RESUMEN
Background: Asthma has a high healthcare burden globally, with up to 10% of the asthma population suffering from severe disease. Biologic agents are a newer class of asthma treatments for severe asthma, with good evidence for efficacy in clinical trials. Nevertheless, real-world studies of its impact on clinical outcomes are limited.Methods: This is an observational cohort study using administrative claims data. The study population consisted of patients aged ≥18 years who had a diagnosis of asthma and initiated mepolizumab after November 4, 2015 and had continuous medical and drug coverage in both the 365 days prior to and following mepolizumab initiation. In patients treated with mepolizumab, we described clinically significant asthma exacerbations by minimum continuous treatment thresholds following initiation of mepolizumab, medication switching patterns and chronic oral corticosteroid (≥28 days) use.Results: We identified 2,536 adults with asthma who initiated mepolizumab. There was an association toward reduction in severe asthma-related events over the first one year of exposure. We observed associations with reduced dispensings of oral corticosteroids over the first year after mepolizumab initiation. Very few patients switched to other biologics during the study period.Conclusions: Treatment with mepolizumab may be associated with fewer asthma-related events in the first year. Over the first one year after initiating mepolizumab, we found associations with decreased concomitant dispensings of oral corticosteroids and medium to high dose ICS/LABA. Additionally, most patients who initiated mepolizumab did not switch to other biologics.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Productos Biológicos , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Asma/epidemiología , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The clinical context for using blood eosinophil (EOS) counts as treatment-response biomarkers in asthma and COPD requires better understanding of EOS distributions and ranges. We describe EOS distributions and ranges published in asthma, COPD, control (non-asthma/COPD) and general populations. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis of observational studies (January 2008 to November 2018) that included EOS counts in asthma, severe asthma, COPD, control and general populations. Excluded studies had total sample sizes <200, EOS as inclusion criterion, hospitalised population only and exclusively paediatric participants. RESULTS: Overall, 91 eligible studies were identified, most had total-population-level data available: asthma (39 studies), severe asthma (12 studies), COPD (23 studies), control (seven studies) and general populations (14 studies); some articles reported data for multiple populations. Reported EOS distributions were right-skewed (seven studies). Reported median EOS counts ranged from 157-280â cells·µL-1 (asthma, 22 studies); 200-400â cells·µL-1 (severe asthma, eight studies); 150-183â cells·µL-1 (COPD, six studies); and 100-160â cells·µL-1 (controls, three studies); and 100-200â cells·µL-1 (general populations, six studies). The meta-analysis showed that observed variability was mostly between studies rather than within studies. Factors reportedly associated with higher blood EOS counts included current smoking, positive skin-prick test, elevated total IgE, comorbid allergic rhinitis, age ≤18â years, male sex, spirometric asthma/COPD diagnosis, metabolic syndrome and adiposity. CONCLUSION: EOS distribution and range varied by study population, and were affected by clinical factors including age, smoking history and comorbidities, which, regardless of severity, should be considered during treatment decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Trastornos Respiratorios , Adolescente , Asma/diagnóstico , Niño , Eosinófilos , Humanos , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To estimate eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) prevalence and disease burden in patients with newly diagnosed EGPA in Japan. METHODS: This retrospective descriptive cohort study (GSK ID: 209751, HO-18-19652) used administrative claim data from patients (aged ≤74 years) with EGPA (study period: January 1, 2005-December 31, 2017), identified from their first ICD-10 code for EGPA (index). Data were examined during the 12 months before (baseline) and 12 months following the index date (follow-up). EGPA prevalence, respiratory comorbidities, all-cause healthcare utilization, and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use were assessed. RESULTS: EGPA prevalence (95%CI) increased from 4.2 (0,23.7)/million people (2005) to 38.0 (31.8,45.1)/million people (2017), was generally more common in females versus males, and increased with age. Of the 45 patients with newly diagnosed EGPA, 57.8% had acute bronchitis and 42.2% had upper respiratory tract infections during baseline. During follow-up, 60.0% of patients were hospitalized at least once and 77.8% used OCS (OCS dependent [≥80% of days]: 73.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, EGPA prevalence increased over time, was generally more common in females, and increased with patient age. EGPA burden was high; respiratory comorbidities were common, and most patients required hospitalization and OCS use. Our data suggest additional EGPA treatment options are needed.