Using family history forms in pediatric oncology to identify patients for genetic assessment.

OBJECTIVE: We set out to identify and offer genetic testing to the 5%-10% of pediatric cancer patients who have been estimated to carry germline mutations in inherited cancer predisposition syndromes. Clinical genetic testing has become widely available, and thus in busy oncology clinics, tools are needed to identify patients who could benefit from a referral to genetics. METHODS: We studied the clinical utility of administering a family history form in the pediatric oncology long-term follow-up clinic to identify patients who might have an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome. Genetic testing involved primarily Sanger sequencing in clia (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments)-certified laboratories. RESULTS: Of 57 patients who completed forms, 19 (33.3%) met criteria for referral to genetics. A significant family history of cancer was present for 4 patients, and 12 patients underwent genetic testing. Of 18 genetic tests ordered, none identified a pathogenic mutation, likely because of a small sample size and a candidate-gene approach to testing. Three families were also identified for further assessment based on a family history of breast cancer, with two of families having members eligible for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic testing in pediatric oncology patients is important to guide the management of patients who have an inherited cancer predisposition syndrome and to identify other family members at risk when mutations are identified. When no mutations are identified, that information is often reassuring to families who are worried about siblings. However, in the absence of an identified genetic cause in a patient, some uncertainty remains.

Living with the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic mutation: learning how to adapt to a virtual chronic illness.

The objective of this study was to understand how women living with the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic mutation adapt to this life transition and to identify the main adaptive tasks. A qualitative inquiry inspired by grounded theory revealed that participants cognitively appraised their test result in the same manner as women who have been diagnosed with breast cancer. Consequently, participants had to adapt to a condition that they perceived as a chronic illness. The following three main tasks were identified: Physical Task: Attempting to Limit the Impact of the Test Result, Psychological Task: Living with Uncertainty, and Social Task: Finding Effective Support. In conclusion, although these women live with the possibility of developing breast cancer, their experiences mirror those of individuals living with a chronic illness, and they must therefore adapt accordingly in a physical, psychological, and social manner.

Living with the BRCA genetic mutation: an uncertain conclusion to an unending process.

Women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 genetic mutation have an up to 80% lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. It is especially important to understand the experiences of these women, as their lives are permeated with the threat of cancer. This qualitative study examined the experiences of six young women of reproductive age (age < 45 years) who were identified as carriers. The analysis of the semi-structured interviews inspired by grounded theory methodology, showed that participants experienced the same type of uncertainty demonstrated by women who have already been diagnosed with breast cancer.

Mutation analysis of RAD51D in non-BRCA1/2 ovarian and breast cancer families.

BACKGROUND: Recent data show that mutations in RAD51D have an aetiological role in ovarian carcinoma, yet mutations do not appear to be associated with an increased risk for breast cancer. We studied ovarian and breast cancer families having at least one woman affected by ovarian carcinoma, to assess the importance of RAD51D mutations in such families. METHODS: The coding region of the RAD51D gene was analysed in 175 BRCA1/2-negative families with family histories of both ovarian and breast cancer ascertained from two Canadian and two Belgian institutions. RESULTS: We identified one previously reported deleterious mutation, p.Arg186(*) (c.556C>T), and two novel variants; missense substitution p.Cys119Arg and an intronic variant c.83-26A>G. p.Arg186(*) segregated with the disease in the family and two ovarian carcinomas available for analysis showed loss of the wild-type allele, but the novel variants are likely neutral. CONCLUSION: RAD51D should be included in genetic screening of ovarian cancer families that do not have BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. We show that mutations are more likely to be found in families with two or more ovarian cancers, or in probands with first-degree relatives with ovarian cancer, and we feel testing should be preferentially offered to affected women from such families.

