Management of pregnancy in left ventricular assist device and heart transplant recipients: a concise review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Women of reproductive age are increasingly undergoing heart transplantation (HT) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation for advanced heart failure. This review is intended to give an overview of the current state of the art management of pregnancy in patients with LVAD or HT recipients. RECENT FINDINGS: Heart transplant recipients are at increased risk for graft rejection, renal dysfunction, preeclampsia and worsening of comorbidities (hypertension and diabetes). Patients with LVAD are at higher risk of thromboembolic events, infections, right ventricular failure and require close surveillance during pregnancy. Preconception counseling must be offered to all women of reproductive age group with HT or LVAD to avoid unplanned pregnancies. SUMMARY: A multidisciplinary approach with close antepartum and postpartum surveillance is recommended.

COVID-19 associated development of antibody mediated rejection in orthotopic heart transplantation patients.

Solid organ transplant candidates encountered increased wait times and mortality rates during the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Despite improvement in medical management and vaccination efficacy, this patient population remains at increased risk for complications post COVID-19 including organ rejection. We describe the development of antibody mediated rejection with or without cellular rejection in heart transplant (HT) recipients and previous COVID-19 infection or vaccination. Although centers have changed their management of outpatient follow-up for orthotopic heart transplant patients, little is known on surveillance of rejection and management of HT recipients after COVID-19 infection. We recommend frequent surveillance for rejection or allograft dysfunction after COVID-19 infection. We have adopted a transplant surveillance protocol for HT recipients with COVID-19 infection, given our recent experience with transplanted patients affected of COVID-19.

Elevated AT1R Antibody and Morbidity in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplant Using Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: We studied longitudinal levels of angiotensin-II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) and their effects on adverse events (death, treated rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy) in patients who were bridged to heart transplant using a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Sera of 77 patients bridged to heart transplant (from 2009 to 2017) were tested for AT1R-Ab and CRP before and after LVAD. Elevated AT1R-Ab was defined as >10.0 U/mL. The median follow-up after transplant was 3.6 years (interquartile range, 2.2-5.6 years). After LVAD, AT1R-Ab levels increased from baseline and remained elevated until transplant. Freedom from adverse events at 5 years was lower in those with elevated AT1R-Ab levels at time of transplant. In an adjusted, multivariable Cox analysis, an AT1R-Ab level of >10 U/mL was associated with developing the primary end point (adjusted hazard ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-9.2, P = .017). Although C-reactive protein levels were high before and after LVAD placement, C-reactive protein did not correlate with AT1R-Ab. CONCLUSIONS: In LVAD patients bridged to heart transplant, an increased AT1R-Ab level at time of transplant was associated with poor outcomes after heart transplant. Post-LVAD AT1R-Ab elevations were not correlated with serum markers of systemic inflammation. Larger studies are needed to examine the pathologic role of AT1R-Ab in heart transplant.

Association of chronic kidney dysfunction and preeclampsia: insights of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia occurs in 3% to 5% of pregnancies and can lead to potentially fatal outcomes for parent and child. Disparities in socioeconomic status, medical access, racial or ethnic, and regional background within the United States result in a very heterogenic population. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the regional differences in the severity of chronic kidney disease in pregnant patients as well as the risk of preeclampsia in a contemporary cohort within the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Pregnant patients were identified within the National Inpatient Sample database between 2015 and 2019. Patients were stratified by diagnosis of end-stage kidney disease or chronic kidney disease. The primary endpoint of this study was to determine the incidence of mild preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and eclampsia in hospitalized pregnant patients with kidney dysfunction compared with controls. Secondary endpoints were to determine regional, racial or ethnic, and socioeconomic differences within the United States. RESULTS: A total of 16,343,563 pregnant patients were identified from 2015 to 2019. Presence of chronic kidney disease increased risk of mild and severe preeclampsia independent of the stage of chronic kidney disease (odds ratio >2 each). There was a markedly difference in prevalence of chronic kidney disease in regard to geographic location within the United States, with patients in the Northeast having predominantly milder stages of chronic kidney disease and patients in the South and West having more progressive kidney disease. There was a significant difference in chronic kidney disease distribution in relation to racial/ethnic background within the United States. Black and Latinx patients were at increased risk of eclampsia and death. There was no significant difference regarding chronic kidney disease and socioeconomic background. However, a larger proportion of patients with very low income had advanced stages of chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSION: Our data add to the previous findings that patients with chronic kidney disease are at increased risk of developing preeclampsia even in the modern era of medical management, independent of the cause of chronic kidney disease. Racial or ethnic and geographic differences in chronic kidney disease prevalence exist. A multidisciplinary team approach to follow-up with pregnant patients with chronic kidney disease could decrease maternal and neonatal mortality.

