Protective Effect of Vaccine Doses and Antibody Titers Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Patients undergoing kidney transplantation have a poor response to vaccination and a higher risk of disease progression of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The effectiveness of vaccine doses and antibody titer tests against the mutant variant in these patients remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a single medical center according to vaccine doses and immune responses before the outbreak. Among 622 kidney transplant patients, there were 77 patients without vaccination, 26 with one dose, 74 with two doses, 357 with three, and 88 with four doses. The vaccination status and infection rate proportion were similar to the general population. Patients undergoing more than three vaccinations had a lower risk of infection (odds ratio = 0.6527, 95% CI = 0.4324-0.9937) and hospitalization (odds ratio = 0.3161, 95% CI = 0.1311-0.7464). Antibody and cellular responses were measured in 181 patients after vaccination. Anti-spike protein antibody titer of more than 1,689.3 BAU/mL is protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio = 0.4136, 95% CI = 0.1800-0.9043). A cellular response by interferon-γ release assay was not correlated with the disease (odds ratio = 1.001, 95% CI = 0.9995-1.002). In conclusion, despite mutant strain, more than three doses of the first-generation vaccine and high antibody titers provided better protection against the omicron variant for a kidney transplant recipient.

Long-term durability of sustained virologic response for hepatitis C virus infection in solid organ transplant recipients receiving direct-acting antivirals.

Data are limited regarding the long-term durability of sustained virologic response (SVR) in solid organ transplant recipients who achieve SVR12 with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for hepatitis C virus (HCV). We reported the virologic outcomes in 42 recipients who received DAAs for acute or chronic HCV infection after heart, liver, and kidney transplantation. After achieving SVR12, all recipients received HCV RNA surveys at SVR24, and biannually until the last visit. If HCV viremia was detected during the follow-up period, direct sequencing and phylogenetic analysis were performed to confirm late relapse or reinfection. Sixteen (38.1%), 11 (26.2%), and 15 (35.7%) patients underwent heart, liver and, kidney transplantation. Thirty-eight (90.5%) received sofosbuvir (SOF)-based DAAs. No recipients had late relapse or reinfection after a median (range) of post-SVR12 follow-up 4.0 (1.0-6.0) years. We demonstrate that the durability of SVR in solid organ transplant recipients is excellent once SVR12 is achieved with DAAs.

The role of S100A9 in the interaction between pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells and stromal cells.

BACKGROUND: A major feature of the microenvironment in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the significant amount of extracellular matrix produced by pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs), which have been reported to enhance the invasiveness of pancreatic cancer cells and negatively impact the prognosis. METHODS: We analyzed the data from two publicly available microarray datasets deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus and found candidate genes that were differentially expressed in PDAC cells with metastatic potential and PDAC cells cocultured with PSCs. We studied the interaction between PDAC cells and PSCs in vitro and verified our finding with the survival data of patients with PDAC from the website of The Human Protein Atlas. RESULTS: We found that PSCs stimulated PDAC cells to secrete S100A9, which attracted circulatory monocytes into cancer tissue and enhanced the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on macrophages. When analyzing the correlation of S100A9 and PD-L1 expression with the clinical outcomes of patients with PDAC, we ascertained that high expression of S100A9 and PD-L1 was associated with poor survival in patients with PDAC. CONCLUSIONS: PSCs stimulated PDAC cells to secrete S100A9, which acts as a chemoattractant to attract circulatory monocytes into cancer microenvironment and induces expression of PD-L1 on macrophages. High expression of S100A9 and PD-L1 was associated with worse overall survival in a cohort of patients with PDAC.

Survey of factors associated with the willingness toward living kidney donation.

