RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation from donors with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to recipients with HIV is an emerging practice. It has been performed since 2016 under the U.S. congressional HIV Organ Policy Equity Act and is currently approved for research only. The Department of Health and Human Services is considering expanding the procedure to clinical practice, but data are limited to small case series that did not include donors without HIV as controls. METHODS: In an observational study conducted at 26 U.S. centers, we compared transplantation of kidneys from deceased donors with HIV and donors without HIV to recipients with HIV. The primary outcome was a safety event (a composite of death from any cause, graft loss, serious adverse event, HIV breakthrough infection, persistent failure of HIV treatment, or opportunistic infection), assessed for noninferiority (margin for the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval, 3.00). Secondary outcomes included overall survival, survival without graft loss, rejection, infection, cancer, and HIV superinfection. RESULTS: We enrolled 408 transplantation candidates, of whom 198 received a kidney from a deceased donor; 99 received a kidney from a donor with HIV and 99 from a donor without HIV. The adjusted hazard ratio for the composite primary outcome was 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 1.38), which showed noninferiority. The following secondary outcomes were similar whether the donor had HIV or not: overall survival at 1 year (94% vs. 95%) and 3 years (85% vs. 87%), survival without graft loss at 1 year (93% vs. 90%) and 3 years (84% vs. 81%), and rejection at 1 year (13% vs. 21%) and 3 years (21% vs. 24%). The incidence of serious adverse events, infections, surgical or vascular complications, and cancer was similar in the groups. The incidence of HIV breakthrough infection was higher among recipients of kidneys from donors with HIV (incidence rate ratio, 3.14; 95%, CI, 1.02 to 9.63), with one potential HIV superinfection among the 58 recipients in this group with sequence data and no persistent failures of HIV treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this observational study of kidney transplantation in persons with HIV, transplantation from donors with HIV appeared to be noninferior to that from donors without HIV. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03500315.).
Asunto(s)
Infección Irruptiva , Infecciones por VIH , Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Donantes de Tejidos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infección Irruptiva/epidemiología , Infección Irruptiva/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/inmunología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto/inmunología , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapiaRESUMEN
In the Spring of 2020, the United States of America (USA) deployed COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) to treat hospitalized patients. Over 500,000 patients were treated with CCP during the first year of the pandemic. In this study, we estimated the number of actual inpatient lives saved by CCP treatment in the United States of America based on CCP weekly use, weekly national mortality data, and CCP mortality reduction data from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and real-world data. We also estimate the potential number of lives saved if CCP had been deployed for 100% of hospitalized patients or used in 15 to 75% of outpatients. Depending on the assumptions modeled in stratified analyses, we estimated that CCP saved between 16,476 and 66,296 lives. The CCP ideal use might have saved as many as 234,869 lives and prevented 1,136,133 hospitalizations. CCP deployment was a successful strategy for ameliorating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA. This experience has important implications for convalescent plasma use in future infectious disease emergencies.
Asunto(s)
Sueroterapia para COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunización Pasiva , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/terapia , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , PandemiasRESUMEN
The optimum number of units of blood and the associated number of blood donors required to meet a given population's needs remain undetermined globally. Typically, a whole blood donation rate of ten donations per 1000 population, at a minimum, is necessary to meet a country's blood needs. This rate is attributed to a WHO recommendation that 1% of a given country's population should donate blood to ensure a blood supply that is sufficient to meet clinical needs. This often cited metric was first referenced in a 1971 WHO report, yet neither supporting data or references were provided, suggesting that it was flawed at its founding. Regardless, this metric does not provide an accurate or contemporary determination of blood needs, which has ramifications for health service provision and planning, particularly in low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Modelling studies that account for geographical variability in disease burden, health-care infrastructure, and transfusion practices are needed to accurately estimate blood needs. A paucity of data to inform modelling remains a major obstacle in this regard. We discuss the history of the global blood donation index and highlight some factors that should be considered to better understand contemporary blood needs.