Final results of a randomized phase III trial comparing cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil with a dose-intensified epirubicin and cyclophosphamide + filgrastim as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced breast cancer: an EORTC-NCIC-SAKK multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of a standard anthracycline-based regimen to a dose-intensified anthracycline regimen in locally advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Locally advanced breast cancer patients were randomly assigned onto a study comparing cyclophosphamide (C; 75 mg/m(2) orally days 1 to 14), epirubicin (E; 60 mg/m(2) intravenously [IV] days 1, 8), and fluorouracil (F; 500 mg/m(2) IV days 1, 8) six cycles every 28 days versus E (120 mg/m(2) IV day 1), C (830 mg/m(2) IV day 1), and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim; 5 micro g/kg/d subcutaneously days 2 to 13) six cycles every 14 days. The study was designed to detect a 15% improvement; that is, from 50% to 65% in median progression-free survival (PFS) in favor of the dose-intensified regimen. RESULTS: A total of 448 patients were enrolled over a period of 3 years. The median dose intensity delivered for C and E reached, respectively, 85% and 87% of that planned in the CEF arm and 96% and 95% of that planned in the EC arm. The dose-intensified arm was slightly more emetogenic and generated more grade 3 to 4 anemia but less febrile neutropenia episodes. After a median follow-up of 5.5 years, 277 events have been reported. The median PFS was 34 and 33.7 months for CEF and EC, respectively (P =.68), and the 5-year survival rate was 53% and 51% for CEF and EC, respectively (P =.94). CONCLUSION: Dose-intensified EC does not provide a measurable therapeutic benefit over CEF as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unselected locally advanced breast cancer patients.

Phase I study of docetaxel administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion on a weekly basis.

PURPOSE: This phase I study of Taxotere (RP 56976, NSC 628503; docetaxel, Rhône-Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France) was undertaken to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxic effects, and basic pharmacokinetics of a day-1 and -8 schedule of this novel semisynthetic product related to Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two eligible patients with refractory solid malignancies have been treated with a 1-hour infusion of Taxotere on a day-1 and -8 schedule every 3 weeks as long as patients maintained a polymorphonucleotide count > or = 1,500/microL and a platelet count > or = 100,000/microL. Dose levels tested have ranged between 20 and 110 mg/m2 per course. RESULTS: Considering 128 assessable courses, the main toxicities have been neutropenia (which was dose-limiting), asthenia, alopecia, hypersensitivity reactions, skin toxicity, and edema. No significant cardiac or platelet toxicity has been observed. Seven patients have had aggravation of preexisting paresthesias or new onset of sensory symptoms during Taxotere treatment. The MTD at this schedule appears to be 110 mg/m2 per course, with six of 10 patients at this level experiencing severe toxicity. Five partial remissions have been observed in four heavily pretreated patients with breast cancer and in one patient with adenocarcinoma of unknown origin. Two patients with ovarian cancer have had meaningful decreases in CA125 levels. CONCLUSION: Like Taxol, this novel chemotherapeutic agent appears to possess promising activity in patients with refractory breast and ovarian neoplasms, with tolerable toxicities. Using this schedule, 100 mg/m2 per course is the recommended dose for future phase II trials.

Randomized phase II study of high-dose paclitaxel with or without amifostine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the neurotoxicity of paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2) given over 3 hours every 3 weeks could be reduced by pretreatment with amifostine 910 mg/m(2). Secondary objectives included comparing myelosuppression, myalgias, and response rates of the two groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either paclitaxel alone (arm 1) or paclitaxel preceded by amifostine (arm 2). All were assessable for toxicity, and 37 were assessable for response. At baseline and after each cycle, all patients completed questionnaires for neurologic symptoms and had standardized neurologic examinations, including objective assessments of power and vibration sense. In addition, standard follow-up assessments for other toxicities and tumor response were undertaken. Changes from baseline after courses 1, 2, and 3 were assessed. The sample size was sufficient to detect a 50% improvement in the expected determination in sensory change. RESULTS: There were no differences observed in any of the measures of neurotoxicity. Other toxicity was similar in arms 1 and 2, including hair loss (95% v 90%), neurosensory changes (100% v 100%), fatigue/lethargy (85% v 90%), myalgia (95% v 90%), and grade 4 neutropenia (47% v 60%). Nausea, vomiting, dizziness, hypotension, and sneezing were more common in the amifostine arm. Response rates (22.2% v 36.8%) and paclitaxel pharmacokinetics were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: There was no protection from paclitaxel-related neurotoxicity or hematologic toxicity in this study. These results suggest that the mechanism of action of paclitaxel-related toxic effects is not amenable to the cytoprotective action of amifostine.

Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus mitomycin plus vinblastine in patients with metastatic breast cancer progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. 304 Study Group.

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel with mitomycin plus vinblastine (MV) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n=392) were randomized to receive either docetaxel 100 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks (n=203) or mitomycin 12 mg/m2 i.v. every 6 weeks plus vinblastine 6 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks (n=189), for a maximum of 10 3-week cycles. RESULTS: In an intention-to-treat analysis, docetaxel produced significantly higher response rates than MV overall (30.0% v 11.6%; P < .0001), as well as in patients with visceral involvement (30% v 11%), liver metastases (33% v 7%), or resistance to previous anthracycline agents (30% v 7%). Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival were significantly longer with docetaxel than MV (19 v 1 weeks, P=.001, and 1 1.4 v 8.7 months, P=.0097, respectively). Neutropenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with docetaxel (93.1 % v62.5%; P < .05); thrombocytopenia grade 3/4 was more frequent with MV (12.0% v 4.1%; P < .05). Severe acute or chronic nonhematologic adverse events were infrequent in both groups. Withdrawal rates because of adverse events (MV, 10.1%; docetaxel, 13.8%) or toxic death (MV, 1.6%; docetaxel, 2.0%) were similar in both groups. Quality-of-life analysis was limited by a number of factors, but results were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is significantly superior to MV in terms of response, TTP, and survival. The safety profiles of both therapies are manageable and tolerable. Docetaxel represents a clear treatment option for patients with MBC progressing despite previous anthracycline-containing chemotherapy.

Systemic treatment for locally advanced breast cancer: what we still need to learn after a decade of multimodality clinical trials.

Multimodality therapy of locally advanced breast cancer with initial chemo-(hormono)-therapy followed by locoregional treatment has become increasingly popular during the past decade. A paucity of large randomised clinical trials leaves the following unanswered questions: does systemic treatment impact on long-term control of distant metastases? What is the best treatment sequence? The most effective drug combination? The optimum treatment duration? Future prospects in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer include the use of haematopoietic growth factors to increase the dose-intensity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the investigation of autologous bone marrow transplantation with high dose chemotherapy on a larger scale, the development of new approaches designed at interrupting the "autocrine loop" of breast cancer local growth factors and the introduction of diphosphonates in the adjuvant systemic therapy.

Estimates of the lifetime costs of breast cancer treatment in Canada.

A comprehensive understanding of the cost components of common illnesses is a necessary first step towards ensuring optimal use of scarce healthcare resources. Since breast cancer is the commonest malignancy affecting Canadian women, we estimated the direct healthcare costs associated with the lifetime management of a cohort of 17700 women diagnosed in 1995. Using a multiplicity of data sources, treatment algorithms, follow-up and disease progression patterns were determined by age (<50; >/=50 years) for all four stages of breast cancer at diagnosis, as well as for the management of local and distant recurrence. Statistics Canada's Population Health Model (POHEM) was used to integrate the data from the different sources and to estimate the lifetime costs, discounted at 0, 3 and 5% rates. The average undiscounted lifetime cost per case of treating women diagnosed with breast cancer varied by stage, from $36,340 for stage IV or metastatic disease, to $23,275 for stage I patients. The total cost of treatment for the cohort diagnosed in 1995 was estimated to be over 454 million Canadian dollars. Hospitalisation (mainly for initial treatment and terminal care) represented 63% of the lifetime costs of care delivery. Disease costing models are valuable tools for optimising the use of scare resources without compromising the health status of individual patients. The breast cancer costing model has recently been used to assess the cost impact and cost-effectiveness of providing radiotherapy to all patients undergoing breast surgery, and of performing outpatient breast surgery.