BACKGROUND: Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is an important organ resource, especially in countries with low deceased donation rates. Strategies for expanding access to transplantation should be developed by identifying the modifiable factors. In this study, we evaluated these factors in the relatives of patients from both medical centers and dialysis clinics using questionnaires. METHODS: The questionnaires were anonymous and confidential. We collected questionnaires from previous donors, relatives of patients on the waitlist in the medical center, and relatives of dialysis patients in three nephrology clinics. The study groups were divided into three categories: donor group (n = 68), willing group (n = 43), and non-donor group (n = 65). RESULTS: Respondents in the clinics had lower cognition and willingness towards LDKT than those in the medical center. More knowledge of LDKT, better relationship with patients, more familial support, and female gender were positively related to donation. The non-donor group tended to want to maintain an intact body for the afterlife. There was no significant difference in age, educational degree, average monthly income, and medical compliance among the three groups. CONCLUSION: More efforts need to be made in dialysis clinics, where general nephrologists are important for the outreach of information. In addition, dealing with religious ambivalence and reestablishing cultural mindsets with health education programs are important issues in a non-Christian country.

Dynamics of cellular immune responses in recipients of renal allografts positive for hepatitis B surface antigen.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive renal transplantation recipients must take lifelong immunosuppressants and nucleotide analogues (NAs). We investigated the cellular immune responses of HBsAg-positive renal transplantation recipients taking immunosuppressants and NAs. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from HBsAg-positive individuals with end-stage renal disease on the transplant waiting list (Group 1) and renal transplantation recipients taking immunosuppressants and NAs (Group 2) or immunosuppressants without NAs (Group 3). Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific pentamers were used to quantify circulating HBV-specific CD8+ T cells. RESULTS: Groups 2 and 3 had higher cellular immune responses, as indicated by significantly lower regulatory T (Treg)/CD8+ T cell ratios than Group 1. With undetectable viral loads under both immunosuppressant and NAs, the CD8+ T cell and HBV-specific CD8+ T cell frequencies were similar in Group 2 and Group 1. Patients in Group 3 did not use NAs and had an elevated viral load and higher HBV-specific CD8+ T cell and IFN-γ-producing HBV-specific CD8+ T cell frequencies, but lower a frequency of programmed death-1 (PD-1)+ HBV-specific CD8+ T cells than the other groups. Increased viral replication in Group 3 resulted in significantly higher CD8+ T cell and IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T cell frequencies than Group 1. CONCLUSION: Immunosuppressant therapy increases viral replication in HBsAg-positive renal transplant recipients due to disabling or dysregulation of virus-specific CD8+ T cells. The higher cellular immune responses due to lower Treg/CD8+ T cell ratios in HBsAg-positive renal transplant recipients may be one of the reasons to induce liver pathology because of uncontrolled viral replication.

Two-year protocol biopsy after kidney transplantation in clinically stable recipients - a retrospective study.

The idea of protocol biopsy is to detect subclinical pathologies, including rejection, recurrent disease, or infection for early intervention and adjustment of immunosuppressants. Nevertheless, it is not adopted by most clinicians because of its low yield rate and uncertain long-term benefits. This retrospective study evaluated the impact of protocol biopsy on renal function and allograft survival. A two-year protocol biopsy was proposed for 190 stable patients; 68 of them accepted [protocol biopsy (PB) group], while 122 did not [nonprotocol biopsy (NPB) group]. The rejection diagnosis was made in 13 patients by protocol biopsy, and 11 of them had borderline rejection. In the following 5 years, graft survival was better in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0143). A total of 4 and 17 patients in the PB and NPB groups, respectively, had rejection events proven by indication biopsy. Renal function was better preserved in the PB group than in the NPB group (P = 0.0107) for patients with rejection events. Nevertheless, the survival benefit disappeared by a longer follow-up period (12-year, P = 0.2886). In conclusion, 2-year protocol biopsy detects subclinical pathological changes in rejection and preserves renal function by early intervention so as to prolong graft survival within 5 years.

