National Emergency Resuscitation Airway Audit (NERAA): a pilot multicentre analysis of emergency intubations in Irish emergency departments.

BACKGROUND: There is paucity of literature on why and how patients are intubated, and by whom, in Irish Emergency Departments (EDs). The aim of this pilot study was to characterise emergency airway management (EAM) of critically unwell patients presenting to Irish EDs. METHODS: A multisite prospective pilot study was undertaken from February 10 to May 10, 2020. This project was facilitated through the Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network (ITERN). All patients over 16 years of age requiring EAM were included. Eleven EDs participated in the project. Data recorded included patients' demographics, indication for intubation, technique of airway management, medications used to facilitate intubation, level of training and specialty of the intubating clinician, number of attempts, success/complications rates and variation across centres. RESULTS: Over a 3-month period, 118 patients underwent 131 intubation attempts across 11 EDs. The median age was 57 years (IQR: 40-70). Medical indications were reported in 83% of patients compared to 17% for trauma. Of the 118 patients intubated, Emergency Medicine (EM) doctors performed 54% of initial intubations, while anaesthesiology/intensive care medicine (ICM) doctors performed 46%. The majority (90%) of intubating clinicians were at registrar level. Emergency intubation check lists, video laryngoscopy and bougie were used in 55, 53 and 64% of first attempts, respectively. The first pass success rate was 89%. Intubation complications occurred in 19% of patients. EM doctors undertook a greater proportion of intubations in EDs with > 50,000 attendance (65%) compared to EDs with < 50,000 attendances (16%) (p < 0.000). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to describe EAM in Irish EDs, and demonstrates comparable first pass success and complication rates to international studies. This study highlights the need for continuous EAM surveillance and could provide a vector for developing national standards for EAM and EAM training in Irish EDs.

Psychological distress during the acceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of doctors practising in emergency medicine, anaesthesia and intensive care medicine in the UK and Ireland.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify psychological distress experienced by emergency, anaesthetic and intensive care doctors during the acceleration phase of COVID-19 in the UK and Ireland. METHODS: Initial cross-sectional electronic survey distributed during acceleration phase of the first pandemic wave of COVID-19 in the UK and Ireland (UK: 18 March 2020-26 March 2020 and Ireland: 25 March 2020-2 April 2020). Surveys were distributed via established specialty research networks, within a three-part longitudinal study. Participants were doctors working in emergency, anaesthetic and intensive medicine during the first pandemic wave of COVID-19 in acute hospitals across the UK and Ireland. Primary outcome measures were the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12). Additional questions examined personal and professional characteristics, experiences of COVID-19 to date, risk to self and others and self-reported perceptions of health and well-being. RESULTS: 5440 responses were obtained, 54.3% (n=2955) from emergency medicine and 36.9% (n=2005) from anaesthetics. All levels of doctor seniority were represented. For the primary outcome of GHQ-12 score, 44.2% (n=2405) of respondents scored >3, meeting the criteria for psychological distress. 57.3% (n=3045) had never previously provided clinical care during an infectious disease outbreak but over half of respondents felt somewhat prepared (48.6%, n=2653) or very prepared (7.6%, n=416) to provide clinical care to patients with COVID-19. However, 81.1% (n=4414) either agreed (31.1%, n=2709) or strongly agreed (31.1%, n=1705) that their personal health was at risk due to their clinical role. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate that during the acceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, almost half of frontline doctors working in acute care reported psychological distress as measured by the GHQ-12. Findings from this study should inform strategies to optimise preparedness and explore modifiable factors associated with increased psychological distress in the short and long term. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10666798.

No rest for the weary: a cross-sectional study comparing patients' sleep in the emergency department to those on the ward.