Characterisation of complete responders to combination chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer: a retrospective EORTC Breast Group study.

This retrospective study was undertaken to characterise the natural history of women achieving complete response (CR) following standard dose combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and to analyse the significance of various patient, disease and treatment characteristics in determining survival and time to disease progression. 75 patients achieving a CR following standard dose combination chemotherapy or combined chemoendocrine therapy for MBC have been studied. At a median follow-up of 6 years, 28% of patients are still alive, with 18 of 21 patients showing no evidence of disease. 15 (20%) patients, with median follow-up of 61 months from start of chemotherapy, have never experienced relapse. Median overall survival is 32.5 months. Multivariate analysis for survival identified inclusion of anthracyclines and WHO performance status as significant predictors of good long-term outcome. Concomitant hormonotherapy almost reached statistical significance in our multivariate analysis. Neither dominant site of disease nor disease-free interval were significant determinants of complete remission. With conventional dose combination chemotherapy, approximately 20% of women with MBC who have achieved a clinical CR have been shown to be expected to remain alive and free of disease at 5 years. Inclusion of an anthracycline appears to be an important determinant of durability of CR and patient survival.

Concurrent use of multiple chemotherapy resistance modulators with etoposide in patients with resistant malignancies.

Since chemotherapy resistance is probably multifactorial, we studied the toxicity and efficacy of adding to etoposide in sequence 5 resistance modulators in the treatment of resistant solid tumors. In cohort 1, metronidazole and ketoconazole were given with i.v. etoposide 100 mg/m(2)/day x 5 days. Because of excessive toxicity, cohort 2 received just metronidazole with etoposide, and metronidazole doses were reduced. Subsequent patient cohorts had the following drugs added to etoposide plus metronidazole: ketoconazole (cohort 3), dipyridamole (cohort 4), tamoxifen [cohort 5 (with etoposide 75 mg/m(2)/day) and 6 (with etoposide 60 mg/m(2)/day)], and cyclosporin (cohort 7). Hence, cohort 7 received daily x 5 i.v. etoposide 60 mg/m(2)/day plus 5 resistance modulators. Forty patients were treated, of whom 38 were evaluable for toxicity. Metronidazole resulted in augmentation of both central neurotoxicity and peripheral neuropathy. Sequential addition of each of dipyridamole, tamoxifen, and cyclosporin appeared to increase hematological toxicity. Some patients also experienced reversible hepatic and renal toxicity. Partial responses were seen in adrenocortical and small cell lung cancers, and minor responses with symptomatic improvement were seen in adrenocortical, small cell lung, non-small cell lung and colorectal carcinomas. Further evaluation of this approach may be warranted in patients with minimal prior chemotherapy exposure.

Concurrent use of multiple low dose chemotherapy agents with differing mechanisms of action as a strategy vs passive resistance: A pilot study.