Latent Tuberculosis Infection Increases in Kidney Transplantation Recipients Compared With Transplantation Candidates: A Neglected Perspective in Tuberculosis Control.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence and incidence of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in patients with kidney transplantation remain unclear. METHODS: In this prospective study, we enrolled kidney transplantation candidates (KTCs) and recipients (KTRs) from 2014 to 2018. We defined LTBI as a positive result of QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-tube (QFT). We analyzed the predictors for LTBI acquisition and followed up on QFT assay test for 2 years among those initially without LTBI. RESULTS: Of 425 patients enrolled, 305 (71.8%) patients belonged to the KTC group and 120 (28.2%) to the KTR group. The initial QFT showed positive results in 32 (10.5%) and 24 (20.0%) patients in the KTC and KTR groups, respectively (P = .009). The QFT response value in patients with LTBI was higher in the KTR group than in the KTC group (1.85 vs 1.06 IU/mL, P = .046). Multivariate logistic regression showed that old age, absence of bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) scar, presence of donor-specific antibody, and KTR group were independent factors for positive LTBI. For participants with initial negative QFT, positive QFT conversion within a 2-year follow-up was higher after kidney transplantation (20%) than in KTCs (5.5%) (P = .034). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first cohort to follow up LTBI status in patients with kidney transplantation and shows its higher prevalence and incidence in KTRs. It indicates that surveillance of LTBI after renal transplantation is important. In addition to status of kidney transplantation, old age, no BCG vaccination, and positive donor-specific antibody are also positive predictors for LTBI.

Telbivudine for renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B infection: a randomized controlled trial with early termination.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze changes in renal function in HBsAg-positive renal transplant recipients receiving lamivudine who did or did not switch to telbivudine. METHODS: In this prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT), HBsAg-positive renal transplant recipients who had received lamivudine prophylaxis for at least 6 months were 1:2 randomized to receive either lamivudine or telbivudine for another 24 months. Renal function was evaluated by creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the time of randomization (baseline), 6, 12, 18, and 24 months respectively. RESULTS: This RCT was prematurely terminated after recruiting only 17 patients due to a high incidence (61.5%; 8/13) of clinical myalgia in the telbivudine group. Cox's proportional hazards model revealed that there was no independent predictor of myalgia. Based on intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses using generalized estimating equations, the patients in the randomized telbivudine group had a significantly increased eGFR and the patients in the lamivudine group had a significantly decreased eGFR at the end of follow-up compared to the values at study enrollment. However, there was no significant difference between the lamivudine and telbivudine groups. CONCLUSIONS: The renal protective effect of telbivudine for HBsAg positive renal transplant recipients was uncertain for high incidence of myalgia and only patients who were on telbivudine for 24 months had renal function maintenance.

Prognostic factors for renal transplant graft survival in a retrospective cohort of 1000 cases: The role of desensitization therapy.

BACKGROUND: To review the results of renal transplantation after promulgation of the Human Organ Transplant Act in Taiwan in 1987, we conducted a retrospective study in the first 1000 cases performed in our hospital. Prognostic factors for graft survival were assessed with emphasis on the impact of donor-specific antibody (DSA). METHODS: Between January 1988 and April 2014, there were 1000 cases of renal transplantation performed in our hospital. Excluding 30 patients of ABO-incompatible transplantation, we reviewed 970 cases of ABO-compatible renal transplantation to analyze the prognostic factors for graft survival. The patients were grouped according to the dates of operations before (the Early group: 503 cases) and after (the Late group: 467 cases) the introduction of detection and desensitization of alloantibody in our hospital in 2004. RESULTS: The overall 5-year graft survival rate were 82.6%, which was significantly lower in the Early group (79.2%) than the Late group (86.3%) (p = 0.0012). The 1-year rejection-free survival was significantly lower in the Early group (78.3%) than the Late group (91.2%) (p = 0.0165). The difference between the two groups became insignificant when the time of observation extended beyond 12 months. In a multivariate regression model, we identified significant factors for poor graft survival, including HLA mismatches, delayed graft function with or without recovery, and antibody-mediate rejection (AMR). CONCLUSION: HLA mismatches, delayed graft function with or without recovery, and AMR were significant factors for poor graft survival. Detection and desensitization of DSA currently might be inadequate to improve the long-term outcome of renal transplantation.

