Pyronaridine-artesunate real-world safety, tolerability, and effectiveness in malaria patients in 5 African countries: A single-arm, open-label, cohort event monitoring study.

BACKGROUND: In Phase II/III randomized controlled clinical trials for the treatment of acute uncomplicated malaria, pyronaridine-artesunate demonstrated high efficacy and a safety profile consistent with that of comparators, except that asymptomatic, mainly mild-to-moderate transient increases in liver aminotransferases were reported for some patients. Hepatic safety, tolerability, and effectiveness have not been previously assessed under real-world conditions in Africa. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This single-arm, open-label, cohort event monitoring study was conducted at 6 health centers in Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Ivory Coast, and Republic of Congo between June 2017 and April 2019. The trial protocol as closely as possible resembled real-world clinical practice for the treatment of malaria at the centers. Eligible patients were adults or children of either sex, weighing at least 5 kg, with acute uncomplicated malaria who did not have contraindications for pyronaridine-artesunate treatment as per the summary of product characteristics. Patients received fixed-dose pyronaridine-artesunate once daily for 3 days, dosed by body weight, without regard to food intake. A tablet formulation was used in adults and adolescents and a pediatric granule formulation in children and infants under 20 kg body weight. The primary outcome was the hepatic event incidence, defined as the appearance of the clinical signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity confirmed by a >2× rise in alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST) versus baseline in patients with baseline ALT/AST >2× the upper limit of normal (ULN). As a secondary outcome, this was assessed in patients with ALT/AST >2× ULN prior to treatment versus a matched cohort of patients with normal baseline ALT/AST. The safety population comprised 7,154 patients, of mean age 13.9 years (standard deviation (SD) 14.6), around half of whom were male (3,569 [49.9%]). Patients experienced 8,560 malaria episodes; 158 occurred in patients with baseline ALT/AST elevations >2×ULN. No protocol-defined hepatic events occurred following pyronaridine-artesunate treatment of malaria patients with or without baseline hepatic dysfunction. Thus, no cohort comparison could be undertaken. Also, as postbaseline clinical chemistry was only performed where clinically indicated, postbaseline ALT/AST levels were not systematically assessed for all patients. Adverse events of any cause occurred in 20.8% (1,490/7,154) of patients, most frequently pyrexia (5.1% [366/7,154]) and vomiting (4.2% [303/7,154]). Adjusting for Plasmodium falciparum reinfection, clinical effectiveness at day 28 was 98.6% ([7,369/7,746] 95% confidence interval (CI) 98.3 to 98.9) in the per-protocol population. There was no indication that comorbidities or malnutrition adversely affected outcomes. The key study limitation was that postbaseline clinical biochemistry was only evaluated when clinically indicated. CONCLUSIONS: Pyronaridine-artesunate had good tolerability and effectiveness in a representative African population under conditions similar to everyday clinical practice. These findings support pyronaridine-artesunate as an operationally useful addition to the management of acute uncomplicated malaria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03201770.

Overview of HIV treatment failure in Africa using the WHO Pharmacovigilance data.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the factors associated with HIV treatment failure (HIVTF) from reported pharmacovigilance data in Africa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is an observational pharmacovigilance analysis of the safety data of HIVTF available in the WHO International Pharmacovigilance database 'VigiBase® '. We used the Standardised MedDRA Queries (SMQ) to identify all the terms corresponding to HIVTF. To identify all relevant molecules and classes of antiretroviral therapy, we used the anatomic, therapeutic, and chemical classification. We presented results as a percentage or an adjusted Reporting Odds Ratio (aROR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: HIVTF was more reported in Africa compared with the rest of the world with 19.1% (18.1%-20.1%) corresponding to 1206 of all 6304 HIVTF reports. Among all the 37 WHO country members in Africa, South Africa was the main source of origin for these HIVTF reports with 86.8% (84.9%-88.7%). Compared to adults, children and adolescents were the most population groups affected by HIVTF, aROR = 2.7, (95% CI) 1.7-4.2 and aROR = 7.9, (95% CI) 4.5-13.9, respectively. CONCLUSION: South Africa was the leading country of the reporting of HIVTF in Africa. The proportion of HIVTF was higher in both HIV-infected children and adolescents than in adults. There is a need for the improvement of medical care for children and adolescents with HIV infection in Africa.

Effectiveness of pyronaridine-artesunate against Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale spp, and mixed-Plasmodium infections: a post-hoc analysis of the CANTAM-Pyramax trial.

