A Practical Dosing Algorithm for Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During Total Intravenous Anesthesia: ROCURITHM.

BACKGROUND: The number of trials investigating the effects of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on surgical conditions and patient outcomes is steadily increasing. Consensus on which surgical procedures benefit from deep NMB (a post tetanic count of 1-2) and how to implement it has not been reached. The ESAIC does not advise routine application but recommends use of deep NMB to improve surgical conditions on indication. This study investigates the optimal dosing strategy to reach and maintain adequate deep NMB during total intravenous anesthesia. METHODS: Data from three trials investigating deep NMB during laparoscopic surgery with TIVA (n=424) was pooled to analyze the required rocuronium dose, when to start continuous infusion and how to adjust. The resulting algorithm was validated (n=32) and compared to the success rate in ongoing studies where the algorithm was not used (n=180). RESULTS: The mean rocuronium dose based on actual bodyweight for PTC 1-2 was 1.0 ± 0.27 mg.kg -1.h -1 in the trials where mean duration of surgery was ±2 hours (116 minutes). An induction dose of 0.6 mg.kg -1 lead to a PTC of 1-5 in a quarter of patients after a mean of 11 minutes. The remaining patients were equally divided over too shallow (additional bolus and direct start of continuous infusion) or too deep; a ±15-minute wait after PTC 0 for return of PTC to ≥1. Using the proposed algorithm, a mean 76% of all 5-minute measurements throughout surgery were on target PTC 1-2 in the validation cohort. The algorithm performed significantly better than anesthesiology residents without the algorithm, even after a learning curve from 0-20 patients (42% on target, P≤.001, Cohen's d=1.4 [95% CI 0.9, 1.8]) to 81-100 patients (61% on target, P≤.05, Cohen's d=0.7 [95% CI 0.1, 1.2]). CONCLUSIONS: We propose a dosing algorithm for deep NMB with rocuronium in patients receiving TIVA.

Outcomes of primary versus conversional Roux-En-Y gastric bypass after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Conversional surgery is common after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) because of suboptimal weight loss (SWL) or poor responders and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most common conversional procedure after LSG. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who underwent primary RYGB (PRYGB) or conversional RYGB (CRYGB) at three specialized bariatric centers between 2008 and 2019 and tested for weight loss, resolution of GERD, food tolerance (FT), early and late complications, and the resolution of associated medical problems. This was analyzed by propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: In total, 558 (PRYGB) and 155 (CRYGB) completed at least 2 years of follow-up. After PSM, both cohorts significantly decreased BMI from baseline (p < 0.001). The CRYGB group had an initially more significant mean BMI decrease of 6.095 kg/m2 at 6 months of follow-up (p < 0.001), while the PRYGB group had a more significant mean BMI decrease of 5.890 kg/m2 and 8.626 kg/m2 at 1 and 2 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Food tolerance (FT) improved significantly in the CRYGB group (p < 0.001), while CRYGB had better FT than PRYGB at 2 years (p < 0.001). A GERD resolution rate of 92.6% was recorded in the CRYGB (p < 0.001). Both cohorts had comparable rates of early complications (p = 0.584), late complications (p = 0.495), and reoperations (p = 0.398). Associated medical problems at 2 years significantly improved in both cohorts (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CRYGB is a safe and efficient option in non- or poor responders after LSG, with significant weight loss and improvement in GERD. Moreover, PRYGB and CRYGB had comparable complications, reoperations, and associated medical problem resolution rates.