BACKGROUND: Boarding in emergency departments (EDs) is a persistent problem worldwide. We hypothesised that patients sleeping while being boarded in EDs have worse self-rated sleep than those admitted from EDs who sleep on the ward. METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study conducted at the University College Hospital, Galway between October and November 2016. Self-rated sleep in patients boarded in EDs from 23:00 to 07:00 was compared with those admitted to the ward before 23:00. Patients rated their sleep using the Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire. Patients were excluded if they had cognitive impairment, were unable or incapacitated or had evidence of alcohol or drug use in the previous 24 hours. Continuous data are shown as medians (IQRs 25th-75th percentiles). Linear regression models of log-transformed outcome variables were performed. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were included and 22 were excluded. Patients who boarded in the ED were significantly more likely to be medical patients (78% vs 21%, p<0.001), to be older (median age (IQR)=60 (39-71) vs 47 (32-68), p=0.04) and have more urgent presentations (74% vs 48% presenting as Manchester triage category 1 or 2, p=0.01) than patients who sleep on a ward. Patients who slept on the ward had significantly better sleep scores (mean log-transformed sleep scores (SD)=2.92 (1.05) vs 3.72 (0.66), p<0.001)). Those sleeping in the ED reported greater noisiness than those sleeping on the ward (mean log-transformed noisiness scores (SD)=3.18 (1.10) vs 4.15 (0.57), p<0.001). These significant differences in sleep scores and noisiness ratings persisted after adjustment for age, triage category and admitting service. CONCLUSION: We found those who sleep boarded in EDs have worse self-rated sleep than those who sleep on the ward.

Ovulation induction: comparing success rates between anovulatory and ovulatory cycles using different treatment protocols.

The management of patients with sub-fertility, particularly unexplained sub-fertility, is a sensitive and complex matter. This was a prospective observational study conducted from October 2016 to March 2017 in Galway, Ireland, the aim of which was to identify the clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) in women undergoing ovulation induction (OI) with timed sexual intercourse (TSI) or intrauterine insemination (IUI) and to compare them across two groups: (1) Anovulatory women and (2) ovulatory women with unexplained subfertility. Patients undergoing OI were recruited consecutively and OI regimens were prescribed as per local clinical protocol. The main observation was a higher CPR in the anovulatory group (18%) compared with the ovulatory group (CPR = 10%) (p < 0.05). No difference was observed in the CPR between the TSI and IUI groups. There are many studies to support the use of OI in the treatment of women with anovulatory subfertility, though the use of OI in ovulatory women is a more controversial issue. The treatment options offered to these patients need to be individualized to each couple and should consider their length of infertility, age, and financial means. Due to the lower cost and the less invasive nature of OI-treatment we conclude that a short treatment course could be offered as an acceptable alternative prior to IVF.

Respiratory viral testing for young febrile infants presenting to emergency care: a planned secondary analysis of the Febrile Infants Diagnostic assessment and Outcome (FIDO) prospective observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the association of respiratory viral test results and the risk of invasive bacterial infection (IBI) for febrile young infants presenting to emergency care. DESIGN: A planned secondary analysis within the Febrile Infants Diagnostic assessment and Outcome (FIDO) study, a prospective multicentre observational cohort study conducted across the UK and Ireland. SETTING: 35 paediatric emergency departments and assessment units across the UK and Ireland between 6 July 2022 and 31 August 2023. PATIENTS: Febrile infants aged 90 days and under presenting to emergency care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IBI (meningitis or bacteraemia) among febrile infants, undergoing respiratory viral testing for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza and SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: 1395 out of 1821 participants underwent respiratory viral testing, of those tested 339 (24.5%) tested positive for at least one of, SARS-CoV-2, RSV or influenza. A total of 45 infants (3.2%) were diagnosed with IBI. Of these, IBI occurred in 40 out of 1056 (3.8%) participants with a negative viral test and 5 out of 339 (1.5%) occurred in participants with a positive viral respiratory test (p=0.034). Infants aged 29 days and older with a positive respiratory viral test had a significantly lower rate of IBI (0.7%) compared with those with a negative test (3.2%) (p=0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Young febrile infants with a positive respiratory viral test for SARS-CoV-2, RSV or influenza are at lower risk of IBI. Infants over 28 days of age with a positive viral test represent the lowest risk cohort. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05259683.

The Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network (ITERN): five years of collaboration.

In 2018, a group of Irish emergency medicine (EM) trainees recognised their common interest in collaborative research and the difficulties that trainees can encounter when trying to broaden their research capacity, prompting the beginning of the Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network (ITERN) journey. Trainee-led collaboratives have been shown to be feasible and have the potential to deliver impactful research projects, generating an evidence base that may not have been possible without collaboration. This article describes the successes and achievement of ITERN and describes the processes and challenges that a trainee-led research network can encounter. The authors believe that trainee-led collaboratives can deliver powerful and impactful research for patients and broaden the research capacity of individuals, hospitals, and groups of healthcare professionals.

Exploring communication preferences and risk thresholds of clinicians and parents of febrile infants under 90 days presenting to the emergency department: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Febrile infants under 3 months of age are at higher risk of invasive bacterial illness (IBI) when compared with older children. Increasingly sequential assessment based on age, clinical appearance and biomarkers is used to determine the risk of IBI, and appropriateness of invasive procedures such as lumbar puncture. The purpose of this qualitative study is to report parents and clinicians' opinions on communication of risks and benefits of sequential assessment and tailored treatment. METHODS: 18 parents enrolled in the Febrile Infant Diagnostic Assessment and Outcomes study and seven clinicians from England, Wales and Northern Ireland were purposively selected to participate in virtual qualitative interviews. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Tailored treatment plans were widely supported. Confidence in the clinician was central to parents' attitude towards management recommendations. Parents' decision-making preferences change throughout their child's clinical journey, with an initial preference for clinician-led decisions evolving towards collaborative decision-making as their stress and anxiety reduce. There were widespread differences in preferences for how risk was discussed. Parents self-reported poor retention of information and felt communication adjuncts helped their understanding. Clinicians were generally positive about the use of clinical decision aids as a communication tool, rather than relying on them for decision-making. DISCUSSION: Parents want to feel informed, but their desire to be involved in shared decision-making evolves over time.Clinicians appear to use their clinical judgement to provide individualised information, evolving their communication in response to perceived parental needs.Poor information retention highlights the need for repetition of information and use of communication adjuncts. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05259683.

Conundrums in the Management of Febrile Infants under Three Months of Age and Future Research.

Febrile infants under three months of age pose a diagnostic challenge to clinicians. Unlike in older children, the rates of invasive bacterial infections (IBIs), such as bacteraemia or meningitis, are high. This greater risk of IBI combined with the practical challenges of assessing young infants results in a cautious approach with many febrile infants receiving parenteral antibiotics "just in case". However, there is a range of validated tailored care guidelines that support targeted investigation and management of febrile infants, with a cohort identified as lower risk suitable for fewer invasive procedures and observation without parenteral antibiotics. This manuscript outlines five common conundrums related to the safe application of tailored-care guidelines for the assessment and management of febrile infants under three months of age. It also explores future research which aims to further refine the management of febrile infants.

Utility of respiratory viral testing in the risk stratification of young febrile infants presenting to emergency care settings: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Febrile infants under 3 months of age are at risk of invasive bacterial infection (IBI). It is currently unclear if testing for respiratory viruses may have a role in IBI risk stratification. If found to be associated with the likelihood of IBI, respiratory viral point-of-care testing may improve patient and caregiver experience, reduce costs and enhance antimicrobial stewardship. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis that aims to answer the following question: In young febrile infants presenting to emergency care settings does a positive respiratory viral test for RSV, Influenza or SARS-CoV2 (relative to a negative test) add value to current risk stratification pathways for the exclusion of invasive bacterial infection, subsequently enabling safe de-escalation of investigation and treatment?A search strategy will include MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and grey literature. Abstracts and then full texts will be independently screened for selection. Data extraction and quality assessment will be completed by two independent authors.The primary objective is to analyse the ability of a positive respiratory viral test to identify the overall risk of IBI. The secondary objective is to perform a subgroup analysis to investigate how the risk stratification alters based on other variables including virus type, patient characteristics and the presence of an identified source of fever.Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis will be undertaken. Diagnostic odds ratios (OR), sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative likelihood ratios will be calculated. The degree of heterogeneity and publication bias will be investigated and presented. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to disseminate the study results through publication and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: This protocol is registered in PROSPERO-ID number: CRD42023433716.