An observational study of microcirculation in dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Microcirculatory dysfunction contributes to acute and chronic kidney diseases. To the best of our knowledge, no study has compared differences in microcirculation among healthy volunteers, dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sublingual microcirculation was examined using sidestream dark field imaging and was compared among 90 healthy volunteers, 40 dialysis patients and 40 kidney transplant recipients. The gender effect on microcirculation and the correlations among the microcirculation parameters, age, body mass index, heart rate and blood pressure were analysed. RESULTS: Total small vessel density, perfused small vessel density and the proportion of perfused small vessels were lower in the dialysis patients than in the healthy volunteers and kidney transplant recipients [total small vessel density; healthy volunteers vs. dialysis patients vs. kidney transplant recipients, 25·2 (2·3) vs. 22·8 (2·6) vs. 24·2 (2·9) mm/mm2 , P < 0·001]. Systolic blood pressure showed a weak negative correlation with the microvascular flow index scores in the healthy volunteers. By contrast, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure showed weak positive correlations with proportion of perfused small vessels and the microvascular flow index scores in the dialysis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Microcirculatory dysfunction is noted in dialysis patients, and this alteration is ameliorated in KT recipients. The positive correlation between blood pressure and microcirculation in dialysis patients suggests that additional studies should investigate the optimal goal of blood pressure management for dialysis patients.

Renal transplantation across the donor-specific antibody barrier: Graft outcome and cancer risk after desensitization therapy.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Desensitization regimens including use of intravenous immune globulin and rituximab have been reported to overcome renal transplant hyperacute rejection. A retrospective case-control study was performed to assess the results and complications of renal transplantation with desensitization therapy for donor-specific antibody (DSA) in a transplant center in Asia, where donor exchange was usually not allowed. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2013, 22 patients with DSA received live-donor renal transplantation after desensitization (DSA group). During the same period, the DSA group was compared to the NSA group (152 renal transplants) who had no specific antibody to the donors (66 from deceased donors and 86 from living relatives). Rejection, renal function, graft and patient survival rates, infection, and cancer incidence were reviewed and analyzed from medical records. RESULTS: The DSA group (46.8%) had significantly higher acute rejection rates than the NSA group (13.7%) at the 1-year follow-up. The estimated renal function, 5-year graft, and patient survival rates were comparable between the groups. The DSA group (19.6%) had significantly higher 5-year de novo cancer incidence than the NSA group (8.5%; p = 0.028); three patients of the DSA group developed urothelial carcinoma 17.0 ± 3.0 months after transplantation. By using stepwise Cox regression analysis, desensitization therapy was identified as the sole independent risk factor for post-transplant urothelial carcinoma. CONCLUSION: When compared to renal transplantation without DSA, desensitization therapy for DSA resulted in equivalent renal transplant outcome but potentially increased risk of urothelial carcinoma after transplantation.

Repeated cycles of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis for treatment of late antibody-mediated rejection of renal transplants.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) plays a central role in the treatment of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) of renal allografts, but the treatment outcomes for late AMR (>6 months after transplantation) are poor. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study to assess the response patterns of IVIG-based (2 g/kg) desensitization for late AMR. Patients who received desensitization after the pathological diagnosis of late AMR positive for complement component C4d were grouped as the Desensitized Group and compared to a historical Control Group with complement component C4d positivity in retrospective stainings. RESULTS: The 10-year graft survival of the Desensitized Group (73.9%, n = 35) was significantly better than that of the historical Control Group (35.0%, n = 40) without desensitization. In the Desensitized Group, a subgroup of patients (D2 Subgroup, n = 11), who responded to desensitization initially but deteriorated later, was identified to benefit from repeated cycles of desensitization at 31.1 ± 20.9 months. Patients receiving only one cycle of desensitization were further grouped into D1-good (n = 10) and D1-poor (n = 14) based on their long-term renal function. The D2 Subgroup patients did not exhibit significant improvements in renal function compared to the D1-poor patients, until 30 months after IVIG-based desensitization, suggesting desensitization therapy has a working window of approximately 24 months. CONCLUSION: Repeated cycles of IVIG-based desensitization help stabilize long-term renal function in patients with persistent AMR.

