RESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of biliary duct visualization using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography (EOB-MRC) in patients with liver cirrhosis. Forty adult patients with liver cirrhosis (cirrhosis group) and 20 adult individuals with normal liver parenchyma (control group) underwent EOB-MRC using T1-weighted GRE imaging up to 180 min after Gd-EOB-DTPA administration. Two observers assessed the visualization of each biliary structure and the overall anatomical visualization of the biliary tree. Child-Pugh, MELD score and laboratory findings were compared. The grade of visualization for each evaluated biliary structure was statistically different in the two groups (P = 0.004 to <0.001). The overall EOB-MRC quality was rated as sufficient for anatomical visualization of the biliary tree in all individuals of the control group 20 min after Gd-EOB-DTPA application, but in only 16/40 patients (40%) of the cirrhosis group within 30 min after application. Analysis of the ROC curves revealed that the cut-off values, for non-sufficient visualization of the biliary tree 20 min after Gd-EOB-DTPA application, were MELD scores > or =11 and total serum bilirubin levels > or =30 micromol/l. Consecutively, EOB-MRC in patients with liver cirrhosis resulted in a decreased or even non-visualization of the biliary tree in a substantial percentage of patients.
Asunto(s)
Conductos Biliares/patología , Pancreatocolangiografía por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Gadolinio DTPA , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Medios de Contraste , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To prospectively assess and compare two formulations and methods of administration of low-dose nasal midazolam for the treatment of claustrophobic patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as part of a multicenter Phase III trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 108 consecutive adult claustrophobic patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups (multidose group: MDG, unit-dose group: UDG). MDG encompassed 55 patients who received intranasally a 0.5% midazolam formulation into each nostril (total dose, 1.0 mg), whereas the 53 patients in UDG received a 1% midazolam formulation into only one nostril (total dose, 1.0 mg). This initial dose could be repeated once. Patient tolerance and anxiety were assessed using a questionnaire and a visual analog scale immediately before and after MRI. Image quality was evaluated using a five-point scale. RESULTS: In all, 53/55 MR examinations (96%) with MDG and 52/53 (98%) with UDG were completed successfully. The dose of 1 mg had to be repeated significantly less often in UDG compared to MDG (4/53, 8% vs. 13/55, 24%; P = 0.003). The image quality of all MR examinations was rated good to excellent, and slightly better in UDG (P = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Nasally applied low-dose midazolam is a patient-friendly solution to facilitate MRI of claustrophobic patients. The nasal spray of UDG is superior to that of MDG with a necessity of additional dosing.
Asunto(s)
Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/psicología , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Fóbicos/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intranasal , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to assess prospectively the potential of low-dose intranasal midazolam compared to oral midazolam in claustrophobic patients undergoing routine body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Seventy-two adult claustrophobic patients referred for body MRI were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups (TG1 and TG2). The 36 patients of TG1 received 7.5 mg midazolam orally 15 min before MRI, whereas the 36 patients of TG2 received one (or, if necessary, two) pumps of a midazolam nasal spray into each nostril immediately prior to MRI (in total, 1 or 2 mg). Patients' tolerance, anxiety and sedation were assessed using a questionnaire and a visual analogue scale immediately before and after MRI. Image quality was evaluated using a five-point-scale. In TG1, 18/36 MRI examinations (50%) had to be cancelled, the reduction of anxiety was insufficient in 12/18 remaining patients (67%). In TG2, 35/36 MRI examinations (97%) were completed successfully, without relevant adverse effects. MRI image quality was rated higher among patients of TG2 compared to TG1 (p<0.001). Low-dose intranasal midazolam is an effective and patient-friendly solution to overcome anxiety in claustrophobic patients in a broad spectrum of body MRI. Its anxiolytic effect is superior to that of the orally administrated form.
Asunto(s)
Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/psicología , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Fóbicos/prevención & control , Administración Intranasal , Administración Oral , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Ansiedad/psicología , Nivel de Alerta/efectos de los fármacos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Midazolam/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Trastornos Fóbicos/psicología , Postura , Estudios Prospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the prevalence and determine the size of meniscal cysts, ganglionic cysts, synovial cysts of the popliteal space, fluid-filled bursae, and other fluid collections on MR images of asymptomatic knees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 102 asymptomatic knees were evaluated with regard to the prevalence of meniscal cysts, ganglionic cysts, synovial cysts of the popliteal space, fluid-filled bursae, and other fluid collections. The MR examinations were performed in patients (mean age, 42.8 years; age range, 18-73 years) with clinically suspected meniscal lesions in the contralateral knee. The craniocaudal, anteroposterior, and mediolateral diameters of detectable abnormal fluid collections were measured. RESULTS: Medial meniscal cysts (mean size [craniocaudal x anteroposterior x mediolateral], 9 x 6 x 13 mm) were found in four asymptomatic knees. Neither lateral meniscal cysts nor ganglionic cysts of the cruciate ligaments were identified. Twenty-six synovial cysts of the popliteal space (Baker's cyst)-consisting of 11 gastrocnemius portions (mean size, 19 x 8 x 10 mm) and 15 semimembranosus portions (mean size, 20 x 7 x 9 mm)-were found in 19 knees. Twenty-four (92%) of these cysts had a maximal diameter of 30 mm or less. Fluid-filled bursae were found in 49 knees. The deep infrapatellar bursa was most commonly involved (42 knees; mean size, 6 x 3 x 5 mm). Fluid-filled anserine bursae (mean size, 27 x 12 x 10 mm) were detected in five knees. CONCLUSION: Meniscal cysts may be present in asymptomatic knees, at least on the medial side. Synovial cysts of the popliteal space can be found in approximately one fifth of asymptomatic knees. Their maximal diameter is usually smaller than 30 mm.