Effects of obstructive sleep apnea on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with obesity: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity has been linked to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a widespread chronic liver ailment, as well as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The development of NAFLD is influenced by repeated intermittent hypoxia, a feature of OSA. METHODS: This systematic review (SR) investigated CENTRAL, PubMed, and EMBASE databases. The endpoint of this SR was to assess which OSA-related indicators could predict the presence of NAFLD and the effect of bariatric metabolic surgery (BMS) on improving OSA and NAFLD over time. RESULTS: Compared to previous SRs published in 2013, 14 new publications were added to our SR, alongside studies conducted prior to 2013. The SR ultimately included 28 studies (18 cross-sectional and 10 cohort trials). In the majority of studies, significant correlations were observed between OSA, OSA-related outcomes, and NAFLD. However, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) alone proved to be an inadequate predictor of NAFLD. Instead, respiratory and metabolic changes were found to alleviate oxidative stress induced by hypoxemia. Six studies involved patients who underwent BMS, with one evaluating patients before and after BMS, revealing associations between increased OSA and NAFLD improvement following BMS. Six months after surgery, 100% of patients in the mild-to-moderate OSA group were free from fatty liver, and an 89% reduction was observed in the severe OSA group. CONCLUSION: For the first time, BMS has been tested in treating both OSA and NAFLD pre and postoperative with positive results. Further research, ideally with histological and functional data, is needed to confirm these findings. The SR identified 14 distinct liver outcome tests; however, high heterogeneity and incomplete data precluded a meta-analysis. It is imperative to pay greater attention to the influence of OSA-related factors and uniformity in liver outcomes testing concerning NAFLD. To accomplish this, study designs should be enhanced by incorporating more comprehensive pre- and postoperative evaluations, extending follow-up periods, and employing a more consistent methodology for liver diagnosis in patients with obesity.

Propensity score matching analysis comparing outcomes between primary and revision Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after adjustable gastric banding: a retrospective record-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: One-stage revision Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RRYGB) after Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is widely adopted, but its safety is still debated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare outcomes between primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (PRYGB and RRYGB after LAGB. METHOD: A retrospective record-based cohort study of patients who underwent PRYGB and RRYGB for failed LAGB and completed at least 2 years of follow-up from 2008 to 2019. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to obtain a balanced sample of patients with RRYGB and PRYGB interventions by adjusting for baseline covariates including age and sex. RESULTS: Patients with PRYGB (n = 558) and RRYGB (n = 156) were included. PSM identified 98 patients for RRYGB and 98 patients for PRYGB. Both cohorts exhibited significant reductions in BMI compared to baseline values (p < 0.001), but reductions were significantly higher in PRYGB compared to those in RRGYB at 6 months (- 10.55 ± 8.54 vs. - 8.38 ± 5.07; p = 0.032), 1-year (- 21.50 ± 8.19 vs. 16.14 ± 6.93; p < 0.001), and 2 years (- 24.02 ± 7.85 vs. - 18.93 ± 6.80; p < 0.001), respectively. A significant improvement in food tolerance from the 1st to the 2nd year was seen after RYGB (p < 0.001). The rates of early and late complications were similar in both cohorts (p = 0.537, p = 1.00). Overall re-intervention rates were 5.1 and 3.1% for RRYGB and PRYGB p = 0.721). Both cohorts exhibited significant improvement in comorbidities after 2 years (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: One-stage RRYGB for failed LAGB is safe and effective with comparable rates of complications, re-interventions, and resolution of associated comorbid conditions compared to PRYGB.

Opt-In and Opt-Out Consent Procedures for the Reuse of Routinely Recorded Health Data in Scientific Research and Their Consequences for Consent Rate and Consent Bias: Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Scientific researchers who wish to reuse health data pertaining to individuals can obtain consent through an opt-in procedure or opt-out procedure. The choice of procedure may have consequences for the consent rate and representativeness of the study sample and the quality of the research, but these consequences are not well known. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to provide insight into the consequences for the consent rate and consent bias of the study sample of opt-in procedures versus opt-out procedures for the reuse of routinely recorded health data for scientific research purposes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed based on searches in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently included studies based on predefined eligibility criteria and assessed whether the statistical methods used in the reviewed literature were appropriate for describing the differences between consenters and nonconsenters. Statistical pooling was conducted, and a description of the results was provided. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Of the 15 studies, 13 (87%) implemented an opt-in procedure, 1 (7%) implemented an opt-out procedure, and 1 (7%) implemented both the procedures. The average weighted consent rate was 84% (60,800/72,418 among the studies that used an opt-in procedure and 96.8% (2384/2463) in the single study that used an opt-out procedure. In the single study that described both procedures, the consent rate was 21% in the opt-in group and 95.6% in the opt-out group. Opt-in procedures resulted in more consent bias compared with opt-out procedures. In studies with an opt-in procedure, consenting individuals were more likely to be males, had a higher level of education, higher income, and higher socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS: Consent rates are generally lower when using an opt-in procedure compared with using an opt-out procedure. Furthermore, in studies with an opt-in procedure, participants are less representative of the study population. However, both the study populations and the way in which opt-in or opt-out procedures were organized varied widely between the studies, which makes it difficult to draw general conclusions regarding the desired balance between patient control over data and learning from health data. The reuse of routinely recorded health data for scientific research purposes may be hampered by administrative burdens and the risk of bias.