Azithromycin versus erythromycin infusions prior to endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Background: Intravenous erythromycin prior to endoscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) improves outcomes but requires immediate preparation delaying administration in emergency cases. Azithromycin is readily available and does not require prolonged preparation. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of azithromycin in improving the quality of endoscopic visualization in upper GIB compared to erythromycin. Methods: Patients admitted with upper GIB who received erythromycin or azithromycin before urgent endoscopy were included. Primary outcome of the quality of visualization was assessed by two gastroenterologists, blinded to the choice of infusion, using a scoring system ranging from 0 to 8, with a maximum of 2 points assigned to the fundus, body, antrum and bulb. Results: Sixty-six patients were included; 25 received azithromycin and 41 received erythromycin. Mean total visualization score was significantly higher with azithromycin compared to that with erythromycin (6.8±1.4 vs. 5.5±2.2, respectively; P=0.01) and remained significant after adjusting for confounders (Diff: 0.01, 1.88; P=0.05). Secondary outcomes analyses showed a shorter LOS when given azithromycin compared to erythromycin [6 (3 to 9) vs. 8 (7 to 16) days, respectively, 95% CI: 1.03, 3.89; P=0.04]. Time between initiating the infusion and endoscopy was longer with azithromycin (Diff: 40.64 min; 95% CI: 7.23, 74.05; P=0.02). Need for second look endoscopy, procedure time, blood transfusion requirements and procedure-related complications did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: Azithromycin infusion before endoscopy for upper GIB was associated with better visualization than that of erythromycin. Randomized trials are needed to validate these findings.

Evaluation and management of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension - consensus statement from the ISHLT.

ISHLT members have recognized the importance of a consensus statement on the evaluation and management of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The creation of this document required multiple steps, including the engagement of the ISHLT councils, approval by the Standards and Guidelines Committee, identification and selection of experts in the field, and the development of 6 working groups. Each working group provided a separate section based on an extensive literature search. These sections were then coalesced into a single document that was circulated to all members of the working groups. Key points were summarized at the end of each section. Due to the limited number of comparative trials in this field, the document was written as a literature review with expert opinion rather than based on level of evidence.

Tobacco smoke exposure in either the donor or recipient before transplantation accelerates cardiac allograft rejection, vascular inflammation, and graft loss.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco exposure in cardiac transplant recipients, before and after transplantation, may increase the risk of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and allograft loss, but no direct evidence for this phenomenon is forthcoming. In this experimental study, we investigated early consequences of tobacco smoke exposure in cardiac transplant donors and recipients with an emphasis on alloinflammatory mediators of graft outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using heterotopic rat cardiac transplantation, we tested the effects of donor or recipient tobacco smoke exposure in 6 groups of animals (rat heterotopic cardiac transplantation) as follows: tobacco-naïve allogeneic rejecting controls (n=6), tobacco-naïve nonrejecting controls (n=3; killed on day 5 to simulate survival times of tobacco-treated animals), isografts (n=3), both donor and recipient rats exposed to tobacco smoke (n=4), only donor rats exposed to tobacco smoke (n=7), and only recipient rats exposed to tobacco smoke (n=6). Polymerase chain reaction studies of tissue and peripheral (systemic) protein expression were performed to evaluate inflammatory (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-gamma, interleukin-6) and alloimmune (interleukin-1 receptor 2, programmed cell death-1, and stromal cell-derived factor-1) pathways, as was histological analysis of the cardiac allografts. Our experiments reveal that pretransplantation tobacco exposure in donors and/or recipients results in heightened systemic inflammation and increased oxidative stress, reduces posttransplantation cardiac allograft survival by 33% to 57%, and increases intragraft inflammation (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-gamma, interleukin-6) and alloimmune activation (CD3, interleukin-1 receptor 2, programmed cell death-1, and stromal cell-derived factor-1) with consequent myocardial and vascular destruction. CONCLUSIONS: These sentinel findings confirm that tobacco smoke exposure in either donors or recipients leads to accelerated allograft rejection, vascular inflammation, and graft loss. Molecular pathways that intersect as arbiters in this phenomenon include instigation of alloimmune activation associated with tobacco smoke-induced inflammation.

