6 mm short versus 11 mm long inter-foraminal implants in the full-arch rehabilitation of edentulous non-atrophic mandibles: 5-year results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this multicenter parallel-group randomized controlled trial is to compare, in the same clinical scenario, 6 mm short with 11 mm long implants for the rehabilitation of completely edentulous non-atrophic mandibles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients in three study centers received a fixed full-arch mandibular rehabilitation supported by five inter-foraminal implants, with no need for bone augmentation procedures. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio), at the time of surgery, to test (6 mm implants) or control group (11 mm implants). After 3 months, a screw-retained full-arch prosthesis was positioned (baseline). Peri-implant marginal bone level change (MBLc, primary outcome) together with implant and prosthesis survival rate, and biological/technical complications (secondary outcomes) were evaluated up to 5 years. RESULTS: Twenty seven patients were controlled at 5 years (3 drop-outs). No implant or prosthesis loss occurred. No significant intergroup difference for biological/technical complications (p > .05, Fisher's exact test) and no significant intragroup and intergroup difference in the MBLc values were registered (test -0.03 ± 0.17 mm and control -0.13 ± 0.32 mm at 5-years; p > .025, one-sided Mann-Whitney U-test). CONCLUSIONS: When used in comparable anatomic, surgical, and prosthetic conditions, no difference in the clinical and radiographic outcomes between 6-mm and 11-mm implants was observed at 5 years of follow-up. Short implants showed to be a reliable option for the rehabilitation of completely edentulous non-atrophic mandibles. There is growing clinical evidence supporting the use of short implants, even in the case of non-atrophic sites.

Microbiome differences in periodontal, peri-implant, and healthy sites: a cross-sectional pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore microbial communities associated with health and disease status around teeth and dental implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 healthy, 24 periodontitis, and 24 peri-implant sites from 24 patients were sequenced by next-generation sequencing. Microbial DNA was extracted and 16S rRNA gene was amplified. Bioinformatic analyses were performed using quantitative insights into microbial ecology (QIIME), linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSE), and STAMP. RESULTS: Differences in microbial diversity across three types of sites were not statistically significant. Several genera and species were more prevalent in healthy compared with diseased sites, including Lautropia, Rothia and Capnocytophaga and Kingella. Among diseased sites, Peptostreptococcaceae, Dialister, Mongibacterium, Atopobium, and Filifactor were over-represented in peri-implantitis sites, while Bacteroidales was more abundant in periodontitis sites. CONCLUSIONS: Diseased periodontal and peri-implant sites and corresponding healthy sites have distinct microbiological profiles. These findings suggest that microbial analyses could identify biomarkers for periodontal health and disease and lead to the development of new strategies to improve periodontal health and treat peri-implant and periodontal diseases. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The study contributes to improving our understanding of healthy, periodontally affected, and peri-implantitis sites which can improve our ability to diagnose, monitor, and manage these oral conditions.

6-mm-short and 11-mm-long implants compared in the full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible: A 3-year multicenter randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this multicenter parallel-group randomized controlled trial is to compare 6-mm-short with 11-mm-long implants in the rehabilitation of totally edentulous mandible in a completely comparable clinical situation, from anatomical, surgical, and prosthetic point of view. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty patients were selected in three study centers to receive a fixed full-arch mandibular rehabilitation supported by five inter-foraminal implants. Patients were randomly allocated, at the time of surgery, half to the test group (6-mm-long implants) and half to the control group (11-mm-long implants). No bone augmentation procedure was performed. After 3 months, a screw-retained full-arch prosthesis with distal cantilevers was positioned (baseline). Peri-implant marginal bone level change (MBLc), implant and prosthesis survival rate, and biological/technical complications were evaluated after 1 and 3 years. RESULTS: Thirty subjects (150 implants) were evaluated after 1 year and 28 (140 implants) after 3 years. No implant or prosthesis loss occurred. No significant inter-group difference for biological/technical complications was registered. No statistically significant (p > .025) intra-group or inter-group difference in the mean MBLc values was registered. The mean MBLc was 0.01 ± 0.19 mm and -0.04 ± 0.21 mm at 1 year, and -0.10 ± 0.24 mm and 0.02 ± 0.25 mm at 3 years (test and control groups, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: 6-mm-short implants may be a reliable option when used in the rehabilitation of total edentulous mandibles. These results need to be confirmed by longer follow-up data from well-designed randomized controlled clinical trials.

Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes in implant-supported overdentures retained by milled bars: Two-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: This observational clinical study evaluated the patient satisfaction and the clinical outcomes of edentulous arches rehabilitated with overdentures retained by CAD-CAM milled titanium bars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Edentulous patients were treated with a full-arch removable overdenture anchored on two milled bars based on a friction retention system. Patient satisfaction was tested using the validated Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaire at the pre- and post-treatment visits, up to two years after prosthesis delivery (possible score range: 0-56. Best: 0). The prosthodontist satisfaction was also assessed through a designed questionnaire (best possible range 0-4. Best:0). Radiographic and clinical examinations were performed at baseline and after 2 years of function. Implant and prostheses complications were recorded. RESULTS: Forty (25 mandible) edentulous patients, mean age 69 ± 9.5 (SD) (52% males, 10% smokers), were treated with a total of 185 implants. The mean difference between pre- and post-treatment OHIP-14 score was 20.6 ± 8.0 (P < 0.0001) showing a high level of satisfaction for aesthetics, functional and psychological outcomes. This perception was not influenced by patient's age or gender. The clinicians' mean score was 3.4 ± 4.0. There was a marginal bone level (MBL) gain of 0.02 ± 0.22 mm between the two time points. Minor complications were reported in five patients. CONCLUSIONS: This procedure may lead to satisfaction regarding aesthetics and mastication function. One of the most relevant aspects is the versatility, which allows selection of the most suitable treatment option according to patient needs. The prosthodontist satisfaction questionnaire showed that this procedure met the clinical expectations.

Immediate placement and loading of implants with laser-microgrooved collar in combination with an anorganic porcine bone mineral matrix in the esthetic zone. Twelve-month results of a prospective multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Many techniques have been proposed to address post-extraction ridge resorption, which often represents a concern, especially in the esthetic region. PURPOSE: The purpose of the present, prospective, multicenter, single cohort study was to investigate, up to 1 year of function, the effectiveness of a protocol for alveolar ridge preservation involving implants with laser-microgrooved surface immediately placed in fresh extraction sockets. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty eight patients candidate to tooth extraction in the esthetic zone (site 15-25 and 35-45) were treated by immediate placement of a single laser-microgrooved implants with the adjunct of a highly porous anorganic porcine bone mineral matrix and a collagen wound dressing. Peri-implant marginal bone level (MBL) was evaluated at time of loading, 3 and 12 months after loading. Gingival index, plaque index, probing depth, and bleeding on probing were measured at 3, 6, and 12 months after loading. Dimensional changes at implant sites were digitally evaluated using the best-fit superimposition of pre-and post-socket preservation models. Implant aesthetic score (IAS) as well as patients' post-operative quality of life were also evaluated at 12 months. Comparisons between data relative to thick and thin gingival phenotypes were made using Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test, as appropriate. The significance level was set at p = 0.05. RESULTS: No patient dropped out, and 28 implants were evaluated at 12 months post-loading. The overall MBL was found to be 0.92 ± 1.11 mm. Volumetric analysis of superimposed models showed an alveolar bone tissue displacement at the buccal aspect of -0.57 ± 0.52 mm in thin phenotypes and -0.46 ± 0.31 mm in thick phenotypes (p = 0.58, unpaired Student's t-test). No signs of soft tissue recession or esthetically unpleasant buccal gingiva were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical protocol herein employed showed benefits in maintaining marginal bone levels and soft tissue contour around post-extraction implants in the esthetic zone.

Use of Autogenous Tooth-Derived Mineralized Dentin Matrix in the Alveolar Ridge Preservation Technique: Clinical and Histologic Evaluation.

This study clinically and histologically evaluated the new bone formation and soft tissue changes when an autogenous tooth-derived mineralized dentin matrix (DDM) graft covered with a free gingival graft (FGG) was used for alveolar ridge preservation, as compared to spontaneous healing. Using a split-mouth protocol, 14 consecutive patients who required two extractions of a single-rooted tooth in the maxillary arch were enrolled. In each patient, one extraction site was treated with DDM and FGG (test group), while the other extraction site was covered with FGG and healed spontaneously (control group). In both test and control sites, implant placement was performed after a 16-week healing period. Compared to baseline (immediately after tooth extraction), both treatments yielded statistically significant differences in some clinical parameters and in the bone micro-architecture within the augmented sites. However, the use of DDM with the FGG created greater new vital bone formation, more newly formed bone, and fewer dimensional tissue changes than spontaneous healing with FGG.

Immediate functional loading of implants in single tooth replacement: a prospective clinical multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome of immediate functional loading of implants in single-tooth replacement using two different installation procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-one subjects, who required single-tooth rehabilitation in the area of 15-25 and 35-45, were enrolled in eight private clinics in Italy. The implant sites were randomly allocated to one of the following treatment groups. In the control group, in which a standard preparation procedure for implant placement and submerged healing of the implant was used, abutment connection and loading of the implants were performed 3 months after installation. In the test group 1, a standard preparation procedure for the implant placement and immediate functional loading of implant was carried out. In the test 2 group, however, a modified implant installation procedure (osteotome technique) was used followed by immediate functional loading of the implant. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed at 3 and 12 months of follow-up at all sites. RESULTS: Three implants (5.5%) from the test 2 group (osteotome preparation) and one (2%) from the test 1 group (conventional drill preparation) failed to integrate and were removed one and three months after implant installation. The mean marginal bone loss assessed at 12 months was 0.31 mm (test 1), 0.25 mm (test 2) and 0.38 mm (control) (no statistically significant differences were found between the three treatment groups.) CONCLUSION: It is suggested that immediate functional loading of implants that are placed with a conventional installation technique and with sufficient primary stability may be considered as a valid treatment alternative in a single-tooth replacement.