Resistance may be classified as active (or competitive) (due to excess amount of a factor) vs passive (or non-competitive) (due to a deficiency of a factor). Passive resistance may be important in human solid tumors. In passive resistance, the dose-response curve may be shallow, or may flatten at a relatively low dose. We hypothesized that, if passive resistance were important, it might be advantageous to use low doses of multiple concurrent chemotherapy agents with differing mechanisms of action, rather than using high doses of 2 or 3 drugs. We combined single day cisplatin 60 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2, epirubicin 40 mg/m2, paclitaxel 60 mg/m2, and vinblastine 2.5 mg/m2, with 5 days of 5-fluorouracil 200 mg/m2, folinic acid 20 mg/m2 and dexamethasone 4 mg orally q.i.d. every 3 weeks. In later cohorts, doses were escalated, and tamoxifen and verapamil were added. Twenty-three patients were entered. ECOG performance status was 1 in 15 patients and 2 in 8. Number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 0 in 4 patients, 1 in 4, 2 in 8, 3 in 4, 4 in 2, and 7 in 1. Sixteen patients had prior radiotherapy, and 3 had no prior therapy. Myelosuppression and febrile neutropenia were frequent, and 4 heavily pretreated patients died of pneumonia contracted while neutropenic. Diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, and fatigue were also prominent. Among 9 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, one had a partial remission, 4 had stable disease (including 3 with minor objective responses). Two additional non-small cell lung cancer patients also had objective tumor regression, but were coded as failures, since one had tumor progression in <6 weeks and the other died of respiratory failure (thought to be due to severe mucous plugging) one week after his first course of treatment. Among 14 patients with other tumor types, there was one partial response (esophageal carcinoma), 6 patients with stable disease for >6 weeks (including minor responses in one patient each with adenocarcinomas of kidney and breast), and 7 failures (including one patient with adenocarcinoma unknown primary who had minor tumor regression lasting 4 weeks). Despite the unacceptably high toxic death rate, median survival time was 24 weeks (range, 1 week to >104 weeks). This regimen is toxic, but survival duration is longer than would be expected in this heavily pre-treated population. Doses recommended for further study are those used in the first treatment cohort (as described above). Since myelosuppression is the major toxic effect, hemopoietic growth factors might prove helpful with this regimen.

Phase II study of a one hour paclitaxel infusion in combination with carboplatin for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the activity, toxicity, and optimal dose of paclitaxel when given by one hour infusion combined with carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. Paclitaxel was administered by one hour infusion at a dose of 175 mg/m2 for the first cycle, and was escalated up to 255 mg/m2 over successive cycles if tolerated. In the absence of toxicity, the carboplatin dose was kept constant at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 6. Cycles were repeated at 3-week intervals until progression or intolerable toxicity occurred. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were evaluable for toxicity and survival, and thirty-five for responses. The partial response rate was 10 of 35 (29%) and there were no complete responses. The median duration of response was 4.8 months (range 0.5-11.7 months). The median survival duration was 6.5 months, and 1 year survival was 31%. The mean paclitaxel dose was 188 mg/m2. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Four patients (11%) had febrile neutropenia. Five patients (14%) had grade 3 neuropathy, and 4 (11%) had grade 3 nausea and vomiting. Minor toxicities included alopecia, myalgias, arthralgias and stomatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel and carboplatin is a well-tolerated regimen that can safely be given by a one hour paclitaxel infusion. The modest response rate observed in this study may be due to either the low dose-intensity of paclitaxel or the short infusion duration. Further trials to optimize the relative doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin are needed.

Paclitaxel plus hydroxyurea as second line therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