Asunto(s)
Donación de Sangre , Transfusión Sanguínea , Salud Global , Humanos , Donación de Sangre/provisión & distribución , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Países en Desarrollo , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Evaluación de Necesidades , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oral human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and the oral microbiome are associated with oropharyngeal cancer. However, population-based data on the association of oral microbiome with oral HPV infection are limited. METHOD: A cross-sectional analysis of 5496 20-59-year-old participants in the 2009-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey was performed. Associations with oral HPV infection were assessed using multivariable logistic regression for oral microbiome α-diversity (within-sample diversity), and using principal coordinate analysis and permutational multivariate analysis of variance for ß-diversity (between-sample heterogeneity). RESULTS: Overall, for α-diversity, a lower number of observed amplicon sequence variants (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.996; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .992-.999) and reduced Faith's phylogenetic diversity (aOR = 0.95; 95% CI = .90-.99) were associated with high-risk oral HPV infection. ß-diversity showed differentiation of oral microbiome community by high-risk oral HPV infection as measured by Bray-Curtis dissimilarity (R2 = 0.054%; P = .029) and unweighted UniFrac distance (R2 = 0.046%; P = .045). There were differential associations when stratified by sex. CONCLUSIONS: Both oral microbiome α-diversity and ß-diversity were marginally associated with oral HPV infection. Longitudinal studies are needed to characterize the role of the microbiome in the natural history of oral HPV infection.
Asunto(s)
Microbiota , Boca , Encuestas Nutricionales , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/microbiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Boca/microbiología , Boca/virología , Adulto Joven , Papillomaviridae/genética , Papillomaviridae/aislamiento & purificación , Papillomaviridae/clasificación , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Durability of variant neutralization in solid organ transplant recipients following Omicron-containing boosters is unknown. We report wane in XBB.1.5 neutralization by 3 months following a first bivalent booster, improved by a second booster; hybrid immunity improved peak, and duration of neutralization. Boosting at 3 to 6 months appears necessary to maintain neutralization.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Inmunización Secundaria , Trasplante de Órganos , SARS-CoV-2 , Receptores de Trasplantes , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Masculino , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunación , Adulto , Anciano , Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273/inmunologíaRESUMEN
As the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic led to a global health crisis, there were limited treatment options and no prophylactic therapies for those exposed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Convalescent plasma is quick to implement, potentially provides benefits, and has a good safety profile. The therapeutic potential of COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) is likely mediated by antibodies through direct viral neutralization and Fc-dependent functions such as a phagocytosis, complement activation, and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. In the United States, CCP became one of the most common treatments with more than a half million units transfused despite limited efficacy data. More than a dozen randomized trials now demonstrate that CCP does not provide benefit for those hospitalized with moderate to severe disease. However, similar to other passive antibody therapies, CCP is beneficial for early disease when provided to elderly outpatients within 72 hours after symptom onset. Only high-titer CCP should be transfused. CCP should also be considered for immunosuppressed patients with COVID-19. CCP collected in proximity, by time and location, to the patient may be more beneficial because of SARS-CoV-2 variants. Additional randomized trial data are still accruing and should be incorporated with other trial data to optimize CCP indications.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Coronavirus , Neumonía Viral , Anciano , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19/terapia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva , Neumonía Viral/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , Sueroterapia para COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion remains a major treatment for sickle cell disease (SCD). Patients with SCD have a high prevalence of renal impairment and cardiorespiratory disease, conferring risk of transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We describe an approach, titled euvolemic automated transfusion (EAT), to transfuse SCD patients with severe anemia who are at risk of TACO. In EAT, plasmapheresis is performed using donor RBCs, rather than albumin or plasma, as replacement fluid. Euvolemia is maintained. A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with SCD who underwent EAT at our institution over a 10-year period, to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EAT. RESULTS: Eleven SCD patients underwent 109 EAT procedures (1-59 procedures per patient). The median age was 42 years (IQR = [30-49]) and 82% (n = 9) were female. Most (82%; n = 9) patients had severe chronic kidney disease and 55% (n = 6) had heart failure. One (9%) patient had a history of life-threatening TACO. Mean pre- and post-procedure Hct values were 19.8% (SD ± 1.6%) and 29.1% (SD ± 1.4%), respectively. The average Hct increment was 3.2% per RBC unit. Only two EAT-related complications were recorded during the 109 procedures: central line-associated infection and citrate toxicity (muscle cramping). EAT used an average of two RBC units less than that projected for standard automated RBC exchange. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that EAT is safe and effective to treat patients with SCD and severe anemia, who are at risk for TACO. EAT requires fewer RBC units compared to automated RBC exchange.
