Results of a phase 2 study of pacritinib (SB1518), a JAK2/JAK2(V617F) inhibitor, in patients with myelofibrosis.

Pacritinib (SB1518) is a Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), JAK2(V617F), and Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitor that does not inhibit JAK1. It demonstrated a favorable safety profile with promising efficacy in phase 1 studies in patients with primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF). This multicenter phase 2 study further characterized the safety and efficacy of pacritinib in the treatment of patients with MF. Eligible patients had clinical splenomegaly poorly controlled with standard therapies or were newly diagnosed with intermediate- or high-risk Lille score. Patients with any degree of cytopenia were eligible. Thirty-five patients were enrolled. At entry, 40% had hemoglobin <10 g/dL and 43% had platelets <100 000× 10(9)/L. Up to week 24, 8 of 26 evaluable patients (31%) achieved a ≥35% decrease in spleen volume determined by magnetic resonance imaging and 14 of 33 (42%) attained a ≥50% reduction in spleen size by physical examination. Median MF symptom improvement was ≥50% for all symptoms except fatigue. Grade 1 or 2 diarrhea (69%) and nausea (49%) were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events. The study drug was discontinued in 9 patients (26%) due to adverse events (4 severe). Pacritinib is an active agent in patients with MF, offering a potential treatment option for patients with preexisting anemia and thrombocytopenia. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00745550.

Long-term follow up of the combination of ofatumumab, high-dose methylprednisolone, and lenalidomide for untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia with biomarker analysis.

BACKGROUND: Advancements in frontline therapy and chemotherapy-sparing treatments in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) have altered the treatment algorithms of this disease. We present a frontline alternative for treatment- naïve (TN) CLL/SLL patients. METHODS: This was a single-center, phase 2 study of high-dose methylprednisolone (HDMP) and ofatumumab with lenalidomide and ofatumumab consolidative therapy for all comers with TN CLL/SLL. Treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerable side effects. Patients were assessed for response per iwCLL 2008 criteria after completing cycles 3 and 12. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were enrolled (median age, 62.6 years). High-risk features included del17p (18%), Del11q (22%), and unmutated IGHV gene (76%). Median treatment duration was 32·2 (2·7-75·9) months. Thirty-six patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression (22%), adverse events (40%), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) (7%), consent withdrawal (4%), and secondary malignancies (7%). The best overall and complete response rates were 96& and 29% respectively. At median follow-up of 61·7 (5·6-84·9) months, 9 patients remained on treatment. Median progression-free survival was 54·4 (2·9-77·6) months. Three patients underwent allo-HCT after a median of 3 (3-4) treatment cycles. Treatment was well tolerated, with a grade 3/4 infusion reaction in one patient. The most common grade 3/4 hematological adverse event was neutropenia (69%). Four patients had grade 3/4 infections. No grade 3/4 tumor flares, tumor lysis syndrome, or thrombosis were observed. CONCLUSION: The combination of ofatumumab, HDMP, and lenalidomide was effective and relatively well tolerated in treatment-naive CLL/SLL. Its role in the frontline setting remains unclear given the current available and effective treatment options. FUNDING: The funders had no role in the study.

Brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin and dacarbazine in nonbulky limited-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

ABVD (Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) with or without radiation has been the standard treatment for limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) but carries risks of bleomycin lung injury and radiation toxicity. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is approved with AVD for stage III-IV HL, but carries increased risks of peripheral neuropathy (PN) and neutropenic fever, likely due to overlapping toxicity between BV and vinblastine. We therefore evaluated BV in combination with AD for 4 or 6 cycles based on interim positron emission tomography response. Thirty-four patients with nonbulky stage I-II HL were enrolled. Risk was early favorable in 53% and unfavorable in 47%. The overall and complete response rates (CRRs) were 100% and 97%, respectively, with a 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 91%. No differences in outcome were observed based on stage (I vs II) or risk status (early favorable vs unfavorable). The most common adverse events were nausea (85%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (59%), and fatigue (56%). There were no cases of grade-4 neutropenia or neutropenic fever, and no patient received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. Most cases of PN were grade 1, and no patient experienced grade ≥3 PN. BV-AD produced a high CRR and durable PFS with most patients requiring 4 cycles of therapy. Compared with BV-AVD, the toxicity profile appeared improved, with predominantly grade 1 reversible PN and no case of grade 4 neutropenia or neutropenic fever. This regimen warrants further study in HL and may serve as a backbone for the addition of novel agents. This trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02505269).

Nurses in clinical trials: perceptions of impact on the research enterprise.

Background: Clinical Research Nurses practice across a wide spectrum of roles and settings within the global research enterprise. Clinical Research Nurses working with clinical trials face a dual fidelity in their role, balancing integrity of the protocol and quality care for participants. Aims: The purpose of this study was to describe Clinical Research Nurses' experiences in clinical trials, educational preparation, and career pathways, to gain a deeper understanding of clinical research nursing contributions to the clinical research enterprise. Methods: An internet-based survey was conducted to collect demographic data and free text responses to four open-ended queries related to the experience of nurses working in clinical trials research, educational preparation, and role pathways. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze free text responses. The study was guided by the Clinical Research Nursing Domain of Practice and Duffy's Quality Caring Model of relationship centered professional encounters. Results: Forty clinical research nurses responded to the open-ended questions with themes related to dual fidelity to study participants and protocols, relationships and nursing care, interdisciplinary team membership and contributing to science, emerging from the data. Gaps in educational preparation and professional pathways were identified. Conclusion: This study provides insights to unique clinical research nurse practice contributions in the clinical trial research enterprise within a context of Duffy's Quality Caring Model.

Results of a phase II study of lenalidomide and rituximab for refractory/relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is an incurable disease in need of new therapeutic strategies. The immunomodulatory agent, lenalidomide, has shown activity as salvage therapy for CLL. In this phase II trial, we combined lenalidomide with rituximab in 25 patients (range, 41-79) with refractory/relapsed CLL. Lenalidomide was administered orally on escalating doses, with cycle 1 doses of 2.5mg daily on days 1-7, 5mg on days 8-14, and 10mg on days 15-21 followed by 7days off. On cycle 2 and beyond, lenalidomide was administered at 20mg daily on days 1-21. Rituximab was administered at 375mg/m(2) intravenously on a weekly basis for the first cycle starting on day 15 for 4 doses, with each cycle being 28days. Treatment was continued until disease progression or toxicity. Overall response rate was 45.8% on intent-to-treat and 61.1% in evaluable patients (all partial responses). Median time to treatment failure was 14.3 months for evaluable patients, and median overall survival was not reached. The most common grade 3/4 toxicity was neutropenia (72% of patients). The most common nonhematologic toxicity was infection (29% of patients). Lenalidomide combined with rituximab showed activity in heavily treated refractory CLL with an acceptable toxicity profile.