Comparison of clinical and serological features in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome patients, with and without associated systemic lupus erythematosus, followed for up to 42 years: A single centre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of concomitant systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) on the clinicopathological manifestations of thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: This single-centre, retrospective study compared clinical and antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) data from 118 patients, 58 with SLE-associated APS (SLE-APS), and 60 with primary APS. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 13.9 (IQR 7.7-19.3) and 8.6 years (3.5-10.6) for the SLE-APS cohort and PAPS cohort, respectively. Age at diagnosis of APS was lower in the SLE-APS cohort (mean 35.9 vs PAPS: 46.7 years; p < 0.05). Distribution of aPL subtypes was similar across cohorts. 198 thrombotic events were identified overall (index plus recurrent), with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial thrombosis each occurring in just over half of patients in both cohorts. Microvascular thrombosis (12.1% vs 0%), and a mixed (any combination of venous, arterial and microvascular) thrombotic phenotype (19.0% vs 6.7%, p = 0.05) were more prevalent in SLE-APS patients. Recurrent thrombosis incidence rates (∼0.5 events/10-patient years), and Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival after index thrombosis, were similar. In the PAPS cohort, only: (i) triple-aPL-positivity was associated with a significantly higher recurrent thrombosis event rate (incidence rate ratio 2.22, p = 0.03) and lower recurrence-free survival after first thrombosis (log-rank test p = 0.01); (ii) lupus anticoagulant (LA)-positivity was associated with higher prevalance of arterial thrombosis (RR 2.69, p = 0.01), and lower prevlance of VTE (RR 0.48, p < 0.001), versus LA-negativity. CONCLUSION: Concomitant SLE does not appear to modify long-term recurrent thrombosis risk, or aPL phenotypes, in patients with APS. Triple-aPL-positivity and LA-positive status may have less influence on thrombotic outcomes in patients with SLE-APS compared to PAPS.

Oral or pulse glucocorticoid use at the onset of giant cell arteritis and its influence on the risk of relapse: a retrospective study.

The objective is to investigate whether initial therapy with intravenous methylprednisolone pulses (ivMTP) or oral glucocorticoid (OG) influences the relapse rate in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients. This is a retrospective observational study of patients with GCA from 2004 to 2021. Demographics, clinical and laboratory variables, cumulative glucocorticoid dose and relapse rate at 6-month follow-up defined according to EULAR recommendations were recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine possible risk factors for relapse. A total of 74 GCA patients were included for analysis (54 (73%) female, mean (SD) age 77.2 (7.4) years). Overall, 47 (63.5%) patients received ivMTP at disease onset and 27 (36.5%) OG. Mean (SD) cumulative prednisone dose (mg) at 6-month follow-up was 3790.7 (1832.7) for patients with ivMTP vs 4298.1 (2930.6) for the OG group, p = 0.37. A total of 15 (20.3%) relapses occurred at 6-month follow-up. Relapse rates did not differ according to the initial therapy (19.1 vs 22.2%, respectively, p = 0.75). In the multivariate analysis, fever at disease onset (OR 4.837; CI 1.1-21.6) and dyslipidemia (OR 5.651; CI 1.1-28.4) were independent predictors for relapse. Initial therapy with ivMTP or OG does not influence the relapse rate of GCA patients. Fever at disease onset and dyslipidemia are independent predictors of disease relapse.

What to Expect When Systemic Treatment in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Is Withdrawn?

OBJECTIVE: The goal of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) treatment is to maintain clinical remission. It is also important to reduce drug exposure, whenever possible, in order to avoid or decrease potential side effects. We aimed to analyze remission survival after systemic treatment withdrawal and to determine which factors can influence it. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, observational, longitudinal study. All patients included had a diagnosis of JIA. We analyzed remission survival using Kaplan-Meier curves according to the systemic treatment received (methotrexate [MTX] alone or in combination with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [bDMARDs]) and JIA subgroups (oligoarticular and polyarticular course, juvenile spondyloarthritis, and systemic JIA). In addition, risk factors were examined using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: We included 404 patients with JIA; 370 of them (92%) had received systemic treatment at some point and half of them (185 patients) had withdrawn on at least 1 occasion. There were 110 patients who flared (59%) with a median time of 2.3 years. There were no differences in remission survival between JIA subcategories. Twenty-nine percent of patients with JIA who received MTX and bDMARDs, in which MTX alone was withdrawn, flared; median time to flare of 6.3 years. However, if only the bDMARD was withdrawn, flares occurred 57% of the time; median time to flare of 1.1 years. CONCLUSION: Flares are frequent when systemic treatment is withdrawn, and uveitis or joint injections could be related risk factors. In MTX and biologic-naïve patients, the frequency of flares occurred in more than half of patients, although they were less frequent when clinical remission lasted for > 1 year.

Persistence and adherence to biologic therapies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that often requires biological therapy to control its activity. Medication persistence and adherence are important aspects on which we have scarce information. We performed a longitudinal, retrospective, and observational study based on data from the daily clinical management of JIA patients. We recorded clinical remission at 6 and 12 months. Persistence of biological therapy was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and adherence was assessed using the medication possession ratio (MPR). We included 68 patients who received biological therapy. Of these, 11 (16.2%) and 5 (7.4%) required a second and third drug, respectively. The persistence rate for biological therapy at 5 years was 64%, with no differences between the first and second lines. Adherence was high during the first year of treatment (MPR80: 96.3%) and also in the second and third years (MPR80: 85.2% and 91.8%, respectively). Persistence and adherence to biological therapy were remarkably high in our JIA cohort. Adherence to biological treatments could be related to a higher probability of fulfilling the Wallace remission criteria at 6 months, although this was not confirmed at 12 months.

Subclavian artery involvement in patients with giant cell arteritis: do we need a modified Halo Score?

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether adding the subclavian artery examination into the ultrasound (US) Southend Halo Score, as proposed in the modified Halo Score, improves the diagnostic accuracy of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and its relationship with systemic inflammation. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients referred to a GCA fast track pathway (FTP) over a 1-year period. Patients underwent US exam of temporal and large vessel (LV) (carotid, subclavian, and axillary) arteries. The extent of inflammation was measured by the halo count, the Southend Halo Score, and the modified Halo Score. The gold standard for GCA diagnosis was clinical confirmation after 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were evaluated in the FTP, 17 (26.5%) had GCA. Subclavian artery involvement was present only in patients with GCA (29.4% versus 0%, p < 0.001). Overall, the three scores showed excellent diagnostic accuracy for GCA (ROC AUC 0.906, 0.930, and 0.928, respectively) and moderate correlations with acute phase reactants (0.35-0.51, p < 0.01). Only the modified Halo Score correlated with markers of inflammation in patients with LV involvement. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of subclavian artery examination in the modified Halo Score does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of GCA. Nevertheless, it correlates better with markers of systemic inflammation in LV-GCA. Key Points • Adding the subclavian artery examination into the Southend Halo Score, as proposed in the modified Halo Score, does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of GCA. • However, the extent of vascular inflammation as quantified by the modified Halo Score correlates better with markers of systemic inflammation in the large vessel (LV) GCA subgroup of patients. • Although the diagnostic value of adding subclavian arteries to the current recommended US examination of GCA is limited, it may have a role in monitoring disease activity as it correlates with the general burden of inflammation in LV GCA. These findings need to be confirmed in additional populations and larger prospective studies.