Gene-based bio-signature patterns and cardiac allograft rejection.

Clinicians have long awaited an alternative to invasive endomyocardial biopsy for surveillance of cardiac transplant rejection. Transcriptional signals in peripheral blood mononuclear cells allow for the development of multigene-based panels that can inform on the presence or absence of immunologic quiescence. The informative genes represent several biologic pathways, including T-cell activation (PDCD1), T-cell migration (ITGA4), and mobilization of hematopoietic precursors (WDR40A and microRNA gene family cMIR), and steroid-responsive genes such as IL1R2, the decoy receptor for interleukin 2. The greatest value may include the ability to inform on the potential of future proclivity for rejection, allowing patients to be stratified into low, intermediate, or high risk subsets for future rejection. In these individuals, this knowledge may allow clinicians to use tailored approaches to immunosuppression, thereby avoiding adverse pharmacologic effects in low-risk patients while improving rejection outcomes in those at high risk for future allograft compromise. Despite these advances, clinical entrenchment of gene-based pharmacotherapy in cardiac transplantation will require independent replication and validation of investigational findings.

Report from the 2018 consensus conference on immunomodulating agents in thoracic transplantation: Access, formulations, generics, therapeutic drug monitoring, and special populations.

In 2009, the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation recognized the importance and challenges surrounding generic drug immunosuppression. As experience with generics has expanded and comfort has increased, substantial issues have arisen since that time with other aspects of immunomodulation that have not been addressed, such as access to medicines, alternative immunosuppression formulations, additional generics, implications on therapeutic drug monitoring, and implications for special populations such as pediatrics and older adults. The aim of this consensus document is to address critically each of these concerns, expand on the challenges and barriers, and provide therapeutic considerations for practitioners who manage patients who need to undergo or have undergone cardiothoracic transplantation.

Donor heart and lung procurement: A consensus statement.

Heart and lung procurements are multiphased processes often accompanied by an array of complex logistics. Approaches to donor evaluation and management, organ procurement, and organ preservation vary among individual procurement teams. Because early graft failure remains a major cause of mortality in contemporary thoracic organ transplant recipients, we sought to establish some standardization in the procurement process. This paper, in this vein, represents an international consensus statement on donor heart and lung procurement and is designed to serve as a guide for physicians, surgeons, and other providers who manage donors to best optimize the clinical status for the procurement of both heart and lungs for transplantation. Donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory determination death (referred to as donation after circulatory death [DCD] for the remainder of the paper) for both heart and lung transplantation will be discussed in this paper. Although the data available on DCD heart donation are limited, information regarding the surgical technique for procurement is included within this consensus statement. Furthermore, this paper will focus on adult DBD and DCD heart and lung procurement. Currently, no certification, which is either recognized and/or endorsed by the transplant community at large, exists for the training of a cardiothoracic procurement surgeon. Nevertheless, establishing a training curriculum and credentialing requirements are beyond the scope of this paper.

Cardiomyopathy and the dilemma of geometric mitral regurgitation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Geometric mitral regurgitation is a phenomenon encountered by an otherwise anatomically normal mitral valve in the setting of advanced adverse left ventricular remodeling that alters the alignment characteristics of the mitral valve apparatus leading to functional production of a leaking valve. In this review, we discuss contemporary directions in the knowledge base for managing geometric mitral regurgitation. RECENT FINDINGS: Much progress has been encountered in describing the types of geometric mitral regurgitation (nonischemic and ischemic origins), standardization of echocardiographic techniques to allow for a common language in ascertaining the severity of mitral regurgitation, knowledge on dynamic mitral regurgitation during exercise, effectiveness of therapy and appropriate use and timing of surgical repair. SUMMARY: Geometric mitral regurgitation develops in tandem with progressive ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathy and can improve with antiremodeling pharmacological and device-based therapy. Surgical therapy can be accomplished at experienced centers with low morbidity and mortality, and may improve symptoms and enhance pump function. Whether such therapy saves lives remains uncertain. New percutaneous approaches to tackle geometric mitral regurgitation are developing, and early data is encouraging but remains experimental.

Gene expression profiles and B-type natriuretic peptide elevation in heart transplantation: more than a hemodynamic marker.