Asunto(s)
Anemia de Células Falciformes , Reacción a la Transfusión , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anemia de Células Falciformes/complicaciones , Anemia de Células Falciformes/terapia , Transfusión Sanguínea , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/efectos adversos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/métodos , Eritrocitos , Reacción a la Transfusión/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The data to support chronic automated red cell exchange (RCE) in sickle cell disease (SCD) outside of stroke prevention, is limited, especially in adults. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of patients with SCD who were referred for chronic RCE at our institution over a 10-year period. Data that were evaluated included patient demographics, referral indications, and procedural details (e.g., vascular access, adverse events, etc.). In a subanalysis, the number of annual acute care encounters during 3 years of chronic RCE was compared with that in the year preceding the first RCE. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were referred for chronic RCE: median age was 28 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 22-36) at referral and 60% were female. Seventy (42.6%) were naïve to chronic transfusion (simple or RCE) prior to referral. The leading indications for referral were refractory pain (73/164, 44.5%) and iron overload (57/164, 34.7%). A total of 5090 procedures occurred during the study period (median = 19, IQR = 5-45). Of the 138 patients who had central vascular access, 8 (6%) and 16 (12%) had ≥1 central-line-related thrombosis and/or infection, respectively. Of those who were not RBC alloimmunized at initiation of RCE, 12/105 (11.4%) developed new antibodies during chronic RCE. In those 30 patients who were adherent to therapy for 3 years, there was no significant difference in acute care encounters following initiation of RCE. CONCLUSION: Prospective clinical trials are needed to determine which patients are most likely to benefit from chronic RCE and refine selection accordingly.
Asunto(s)
Anemia de Células Falciformes , Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Humanos , Anemia de Células Falciformes/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Washing red blood cell (RBC) units mitigates severe allergic transfusion reactions. However, washing reduces the time to expiration and the effective dose. Automated washing is time- and labor-intensive. A shortage of cell processor tubing sets prompted review of medical necessity for washed RBC for patients previously thought to require washing. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study investigated discontinuing wash RBC protocols in chronically transfused adults. In select patients with prior requirements for washing, due to a history of allergic transfusion reactions, trials of unwashed transfusions were performed. Patient demographic, clinical, laboratory, and transfusion data were compiled. The per-unit washing cost was the sum of the tubing set, saline, and technical labor costs. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (median age 34 years interquartile range [IQR] 23-53 years, 46.7% female) were evaluated. These patients had been transfused with a median of 531 washed RBC units (IQR 244-1066) per patient over 12 years (IQR 5-18 years), most commonly for recurrent, non-severe allergic reactions. There were no transfusion reactions with unwashed RBCs aside from one patient with one episode of pruritus and another with recurrent pruritus, which was typical even with washed RBC. We decreased the mean number of washed RBC units per month by 72.9% (104 ± 10 vs. 28.2 ± 25.2; p < .0001) and saved US $100.25 per RBC unit. CONCLUSION: Washing of RBCs may be safely reconsidered in chronically transfused patients without a history of anaphylaxis. Washing should be implemented judiciously due to potential lack of necessity and logistical/operational challenges.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión de Eritrocitos , Reacción a la Transfusión , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Eritrocitos , PruritoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity data in women living with HIV (WLHIV), their infants and associated factors in this subpopulation remain limited. We retrospectively measured SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity from 07/2020-11/2021 among WLHIV and their children in the PROMOTE observational cohort in Uganda, Malawi, and Zimbabwe prior to widespread SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in those countries. METHODS: Plasma stored during 3 waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in East/Southern Africa were tested for SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibodies (Ab) using serological assays that detect adaptive immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. (EUROIMMUN, Mountain Lakes, New Jersey and Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Modified-Poisson regression models were used to calculate prevalence rate ratios (PRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to identify sociodemographic and clinical risk factors. RESULTS: PROMOTE samples from 918 mothers and 1237 children were analysed. Overall, maternal SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity was 60.1% (95% CI: 56.9 -63.3) and 41.5% (95%CI: 38.8 - 44.2) for children. Non-breastfeeding mothers had a 31% higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity compared to breastfeeding mothers (aPRR=1.31, 95%CI: 1.08-1.59). WLHIV with undetectable viral