Comparison of the mid-term outcomes of banded and non-banded sleeve gastrectomy: safety, food tolerance, and weight regain.

BACKGROUND: Long-term weight regain (WR) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a major challenge. Laparoscopic banded SG (BSG) was introduced to overcome pouch dilation and, consequently, WR; however, its mid-and long-term outcomes have not been sufficiently demonstrated. OBJECTIVE: This study retrospectively evaluated the mid-term weight loss efficacy and morbidity over at least a 4-year follow-up after laparoscopic banded SG using a MiniMizer Gastric Ring® and laparoscopic non-banded SG. METHOD: The data of 1586 bariatric surgeries were retrospectively evaluated. To ensure homogeneity in our study cohort, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 1392 patients: the non-banded SG (n = 1260) and BSG (n = 132) groups. In our matched cohort (SG, n = 655 and BSG, n = 132), WR was noted in 4 (3.0%) and 71 (10.8%) patients in the BSG and SG groups, respectively. Gastric band erosion or slippage was not noted in the BSG cohort. The levels of cholesterol and triglyceride were similar in the two groups. Postoperative glycemic control was significantly reduced in the BSG group. CONCLUSION: Although the percentage of weight loss achieved in the BSG group was low in the first year postoperatively, the mid-term (sustained) weight loss associated with BSG was superior to that associated with non-banded SG. BSG is a safe procedure with no significant mid-term band-related morbidity; its impact on the resolution of comorbidities is equivalent and perhaps superior to SG.

Impact of bariatric surgery on the effectiveness of serological response after COVID-19 vaccination.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of the current study is to determine whether bariatric surgery reversed the negative impact of obesity on the serological response after the COVID-19 vaccination. This objective is achieved in two steps: (a) quantifying the negative impact of obesity on the serological response after COVID-19 vaccination if it is present, and (b) testing whether bariatric surgery reversed this impact. The secondary objective was to monitor the occurrence of adverse events. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study between May 2021 and August 2021 on the strength of serological response after COVID-19 vaccination. Patients were classified into three groups. Group A (controls with normal or overweight), Group B (bariatric patients pre-operative), and Group C (bariatric patients post-operative). Quantitative antibodies against SARS­CoV­2 RBD with a strong neutralizing capacity were quantified from sera after at least 2 weeks post-vaccination. RESULTS: Of the 276 participants, Group A had n = 73, Group B had n = 126, and Group C had n = 77 patients. Overall, a strongly positive vaccine serological response was observed among 86% in group A, 63% in Group B, and 88% in Group C. Group C showed 5.33 times [95% CI 2.15 to 13.18] higher immune response than group B. Mild to moderate adverse events occurred in 30.1% [95% CI 24.7 to 35.9] of the study samples. Adverse events with the whole virus, mRNA, and vector vaccines occurred in 25%, 28%, and 37%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Vaccinating and bariatric surgery are safe and effective treatments in the serological response in patients who suffer from obesity.

Single Center and Surgeon's Long-Term (15-19 Years) Patient Satisfaction and Revision Rate of Round Textured Eurosilicone Breast Implants.

BACKGROUND: Breast augmentation is one of the most commonly performed aesthetic plastic surgical procedures, with over 250,000 procedures in the United States in 2020 alone. However, the safety of breast implants should be closely researched and monitored, especially in the long term. OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to evaluate the long-term results of round micro-textured Eurosilicone (Eurosilicone S.A.S, Apt Cedex, France) Cristalline Paragel breast implants from a single-center, single-surgeon experience regarding both patient-reported outcome measures and revisions. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of 84 patients who underwent primary breast augmentation with round micro-textured Eurosilicone Cristalline Paragel breast implants, either submuscular (dual-plane) or subglandular placed, between 2001 and 2004. All patients were contacted for informed consent, and after approval, the validated BREAST-Q questionnaire was sent and utilized to analyze patient satisfaction. In addition, objective data regarding revisions, including capsular contracture, rupture rate, pain, and/or aesthetic causes needing revision surgery, were analyzed. RESULTS: High BREAST-Q scores (67%-100% for 0-100 scale variables and 66.0%-77.3% of the patients scored "very satisfied" on categorical variables) were found without clinically significant differences between patients with dual-plane-placed implants and subglandular-placed implants. The overall revision rate was 29.8%, also with no significant differences between groups (P = 0.317). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed high patient satisfaction and relatively low revision rates after 15 to 19 years of follow-up of round micro-textured Eurosilicone Cristalline Paragel breast implants. No clinically relevant significant differences were found between dual-plane and subglandular placement of the implants.

The HIPPO Trial, a Randomized Double-blind Trial Comparing Self-gripping Parietex Progrip Mesh and Sutured Parietex Mesh in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty: A Long-term Follow-up Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a self-gripping mesh (Progrip) on the incidence of chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) and recurrence rate after Lichtenstein hernioplasty. BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is the most common complication of inguinal hernioplasty. One of the causes may be the use of sutures to secure the mesh. METHODS: Adult male patients undergoing Lichtenstein hernioplasty for a primary unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to a self-gripping polyester mesh or a sutured polyester mesh. Follow-up took place after 2 weeks, 3, 12, and 24 months. Pain and quality of life were assessed using the Verbal Rating Scale, Visual Analog Scale, and Short Form 36. CPIP was defined as moderate pain lasting at least 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There were 165 patients in the Progrip mesh group and 166 patients in the sutured mesh group. The incidence of CPIP was 7.3% at 3 months declining to 4.6% at 24 months and did not differ between both groups. Pain and quality of life scores were significantly improved after 2 years. Hernia recurrence rate after 24 months was 2.4% for the Progrip mesh and 1.8% for the sutured mesh (P = 0.213). The mean duration of surgery was significant shorter with the Progrip mesh (44 vs 53 minutes, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The self-gripping Progrip mesh does not reduce CPIP rates. Outcomes of the Progrip mesh are comparable to the Lichtenstein technique with the additional advantage of a reduced operation time. NCT01830452.

A Reliable Method to Measure Lip Height Using Photogrammetry in Unilateral Cleft Lip Patients.

There is still no reliable tool to determine the outcome of the repaired unilateral cleft lip (UCL). The aim of this study was therefore to develop an accurate, reliable tool to measure vertical lip height from photographs. The authors measured the vertical height of the cutaneous and vermilion parts of the lip in 72 anterior-posterior view photographs of 17 patients with repairs to a UCL. Points on the lip's white roll and vermillion were marked on both the cleft and the noncleft sides on each image. Two new concepts were tested. First, photographs were standardized using the horizontal (medial to lateral) eye fissure width (EFW) for calibration. Second, the authors tested the interpupillary line (IPL) and the alar base line (ABL) for their reliability as horizontal lines of reference. Measurements were taken by 2 independent researchers, at 2 different time points each. Overall 2304 data points were obtained and analyzed. Results showed that the method was very effective in measuring the height of the lip on the cleft side with the noncleft side. When using the IPL, inter- and intra-rater reliability was 0.99 to 1.0, with the ABL it varied from 0.91 to 0.99 with one exception at 0.84. The IPL was easier to define because in some subjects the overhanging nasal tip obscured the alar base and gave more consistent measurements possibly because the reconstructed alar base was sometimes indistinct. However, measurements from the IPL can only give the percentage difference between the left and right sides of the lip, whereas those from the ABL can also give exact measurements. Patient examples were given that show how the measurements correlate with clinical assessment. The authors propose this method of photogrammetry with the innovative use of the IPL as a reliable horizontal plane and use of the EFW for calibration as a useful and reliable tool to assess the outcome of UCL repair.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs one-anastomosis gastric bypass 5-year follow-up: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most performed bariatric procedure worldwide, whereas one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is the third most performed procedure. Both procedures have reported good weight loss (WL) and low complications. However, should both have differences in the durability of WL and malnutrition? METHODS: A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial of 300 patients was conducted to compare the outcomes of LSG and OAGB over a 5-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was WL in percentages of total WL (%TWL) and excess WL (%EWL). The secondary endpoints were complications, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), associated medical problems, bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS) assessment, and weight recurrence (WR). RESULTS: Overall, 201 patients (96 in the LSG group and 105 in the OAGB group) completed 5 years of follow-up. OAGB had significantly higher %TWL and %EWL than those of LSG throughout the follow-up. LSG had significantly higher WR and GERD. Both procedures had significant improvement in associated medical problems and BAROS scores compared with baseline, with no significant difference. WR was associated with higher relapse of associated medical conditions after initial remission and with lower BAROS scores regarding WL scores. CONCLUSION: OAGB had significantly higher WL, less WR, and less GERD. However, it had a higher incidence of bile reflux. Both procedures had comparable complication rates, excellent remissions in associated medical problems, and improved quality of life. WR was associated with significantly more relapse of associated medical problems and significantly lower BAROS scores.