We tested paclitaxel (Taxol) and low dose hydroxyurea as second line therapy in 30 patients with non-small cell lung cancer since both drugs are active against non-small cell lung cancer in other settings, and since hydroxyurea may reverse chemotherapy resistance by disrupting double minute chromosomes. Hydroxyurea 500 mg was given orally each Monday, Wednesday, Friday starting 1 week before paclitaxel, and continuing until removal from study. Paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 was given i.v. over > or = 1 h every 3 weeks with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and ranitidine. Patients could have paclitaxel doses escalated to 175 mg/m2 in course 2 and to 200 mg/m2 in course 3, where tolerated. Sixteen males and 14 females were treated. All patients had previously received a single cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen and 23 had previously received radiotherapy. Twelve patients had adenocarcinomas, six had squamous cell carcinomas, and 12 had large cell carcinomas. Eight patients had Stage IIIb cancers and 22 had Stage IV. Paclitaxel doses were 135 mg/m2 in 56 courses, 175 mg/m2 in 24, and 200 mg/m2 in 15. Treatment was well tolerated. Median granulocyte nadirs were 2.5 (x 10(9)/l) for paclitaxel 135 mg/m2, 1.8 for 175 mg/m2, and 1.3 for 200 mg/m2. No patient developed febrile neutropenia, and none required a dose reduction. Two patients had reversible anaphylaxis. Other toxicities were quite tolerable. They included fatigue, myalgias, dizziness, paresthesias, diarrhea, alopecia, mucositis, flushing, headache, swollen red hands, and anxiety. One patient had a partial remission and 15 had stable disease (including six with minor responses). Median survival was 20 (95% CI, 12-34) weeks, with 19% of patients remaining alive at 1 year from initiation of treatment. This is a well-tolerated regimen with modest activity as second line chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with cisplatin regimens. Higher doses would be feasible and other strategies are now being explored.

Concurrent chemotherapy with hyperfractionated accelerated thoracic irradiation in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effect of hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy combined with low dose radiosensitisers followed by standard dose chemotherapy in the treatment of unresectable stage III non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Forty-seven patients received thoracic radiotherapy (1.5 bid x 5 days x 4 weeks) in combination with low dose daily (3-6 mg/m2) cisplatin +/- weekly vinblastine chemotherapy (step I), followed by three cycles of standard dose chemotherapy alone consisting of cisplatin (75-80 mg/m2) and vinblastine (8-16 mg/m2) given at 3-4 week intervals (step II). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 70% (21% CR). The progression free interval and the median survival duration were 10.4 months and 17.3 months, respectively. The 3 year survival rate was 21%. The site of first progression was local in 44%, distant in 41%, and simultaneous in 15% of patients. Levels of esophageal toxicity were significant but acceptable with the use of prophylactic therapy. Grade 3 or 4 esophageal toxicity was observed in 28 and 19% of patients during step I and II of the study, respectively. There were three deaths associated with esophageal toxicity. All occurred prior to the implementation of the prophylactic therapy for esophagitis. Acute pulmonary symptoms were reported in 25% of patients in step I, and pulmonary fibrosis, primarily asymptomatic, was observed in 51% of patients. Hematological toxicity was moderate. Two patients died of neutropenic sepsis/pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemotherapy and hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy appears moderately effective in controlling tumour growth as measured by response rates and survival estimates. Toxicity is considerable but manageable and compatible with results from other combined modality studies.

Pilot study of multiple chemotherapy resistance modulators plus epirubicin in the treatment of resistant malignancies.

We studied the toxicity and efficacy of adding to epirubicin five resistance modulators in the treatment of resistant solid tumors. Additional drugs were added in successive cohorts of patients, such that cohort 1 patients received two drugs along with their epirubicin, while cohort 4 patients received five modulators along with their epirubicin. Metronidazole, tamoxifen (cohort 1), dipyridamole (cohort 2), ketoconazole (cohort 3) and cyclosporin (cohort 4) were administered with epirubicin. A total of 22 patients were treated. Nausea and vomiting was usually mild to moderate. There was an unexpectedly high incidence of possible cardiac toxicity associated with treatment, although in some patients it was uncertain whether or not observed cardiac events were related to treatment. Granulocytopenia was significant in all four cohorts, but it was unclear whether it was increased by the modulators. There were two febrile neutropenic events in cohorts 1 and 2 successfully treated with antibiotics, and three septic deaths (one in each of cohorts 1, 2 and 4). It was elected to discontinue enrollment on the study prematurely in light of cardiac and other toxicity seen in the first two patients accrued in cohort 4. A single response was observed. While this approach is feasible, the observed toxicity and the difficulty patients experienced in ingesting the large number of prescribed pills will make further exploration of this approach difficult.

Clinical characteristics and the impact of surgery and chemotherapy on survival of patients with advanced and metastatic bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: a retrospective study.