BACKGROUND: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is chronically elevated in heart transplantation and reflects diastolic dysfunction, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and poor late outcome. This investigation studied peripheral gene expression signatures of elevated BNP concentrations in clinically quiescent heart transplant recipients in an effort to elucidate molecular correlates beyond hemodynamic perturbations. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed gene microarray analysis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 28 heart transplant recipients with clinical quiescence (absence of dyspnea or fatigue; normal left ventricular ejection fraction [EF >55%]; ISHLT biopsy score 0 or 1A; and normal hemodynamics [RAP <7 mm Hg, PCWP < or = 15 mm Hg, and CI > or = 2.5 L/min per m2]). BNP levels were performed using the Triage B-type Natriuretic Peptide test (Biosite Diagnostics Inc, San Diego, Calif) and median BNP concentration was 165 pg/mL. Seventy-eight probes (of 7370) mapped to 54 unique genes were significantly correlated with BNP concentrations (P<0.001). Of these, the strongest correlated genes (P<0.0001) were in the domains of gelsolin (actin cytoskeleton), matrix metallopeptidases (collagen degradation), platelet function, and immune activity (human leukocyte antigen system, heat shock protein, mast cell, and B-cell lineage). CONCLUSIONS: In the clinically quiescent heart transplant recipient, an elevated BNP concentration is associated with molecular patterns that point to ongoing active cardiac structural remodeling, vascular injury, inflammation, and alloimmune processes. Thus, these findings allude to the notion that BNP elevation is not merely a hemodynamic marker but should be considered reflective of integrated processes that determine the balance between active cardiac allograft injury and repair.

Sexual activity and chronic heart failure.

Little has been published about sexual function in chronic heart failure (CHF) and knowledge among clinicians in this regard is sparse. To review data regarding sexual function and dysfunction in patients with CHF, 2 of the authors (S.A.M. and P.A.U.) independently conducted a literature search using the MEDLINE database. English-language articles and cited bibliographies published between January 1996 and November 2006 were reviewed. Search terms included heart failure or CHF or ventricular dysfunction or heart disease in conjunction with sexual activity, erectile dysfunction, impotence, or sex. Articles were selected for inclusion if they had a primary focus on CHF and sexual function or dysfunction. Critical reviews of the literature, observational studies using self-reported patient surveys, and prospective, blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials were included. Articles were not excluded on the basis of patient sample size but were excluded if the article concerned a broad aspect of cardiovascular disease rather than CHF. When properly screened and treated, most patients with CHF can safely engage in sexual activity and be treated for erectile dysfunction with sildenafil, provided that they do not have active ischemia and do not require treatment with nitrates. Clinicians should know the physiological requirements of sexual activity and the impact CHF has on sexual performance. Fear of a cardiac event during intercourse can interfere with patients' ability to perform and enjoy sex, and so it is important that the physician be able to counsel patients with CHF about sexual activity.

Genomic biomarkers and heart transplantation.

Clinicians have entered into a new paradigm for managing heart transplant patients with use of multimarker gene expression profiling. Early after transplantation, when corticosteroid modification is the main concern, gene expression testing might assist in optimizing the balance of immunosuppression, defraying the occurrence of rejection, and avoiding crisis intervention. Late after transplantation, the reliance on endomyocardial biopsy could be lessened. These advances, if continually validated in practice, could usher in an era of decreased immunosuppression complications, lesser need for invasive surveillance, and more clinical confidence in immunosuppressive strategies.

Multicenter Evaluation of Octreotide as Secondary Prophylaxis in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is one of the most common complications after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. More than one third of patients with incident bleed go on to develop recurrent GI bleeding. Octreotide, a somatostatin analog, is proposed to reduce the risk of recurrent GI bleeding in this population. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter, retrospective analysis evaluated 51 continuous-flow left ventricular assist device patients who received secondary prophylaxis with octreotide after their index GI bleed from 2009 to 2015. All patients had a hospitalization for GI bleed and received octreotide after discharge. Patient demographics, medical and medication history, and clinical characteristics of patients who rebled after receiving octreotide were compared with non-rebleeders. These data were also compared with matched historical control patients previously enrolled in the HMII (HeartMate II) clinical trials, none of whom received octreotide, to provide a context for the bleeding rates. Twelve patients (24%) who received secondary octreotide prophylaxis developed another GI bleed, whereas 39 (76%) did not. There were similar intergroup demographics; however, significantly more bleeders had a previous GI bleeding history before left ventricular assist device placement (33% versus 5%; P=0.02) and greater frequency of angiodysplasia confirmed during endoscopy (58% versus 23%; P=0.03). Fewer patients in this study experienced a recurrent GI bleed compared with a matched historical control group that did not receive octreotide (24% versus 43%; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device receiving secondary prophylaxis with octreotide had a significantly lower GI bleed recurrence compared with historical controls not treated with octreotide. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these data.

