (Funded by Tibotec and Vertex Pharmaceuticals; REALIZE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00703118.).
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Interferón-alfa/uso terapéutico , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Ribavirina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Serina Proteinasa/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Genotipo , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Humanos , Interferón alfa-2 , Interferón-alfa/efectos adversos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos , ARN Viral/sangre , Proteínas Recombinantes , Recurrencia , Retratamiento , Ribavirina/efectos adversos , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Inhibidores de Serina Proteinasa/efectos adversos , Carga Viral , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In phase 2 trials, telaprevir, a hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 protease inhibitor, in combination with peginterferon-ribavirin, as compared with peginterferon-ribavirin alone, has shown improved efficacy, with potential for shortening the duration of treatment in a majority of patients. METHODS: In this international, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned 1088 patients with HCV genotype 1 infection who had not received previous treatment for the infection to one of three groups: a group receiving telaprevir combined with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 12 weeks (T12PR group), followed by peginterferon-ribavirin alone for 12 weeks if HCV RNA was undetectable at weeks 4 and 12 or for 36 weeks if HCV RNA was detectable at either time point; a group receiving telaprevir with peginterferon-ribavirin for 8 weeks and placebo with peginterferon-ribavirin for 4 weeks (T8PR group), followed by 12 or 36 weeks of peginterferon-ribavirin on the basis of the same HCV RNA criteria; or a group receiving placebo with peginterferon-ribavirin for 12 weeks, followed by 36 weeks of peginterferon-ribavirin (PR group). The primary end point was the proportion of patients who had undetectable plasma HCV RNA 24 weeks after the last planned dose of study treatment (sustained virologic response). RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the T12PR or T8PR group than in the PR group had a sustained virologic response (75% and 69%, respectively, vs. 44%; P<0.001 for the comparison of the T12PR or T8PR group with the PR group). A total of 58% of the patients treated with telaprevir were eligible to receive 24 weeks of total treatment. Anemia, gastrointestinal side effects, and skin rashes occurred at a higher incidence among patients receiving telaprevir than among those receiving peginterferon-ribavirin alone. The overall rate of discontinuation of the treatment regimen owing to adverse events was 10% in the T12PR and T8PR groups and 7% in the PR group. CONCLUSIONS: Telaprevir with peginterferon-ribavirin, as compared with peginterferon-ribavirin alone, was associated with significantly improved rates of sustained virologic response in patients with HCV genotype 1 infection who had not received previous treatment, with only 24 weeks of therapy administered in the majority of patients. (Funded by Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Tibotec; ADVANCE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00627926.).
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Interferón-alfa/uso terapéutico , Oligopéptidos/uso terapéutico , Polietilenglicoles/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Serina Proteinasa/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Humanos , Interferón alfa-2 , Interferón-alfa/efectos adversos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos , ARN Viral/sangre , Proteínas Recombinantes , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Inhibidores de Serina Proteinasa/efectos adversos , Carga Viral , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Several studies have reported that low doses of interferon can delay the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and progression of chronic hepatitis C. We investigated the incidence of clinical events among participants of the Evaluation of PegIntron in Control of Hepatitis C Cirrhosis (EPIC)3 program. METHODS: Data were analyzed from an open-label randomized study of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had failed to respond to interferon alfa plus ribavirin. All patients had compensated cirrhosis with no evidence of HCC. Patients received peginterferon alfa-2b (0.5 µg/kg/week; n=311) or no treatment (controls, n=315) for a maximum period of 5 years or until 98 patients had a clinical event (hepatic decompensation, HCC, death, or liver transplantation). The primary measure of efficacy was time until the first clinical event. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in time to first clinical event among patients who received peginterferon alfa-2b compared with controls (hazard ratio [HR], 1.452; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.880-2.396). There was no decrease in the development of HCC with therapy. The time to disease progression (clinical events or new or enlarged varices) was significantly longer for patients who received peginterferon alfa-2b compared with controls (HR, 1.564; 95% CI: 1.130-2.166). In a prospectively defined subanalysis of patients with baseline portal hypertension, peginterferon alfa-2b significantly increased the time to first clinical event compared with controls (P=.016). There were no new safety observations. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance therapy with peginterferon alfa-2b is not warranted in all patients and does not prevent HCC. However, there is a potential clinical benefit of long-term suppressive therapy in patients with preexisting portal hypertension.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/prevención & control , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Interferón-alfa/administración & dosificación , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/prevención & control , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/virología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C Crónica/mortalidad , Humanos , Hipertensión Portal/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión Portal/virología , Interferón alfa-2 , Interferón-alfa/efectos adversos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrosis Hepática/mortalidad , Cirrosis Hepática/virología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/virología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , América del Norte , Selección de Paciente , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , ARN Viral/sangre , Proteínas Recombinantes , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , América del Sur , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga ViralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: EPIC-3 is a prospective, international study that has demonstrated the efficacy of PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus weight-based ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C and significant fibrosis who previously failed any interferon-alfa/ribavirin therapy. The aim of the present study was to assess FibroTest (FT), a validated non-invasive marker of fibrosis in treatment-naive patients, as a possible alternative to biopsy as the baseline predictor of subsequent early virologic (EVR) and sustained virologic response (SVR) in previously treated patients. METHODS: Of 2312 patients enrolled, 1459 had an available baseline FT, biopsy, and complete data. Uni- (UV) and multi-variable (MV) analyses were performed using FT and biopsy. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar as in the overall population; METAVIR stage: 28% F2, 29% F3, and 43% F4, previous relapsers 29%, previous PEG-IFN regimen 41%, high baseline viral load (BVL) 64%. 506 patients (35%) had undetectable HCV-RNA at TW12 (TW12neg), with 58% achieving SVR. The accuracy of FT was similar to that in naive patients: AUROC curve for the diagnosis of F4 vs F2=0.80 (p<0.00001). Five baseline factors were associated (p<0.001) with SVR in UV and MV analyses (odds ratio: UV/MV): fibrosis stage estimated using FT (4.5/5.9) or biopsy (1.5/1.6), genotype 2/3 (4.5/5.1), BVL (1.5/1.3), prior relapse (1.6/1.6), previous treatment with non-PEG-IFN (2.6/2.0). These same factors were associated (p ≤ 0.001) with EVR. Among patients TW12neg, two independent factors remained highly predictive of SVR by MV analysis (p ≤ 0.001): genotype 2/3 (odds ratio=2.9), fibrosis estimated with FT (4.3) or by biopsy (1.5). CONCLUSIONS: FibroTest at baseline is a possible non-invasive alternative to biopsy for the prediction of EVR at 12 weeks and SVR, in patients with previous failures and advanced fibrosis, retreated with PEG-IFN alfa-2b and ribavirin.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Interferón-alfa/administración & dosificación , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Ribavirina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Biopsia , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hígado Graso/diagnóstico , Femenino , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Humanos , Interferón alfa-2 , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas RecombinantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Treatment with peginterferon alfa and ribavirin produces a sustained virologic response (SVR) in approximately 60% of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. Alternate options are needed for patients who relapse or do not respond to therapy. METHODS: This prospective, international, multicenter, open-label study evaluated efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2b (1.5 microg/kg/wk) plus weight-based ribavirin (800-1400 mg/day) in 2333 chronic HCV-infected patients with significant fibrosis/cirrhosis whose previous interferon alfa/ribavirin therapy failed. Patients with undetectable HCV-RNA at treatment week (TW) 12 received 48 weeks of therapy; patients with detectable HCV-RNA at TW12 could enter maintenance studies at TW18; 188 patients with low/detectable HCV-RNA at TW12 continued therapy at the investigator's request. RESULTS: Overall, 22% of the patients attained SVR (56% with undetectable HCV-RNA and 12% with low/detectable HCV-RNA at TW12). SVR was better in relapsers (38%) than nonresponders (14%), regardless of previous treatment, and in patients previously treated with interferon-alfa/ribavirin (25%) than peginterferon alfa-ribavirin (17%). Predictors of response in patients with undetectable HCV-RNA at TW12 were genotype (2/3 vs 1, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 2.4; P < .0001), fibrosis score (F2 vs F4; OR, 2.2; F3 vs F4; OR, 1.7; P < .0001), and baseline viral load (< or =600,000 vs >600,000 IU/mL; OR, 1.4; P = .0223). These factors plus previous treatment and response were overall predictors of SVR. Safety was similar among fibrosis groups. CONCLUSIONS: Peginterferon alfa-2b plus weight-based ribavirin is effective and safe in patients who failed interferon alfa/ribavirin therapy. Genotype, baseline viral load, and fibrosis stage were predictors of response.
Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Interferón-alfa/administración & dosificación , Ribavirina/administración & dosificación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C Crónica/virología , Humanos , Interferón alfa-2 , Interferón-alfa/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polietilenglicoles , ARN Viral/sangre , Proteínas Recombinantes , Insuficiencia del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) are at a high risk for renal failure and death despite successful treatment of infection. Intravenous (IV) albumin administration combined with antibiotic treatment has been shown to significantly decrease these risks. Clinical evidence is lacking on which patients are appropriate candidates for albumin treatment. AIM: To retrospectively analyse the usefulness of serum creatinine and bilirubin levels in predicting renal failure and mortality of patients hospitalized for SBP. METHODS: Between March 1995 and September 1998, 127 cirrhotic patients with SBP who had not received plasma expansion were evaluated. Eighty-one patients (64%) were classified as having a high risk for renal failure and mortality (serum bilirubin >4 mg/dl or serum creatinine >1 mg/dl) and 46 (36%) as having a low risk. RESULTS: At admission, 36.3% of all patients presented renal failure. Mortality during their hospitalization was 23% among those with a high risk and 6.5% among those with a low risk (P=0.01). Renal failure occurred in 23% of the high-risk patients, compared with 2.6% of the low-risk patients (P=0.006). The presence of hyponatraemia was significantly associated with higher mortality and renal failure in the high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective review of patients with SBP suggests that serum bilirubin levels >4 mg and serum creatinine levels >1 mg/dl at the time of diagnosis represent significant risk factors for the clinical outcomes of patients with SBP. Patients without these risk factors may have a very low likelihood of death or renal failure.
Asunto(s)
Bilirrubina/sangre , Creatinina/sangre , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Peritonitis/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal/metabolismo , Insuficiencia Renal/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Argentina , Humanos , Hiponatremia/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Insuficiencia Renal/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is associated with ulcerative colitis (UC) and seems to be a risk factor for colon cancer. However, taking into account that no data are available in South American population, we analyzed the prevalence of PSC in 1,333 patients with UC and the risk for developing colon cancer. MATERIAL: patients with persistent increases of alkaline phosphatase were studied by cholangiography and liver biopsy. To assess the risk of colon cancer, each patient with PSC and UC was matched with two control patients with UC without PSC of the same age, gender, extent and duration of UC. RESULTS: the whole prevalence of PSC was 2.9% (39 patients) reaching 6.2% in extensive colitis. Seven (18%) out of 39 patients with PSC developed colorectal carcinoma compared with 2 out of 78 (2.6%) in the control group (p=0.006). The cumulative risk of colorectal carcinoma was 11% and 18% after 10 and 20 years in the PSC group compared with 2% and 7% in the control group, respectively (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: this is the first prospective study performed in Latin America showing that the prevalence of PSC in patients with UC is similar to that reported in the Anglo-Saxon population. Patients with UC and PSC have a high risk of colorectal cancer.
