Evaluation of a hydrogen peroxide-based system for high-level disinfection of vaginal ultrasound probes.

OBJECTIVES: Because of the complex process and the risk of errors associated with the glutaraldehyde-based solutions previously used at our institution for disinfection, our department has implemented a new method for high-level disinfection of vaginal ultrasound probes: the hydrogen peroxide-based Trophon system (Nanosonics, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia). The aim of this study was to compare the time difference, safety, and sonographers' satisfaction between the glutaraldehyde-based Cidex (CIVCO Medical Solutions, Kalona, IA) and the hydrogen peroxide-based Trophon disinfection systems. METHODS: The Institutional Review Board approved a 14-question survey administered to the 13 sonographers in our department. Survey questions addressed a variety of aspects of the disinfection processes with graded responses over a standardized 5-point scale. A process diagram was developed for each disinfection method with segmental timing analysis, and a cost analysis was performed. RESULTS: Nonvariegated analysis of the survey data with the Wilcoxon signed rank test showed a statistical difference in survey responses in favor of the hydrogen peroxide-based system over the glutaraldehyde-based system regarding efficiency (P = .0013), ease of use (P = .0013), ability to maintain work flow (P = .026), safety (P = .0026), fixing problems (P = .0158), time (P = .0011), and overall satisfaction (P = .0018). The glutaraldehyde-based system took 32 minutes versus 14 minutes for the hydrogen peroxide-based system; the hydrogen peroxide-based system saved on average 7.5 hours per week. The cost of the hydrogen peroxide-based system and weekly maintenance pays for itself if 1.5 more ultrasound examinations are performed each week. CONCLUSIONS: The hydrogen peroxide-based disinfection system was proven to be more efficient and viewed to be easier and safer to use than the glutaraldehyde-based system. The adoption of the hydrogen peroxide-based system led to higher satisfaction among sonographers.

Evaluation of pancreatic allografts with sonography.

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to develop a protocol for evaluating pancreas allografts, to describe a method for successfully studying pancreatic transplants, and to determine whether the resistive index (RI) of the splenic artery is a useful differentiator between complications. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical, surgical, procedural, and radiologic reports in 51 consecutive patients undergoing 182 sonographic examinations during a 4.5-year period. Complications included splenic vein thrombosis, rejection, and pancreatitis. We obtained RIs in normal and complication groups and performed mixed model regression methods and receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: The mean RI ± SD for normal transplants was 0.65 ± 0.09; for splenic vein thrombosis, 0.76 ± 0.09; after resolution of splenic vein thrombosis, 0.73 ± 0.09; during rejection, 0.94 ± 0.09; after successful treatment of rejection, 0.74 ± 0.09; for pancreatitis, 0.83 ± 0.09; and for fluid collections, 0.66 ± 0.09. There was a statistically significant difference (P < .05) between normal transplants and splenic vein thrombosis (P = .0003), rejection (P < .0001), and pancreatitis (P = .04). A significant difference was also seen between rejection and successful treatment thereof (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: We developed a protocol that allowed us to successfully evaluate 96% of the pancreatic allografts studied. Furthermore, our data show that the RI can be used as a therapeutic guide. When the RI is less than 0.65, the risk of vascular abnormalities is very low; however, fluid collections may be present. When greater than 0.75, splenic vein thrombosis, pancreatitis, or rejection should be suspected. When greater than 0.9, rejection must be seriously considered.

Shades of gray: a history of the development of diagnostic ultrasound in a large multispecialty clinic.

The Department of Radiology at the Ochsner Health System has been a central player in the development of ultrasound nationally and internationally for much of the history of this technology. In the following article, we review the progress of ultrasound in our institution.

Early postoperative hepatic sonography as a predictor of vascular and biliary complications in adult orthotopic liver transplant patients.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to quantitatively assess the value of early posttransplantation hepatic artery resistive indexes in predicting vascular and nonvascular complications in adult orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2001, 110 consecutive adults received grafts. Doppler sonographic graft evaluations measured main, right, and left resistive indexes within 24 to 48 hr after surgery (normal resistive index cutoff, 0.6). Clinical, operative, procedural, and radiologic reports were reviewed for vascular and biliary complications. Frequency, Student's t test, logistic, and regression statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: even patients (6.4%) had vascular complications, including two (1.8%) hepatic artery and two (1.8%) hepatic vein stenoses, one (0.9%) hepatic vein thrombosis, two (1.8%) portal vein thromboses, and one (0.9%) thrombosis and two (1.8%) stenoses of the inferior vena cava (IVC). In 19 patients (17.3%), biliary complications included anastomotic strictures and leaks 1 week to 18 months after transplantation. In 11 patients (10%), sonographically large hematomas required surgical evacuation. In grafts with vascular complications or large hematomas, the mean early posttransplant main, right, and left indexes were significantly lower (< or = 0.6) than without these complications (p < 0.01). In grafts with and without biliary complications, mean early posttransplant main, right, and left indexes did not differ significantly. CONCLUSION: In adult OLT patients, low early posttransplant hepatic artery resistive indexes were sensitive (100%) and specific (80%) predictors for vascular complications (e.g., hepatic artery, portal vein, hepatic vein, and IVC) but not for biliary complications. All patients with indexes less than 0.6 within 24-48 hr after surgery should be monitored closely for vascular complications.