Management of Leak by Intraoperative Megastent Insertion During Revisional Bariatric Metabolic Surgery: a Case Report.

We describe gastric tube continuity restoration (gastrogastrostomy) in a patient who underwent revisional laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) due to weight recurrence after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The patient sought restoration to SG due to poor quality of life. A postoperative 11-mm leak at the site of the gastrogastrostomy, attributed to adhesions and edema from a marginal ulcer, complicated the procedure. As a result, laparoscopic exploration was performed, followed by insertion of a megastent. We hereby present video documentation of this case report as well as megastent insertion technique for the treatment of such complications.

Expression and Relations of Unique miRNAs Investigated in Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Several studies have indicated that miRNAs play crucial roles in adipogenesis, insulin resistance, and inflammatory pathways associated with obesity and change after metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). This systematic review explores and maps the existing literature on how miRNAs are expressed and investigates the unique miRNAs with the effects after MBS. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, and EMBASE were searched from 2019 until February 2024. This SR found 825 miRNAs from 25 studies, identifying 507 unique ones not used twice in the same study. A total of 21 studies (84%) measured RNA before and after surgery. The miRNA used per study ranged from 1 to 146 miRNA types, with a median study sample size of just 27 patients per study, raising concerns about some conclusions' robustness. From the 507 unique miRNAs, only 16 were consistently analyzed in 4 to 7 studies, which gave 77 different outcomes in relation to miRNA after MBS. MiRNA 122 and 122-5p were analyzed the most. Others were 106b-5p, 140-5p, 183-5p, 199b-5p, 20b-5p, 424-5p, 486-5p, 7-5p, 92a, 93-5p, 194-5p, 21-5p, 221, 320a, and 223-3p. A gap was observed in many studies, whereby the results were not the same, or there was no explanation for the effects after MBS was given within the same miRNA. Fifteen miRNAs were reported to have the same upward and downward trend, although not within the same study, and only 26.1% employed some form of statistical modeling to account for bias or confounding factors. Directions and effects in miRNA are visible, but still, inconsistent outcomes linked to the same miRNA after MBS, underscoring the need for clarity in miRNA-outcome relationships. Collaborative efforts, consensus-driven miRNA dictionaries, and larger, more rigorous studies are necessary to improve methodology designs and improve outcomes.

Effect of Cytokeratin-18, C-peptide, MHR, and MACK-3 Biomarkers in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has emerged as a valuable treatment for various metabolic disorders, including metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in patients with obesity. Consequently, there is a pressing need to develop noninvasive biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring disease progression. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate specific biomarkers, including Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18), C-peptide, monocyte to HDL cholesterol ratio (MHR), and MACK-3, in patients with obesity with MAFLD undergoing LSG. Design: A prospective cohort study on patients with obesity before and 6 months after the LSG procedure. Methods: 70 patients with obesity with confirmed MAFLD, determined by Transient Elastography (TE), were pre- and 6 months postoperatively tested. Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), lipid profile, ghrelin, leptin, peptide YY, GLP-1, and liver fibrosis scores, including AST/ALT ratio (AAR), Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), and BARD Score were tested. Results: BMI significantly decreased in all participants, with a % excess weight loss of 62.0% ± 15.4%. TE measurements revealed a significant postoperative reduction from 100% to 87.1% (P = .006). All selected biomarkers showed significant postoperative improvement-a significant association of CK-18 with MAFLD markers, including AAR, FIB-4, and BARD score, were found. MACK-3 had positive associations with FIB-4. C-peptide and MHR showed no association with MAFLD markers. Furthermore, there was a positive correlation between CK-18 and MACK-3 tests and between C-peptide and CK-18 and MACK-3. Additionally, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, with CK-18 performing the best, with an estimated area under the curve of 0.863. Conclusion: Serum CK-18 outperformed other selected biomarkers in predicting and monitoring MAFLD in patients with obesity, suggesting its prospective utility in clinical practice. Further studies are needed to validate the accuracy of the MACK-3 test.

Effect on biomarkers in patients with fatty liver after weight loss surgery A sleeve gastrectomy is an operation when patient have obesity and need to lose weight. This operation help people with obesity who also have fatty liver disease that's not related to alcohol use. Researchers are looking for simple blood tests to track the disease. In this study, they checked how well 4 of these tests worked before and after the surgery in 70 people. They found that the patients lost a lot of weight and their liver health improved. One test, in particular, called CK-18, was really good at showing these changes. Another test, MACK-3, also showed promise, but more research is needed to be sure. The other 2 tests didn't seem to be linked to signs of fatty liver disease. This suggests that CK-18 could be a useful tool for doctors to see how patients are doing after this surgery.

Managing the Complication of Band Erosion in Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Case Report.

We present a case involving a patient with laparoscopic banded sleeve gastrectomy (BSG) with a 3-month history of persistent vomiting, decreased tolerance for fluids, and limited intake of soft food items. Upon investigation, an eroded band and gastric dilatation were identified. The treatment involved the removal of the eroded band and a segment of the stomach, followed by the restoration of gastric continuity through a gastrogastrostomy.

Revisional One-Step Bariatric Surgical Techniques After Unsuccessful Laparoscopic Gastric Band: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 2-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has high reported rates of revision due to poor weight loss (WL) and high complication rates. Yet, there is yet to be a consensus on the best revisional procedure after unsuccessful LAGB, and studies comparing different revisional procedures after LAGB are still needed. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that compared the outcomes of one-step revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (rRYGB), one-anastomosis gastric bypass (rOAGB), or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (rLSG) after LAGB. WL, complications, resolution of associated medical conditions, and food tolerance were assessed with a post hoc pairwise comparison one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) throughout a 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The final analysis included 102 (rRYGB), 80 (rOAGB), and 70 (rLSG) patients. After 2 years, an equal percentage of excess weight loss was observed in rOAGB and rRYGB (both >90%; p=0.998), significantly higher than that in rLSG (83.6%; p<0.001). In our study, no leaks were observed. rRYGB had higher complication rates according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (10.8% vs. 3.75% and 5.7% in rOAGB and rLSG, respectively, p=0.754), and re-operations were not statistically significant. Food tolerance was comparable between rOAGB and rRYGB (p = 0.987), and both had significantly better food tolerance than rLSG (p<0.001). The study cohorts had comparable resolution rates for associated medical problems (p>0.60). CONCLUSION: rOAGB and rRYGB had better outcomes after LAGB than rLSG regarding WL, feasibility, food tolerance, and safety. rOAGB had significantly higher rates of nutritional deficiencies.

Influence of mental and behavioral factors on weight loss after bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple factors are related to lower weight loss after bariatric surgery. This review and meta-analysis evaluates the influence of several mental and behavioral factors on weight loss. METHOD: Six electronic databases were searched. Percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) was calculated for all moderator and non-moderator groups of the variables: symptoms of depression, anxiety and binge eating, compliance, physical activity, quality of life, and body image. All moderators, surgery types, and follow-up moments were analyzed separately. RESULTS: In total, 75 articles were included in the review; 12 meta-analyses were conducted. Higher postoperative compliance to follow-up was associated with 6.86%-13.68% higher EWL. Preoperative binge eating was related to more weight loss at 24- and 36-month follow-up (7.97% and 11.79%EWL, respectively). Patients with postoperative binge eating symptoms had an 11.92% lower EWL. Patients with preoperative depressive symptoms lost equal weight compared to patients without symptoms. CONCLUSION: Despite the high heterogeneity between studies, a trend emerges suggesting that the presence of postoperative binge eating symptoms and lower postoperative compliance may be associated with less weight loss after bariatric-metabolic surgery. Additionally, preoperative depressive symptoms and binge eating do not seem to significantly impact weight loss.

Boosting weight loss after conversional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with liraglutide and placebo use. A double-blind-randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Conversional bariatric surgery inherently has less weight loss (WL) compared to primary procedures. Adjunctive use of the GLP-1 analog, liraglutide with conversional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (cRYGB) may maximize the WL benefits of surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This single-center randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial included 80 patients randomized into two groups; the liraglutide group (40 patients) who received daily injections of liraglutide, and the placebo group (40 patients) who received normal saline starting at 6 weeks from cRYGB and continued for 6 months. After discontinuing the drugs at 6 months and unblinding, the patient were followed up to 12 months. The endpoints were percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and changes in the metabolic biomarkers, and complications within 30 and 90 days according to the global outcome benchmark (GOB) stratification. RESULTS: In total, 38 patients in the liraglutide group and 31 in the placebo group completed the 24 weeks. Liraglutide group experienced better WL with a significantly higher mean %TWL at 1 month (10.27±1.39 vs. 8.41±2.08), at 6 weeks (12.65±1.77 vs. 10.47±2.23), at 6 months (18.29 ±1.74 vs. 15.58 ±1.65), and at 12 months 24.15±2.35 versus 22.70±2.13 (all P <0.001). For %EWL, this was also significantly higher in the liraglutide group at all time points. A %TWL of greater than 20% at 6 months of treatment was recorded in six (15.8%) patients in the liraglutide group and none in the placebo group ( P =0.029). Both groups had comparable changes in metabolic biomarkers. Adverse events were recorded in 11 (27.5%) patients in the liraglutide, with no adverse events in the placebo group ( P <0.001). Both groups had Clavien-Dindo scores I and II (5.0 and 2.5%), and GOB values indicated that 90.0 and 97.5% were low-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive use of liraglutide with cRYGB gives significantly higher WL and resolution of associated medical problems.

Incidence of persistent SARS-CoV-2 gut infection in patients with a history of COVID-19: Insights from endoscopic examination.

Background and study aims Gut infection is common during acute COVID-19, and persistent SARS-CoV-2 gut infection has been reported months after the initial infection, potentially linked to long-COVID syndrome. This study tested the incidence of persistent gut infection in patients with a history of COVID-19 undergoing endoscopic examination. Patients and methods Endoscopic biopsies were prospectively collected from patients with previous COVID-19 infection undergoing upper or lower gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE or LGE). Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the presence of persistent SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid proteins. Results A total of 166 UGEs and 83 LGE were analyzed. No significant differences were observed between patients with positive and negative immunostaining regarding the number of previous COVID-19 infections, time since the last infection, symptoms, or vaccination status. The incidence of positive immunostaining was significantly higher in UGE biopsies than in LGE biopsies (37.34% vs. 16.87%, P =0.002). Smokers showed a significantly higher incidence of positive immunostaining in the overall cohort and UGE and LGE subgroups ( P <0.001). Diabetic patients exhibited a significantly higher incidence in the overall cohort ( P =0.002) and UGE subgroup ( P =0.022), with a similar trend observed in the LGE subgroup ( P =0.055). Conclusions Gut mucosal tissues can act as a long-term reservoir for SARS-CoV-2, retaining viral particles for months following the primary COVID-19 infection. Smokers and individuals with diabetes may be at an increased risk of persistent viral gut infection. These findings provide insights into the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the gut and have implications for further research.