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Churg-Strauss , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis , Anciano , Síndrome de Churg-Strauss/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Churg-Strauss/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Costo de Enfermedad , Femenino , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/diagnóstico , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/epidemiología , Humanos , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Prevalencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and associated disease burden of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) in patients with asthma from a US claims database. METHODS: Two cohorts were defined using enrollees (aged ≥18 years) from the Optum deidentified Clinformatics Datamart claims database 2010-2014, based on validated EGPA case definitions with varying specificity: EGPA 1 (main cohort; more specific; patients with 2 codes [in any combination] within 12 months of each other for eosinophilia, vasculitis, or mononeuritis multiplex) and EGPA 2 (sensitivity analysis cohort; less specific; patients with 2 codes of above conditions and/or neurologic symptoms within 12 months of each other). Patients had 3 or more asthma medications in the 12-month baseline before index date (date of the second code). Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis prevalence, asthma severity during the baseline period, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, and health care utilization during the 12-month follow-up period were determined. RESULTS: Overall, 88 and 604 patients were included in main cohort EGPA 1 and sensitivity analysis cohort EGPA 2, respectively; corresponding annual EGPA prevalence rates were 3.2 to 5.9 and 23.4 to 30.7 cases/million patients. Approximately 75% of patients were prescribed OCS and ~30% experienced 1 or more hospitalization; 75% in EGPA 1 and 52% in EGPA 2 with 1 or more non-OCS prescription in the 90 days before index date had severe asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis prevalence estimates varied based on specificity of the case definition but were generally consistent with previous country-specific estimates. Despite differences in prevalence, both cohorts displayed a generally similar, high burden of OCS use and health care utilization, highlighting the substantial disease burden among patients with EGPA and the need for specific treatments.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Síndrome de Churg-Strauss , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Síndrome de Churg-Strauss/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Churg-Strauss/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome de Churg-Strauss/epidemiología , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/diagnóstico , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Granulomatosis con Poliangitis/epidemiología , Humanos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Efficacy of mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, was demonstrated in randomised controlled trials; data on its real-world impact in routine clinical practice are starting to emerge. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of mepolizumab prescribed for patients in the real world. METHODS: REALITI-A is a global, prospective, observational cohort study, collecting data from routine healthcare visits from patients with asthma. Patients newly prescribed mepolizumab for severe asthma with 12â months of relevant medical history pre-mepolizumab (collected retrospectively) were enrolled. An initial analysis of data from early initiators who had completed 1â year of follow-up (as of February 28, 2019) was conducted. The primary objective was to compare the rate of clinically significant exacerbations (requiring oral corticosteroids (OCS) and/or hospitalisation and/or emergency department visit) before and after mepolizumab; exacerbations requiring hospitalisation and/or emergency department visit and change in maintenance OCS use were secondary objectives. Treatment-related adverse events were reported. RESULTS: Overall, 368 mepolizumab-treated patients were included. Rates of clinically significant exacerbations were reduced by 69% from 4.63 per person per year pre-treatment to 1.43 per person per year during follow-up (p<0.001), as were those requiring hospitalisation and/or emergency department visit (from 1.14 to 0.27 per person per year; 77% reduction). In 159 patients with maintenance OCS dose data available during the pre-treatment period, median daily dose decreased from 10.0 (pre-treatment) to 5.0â mg·day-1 by week 21-24 of follow-up, sustained until week 53-56. No new safety signals were reported. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that the effectiveness of mepolizumab is consistent with clinical trial results under real-world settings, with significant reductions in exacerbations and daily maintenance OCS dose.