Diagnostic test accuracy of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for predicting invasive and serious bacterial infections in young febrile infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Febrile infants presenting in the first 90 days of life are at higher risk of invasive and serious bacterial infections than older children. Modern clinical practice guidelines, mostly using procalcitonin as a diagnostic biomarker, can identify infants who are at low risk and therefore suitable for tailored management. C-reactive protein, by comparison, is widely available, but whether C-reactive protein and procalcitonin have similar diagnostic accuracy is unclear. We aimed to compare the test accuracy of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the prediction of invasive or serious bacterial infections in febrile infants. METHODS: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library for diagnostic test accuracy studies up to June 19, 2023, using MeSH terms "procalcitonin", and "bacterial infection" or "fever" and keywords "invasive bacterial infection*" and "serious bacterial infection*", without language or date restrictions. Studies were selected by independent authors against eligibility criteria. Eligible studies included participants aged 90 days or younger presenting to hospital with a fever (≥38°C) or history of fever within the preceding 48 h. The primary index test was procalcitonin, and the secondary index test was C-reactive protein. Test kits had to be commercially available, and test samples had to be collected upon presentation to hospital. Invasive bacterial infection was defined as the presence of a bacterial pathogen in blood or cerebrospinal fluid, as detected by culture or quantitative PCR; authors' definitions of serious bacterial infection were used. Data were extracted from selected studies, and the detection of invasive or serious bacterial infections was analysed with two models for each biomarker. Diagnostic accuracy was determined against internationally recognised cutoff values (0·5 ng/mL for procalcitonin, 20 mg/L for C-reactive protein) and pooled to calculate partial area under the curve (pAUC) values for each biomarker. Optimum cutoff values were identified for each biomarker. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022293284. FINDINGS: Of 734 studies derived from the literature search, 14 studies (n=7755) were included in the meta-analysis. For the detection of invasive bacterial infections, pAUC values were greater for procalcitonin (0·72, 95% CI 0·56-0·79) than C-reactive protein (0·28, 0·17-0·61; p=0·016). Optimal cutoffs for detecting invasive bacterial infections were 0·49 ng/mL for procalcitonin and 13·12 mg/L for C-reactive protein. For the detection of serious bacterial infections, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein had similar pAUC values (0·55, 0·44-0·69 vs 0·54, 0·40-0·61; p=0·92). For serious bacterial infections, the optimal cutoffs for procalcitonin and C-reactive protein were 0·17 ng/mL and 16·18 mg/L, respectively. Heterogeneity was low for studies investigating the test accuracy of procalcitonin in detecting invasive bacterial infection (I2=23·5%), high for studies investigating procalcitonin for serious bacterial infection (I2=75·5%), and moderate for studies investigating C-reactive protein for invasive bacterial infection (I2=49·5%) and serious bacterial infection (I2=28·3%). The absence of a single definition of serious bacterial infection across studies was the greatest source of interstudy variability and potential bias. INTERPRETATION: Within a large cohort of febrile infants, a procalcitonin cutoff of 0·5 ng/mL had a superior pAUC value to a C-reactive protein cutoff of 20 mg/L for identifying invasive bacterial infections. In settings without access to procalcitonin, C-reactive protein should therefore be used cautiously for the identification of invasive bacterial infections, and a cutoff value below 20 mg/L should be considered. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin showed similar test accuracy for the identification of serious bacterial infection with internationally recognised cutoff values. This might reflect the challenges involved in confirming serious bacterial infection and the absence of a universally accepted definition of serious bacterial infection. FUNDING: None.