Heart failure therapy at a crossroad: are there limits to the neurohormonal model?

The advent of neurohormonal blockade in heart failure (HF) has been an overwhelming success, but current evidence points to a ceiling effect as newer neurohormonal targets are exploited in an incremental manner. This has lead us to question whether the neurohormonal model of HF can be sustained by simply stacking multiple neurohormonal or cytokine blockers together as treatment. A unifying theme in some of these disparate trials relates to either a lack of efficacy or, more importantly, adversity resulting in regression of already achieved benefits. It is our contention that the available evidence has uncovered the remarkable complexity of interaction within the context of the neurohormonal construct. As we stand at a crossroad in HF and begin to fervently pursue non-neurohormonal therapeutic targets, we must also direct attention at navigating the multifaceted labyrinth of the neurohormonal model that has led to the current imbroglio.

The impact of mode of donor brain death on cardiac allograft vasculopathy: an intravascular ultrasound study.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the association of mode of brain death with cardiac allograft vasculopathy. BACKGROUND: Explosive brain death (EBD) is accompanied by a sudden increase in intracranial pressure, with recruitment of pro-inflammatory cytokines, as well as adhesion cell and co-stimulatory molecules. Whether these early events influence the later development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy following heart transplantation remains unknown. METHODS: An inception cohort of 61 consecutive heart transplant recipients between 1993 and 1995 who underwent intravascular ultrasound examination of the coronary arteries were evaluated. Based on the mode of donor brain death, this cohort was divided into either an EBD group (n = 27) or non-EBD (n = 34), and the development of intimal thickness and cardiac events (sudden cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and need for coronary revascularization via percutaneous techniques or surgical bypass) was assessed. RESULTS: Despite similar posttransplant survival and distribution of nonimmunological and immunological variables, heart transplant recipients with EBD demonstrated greater intimal thickening (0.59 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.32 +/- 0.2 mm; p = 0.02) and higher cardiac events (37% vs. 12%; p = 0.01) when compared to those with non-EBD donors. Hearts from donors with EBD had lower survival (63 +/- 19 vs. 72 +/- 17 months) than with non-EBD donors (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Explosive brain death is a significant determinant for the late development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and influences long-term allograft survival. Thus, strategies focusing on limitation of vascular allograft injury in the pre-engraftment phase of cardiac transplantation are warranted.

Comparative beneficial effects of simvastatin and pravastatin on cardiac allograft rejection and survival.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the relative effects of low doses of pravastatin (20 mg/day) and simvastatin (10 mg/day) on indices of cardiac allograft rejection. We further examined the relative efficacy and safety of these two drugs on lipid-lowering in heart transplantation. BACKGROUND: The immunomodulatory effects of hydroxy methyl glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors have been increasingly recognized. Previous studies have demonstrated an ameliorative influence of pravastatin on hemodynamically compromising rejection after heart transplantation. A recent observational trial suggested that simvastatin 20 mg/day was associated with trends to lower survival and more adverse effects than pravastatin 40 mg/day. METHODS: In a 12-month prospective, open-label study, 50 heart transplant recipients received either open-label pravastatin 20 mg daily (n = 24) or simvastatin 10 mg daily (n = 26) within four weeks of transplantation. Indices of allograft rejection including treated rejection, rejection with hemodynamic compromise, noncellular rejection, and mean one-year biopsy score were compared between the two cohorts, as well as with a statin-naive control population (n = 37). Lipid levels, safety, and post-transplant outcomes were also assessed as secondary end points. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in any allograft rejection parameter between the two groups. However, total low-density lipoprotein (LDL), but not high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or triglycerides, were lower in the simvastatin arm (-23% vs. -11%, p = 0.02). No cases of rhabdomyolysis or myositis occurred in either group. Survival at one year was similar in both treatment groups (91% for patients on pravastatin and 92% for patients on simvastatin). Both groups had better survival compared with the statin-naive control group (80%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin (10 mg/day) and pravastatin (20 mg/day) are associated with similar beneficial effects on cardiac allograft rejection and one-year survival. At these doses, simvastatin decreases LDL cholesterol more so than pravastatin with no increase in adverse effects in heart transplantation.