Asunto(s)
Fosfatasa Alcalina/sangre , Colangitis Esclerosante/complicaciones , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Neoplasias Colorrectales/etiología , Lesiones Precancerosas/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Argentina/epidemiología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Biopsia , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Pancreatocolangiografía por Resonancia Magnética , Colangitis Esclerosante/epidemiología , Colangitis Esclerosante/patología , Colitis Ulcerosa/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
The findings by epidemiological studies on the link between PBC and HCC are in general agreement with the notion that cirrhosis is a risk factor for HCC development. From the clinical perspective, this implies that in PBC patients with cirrhosis, the screening for HCC should be considered for evaluating prognosis as well as therapeutic options. At this time, it is not possible to determine whether any PBC-specific risk factors other than cirrhosis per se exist for the development of HCC. Identification of such risk factors may point to new mechanisms involved in the carcinogenesis of HCC. In order to answer the question whether the underlying mechanisms for PBC are risk factors for HCC, more aggressive clinical studies with larger patient populations are needed. Such studies should include patients with PBC as well as patients with cirrhosis of other etiologies, both have to be carefully matched for patient characteristics including race, gender, age, disease stage and period of follow-up. On the other hand, the resolution of this issue also relies on a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of PBC itself.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiología , Cirrosis Hepática Biliar/complicaciones , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Masculino , Factores de RiesgoAsunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , ARN Viral/sangre , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Interferón alfa-2 , Interferón-alfa/administración & dosificación , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes , Ribavirina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Low protein concentration in ascitic fluid has been identified as a risk factor for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Until now, primary prophylaxis has not been recommended in these patients. The aim was to investigate the efficacy of long-term administration of ciprofloxacin to prevent SBP. METHODS: One hundred cirrhotic patients with <1.5 g/dl of total protein in ascitic fluid were randomized prospectively, in a double blind fashion to receive ciprofloxacin 500 mg/day (n=50) or placebo (n=50) for 12 months. RESULTS: Baseline data were similar in both groups. In the ciprofloxacin group, SBP occurred almost four times less frequently than in the placebo group but it was not statistically significant. The probability of survival at 12 months was significantly higher in patients receiving ciprofloxacin (86% versus 66%) (p<0.04). SBP and sepsis were the most frequent causes of death in the placebo group whereas gastrointestinal bleeding was responsible for the most deaths in the ciprofloxacin group. The probability of remaining free of bacterial infections was higher in patients receiving ciprofloxacin (80% versus 55%) (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cirrhosis and low protein concentration in ascitic fluid are candidates to receive long-term prophylaxis to reduce the risk of infections and improve survival.
Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Peritonitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Infecciones Bacterianas/mortalidad , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Peritonitis/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of naltrexone for the short and long term treatment of pruritus of cholestasis. METHODS: Twenty patients with pruritus and cholestasis were included. A baseline pruritus score was obtained over 1 week. Patients were then randomized to receive 50 mg/day of naltrexone or placebo for 2 weeks. Subsequently, a 1-week washout period ensued and patients were crossed over to the other therapy for 2 additional weeks. Pruritus was assessed daily with a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10. Patients whose pruritus decreased >50% of basal with naltrexone received naltrexone 50 mg/day for 2 additional months. RESULTS: Mean basal VAS was similar in both groups. VAS showed greater and more significant changes with naltrexone than with placebo (P<0.0003). In nine out of 20 patients (45%) receiving naltrexone, pruritus decreased >50% compared to basal value, including five whose pruritus disappeared completely. No significant changes were observed in serum biochemistry. Most of the adverse events that occurred during the first 48 h of naltrexone therapy were consistent with opioid withdrawal-like phenomena and spontaneously disappeared 2 days after starting treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Naltrexone can be considered as an alternative option to treat pruritus of cholestasis. In the current study, side effects were transient and did not require specific medication.