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Identifying patients with COPD at increased risk of poor outcomes is challenging due to disease heterogeneity. Potential biomarkers need to be readily available in real-life clinical practice. Blood eosinophil counts are widely studied but few studies have examined the prognostic value of blood neutrophil counts (BNC). METHODS: In a large population-based COPD registry in the East of Scotland (TARDIS: Tayside Allergic and Respiratory Disease Information System), BNC were compared to measures of disease severity and mortality for up to 15 years follow-up. Potential mechanisms of disease modification by BNC were explored in a nested microbiome substudy. RESULTS: 178,120 neutrophil counts were obtained from 7220 people (mean follow up 9 years) during stable disease periods. Median BNC was 5200cells/µL (IQR 4000-7000cells/µL). Mortality rates among the 34% of patients with elevated BNCs (defined as 6000-15000cells/µL) at the study start were 80% higher (14.0/100 person years v 7.8/100py, P < 0.001) than those with BNC in the normal range (2000-6000cells/µL). People with elevated BNC were more likely to be classified as GOLD D (46% v 33% P < 0.001), have more exacerbations (mean 2.3 v 1.3/year, P < 0.001), and were more likely to have severe exacerbations (13% vs. 5%, P < 0.001) in the following year. Eosinophil counts were much less predictive of these outcomes. In a sub-cohort (N = 276), patients with elevated BNC had increased relative abundance of Proteobacteria and reduced microbiome diversity. CONCLUSION: High BNC may provide a useful indicator of risk of exacerbations and mortality in COPD patients.
Asunto(s)
Recuento de Leucocitos , Neutrófilos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/sangre , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Eosinófilos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Microbiota , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Sistema de Registros , Escocia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are sparse real-world data on severe asthma exacerbations (SAE) in children. This multinational cohort study assessed the incidence of and risk factors for SAE and the incidence of asthma-related rehospitalization in children with asthma. METHODS: Asthma patients 5-17 years old with ≥1 year of follow-up were identified in six European electronic databases from the Netherlands, Italy, the UK, Denmark and Spain in 2008-2013. Asthma was defined as ≥1 asthma-specific disease code within 3 months of prescriptions/dispensing of asthma medication. Severe asthma was defined as high-dosed inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller. SAE was defined by systemic corticosteroids, emergency department visit and/or hospitalization all for reason of asthma. Risk factors for SAE were estimated by Poisson regression analyses. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 212 060 paediatric asthma patients contributing to 678 625 patient-years (PY). SAE rates ranged between 17 and 198/1000 PY and were higher in severe asthma and highest in severe asthma patients with a history of exacerbations. Prior SAE (incidence rate ratio 3-45) and younger age increased the SAE risk in all countries, whereas obesity, atopy and GERD were a risk factor in some but not all countries. Rehospitalization rates were up to 79% within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, SAE rates were highest in children with severe asthma with a history of exacerbations. Many severe asthma patients were rehospitalized within 1 year. Asthma management focusing on prevention of SAE is important to reduce the burden of asthma.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Adolescente , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The evidence-based beta-blockers carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol succinate reduce mortality and hospitalizations among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Use of these medications is not well described in the general population of patients with HFrEF, especially among patients with potential contraindications. OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to describe the patterns of prescription fills for carvedilol, bisoprolol, and metoprolol succinate among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HFrEF, as well as to estimate the associations between specific contraindications for beta-blocker therapy and those patterns. METHODS AND RESULTS: With the use of the cohort of 15,205 Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for HFrEF from 2007 to 2013 in the 5% Medicare random sample, we described prescription fills (30 days after discharge) and dosage patterns (1 year after discharge) for beta-blockers. By means of of Fine and Gray competing risk models, we estimated the associations between potential contraindications (hypotension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], asthma, and syncope) and prescription fill and dosing patterns while adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and health care utilization. For beneficiaries who did not die or readmitted to the hospital, 38% of hospitalizations were followed by a prescription fill for an evidence-based beta-blocker within 30 days, 12% were followed by prescription fills for at least 50% of the recommended dose of an evidence-based beta-blocker within 1 year, and 9% were followed by a prescription fill for an up-titrated dose of an evidence-based beta-blocker within 1 year. The prevalence of the contraindications were 21% for hypotension, 48% for COPD, 15% for asthma, and 12% for syncope. Among beneficiaries who did not fill a prescription for an evidence-based beta-blocker within 30 days, 67% had at least 1 of these contraindications. Hypotension, COPD, and syncope were each associated with a â¼10% lower risk of filling a prescription for an evidence-based beta-blocker. CONCLUSIONS: Prescription fill and up-titration rates for evidence-based beta-blockers are low among Medicare beneficiaries with HFrEF, but contraindications explain only a minor part of these low rates.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/uso terapéutico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicare Part D , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Bisoprolol/uso terapéutico , Carvedilol/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Metoprolol/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
