RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Children with Chiari Malformation type II (CM-II) have an increased risk of sleep apnoea. The aim of the study was to describe the management of patients with CM-II in relation to sleep apnoea syndrome, clinical symptoms and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. CASE SERIES PRESENTATION: The paper reports 8 consecutive patients with CM-II followed between September 2013 and April 2017. The prevalence of sleep apnoea syndrome was high with 6 out of 8 patients having mild-to-severe sleep apnoea. Patients with severe sleep apnoea syndrome (3 patients) were treated with upper airway surgery and/or noninvasive ventilation. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of respiratory polygraphy in the management of patients with CM-ΙΙ. Poly(somno)graphy is recommended in the follow-up care of children with CM-II.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Children with Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) have an increased risk of sleep apnea. The aim of the study was to describe the management of CM-I patients in relation to symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings and sleep apnea syndrome (SAS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical charts of all 57 CM-I patients seen between September 2013 and April 2017. RESULTS: A total of 45 patients had isolated CM-I or associated co-morbidity (CM-Iia), 5 had craniosynostosis (CM-Ics), and 7 a polymalformative syndrome (CM-Ipm). The prevalence of SAS, defined as an apnea-hypopnea index >1 event/h, was high in CM-I ranging from 50% to 80% according to the CM-I group. The prevalence of central sleep apnea (CSA) was low, with 5 (9%) patients having CSA and only 3 patients with CM-Iia having isolated CSA. A total of 17 patients (30%) had foramen magnum decompression (FMD). Neither positive symptoms of CM-I nor MRI findings alone, nor both combined were good indicators for FMD. No correlation was observed between the cerebellar tonsil descent and SAS in CM-I. But all 5 patients with CSA had a FMD. The combination of MRI findings and/or symptoms of CM-I together with moderate-to-severe SAS best discriminated patients who needed a FMD. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the importance of a combined evaluation of symptoms, MRI and polygraphy results in the management of CM-I patients.