BACKGROUND: High-quality evidence for the therapeutic efficacy and effectiveness of antimalarials for infections caused by Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale spp, and mixed-Plasmodium infections is scarce. In this study, we aimed to analyse the efficacy of pyronaridine-artesunate for the treatment of non-falciparum and mixed-species Plasmodium infections from a large phase 3b/4 clinical trial in central Africa. METHODS: This post-hoc analysis was done in a random subset of samples from two sites (in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and in Gabon) of the CANTAM-Pyramax trial assessing pyronaridine-artesunate therapy. We randomly selected paired dried blood spot samples from day 0 and day 28 (or unforeseen visit) and analysed them by quantitative PCR for mixed Plasmodium infections or non-falciparum mono-infections. Day 28 (or unforeseen visit) samples positive for non-falciparum malaria were re-assessed by microscopy to identify microscopic versus submicroscopic infections. Analyses were done on two sample sets: a per-protocol set and an intention-to-treat set. FINDINGS: Among 1502 randomly selected samples, 192 (12·8%) showed mixed-Plasmodium infections or non-falciparum mono-infections. We did not detect P vivax in the samples. For both the per-protocol and intention-to-treat sets, the overall day 28 cure rates for P malariae, P ovale curtisi, and P ovale wallikeri were 96·3% or higher (95% CIs from 81·0-99·9 to 95·7-100). Cure rates were consistently high in P malariae (99·2%, 95·7-100) and P ovale spp (97·9%, 88·7-99·9, for P ovale curtisi and 96·3%, 81·0-99·9, for P ovale wallikeri) infections. INTERPRETATION: This post-hoc analysis provides important evidence supporting the high efficacy of pyronaridine-artesunate against mono-infections with P malariae, P ovale curtisi, or P ovale wallikeri and mixed-Plasmodium infections in a real-world setting. FUNDING: Medicines for Malaria Venture.

Safety and tolerability of artesunate-amodiaquine, artemether-lumefantrine and quinine plus clindamycin in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

INTRODUCTION: Artemisinin-based combination therapy is currently the best option for the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. Quinine is recommended as a rescue treatment. Safety information during repeated treatment with the same drug is scarce. We report safety data from the Quinact randomized clinical trial (RCT) that was designed to assess efficacy and safety of artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ), artemether-lumefantrine (AL) and quinine+clindamycin (QnC). METHODOLOGY: Males and females aged 12 to 59 months with uncomplicated malaria were treated with ASAQ and followed up during 42 days (preRCT). Clinical failures were randomized to one of the 3 treatments and followed up for 28 days (RCT). Subsequent failures were repeatedly treated with ASAQ several times as needed (postRCT1, postRCT2 and so on) until a 28-days follow up period without parasitaemia. RESULTS: Eight hundred and sixty-five, 242 and 64 patients were recruited respectively in preRCT, RCT and postRCTs. In preRCT, 433 (50.0%) patients experienced at least one drug-related adverse event (AE). The most reported AEs were anorexia (22.9%), asthenia (19.4%), and abnormal behavior (14.6%). Twenty-nine AEs (3.5%) were reported to be severe. In RCT, at least one drug-related AE was reported in 54.7%, 21.5% and 40.0% of patient randomized respectively to ASAQ, AL and QnC (p<0.001). During postRCT1 (n = 64), postRCT 2 (n = 17) and postRCT3 (n = 7), respectively 32.8%, 35.3% and 71.4% of patients experienced at least one drug-related AE. Three serious adverse events occurred but not judged related to study medication. CONCLUSION: The proportion of AEs did not increase over the treatment courses with ASAQ. However, continuous monitoring is important.

Safety profile of fractional dosing of the 17DD Yellow Fever Vaccine among males and females: Experience of a community-based pharmacovigilance in Kinshasa, DR Congo.

BACKGROUND: In early 2016, there was a Yellow Fever (YF) outbreak in Central Africa with several deaths reported from Angola and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Due to a shortage in vaccine supply, fractional dosing (0.1 ml) of 17DD Yellow Fever Vaccine (YFV) was proposed in preventive vaccination campaign in Kinshasa in August 2016. A Pharmacovigilance surveillance at community level was implemented to track Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFIs). The objective of this study was to describe AEFIs as captured from community-based pharmacovigilance and to compare the safety profile of the fractional dosing of YFV between gender. METHODS: PV information sessions were organized in churches, academic institutions, and pediatrician, obstetrician and friend networks. Prior to data collection, education about AEFI was provided through face-to-face discussions, phone calls, SMS and WhatsApp messages. Individuals reported AEFIs though the above communication channels to assigned individuals. Reported AEFIs were entered into VigiFlow and extracted for statistical analysis using Stata 12. Only vaccinees who received fractional dose (subjects from the age of 2-year-old and non-pregnant women) were included in analysis. Proportional t-test was used to compare AEFI preferred terms among males and females. RESULTS: A total of 4020 subjects reported 5409 AEFIs. Reporters were mostly males (54.9%) with an average age of 26 ±â€¯10.7 years. Fever and injection site pain were the most reported systemic and local AEFI respectively. The safety profile was similar between gender although females reported more diarrhea and dizziness whilst males reported more asthenia (P < 0.001). Five individuals reported serious AEFIs. Among them, 4 were less-immunocompetent. CONCLUSION: Fractional dosing of 17DD YFV has a good safety profile, which is similar between gender. These findings complement the documented immunogenicity profile to support recommendation of fractional dose of YFV for outbreak control.