Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Ann Rheum Dis ; 77(4): 488-494, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29259050

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the similarities between LBEC0101 (etanercept biosimilar) and the etanercept reference product (ETN-RP) in terms of efficacy and safety, including immunogenicity, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment. METHODS: This phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, 54-week study was conducted in Japan and Korea. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in the disease activity score in 28 joints based on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at week 24. American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response rate, adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics and development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) were also evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 374 patients were randomised to LBEC0101 (n=187) or ETN-RP (n=187). The least squares mean changes from baseline in DAS28-ESR at week 24 in the per-protocol set were -3.01 (95% CI -3.198 to -2.820) in the LBEC0101 group and -2.86 (95% CI -3.051 to -2.667) in the ETN-RP group. The estimated between-group difference was -0.15 and its 95% CI was -0.377 to 0.078, which was within the prespecified equivalence margin of -0.6 to 0.6. ACR20 response rates at week 24 were similar between the groups (LBEC0101 93.3% vs ETN-RP 86.7%). The incidence of AEs up to week 54 was comparable between the groups (LBEC0101 92.0% vs ETN-RP 92.5%), although fewer patients in the LBEC0101 group (1.6%) than the ETN-RP group (9.6%) developed ADAs. CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy of LBEC0101 was equivalent to that of ETN-RP. LBEC0101 was well tolerated and had a comparable safety profile to ETN-RP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02357069.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Inmunoglobulina G/uso terapéutico , Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/farmacocinética , Artritis Reumatoide/sangre , Sedimentación Sanguínea , Método Doble Ciego , Etanercept/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/metabolismo , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/metabolismo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Cancer Med ; 12(20): 20242-20250, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37824431

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pegfilgrastim is indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. It is the first granulocyte-colony stimulating factor approved for prophylactic use regardless of carcinoma type and is marketed in Japan as G-LASTA (Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). MD-110 is a biosimilar of pegfilgrastim. This phase III, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study investigated the efficacy and safety of MD-110 in early-stage breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant myelosuppressive chemotherapy. METHODS: A total of 101 patients received the study drug. Each patient received docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 (TC) for four cycles on day 1 of each cycle. MD-110 (3.6 mg) was administered subcutaneously on day 2 of each cycle. The primary efficacy endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia during cycle 1 (days with absolute neutrophil count < 500/mm3 ). The safety endpoints were adverse events and the presence of antidrug antibodies. RESULTS: The mean (SD) duration of severe neutropenia for MD-110 was 0.2 (0.4) days. The upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval for the mean duration of severe neutropenia was 0.2 days, below the predefined threshold of 3.0 days. The incidence of febrile neutropenia, the secondary efficacy endpoint, was 6.9% (7/101). Adverse events, occurring in more than 50% of patients, were alopecia, constipation, and malaise, which are common side effects of TC chemotherapy. Antidrug antibodies were negative in all patients. CONCLUSION: MD-110 was effective against chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. No additional safety concern, compared with the originator, was observed in patients with breast cancer receiving TC chemotherapy.(JapicCTI-205230).


Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Neoplasias de la Mama , Neutropenia , Femenino , Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Filgrastim/efectos adversos , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/efectos adversos , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/epidemiología , Neutropenia/prevención & control , Polietilenglicoles/efectos adversos
3.
Arthritis Res Ther ; 21(1): 122, 2019 05 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31113455

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of continuing LBEC0101; the etanercept (ETN) biosimilar; or switching from the ETN reference product (RP) to LBEC0101 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This multicentre, single-arm, open-label extension study enrolled patients who had completed a 52-week randomised, double-blind, parallel phase III trial of LBEC0101 vs ETN-RP. Patients treated with ETN-RP during the randomised controlled trial switched to LBEC0101; those treated with LBEC0101 continued to receive LBEC0101 in this study. LBEC0101 (50 mg) was administered subcutaneously once per week for 48 weeks with a stable dose of methotrexate. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of LBEC0101 were assessed up to week 100. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients entered this extension study (70 in the maintenance group and 78 in the switch group). The 28-joint disease activity scores (DAS28)-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were maintained in both groups from week 52 to week 100 (from 3.068 to 3.103 in the maintenance group vs. from 3.161 to 3.079 in the switch group). ACR response rates at week 100 for the maintenance vs. switch groups were 79.7% vs. 83.3% for ACR20, 65.2% vs. 66.7% for ACR50 and 44.9% vs. 42.3% for ACR70. The incidence of adverse events and the proportion of patients with newly developed antidrug antibodies were similar in the maintenance and switch groups (70.0% and 70.5%, 1.4% and 1.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of LBEC0101 showed sustained efficacy and acceptable safety in patients with RA after continued therapy or after switching from ETN-RP to LBEC0101. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02715908 . Registered 22 March 2016.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Inmunoglobulina G/uso terapéutico , Receptores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antirreumáticos/farmacocinética , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/farmacocinética , Método Doble Ciego , Etanercept/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Equivalencia Terapéutica , Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA