Five years of Hospital at Home adoption in Catalonia: impact, challenges, and proposals for quality assurance.

BACKGROUND: Hospital at home (HaH) was increasingly implemented in Catalonia (7.7 M citizens, Spain) achieving regional adoption within the 2011-2015 Health Plan. This study aimed to assess population-wide HaH outcomes over five years (2015-2019) in a consolidated regional program and provide context-independent recommendations for continuous quality improvement of the service. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining population-based retrospective analyses of registry information with qualitative research. HaH (admission avoidance modality) was compared with a conventional hospitalization group using propensity score matching techniques. We evaluated the 12-month period before the admission, the hospitalization, and use of healthcare resources at 30 days after discharge. A panel of experts discussed the results and provided recommendations for monitoring HaH services. RESULTS: The adoption of HaH steadily increased from 5,185 episodes/year in 2015 to 8,086 episodes/year in 2019 (total episodes 31,901; mean age 73 (SD 17) years; 79% high-risk patients. Mortality rates were similar between HaH and conventional hospitalization within the episode [76 (0.31%) vs. 112 (0.45%)] and at 30-days after discharge [973(3.94%) vs. 1112(3.24%)]. Likewise, the rates of hospital re-admissions at 30 days after discharge were also similar between groups: 2,00 (8.08%) vs. 1,63 (6.58%)] or ER visits [4,11 (16.62%) vs. 3,97 (16.03%). The 27 hospitals assessed showed high variability in patients' age, multimorbidity, severity of episodes, recurrences, and length of stay of HaH episodes. Recommendations aiming at enhancing service delivery were produced. CONCLUSIONS: Besides confirming safety and value generation of HaH for selected patients, we found that this service is delivered in a case-mix of different scenarios, encouraging hospital-profiled monitoring of the service.

[Performance assessment of health services in Catalonia (Spain): evaluation of initial results of the Catalan healthcare service project]. / Análisis del desempeño de los servicios sanitarios de Cataluña: evaluación de los primeros resultados del proyecto demostrativo.

Performance assessment of healthcare services is receiving greater attention due to increasing health care expenditures, greater expectations among the population, and the need to obtain results from the invested resources. Taking advantage of the existing experience of the Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona and the Consorci Sanitari de Barcelona, which compared the healthcare services of Barcelona and Montreal, a grant from the Agència d'Avaluació de Tecnologia i Recerca Mèdiques, and the health planning interest of the Departament de Salut, the performance assessment of the Catalan healthcare service project was started in Catalonia in 2005. This article aims to present the development of the project, to provide some examples that illustrate the kind of numerical and graphical information that could be obtained and the kind of analysis that could be performed, to provide possible explanations for the results shown, and to discuss some limitations and implications. Currently, the added value of this project is that it identifies the extent to which the healthcare system is achieving its objectives, establishes a set of homogeneous indicators that could be used in the future, and is a key tool in the development of the Central de Resultats del Departament de Salut de la Generalitat de Catalunya.

[Reasons for attending emergency departments. People speak out]. / Razones para acudir a los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios. La población opina.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain why people attend hospital emergency departments (ED) for low complexity health problems. METHOD: A phenomenological, interactionist, qualitative study was performed. A theoretical sample that selected one urban and one rural area from Catalonia (Spain) was designed. In each setting, persons (n = 36) who had used the ED or a primary care emergency service 1 month before the beginning of the study were chosen. Data were obtained through 8 focus groups. An interpretative content analysis was performed, and emergent categories were constructed through research triangulation. RESULTS: Five categories emerged: symptoms, whether or not self-diagnosis was involved, perception of needs, awareness of the health services available, and the overall context of the person. Symptoms generated feelings of failing health and thus initiated care seeking. Self-diagnosis determined perceived need and the type of care sought. People contrasted their self-perception of need with their own opinion about the health services available. The decision to go to one or other service was made as a result of this contrast, but the individual's family, work, and social situations also played a part. Informants were more familiar with the service provided by the ED than with that provided by primary care. Time consumption also figured heavily in decision making. CONCLUSIONS: The presence or absence of self-diagnosis is a determining factor in attendance at EDs. Other factors that influence demand are the level of awareness of the health services available, previous experiences, and the life situation of the individual.

[In-patient treatment decisions]. / Decisiones terapéuticas en los pacientes hospitalizados.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the extent to which treatment decisions for medical in-patients in three hospitals in Catalunya are supported by published evidence. PATIENTS AND METHOD: In a retrospective, cross-sectional study, main diagnosis-treatment pairs (DTPs) were identified for 980 hospital discharges. The Cochrane library and MEDLINE from 1966 to 1998 were searched for systematic reviews or, in their absence, randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) that supported the treatment given for each diagnosis. The level of evidence found for each DTP was classified. Descriptive analyses for patients and different DTP were performed. RESULTS: A systematic review or RCT (level I) was found for 65.4% of the 980 patients. In 32.6% of cases, there was only non-experimental or consensus evidence (level II) and in 2% there was no good evidence for the treatment given (level III). An analysis of the 598 unique pairs reduced the percentage of cases supported by level I evidence (55.7) with a proportionate increase in level II (41%). There were some differences in the proportion of cases in each evidence level by diagnostic group. CONCLUSIONS: For about two thirds of patients and a half therapeutic decisions in these three centres, there was a published RCT or a systematic review, with variations according to diagnostic groups. More robust and objective instruments are needed to assess the degree to which scientific evidence is applied in clinical practice.