We retrospectively analyzed data from the clinical charts of 126 patients with bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) referred to the Ottawa Regional Cancer Center. The patient group consisted of 49 men (39%) and 77 women (61%). The mean age at diagnosis was 64 years. Most patients were smokers (85%). At diagnosis, 53% were stage Ia-IIIa and 47% were stage IIIb and IV. Forty-one percent of the patients with advanced and metastatic stages (IIIb, IV) underwent surgery. Multifocal disease was present at diagnosis in 41% of the patients, including 6% who had stage IIIb multifocal disease confined to a single lobe. Surgery was associated with prolonged survival in patients with multifocal unilobar or multilobar disease (P = 0.0001). While this apparent benefit of surgery may have been due to selection bias, it supports further exploration of surgery as therapy for multifocal disease. While patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced disease did not survive longer than patients not receiving chemotherapy, chemotherapy was used primarily in patients with more aggressive disease, suggesting that selection bias may have contributed to its apparent lack of benefit. Of the 30 patients treated with chemotherapy, only 3 (10%) achieved an objective response. One third of the patients (34%) developed distant metastases, with a predilection for the brain and bone.

Oral etoposide and carboplatin. Effective therapy for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Elderly patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and/or those with comorbid conditions are frequently not considered candidates for standard combination chemotherapy. An active, but less toxic regimen is needed for this group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven elderly (> 65 years) or medically unfit patients with SCLC were treated with oral etoposide 100 mg/m2 x 7 days and carboplatin 150 mg/m2 day 1. Treatment was given every 3-4 weeks for six cycles in responding patients. Patients responding to the chemotherapy regimen were also treated with prophylactic cranial irradiation, and limited-stage patients received thoracic radiotherapy. The study population included 36 extensive-stage patients and 11 limited-disease patients with renal or cardiac disease that precluded standard chemotherapy. The median age of the study population was 69 years (range: 47-84). RESULTS: Nine of 47 patients were inevaluable for response, including four patients who succumbed to sepsis. Of the 38 patients evaluable for response, 71% responded (95% CI: 56-86%) (88% LD; 67% ED) with a complete response in 29% of patients (50% LD; 23% ED). Based on an analysis of intent to treat, the overall response rate was 60% and the median survival time of the whole group was 46 weeks (LD, 59 weeks; ED, 45 weeks). Treatment was generally well tolerated. Neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity; the median nadir granulocyte count was 1.04 x 10(9)/L (range: 0-8.2). CONCLUSION: We conclude that this regimen can provide palliation to SCLC patients who might not otherwise be considered for systemic chemotherapy.

A phase III study of high-dose intensification without hematopoietic progenitor cells support for patients with high-risk primary breast carcinoma.

Patients with more than nine ipsilateral lymph node involvement or inflammatory breast cancer have a 5-year survival rate of approximately 50%. We studied the efficacy of high-dose intensification, comparing it with the standard dose chemotherapy for patients with high-risk primary breast cancer. Patients with inflammatory breast cancer or more than nine ipsilateral lymph node involvement without evidence of distant metastasis were randomized to receive either standard dose 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) every 3 weeks for nine courses (control) or six courses of FAC followed by two courses of cyclophosphamide (5.25 g/m2), etoposide (1,500 mg/m2), and cisplatin (165 mg/m2) (HDCVP). The study was terminated in 1998 because of slow accrual of patients. Forty-six patients were entered in the study. At 4 years, the overall survival was 72.8% (SE 11.9%) and 61.7% (SE 12.4%), and disease-free survival were 45.5% (SE 12.3%) and 33.7% (SE 11.9%) for the control and HDCVP groups, respectively (p = 0.757 and 0.720). With the small number of patients in our study, a small overall survival benefit of high-dose intensification compared with the standard therapy cannot be excluded. However, any substantial benefit is unlikely.