load had a 10% increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity (aPRR=1.10, 95%CI: 0.89-1.37). Moreover, those who were normotensive had 12% increased risk SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity (aPRR= 1.12, 95% CI: 0.68-1.85) compared to women with hypertension. Children between 2 and 5 years had a 19% reduced risk of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity (aPRR=0.81, 95%CI: 0.64-1.02) when compared to younger children. Mother/infant SARS-CoV-2 serostatuses were discordant in 346/802 (43.1%) families tested: mothers+/children- in 72.3%; mothers-/children+ in 26.3%; child+/sibling+ concordance was 34.6%. CONCLUSIONS: These SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity data indicate that by late 2021, about 60% of mothers and about 40% of children in a cohort of HIV-affected families in eastern/southern Africa had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. More mothers than their infants tested SARS-CoV-2+, likely due to a greater external exposure for mothers linked to daily routines/employment, and school closures. Breastfeeding was protective for mothers, likely because of higher likelihood of staying home with young children, and thus less exposure. Discordant results between children within the same families underscores the need to further understand transmission dynamics within households.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19 , Infecciones por VIH , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/inmunología , Lactante , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Adulto , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Adulto Joven , Masculino , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Factores de Riesgo , Recién Nacido , Uganda/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
A successful multidisciplinary research center depends on the quality of the science being conducted and the quality of the center's design, culture, infrastructure, and institutional support. In this perspective, we describe our experience building and maintaining a multidisciplinary transplant research center with a large focus on transplant infectious diseases. We identify principles that we believe contributed to our success including: taking inventory, defining culture, creating a multidisciplinary shared leadership model, establishing expertise in a multiple method approach, investing in operations and management, building and sharing resources, and securing institutional support. We share our experience putting these principles into practice and highlight potential roadblocks.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) generate lower antibody responses to messenger RNA (mRNA)-based severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination, yet precise mechanisms for this poor response remain uncertain. One potential contributor is suboptimal spike antigen (sAg) translation and expression owing to transplant immunosuppression, which might lead to insufficient exposure to develop humoral and/or cellular immune responses. METHODS: Within a single-arm clinical trial, 65 KTRs underwent ultrasensitive plasma sAg testing before, and 3 and 14 days after, the third mRNA vaccine doses. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (anti-receptor binding domain [anti-RBD]) were serially measured at 14 and 30 days post-vaccination. Associations between sAg detection and clinical factors were assessed. Day 30 anti-RBD titer was compared among those with versus without sAg expression using Wilcoxon rank sum testing. RESULTS: Overall, 16 (25%) KTRs were sAg positive (sAg+) after vaccination, peaking at day 3. Clinical and laboratory factors were broadly similar in sAg(+) versus sAg(-) KTRs. sAg(+) status was significantly negatively associated with day 30 anti-RBD response, with median (interquartile range) 10.8 (<0.4-338.3) U/mL if sAg(+) versus 709 (10.5-2309.5) U/mL if sAg(-) (i.e., 66-fold lower; p = .01). CONCLUSION: Inadequate plasma sAg does not likely drive poor antibody responses in KTRs, rather sAg detection implies insufficient immune response to rapidly clear vaccine antigen from blood. Other downstream mechanisms such as sAg trafficking and presentation should be explored.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus , Receptores de Trasplantes , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/sangre , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Formación de Anticuerpos , Vacunación , Vacuna BNT162/inmunologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Autoimmune encephalitis (AE) comprises a heterogeneous group of autoantibody-mediated disorders targeting the brain parenchyma. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), one of several first-line therapies for AE, is often initiated when AE is suspected, albeit prior to an established diagnosis. We sought to characterize the role of TPE in the treatment of suspected AE. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis was performed of adults (≥18 years) who underwent at least one TPE procedure for "suspected AE." The following parameters were extracted and evaluated descriptively: clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment course, TPE-related adverse events, outcomes (e.g., modified Rankin scale [mRS]), and diagnosis once investigation was complete. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (median age 56 years, range 28-77 years, 62.2% male) were evaluated. Autoimmune antibody testing was positive in serum for 43.2% (n = 16) and cerebrospinal fluid for 29.7% (n = 11). Patients underwent a median of five TPE procedures (range 3-16), with 97.3% (n = 36) via a central line and 21.6% (n = 8) requiring at least one unit of plasma as replacement fluid. Fifteen patients (40.5%) experienced at least one TPE-related adverse event. Compared with mRS at admission, the mRS at discharge was improved in 21.6% (n = 8), unchanged in 59.5% (n = 22), or worse in 18.9% (n = 7). Final diagnosis of AE was determined to be definite in 48.6% (n = 18), probable in 8.1% (n = 3) and possible in 27.0% (n = 10). Six (16.2%) patients were ultimately determined to have an alternate etiology. CONCLUSION: Empiric TPE for suspected AE is generally well-tolerated. However, its efficacy remains uncertain in the absence of controlled trials, particularly in the setting of seronegative disease.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Autoinmunes del Sistema Nervioso , Encefalitis , Enfermedad de Hashimoto , Intercambio Plasmático , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Intercambio Plasmático/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Plasmaféresis , AutoanticuerposRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage remains suboptimal in the United States, underscoring the importance of monitoring trends in vaccine hesitancy. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from the 2011-2020 National Immunization Survey-Teen were used to assess trends in HPV vaccination initiation among 13-17-year-olds, parental intent to initiate vaccination, and primary reasons for parental hesitancy. RESULTS: Among all sex and race and ethnicity groups, the prevalence of HPV vaccination initiation increased over time, but parental intent to vaccinate against HPV for unvaccinated teens remained consistently low (≤45%). Among hesitant parents, "safety concerns" increased in nearly all demographic groups, with the greatest increases observed for non-Hispanic white female and male teens and no change for non-Hispanic black female teens. In 2019-2020, parents of unvaccinated non-Hispanic white teens were least likely to intend on vaccinating their teens, and the most common reason for hesitancy varied by sex and race and ethnicity (eg, "safety concerns" for white teens and "not necessary" for black female teens). CONCLUSIONS: Although HPV vaccination initiation increased over time, a substantial fraction of parents remain hesitant, and trends in their reason varied by sex and race and ethnicity. Health campaigns and clinicians should address vaccine safety and necessity.
Adolescent vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) is a critical tool for cancer prevention. We analyzed trends in HPV vaccination initiation among adolescents aged 1317 years and trends in parental hesitancy to initiate HPV vaccination for their teen, using data from a national survey in the United States. Between 20112012 and 20192020, adolescent HPV vaccination initiation increased over time for both female teens (from 53.4% to 75.2%) and male teens (from 14.5% to 71.5%). However, the majority of parents/guardians of unvaccinated teens did not intend to vaccinate their teen against HPV (ie, were vaccine hesitant), and this was consistent over time in all sex and race and ethnicity groups. Among hesitant parents, the proportion reporting safety concerns as their main reason for being hesitant increased over time in nearly all demographic groups, with the greatest increases in this reasoning observed for white teens. In 20192020, parents of unvaccinated white teens were most likely to be vaccine hesitant. The most common reason for being vaccine hesitant also differed by sex and race and ethnicity. Although HPV vaccination has been shown to be safe and effective, HPV vaccination coverage remains suboptimal, and a substantial fraction of parents/guardians continue to be hesitant to adolescent HPV vaccination.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Humanos , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Virus del Papiloma Humano , Estudios Transversales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Vacunación , Inmunización , PadresRESUMEN
Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) develop decreased antibody titers to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination compared to healthy controls (HCs), but whether KTRs generate antibodies against key epitopes associated with neutralization is unknown. Plasma from 78 KTRs from a clinical trial of third doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and 12 HCs underwent phage display immunoprecipitation and sequencing (PhIP-Seq) to map antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2. KTRs had lower antibody reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 than HCs, but KTRs and HCs recognized similar epitopes associated with neutralization. Thus, epitope gaps in antibody breadth of KTRs are unlikely responsible for decreased efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this immunosuppressed population.