Asunto(s)
Colestasis/complicaciones , Naltrexona/administración & dosificación , Naltrexona/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Prurito/tratamiento farmacológico , Prurito/etiología , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Cruzados , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Prurito/fisiopatología , SeguridadRESUMEN
Treatment with beta-blockers fails to decrease portal pressure in nearly 40% of cirrhotic patients. Recent studies have suggested that treatment with spironolactone reduces pressure and flow in the portal and variceal systems. This trial was designed to assess if nadolol plus spironolactone is more effective than nadolol alone to prevent the first variceal bleeding. One hundred patients with medium and large varices who had never bled and were without ascites were included in a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The patients were randomized into 2 groups: 51 received nadolol plus placebo (N + P) and 49 received nadolol plus spironolactone 100 mg/d (N + S). Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and activity of the renin-aldosterone system (plasma renin activity/plasma aldosterone levels) were measured in 24 patients. There were no significant differences in the appearance of variceal bleeding and ascites between groups at a mean follow-up of 22 +/- 16 months. However, analyzing both complications together, the incidence was significantly higher in the N + P group than in the N + S group (39% vs. 20%; P <.04). Clinical ascites was also higher in patients in the N + P group than in the N + S group (21% vs. 6%; P <.04). Significant increases in plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone levels were only observed in patients in the N + S group (P <.01). The cumulative probabilities of remaining free of bleeding and ascites were similar in both groups after 70 months of follow-up. In conclusion, these results suggest that nadolol plus spironolactone does not increase the efficacy of nadolol alone in the prophylaxis of the first variceal bleeding. However, when bleeding and ascites were considered together, the combined therapy effectively reduced the incidence of both portal-hypertensive complications.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/etiología , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/prevención & control , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Nadolol/uso terapéutico , Espironolactona/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Hemodinámica/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Circulación Esplácnica/efectos de los fármacos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background/aim: primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is associated with ulcerative colitis (UC) and seems to be a risk factor for colon cancer. However, taking into account that no data are available in South American population, we analyzed the prevalence of PSC in 1.333 patients with UC and the risk for developing colon cancer. Material: patients with persistent increases of alkaline phosphatase were studied by cholangiography and liver biopsy. To assess the risk of colon cancer, each patient with PSC and UC was matched with two control patients with UC without PSC of the same age, gender, extent and duration of UC. Results: the whole prevalence of PSC was 2.9% (39 patients) reaching 6.2% in extensive colitis. Seven (18 %) out of 39 patients with PSC developed colorectal carcinoma compared with 2 out of 78 (2.6%) in the control group (p=0.006). The cumulative risk of colorectal carcinoma was 11% and 18% after 10 and 20 years in the PSC group compared with 2% and 7% in the control group, respectively (p=0.002). Conclusion: this is the first prospective study performed in Latin America showing that the prevalence of PSC in patients with UC is similar to that reported in the Anglo-Saxon population. Patients with UC and PSC have a high risk of colorectal cancer.
Introducción/objetivos: la colangitis esclerosante primaria (CEP) se asocia a colitis ulcerosa (CU) y parece ser un factor de riesgo para cáncer de colon. Sin embargo, teniendo en cuenta que no existen datos disponibles en población de Sudamérica, nosotros analizamos la prevalencia de CEP en 1.333 pacientes con CU y el riesgo de desarrollar cáncer de colon. Material: los pacientes con fosfatasa alcalina persistentemente elevada fueron estudiados con colangiografía y biopsia hepática. Para determinar el riesgo de cáncer de colon cada paciente con CEP y CU fueron apareados con dos pacientes controles con CU sin CEP de la misma edad, sexo, extensión y duración de la CU. Resultados: la prevalencia total de CEP fue de 2.9% (39 pacientes), alcanzando una prevalencia del 6.2% en colitis extensa. Siete (18%) de 39 pacientes con CEP desarrollaron cáncer colorectal comparado con 2 de 78 en el grupo control (p=0.006). El riesgo acumulado de cáncer colorectal fue 11 y 18% después de 10 y 20 años en el grupo con CEP comparado con 2 y 7% en el grupo control, respectivamente (p=0.002). Conclusión: este es el primer estudio prospectivo realizado en Latinoamérica mostrando que la prevalencia de CEP en pacientes con CU es similar a la reportada en población anglosajona. Los pacientes con CU y CEP tienen un alto riesgo de cáncer colorectal.