Mackler's Triad: An Evolving Case of Boerhaave Syndrome in the Emergency Department.

An elderly lady, known with a background history of Alzheimer's dementia, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and a reported history of self-induced vomiting, presented to our emergency department with a two-day history of vomiting, diarrhoea, anorexia, and malaise. Initial clinical examination and investigations only demonstrated mild dehydration. Despite a satisfactory response to initial symptomatic treatment, with complete cessation of vomiting, the patient had a recent sudden deterioration. Due to continued forcible belching, it was found that she had developed a sudden onset of back pain and subcutaneous emphysema. A CT scan showed mid-oesophageal rupture along with pneumomediastinum and bilateral pneumothoraxes. The patient was subsequently diagnosed with Boerhaave syndrome. Due to her clinical factors and the risk of surgical management, it was decided that she should be managed non-operatively with oesophageal stenting and bilateral chest drains, which was met with a good clinical course and outcome.

Exploring barriers and enablers to simulation-based training in emergency departments: an international qualitative study (BEST-ED Study).

INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based training (SBT) has gained significant traction within emergency medicine. The growing body of evidence describes the benefits that SBT can bring. However, identifying barriers and enablers when establishing successful SBT programmes in busy emergency departments (EDs), and ensuring longevity of such programmes, can be difficult. OBJECTIVE: We aim to identify barriers and enablers to SBT in busy EDs. METHODS: We explored and analysed the thoughts, experience and opinions of professionals involved in SBT and organisational support. 32 participants across 15 international sites were invited to a semistructured interview process. We included participants from a variety of backgrounds, from clinical staff to management staff. Transcribed interview data was classified and coded based on capability, opportunity and motivation behaviour (COM-B) domains and analysed based on theoretical domains framework. Frequency of the most mentioned thematic domain among participants is reported. RESULTS: The interview data revealed several common themes, including the following: knowledge and skills (90%), support and leadership (96%), mental barriers (87.5%), local culture (96.6%), dedicated space (65.2%), time constraints (46.8%), social influence (87.5%), education (90.6%), professional development (68.75%), exams (59.3%) and personal goals (93.75%). Management staff was observed to prioritise resource, staffing and flow, while the clinical cohort tended to focus on specialty and personal development when it came to simulation training in the ED. CONCLUSION: Potential barriers and enablers to SBT and in situ simulation for EDs were identified through interviews conducted in this study. The central themes in terms of barriers and enablers were local culture, leadership, individual needs, resources and optimisation. A tailored approach is vital for establishing a successful SBT and in situ simulation programme.

Attitudes and knowledge of emergency doctors towards end-of-life care in the emergency department: a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (EDs) are seeing an increase in patients requiring end-of-life (EOL) care. There is paucity of data of attitudes and knowledge of physicians providing EOL care in the ED both internationally and in Ireland. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this project was to assess the attitudes and knowledge of ED physicians towards EOL care. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional electronic survey of ED physicians working in Irish EDs and was facilitated through the Irish Trainee Emergency Research Network over a 6-week period. The questionnaire covered the following domains: demographic data, awareness of EOL Care, views and attitudes towards EOL care. RESULTS: Of a potential 679 respondents, 441 responses were received, of which 311 (response rate of 44.8%) had fully completed the survey across 23 participant sites. Majority of the respondents were under the age of 35 (62%), were male (58%) and at Senior House Officer level (36%). In terms of awareness, 32% (98) of respondents were not aware of palliative care services in their hospitals while only 29% (91) were aware of national EOL guidance. Fifty-five percent (172) reported commencing EOL care in the ED, however 75.5% (234) respondents reported their knowledge of EOL care to be limited or non-existent. Only 30.2% respondents felt comfortable commencing EOL care in the ED without speciality team input. There appears to be a lack of clarity on the roles and responsibilities of emergency medicine nurses and doctors in the care of the dying patient in ED with only 31.2% (95) being clear on this role. Significant differences were observed associated with clinical experience and physician grade. CONCLUSION: This study has highlighted a lack of awareness and knowledge of EOL care particularly amongst less experienced emergency medicine doctors. Formalized training and education programs in the provision of EOL care in the ED will improve comfort levels and knowledge amongst the emergency medicine doctors and improve the quality of care provided.

