RESUMEN
PURPOSE: The program Old for Old or European Senior Program (ESP), allocates donors aged ≥65 years to recipients of ≥65, within a narrow geographic area in order to minimize cold ischemia time, decrease the waiting time for elderly patients listed for kidney transplantation and expand the transplant resource in this group. The ESP is not officially applied in Greece. In our center, the Old for Old criteria have been used since 2003 for elderly patients who are candidates for kidney transplantation. METHODS: We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the results of kidney transplantation from donors ≥65 years to recipients ≥65 years (Old for Old group), by examining a 5-year actual survival of the recipient and the graft. Ten Old for Old transplantations were performed at our center and the graft and patient survival was estimated during a 5-year follow-up. This group was compared to a control group of 10 recipients under the age of 65, who received grafts from deceased donors aged ≥65 years; it was found that graft and patient survival was significantly lower in the Old for Old group (50% and 58% respectively), compared to the control group, with graft and patient survival 72% and 80%, respectively (P < .05). The main cause of death was cardiovascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: More studies with higher number of patients are needed for the assessment of survival outcome between the elderly transplanted patient and those on dialysis listed for renal allografts to conclude whether Old for Old transplantation is beneficial. It is also important to consider a better pre-transplant medical evaluation with attention to cardiovascular status of the candidates and modification of the immunosuppression protocol in order to avoid serious infections and long hospital stays.
Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Anciano , Femenino , Grecia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The prevalence and impact of pre-existing and de novo anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is still controversial. We investigated the prevalence of DSAs and their implication in the development of allograft dysfunction after OLT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 65 liver transplant patients were tested for anti-HLA antibodies, with single antigen bead technology, before, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation, and thereafter annually, along with other risk factors. Sixteen out of 65 patients (24.6%) had circulating pre-existing anti-HLA antibodies, and 4 of them (25%) had DSAs. All patients positive for anti-HLA antibodies (100%) presented allograft dysfunction. Fourteen out of 65 patients (21.5%) had circulating de novo DSAs, and 12 out of 14 (85.7%) presented allograft dysfunction. The investigated risk factors for allograft dysfunction were: recipient and donor age, time on the waiting list, cold ischemia time, cytomegalovirus infection, immunosuppression regimen, de novo DSAs, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), direct bilirubin and total bilirubin peak post-transplant, and alkaline phosphatase. The multivariate analysis showed that de novo DSAs and time on the waiting list were independent risk factors for allograft dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Our results show that de novo DSAs are an independent risk factor for allograft dysfunction, along with time on the waiting list.