This cross-sectional study assessed the prevalence of bacteria isolated from Spanish children with suspected chronic lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) for whom bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was indicated. BAL fluid (BALF) was collected from 191 children (aged ≥ 6 months to < 6 years, with persistent or recurrent respiratory symptoms, non-responders to usual treatment) and cultured. Nasopharyngeal swabs (NPSs) were also obtained and cultured to assess concordance of BALF and NPS findings in the same patient. Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, or Moraxella catarrhalis were identified from BALF with a bacterial load indicative of infection (> 104 colony-forming units/mL) in 10.5, 8.9, and 6.3% of children, respectively. Clinical characteristics were similar among participants, regardless of positivity status for any of the bacteria. Approximately 26% of pneumococcal isolates were PCV13 serotypes, and 96% of H. influenzae isolates were non-typeable (NTHi). Concordance between BALF and NPS isolates was 51.0% for S. pneumoniae, 52.1% for H. influenzae, and 22.0% for M. catarrhalis. CONCLUSION: S. pneumoniae, NTHi, and M. catarrhalis were the main bacteria detected in BALF and NPS. Children with suspected chronic LRTI may benefit from a vaccine protecting against NTHi. What is Known: ⢠Chronic lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in children can cause high morbidity and is a major use of healthcare resources worldwide. Despite this, their etiology or potential preventive measures are poorly assessed. ⢠Bronchoalveolar lavage can be used to determine bacterial etiology of chronic LRTI. What is New: ⢠We used conventional and molecular techniques to show that Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Moraxella catarrhalis were present in the LRT of Spanish children with suspected chronic LRTI ⢠Concordance between isolates from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and nasopharyngeal swabs was low, suggesting that samples from the upper respiratory tract could not reliably predict the bacterial etiology of suspected chronic LRTI.
Asunto(s)
Líquido del Lavado Bronquioalveolar/microbiología , Infecciones por Haemophilus/diagnóstico , Haemophilus influenzae/aislamiento & purificación , Moraxella catarrhalis/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Moraxellaceae/diagnóstico , Infecciones Neumocócicas/diagnóstico , Neumonía Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Lavado Broncoalveolar , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Infecciones por Haemophilus/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Infecciones por Moraxellaceae/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Neumonía Bacteriana/epidemiología , Neumonía Neumocócica/diagnóstico , Neumonía Neumocócica/epidemiología , España/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: For patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), guidelines recommend use of beta-blockers with gradual up-titration. However, many patients with HFrEF do not use beta-blockers and up-titration is rare. Our purpose was to identify and rank barriers to beta-blocker use and up-titration from the perspective of primary care physicians. METHODS: We conducted 4 moderated, structured group discussions among 19 primary care physicians using the nominal group technique; 16 participants also completed a survey. Participants generated lists of barriers to beta-blocker use and up-titration among patients with HFrEF. Each participant had six votes with three votes assigned to the item ranked most important, two to the second most important item, and one to the third most important item. Investigators characterized items into themes. The percentage of available votes was calculated for each theme. RESULTS: Fifteen of 16 participating primary care physicians who completed the survey reported that management of beta-blockers was their responsibility. Treatment/side effects, particularly hypotension, were identified as the most important barrier for beta-blocker use (72% of available votes) followed by polypharmacy (11%), healthcare system barriers (10%), and comorbidities (6%). Barriers to up-titration included treatment/side effects (49% of available votes), patient communication/buy-in (21%), polypharmacy (13%), and healthcare system barriers (8%). CONCLUSIONS: Many barriers to guideline concordant use of beta-blockers among patients with HFrEF identified by primary care providers are not readily modifiable. Addressing these barriers may require development, testing, and dissemination of protocols for beta-blocker initiation and up-titration that are safe and appropriate in primary care.