Applying clinical decision aids for the assessment and management of febrile infants presenting to emergency care in the UK and Ireland: Febrile Infant Diagnostic Assessment and Outcome (FIDO) Study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Febrile infants 90 days and younger are at risk of invasive bacterial infections (bacteraemia and meningitis) and urinary tract infections. Together this is previously termed serious bacterial infection with an incidence of approximately 10-20%. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance advocates a cautious approach with most infants requiring septic screening, parenteral broad-spectrum antibiotics and hospital admission. Internationally, variations exist in the approach to febrile infants, with European and North American guidance advocating a tailored approach based on clinical features and biomarker testing. None of the available international clinical decision aids (CDAs) has been validated in the UK and Irish cohorts. The aim of the Febrile Infant Diagnostic Assessment and Outcome (FIDO) Study is to prospectively validate a range of CDAs in a UK and Irish population including CDAs that use procalcitonin testing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The FIDO Study is a prospective multicentre mixed-methods cohort study conducted in UK and Irish hospitals. All infants aged 90 days and younger presenting with fever or history of fever (≥38°C) are eligible for inclusion. Infants will receive standard emergency clinical care without delay. Clinical data and blood samples will be collected, and consent will be obtained at the earliest appropriate opportunity using research without prior consent methodology. The performance and cost-effectiveness of CDAs will be assessed. An embedded qualitative study will explore clinician and caregiver views on different approaches to care and perceptions of risk. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was reviewed and approved by the Office for Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland-Health and Social Care Research Ethics Committee B, Public Benefit and Privacy Panel for Health and Social Care Scotland, and Children's Health Ireland Research and Ethics Committee Ireland. The results of this study will be presented at academic conferences and in peer-reviewed publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05259683.

Systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the diagnostic test accuracy of procalcitonin in the diagnosis of invasive bacterial infections in febrile infants: a study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Young febrile infants are at higher risk of invasive bacterial infections (IBIs) compared with older children. The clinical features of IBI are subtle in this cohort mandating that clinicians take a cautious approach to their initial assessment and management. This includes the measurement of blood biomarkers of infection such as C reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT). In the UK, PCT is not widely available and not recommended for routine use in hospital. This is in contrast to Europe and the USA where PCT is regularly used to assist clinical decision-making. The objective of this review and meta-analysis is to report the diagnostic test accuracy of PCT in detecting IBI in febrile infants less than 91 days old, compare its accuracy with CRP and define optimal PCT cut-off values in this cohort. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A search strategy will include MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and grey literature. There will be no language or date limitations. Diagnostic accuracy studies compliant with STARD criteria will be considered against eligibility criteria. Abstracts, then full texts, of potentially eligible studies will be independently screened for selection. Data extraction and quality assessment, using the QUADAS-2 tool, will be completed by two independent authors and a third author used for any inconsistencies. True positives, false positives, true negatives and false negatives will be pooled to collate specificity and sensitivity with 95% CIs. Results will be portrayed in forest plots, alongside their quality assessments. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review does not require ethical clearance. This review will be published in peer-reviewed journals and key messages will be disseminated through presentations at local and international conferences related to this field. The authors aim for this review to be completed and published in 2023.