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is an incurable sexually transmitted infection associated with increased risk of acquiring and transmitting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). HSV-2 is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, but population-level estimates of incidence are sparse. METHODS: We measured HSV-2 prevalence from cross-sectional serological data among adults aged 18-49 years in 2 south-central Uganda communities (fishing, inland). We identified risk factors for seropositivity, then inferred age patterns of HSV-2 with a Bayesian catalytic model. RESULTS: HSV-2 prevalence was 53.6% (n = 975/1819; 95% confidence interval, 51.3%-55.9%). Prevalence increased with age, was higher in the fishing community, and among women, reaching 93.6% (95% credible interval, 90.2%-96.6%) by age 49 years. Factors associated with HSV-2 seropositivity included more lifetime sexual partners, HIV positive status, and lower education. HSV-2 incidence peakied at age 18 years for women and 19-20 years for men. HIV prevalence was up to 10-fold higher in HSV-2-positive individuals. CONCLUSIONS: HSV-2 prevalence and incidence were extremely high, with most infections occurring in late adolescence. Interventions against HSV-2, such as future vaccines or therapeutics, must target young populations. Remarkably higher HIV prevalence among HSV-2-positive individuals underscores this population as a priority for HIV prevention.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Seropositividad para VIH , Herpes Genital , Adulto , Masculino , Adolescente , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Herpesvirus Humano 2 , Uganda/epidemiología , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Prevalencia , Incidencia , Estudios Transversales , Teorema de Bayes , Factores de Riesgo , Seropositividad para VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Conducta SexualRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) reduces hospitalizations among outpatients treated early after symptom onset. It is unknown whether CCP reduces time to symptom resolution among outpatients. METHODS: We evaluated symptom resolution at day 14 by trial arm using an adjusted subdistribution hazard model, with hospitalization as a competing risk. We also assessed the prevalence of symptom clusters at day 14 between treatments. Clusters were defined based on biologic clustering, impact on ability to work, and an algorithm. RESULTS: Among 1070 outpatients followed up after transfusion, 381 of 538 (70.8%) receiving CCP and 381 of 532 (71.6%) receiving control plasma were still symptomatic (P = .78) at day 14. Associations between CCP and symptom resolution by day 14 did not differ significantly from those in controls after adjustment for baseline characteristics (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.99; P = .62). The most common cluster consisted of cough, fatigue, shortness of breath, and headache and was found in 308 (57.2%) and 325 (61.1%) of CCP and control plasma recipients, respectively (P = .16). CONCLUSIONS: In this trial of outpatients with early COVID-19, CCP was not associated with faster resolution of symptoms compared with control. Overall, there were no differences by treatment in the prevalence of each symptom or symptom clusters at day 14. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04373460.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Síndrome , Inmunización Pasiva/efectos adversos , Sueroterapia para COVID-19RESUMEN
The latent viral reservoir (LVR) remains a major barrier to HIV-1 curative strategies. It is unknown whether receiving a liver transplant from a donor with HIV might lead to an increase in the LVR because the liver is a large lymphoid organ. We found no differences in intact provirus, defective provirus, or the ratio of intact to defective provirus between recipients with ART-suppressed HIV who received a liver from a donor with (n = 19) or without HIV (n = 10). All measures remained stable from baseline by 1 year posttransplant. These data demonstrate that the LVR is stable after liver transplantation in people with HIV. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02602262 and NCT03734393.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Seropositividad para VIH , Trasplante de Hígado , Humanos , Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Linfocitos T CD4-Positivos , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Seropositividad para VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Provirus , Carga Viral , Latencia del VirusRESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) use between October and December 2020 was characterized using the National Inpatient Sample database. CCP was administered in 18.0% of COVID-19-associated hospitalizations and was strongly associated with older age and increased disease severity. There were disparities in the receipt of CCP by race and ethnicity, geography, and insurance.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Pacientes Internos , Inmunización Pasiva , Sueroterapia para COVID-19 , Anticuerpos AntiviralesRESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescent plasma (CCP) is a safe and effective treatment for COVID-19 in immunocompromised (IC) patients. IC patients have a higher risk of persistent infection, severe disease, and death from COVID-19. Despite the continued clinical use of CCP to treat IC patients, the optimal dose, frequency/schedule, and duration of CCP treatment has yet to be determined, and related best practices guidelines are lacking. A group of individuals with expertise spanning infectious diseases, virology and transfusion medicine was assembled to render an expert opinion statement pertaining to the use of CCP for IC patients. For optimal effect, CCP should be recently and locally collected to match circulating variant. CCP should be considered for the treatment of IC patients with acute and protracted COVID-19; dosage depends on clinical setting (acute vs protracted COVID-19). CCP containing high-titer severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies, retains activity against circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants, which have otherwise rendered monoclonal antibodies ineffective.