Peginterferon alfa-2a with or without low-dose ribavirin for treatment-naive patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 receiving haemodialysis: a randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: Data comparing the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with peginterferon plus low-dose ribavirin and peginterferon monotherapy in treatment-naive haemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 (HCV-2) infection are limited. DESIGN: In this randomised trial, 172 patients received 24 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2a 135 µg/week plus ribavirin 200 mg/day (n=86) or peginterferon alfa-2a 135 µg/week (n=86). The efficacy and safety endpoints were sustained virological response (SVR) rate and adverse event (AE)-related withdrawal rate. RESULTS: Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy had a greater SVR rate (74% vs 44%, relative risk (RR): 1.68 [95% CI 1.29 to 2.20]; p<0.001). The beneficial effect of combination therapy was more pronounced in patients with baseline viral load ≥800,000 IU/mL than those with baseline viral load <800,000 IU/mL (RR: 3.08 [95% CI 1.80 to 5.29] vs. RR: 1.11 [95% CI 0.83 to 1.45]; interaction p=0.001). Patients receiving combination therapy were more likely to have a haemoglobin level of <8.5 g/dL (70% vs. 8%, risk difference (RD): 62% [95% CI 50% to 73%]; p<0.001) and required a higher dosage [mean: 13,417 vs. 6667 IU/week, p=0.027] of epoetin ß to manage anaemia than those receiving monotherapy. The AE-related withdrawal rates were 6% and 3% in combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively (RD: 2% [95% CI -4% to 9%]). CONCLUSIONS: In treatment-naive haemodialysis patients with HCV-2 infection, combination therapy with peginterferon plus low-dose ribavirin achieved a greater SVR rate than peginterferon monotherapy. Most haemodialysis patients can tolerate combination therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrial.gov number, NCT00491244.

B cells and immunoglobulin in ABO-incompatible renal transplant patients receiving rituximab and double filtration plasmapheresis.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The effect of rituximab on B cell and immunoglobulin production after therapeutic apheresis has not been studied in ABO-incompatible renal transplant patients. METHODS: Twenty consecutive ABO-incompatible renal transplant patients receiving rituximab induction and double filtration plasmapheresis were enrolled; one case was excluded because of repeated plasmapheresis and immunoglobulin therapy (Incompatible group). The B cell count of the Incompatible group was compared to another group of 18 ABO-compatible renal transplant patients who were operated on during the same period (Compatible group). In the Incompatible group, the total IgM, IgG, and IgG1-4 subclasses after transplantation were compared to those before desensitization. Tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids were used for both groups. RESULTS: The B cell count of the Incompatible group was significantly lower than the Compatible group post-transplant from Month 1 to Month 11 only. The B cell count of the Compatible group also decreased for the first 6 months, suggesting that maintenance immunosuppressive agents suppress B cells. Total IgG and IgM levels after transplantation were significantly lower than before desensitization during the 24-month follow-up period. The post-transplant IgG3 level was significantly lower than before desensitization for only 3 months. CONCLUSION: With the aid of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab resulted in sustained suppression of B cell count and total IgG and IgM. Among the IgG subclasses, IgG3 was less sensitive to rituximab.