Diagnostic test accuracy of dipstick urinalysis for diagnosing urinary tract infection in febrile infants attending the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To report the diagnostic test accuracy of dipstick urinalysis for the detection of urinary tract infections (UTIs) in febrile infants aged 90 days or less attending the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS: Febrile infants aged 90 days or less attending between 31 August 2018 and 1 September 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of dipstick urinalysis in detecting UTIs defined as growth of ≥100 000 cfu/mL of a single organism and the presence of pyuria (>5 white blood cells per high-power field). SETTING: Eight paediatric EDs in the UK/Ireland. RESULTS: A total of 275 were included in the final analysis. There were 252 (92%) clean-catch urine samples and 23 (8%) were transurethral bladder catheter samples. The median age was 51 days (IQR 35-68.5, range 1-90), and there were 151/275 male participants (54.9%). In total, 38 (13.8%) participants had a confirmed UTI. The most sensitive individual dipstick test for UTI was the presence of leucocytes. Including 'trace' as positive resulted in a sensitivity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.94) and a specificity of 0.73 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.79). The most specific individual dipstick test for UTI was the presence of nitrites. Including trace as positive resulted in a specificity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.94) and a sensitivity of 0.42 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.59). CONCLUSION: Point-of-care urinalysis is moderately sensitive and highly specific for diagnosing UTI in febrile infants. The optimum cut-point to for excluding UTI was leucocytes (1+), and the optimum cut-point for confirming UTI was nitrites (trace). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04196192.

Psychological distress and trauma in doctors providing frontline care during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom and Ireland: a prospective longitudinal survey cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on doctors is a significant concern. Due to the emergence of multiple pandemic waves, longitudinal data on the impact of COVID-19 are vital to ensure an adequate psychological care response. The primary aim was to assess the prevalence and degree of psychological distress and trauma in frontline doctors during the acceleration, peak and deceleration of the COVID-19 first wave. Personal and professional factors associated with psychological distress are also reported. DESIGN: A prospective online three-part longitudinal survey. SETTING: Acute hospitals in the UK and Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Frontline doctors working in emergency medicine, anaesthetics and intensive care medicine during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychological distress and trauma measured using the General Health Questionnaire-12 and the Impact of Events-Revised. RESULTS: The initial acceleration survey distributed across networks generated a sample of 5440 doctors. Peak and deceleration response rates from the original sample were 71.6% (n=3896) and 56.6% (n=3079), respectively. Prevalence of psychological distress was 44.7% (n=1334) during the acceleration, 36.9% (n=1098) at peak and 31.5% (n=918) at the deceleration phase. The prevalence of trauma was 23.7% (n=647) at peak and 17.7% (n=484) at deceleration. The prevalence of probable post-traumatic stress disorder was 12.6% (n=343) at peak and 10.1% (n=276) at deceleration. Worry of family infection due to clinical work was the factor most strongly associated with both distress (R2=0.06) and trauma (R2=0.10). CONCLUSION: Findings reflect a pattern of elevated distress at acceleration and peak, with some natural recovery. It is essential that policymakers seek to prevent future adverse effects through (a) provision of vital equipment to mitigate physical and psychological harm, (b) increased awareness and recognition of signs of psychological distress and (c) the development of clear pathways to effective psychological care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10666798.

Inhaled methoxyflurane for the reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: Methoxyflurane is an inhalation analgesic used in the emergency department (ED) but also has minimal sedative properties. The major aim of this study was to evaluate the success rate of methoxyflurane for acute anterior shoulder dislocation (ASD) reduction. The secondary aim was to assess the impact of methoxyflurane on ED patient flow compared to propofol. METHODS: A health record review was performed for all patients presenting with ASD who underwent reduction with either methoxyflurane or propofol over a 13-month period (December 2016 - December 2017). The primary outcome was reduction success for methoxyflurane, while secondary outcomes such as recovery time and ED length of stay (LOS) were also assessed compared to propofol. Patients with fracture dislocations, polytrauma, intravenous, or intramuscular opioids in the pre-hospital setting, no sedation for reduction, and alternative techniques of sedation or analgesia for reduction were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients presented with ASD during the study period. Eighty-two patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Fifty-two patients had ASD reduction with propofol while 30 patients had methoxyflurane. Successful reduction was achieved in 80% (95% CI 65.69% to 94.31%) patients who used methoxyflurane. The median recovery time and ED LOS were 30 minutes [19.3-44] and 70.5 minutes [49.3-105], which was found to be shorter for the methoxyflurane group, who had successful reductions compared to sedation with propofol. CONCLUSION: Methoxyflurane was used successfully in 30% of the 82 patients undergoing reduction for ASD, while potentially improving ED efficiency.