De novo cancer avoidance after renal transplantation: A case-control study on low-dose sirolimus combined with a calcineurin inhibitor.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Full-dose sirolimus (SRL) therapy without a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) reduces the incidence of malignancy after renal transplantation, but with significant side effects. We hypothesized that de novo therapy with low-dose SRL combined with a CNI could still prevent cancer in renal transplant recipients. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was performed to assess the cancer incidence among renal transplant patients who had undergone surgery in our transplant centers between January 2000 and June 2012. Patients who received low-dose SRL and a CNI (SRL group, n = 189) were compared with patients receiving conventional CNI-based therapy in the same hospitals (Conventional group, n = 271). RESULTS: The 5-year graft and patient survival rates were comparable between the two groups. Seven patients in the SRL group and 24 patients in the Conventional group developed malignancies during mean follow-up periods of 68.2 ± 37.5 months and 81.7 ± 51.4 months, respectively. The cancer incidence at 5 years was significantly lower in the SRL group (1.9%), than that in the Conventional group (6.7%; p = 0.04). By multivariate analyses, SRL therapy (p = 0.04), male sex (p = 0.04), and younger age (p = 0.01) were significantly associated with a lower risk of malignancy after kidney transplantation. CONCLUSION: De novo therapy with low-dose SRL combined with a CNI was associated with reduced risk of post-transplant cancer in renal transplant recipients. De novo cancer prevention using a low-dose proliferation signal inhibitor such as SRL could be effective for renal transplant recipients.

Robot-assisted renal transplantation in the retroperitoneum.

Minimally invasive surgery for renal transplantation is still under development. We employed the robotic surgical system to perform renal transplantation with a minimally invasive wound. The operation was performed with a Gibson incision and two working ports. The space for the transplantation was created by retroperitoneal dissection with the robot lifting the abdominal wall. Vascular reconstruction was performed with two robotic needle drivers. We successfully performed robot-assisted renal transplantation in five female and five male patients with an average wound length of 7.7 ± 1.04 cm. Nine of the renal allografts functioned immediately, but one with prolonged warm ischemia during the live donor nephrectomy had delayed function. The average creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate at discharge were 1.31 ± 0.31 mg/dl and 58.2 ± 8.1 ml/min, respectively. All the transplants are currently functioning at 6.9 ± 3.9 months after operations. In conclusion, with robot assistance, minimal invasive renal transplantation can be performed successfully in the retroperitoneum.

Long-term effects of prophylactic and therapeutic lamivudine treatments in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Among hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive renal allograft recipients, post-transplant immunosuppression is associated with the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related complications. Lamivudine has proven beneficial in short-term post-transplant follow-up. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2009, 26 adult HBsAg-positive renal allograft recipients received lamivudine prophylaxis (Group 1) and another 28 patients received therapeutic lamivudine (Group 2) due to post-transplant hepatitis B reactivation. The historical control group included 43 HBsAg-positive renal allograft recipients who did not receive lamivudine therapy (Group 3). RESULTS: No subjects in Group 1 presented HCC or liver-related complications and the 10-year HCC incidence of Group 2 and Group 3 was 4.2 and 34 %, respectively. Furthermore, the HCC-free survival rates as well as the 10-year patient and graft survival rates of Group 1 and Group 2 were significantly higher than those of Group 3. However, the rates of liver-related complications and graft rejection of Group 2 and Group 3 were both higher than those of Group 1. Additionally, the HBV mutation-free rate of lamivudine was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine antiviral treatment, either on a prophylactic or therapeutic basis, provided long-term benefits for HBsAg-positive renal allograft recipients, in terms of reducing the occurrence of HCC and prolonging patient and graft survival. Furthermore, compared with therapeutic lamivudine, lamivudine prophylaxis appears to significantly reduce the incidence of liver-related complications, graft rejection, and lamivudine resistance.