OBJECTIFS: Le méthoxyflurane en inhalation est un analgésique utilisé au service des urgences (SU), qui a de très faibles propriétés sédatives. L'étude avait pour objectif principal d'évaluer le taux de réussite de la réduction des luxations antérieures de l'épaule (LAE), en phase aiguë, au SU, à l'aide du méthoxyflurane et, pour objectif secondaire, d'évaluer l'effet du méthoxyflurane sur le flux des patients au SU, comparativement à celui du propofol. MÉTHODE: Il y a eu un examen des dossiers médicaux de tous les patients qui ont subi une réduction d'une LAE à l'aide du méthoxyflurane ou du propofol sur une période de 13 mois (décembre 2016 ­ décembre 2017). Le principal critère d'évaluation consistait en la détermination du taux de réussite des réductions réalisées à l'aide du méthoxyflurane, et les critères d'évaluation secondaires, en la comparaison de mesures comme le temps de rétablissement et la durée du séjour (DS) au SU, entre le méthoxyflurane et le propofol. Étaient exclus de l'étude les cas de fracture avec luxation de l'épaule, de polytrauma, d'administration intraveineuse ou intramusculaire d'opioïdes en phase préhospitalière, de réduction sans sédation d'une LAE ou de recours à d'autres techniques de sédation ou d'analgésie en vue de la réduction d'une LAE. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 151 patients ont été examinés au SU pour une LAE durant la période d'étude et, sur ce nombre, 82 satisfaisaient aux critères de sélection. Dans l'ensemble, 52 patients ont été traités par le propofol contre 30, par le méthoxyflurane pour la réduction d'une LAE. Le taux de réussite des réductions a atteint 80% (IC à 95% : 65,69% ­ 94,31%) chez les blessés traités par le méthoxyflurane. Les valeurs médianes du temps de rétablissement et de la DS au SU étaient de 30 minutes [19,3­44] et de 70,5 minutes [49,3-105], ce qui représente des valeurs plus faibles dans le groupe de traitement par le méthoxyflurane, dans les cas de réussite, que dans le groupe de sédation par le propofol. CONCLUSION: Le méthoxyflurane a atteint un taux de réussite de 30% chez les 82 patients qui ont subi une réduction d'une LAE et pourrait, de ce fait, accroître l'efficacité au SU.

Epidemiology and Characteristics of Cervical Spine Injury in Patients Presenting to a Regional Emergency Department.

Purpose This study aims to establish the demographics and characteristics of patients with cervical spine injury (CSI) in an Irish cohort presenting to a regional emergency department. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who underwent cervical spine computed tomography (CT) scans following trauma from January 2013 to July 2016. We looked at the mechanism of injury, mode of arrival to the emergency department, triage category, correlation between examination, and site of CSI and neurological status. Results Over the study period, 808 patients underwent CT scans of the cervical spine for potential CSI. The incidence of CSI in our cohort was 9.4% (n = 76). Approximately 70% (n = 53) were men. Falls (53%) and motor vehicle accidents (29%) were noted to be the more common mechanisms of injury in this cohort. The C2 region was the most common location for CSI. Only 7% (n = 5) of patients had documented neurology. Conclusion This study demonstrates the epidemiology and characteristics of CSI presenting in an Irish cohort. The incidence of CSI was found to be 9.4% with a male preponderance and falls being the most common cause of trauma.