Pegylated interferon-α2a with or without low-dose ribavirin for treatment-naive patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 receiving hemodialysis: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Data are limited on the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1) receiving hemodialysis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with pegylated interferon plus low-dose ribavirin and pegylated interferon monotherapy for treatment-naive patients with HCV-1 receiving hemodialysis. DESIGN: Open-label, randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00491244). SETTING: 8 centers in Taiwan. PATIENTS: 205 treatment-naive patients with HCV-1 receiving hemodialysis. INTERVENTION: 48 weeks of pegylated interferon-α2a, 135 µg weekly, plus ribavirin, 200 mg daily (n = 103), or pegylated interferon-α2a, 135 µg weekly (n = 102). MEASUREMENTS: Sustained virologic response rate and adverse event-related withdrawal rate. RESULTS: Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy had a greater sustained virologic response rate (64% vs. 33%; relative risk, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.62]; P < 0.001). More patients receiving combination therapy had hemoglobin levels less than 8.5 g/dL than those receiving monotherapy (72% vs. 6%; risk difference, 66% [CI, 56% to 76%]; P < 0.001). Patients receiving combination therapy required a higher dosage (mean, 13 946 IU per week [SD, 6449] vs. 5833 IU per week [SD, 1169]; P = 0.006) and longer duration (mean, 29 weeks [SD, 9] vs. 18 weeks [SD, 7]; P = 0.004) of epoetin-ß than patients receiving monotherapy. The adverse event-related withdrawal rates were 7% in the combination therapy group and 4% in the monotherapy group (risk difference, 3% [CI, -3% to 9%]). LIMITATION: Open-label trial; results may not be generalizable to patients on peritoneal dialysis. CONCLUSION: In treatment-naive patients with HCV-1 receiving hemodialysis, combination therapy with pegylated interferon plus low-dose ribavirin achieved a greater sustained virologic response rate than pegylated interferon monotherapy. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Center of Excellence for Clinical Trial and Research.

The occurrence of primary hepatic adenoma in deceased donor renal transplant recipient.

MAIN FINDINGS: We reported a case of new-onset, multi-focal hepatic adenoma in an 18 year-old man with no classic risk factors occurring forty months after a renal transplant from a cadaver donor. Histopathology of the adenoma was examined and genotype and phenotype were also analyzed. Histopathologic examination of the adenoma showed no malignancy. Genotype and phenotype analysis revealed no HNF1α or ß-catenin gene mutations and no inflammatory infiltration. The patient was well and disease-free postoperatively. CASE HYPOTHESIS: Hepatic adenoma occurs mostly in those taking oral contraceptives or androgenic-anabolic steroids or in those with hereditary diseases. Hepatic adenoma in a renal transplant recipient is rare and has only been reported in one case with glycogen storage disease type Ia. Immunosuppressive treatment might have contributed to the development of the neoplasm. PROMISING FUTURE IMPLICATIONS: Although malignant change occurs most often in ß-catenin gene mutation hepatic adenoma, surgical resection of the adenoma in a patient under immunosuppressive therapy should be considered in order to avoid the possibility of malignant transformation or hemorrhagic rupture.

Gender differences in renal transplant graft survival.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: A long-term retrospective study was conducted to assess the risk factors of renal transplant graft failure focusing on the effects of gender of both the donor and the recipient. METHODS: Medical records of primary renal transplantation performed in a single transplant hospital were reviewed. Cases of ABO incompatibility, positive cross-matches, or multiple organ transplants were excluded. A total of 766 patient records were reviewed, and variables were analyzed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression to determine the independent factors associated with graft survival. RESULTS: The overall 5-year graft and patient survival rates were 84.7% and 92.2%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed significantly poorer prognosis in male patients and in those with acute rejection, delayed function, or more mismatches in human lymphocyte antigens. Multivariate analysis with step-wise regression identified three independent prognostic factors for poor graft survival (male gender, acute rejection, and delayed function). The 5-year graft survival rates for female and male patients were 87.9% and 81.3%, respectively. The risk ratio of graft failure for male renal transplant recipients was 1.3732, when compared with that for female patients. The risk ratios for those with acute rejection and delayed function were 1.8330 and 1.5422, respectively. CONCLUSION: Male gender, in addition to acute rejection and delayed function, was found to be an independent prognostic factor for poor renal transplant survival in this long-term retrospective study.