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Monitoreo de Drogas , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polifarmacia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Less intensive treatment for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) may be appropriate for patients in long-term care settings because of limited life expectancy, frailty, comorbidities, and emphasis on quality of life. METHODS: We compared treatment patterns between REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study participants discharged to long-term care versus home following HFrEF hospitalizations. We examined medical records and Medicare pharmacy claims for 147 HFrEF hospitalizations among 80 participants to obtain information about discharge disposition and medication prescriptions and fills. RESULTS: Discharge to long-term care followed 22 of 147 HFrEF hospitalizations (15%). Participants discharged to long-term care were more likely to be prescribed beta-blockers and less likely to be prescribed aldosterone receptor antagonists and hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate (96%, 14%, and 5%, respectively) compared to participants discharged home (81%, 22%, and 23%, respectively). The percentages of participants discharged to long-term care and home who had claims for filled prescriptions were similar for beta-blockers (68% versus 66%) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARBs) (45% versus 47%) after 1 year. Smaller percentages of participants discharged to long-term care had claims for filled prescriptions of other medications compared to participants discharged home (diuretics: long-term care-50%, home-72%; hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate: long-term care-5%, home-23%; aldosterone receptor antagonists: long-term care-5%, home-23%). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in medication prescriptions and fills among individuals with HFrEF discharged to long-term care versus home may reflect prioritization of some medical therapies over others for patients in long-term care.
Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Hospitalización/tendencias , Cuidados a Largo Plazo , Grupos Raciales , Volumen Sistólico/efectos de los fármacos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etnología , Humanos , Masculino , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Morbilidad/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Pronóstico , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Elevated heart rate of ≥70 beats/min despite ß-blocker use may represent a new treatment target in patients in sinus rhythm with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. However, little is known about the proportion of patients with elevated heart rate despite ß-blocker therapy. METHODS: We analyzed data from a large clinical registry to describe discharge heart rate as a function of ß-blocker use and dose. We included patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <40% who were admitted with acute heart failure in 2003 and 2004; we excluded patients with a history of atrial arrhythmia or with a pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy. We considered the ß-blockers carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, bisoprolol, atenolol, and metoprolol tartrate and described discharge dose as a percentage of target dose (ie, <25%, 25%-49%, 50%-99%, and ≥100%). RESULTS: Among 10,696 patients, median discharge heart rate was 76 beats/min (interquartile range [IQR] 66-86 beats/min). Of these, 7,826 (73%) were discharged on a ß-blocker. For patients not on a ß-blocker, median discharge heart rate was 80 beats/min (IQR 70-89 beats/min), compared with 78 beats/min (IQR 69-88 beats/min) on <25% of target dose, 75 beats/min (IQR 66-85 beats/min) on 25% to 49% of target dose, 74 beats/min (IQR 66-82 beats/min) on 50% to 99% of target dose, and 72 beats/min (IQR 65% to 80%) on 100% of target dose or greater (P < .001). Most patients, 7,647 (71%), had a discharge heart rate of ≥70 beats/min, including 1,460 (63%) of 2,301 patients discharged on 50% of target dose or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Despite treatment with ß-blockers, a substantial proportion of patients hospitalized with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction have elevated heart rate at discharge.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administración & dosificación , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Frecuencia Cardíaca/fisiología , Alta del Paciente , Sistema de Registros , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Frecuencia Cardíaca/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) and Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae) are considered major causes of bacterial acute otitis media (AOM) worldwide, but data from Asia on primary causes of AOM are limited. This tympanocentesis-based, multi-center, cross-sectional study assessed bacterial etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of AOM in Thailand. METHODS: Children 3 to 59 months presenting with AOM (< 72 hours of onset) who had not received prescribed antibiotics, or subjects who received prescribed antibiotics but remained symptomatic after 48-72 hours (treatment failures), were eligible. Study visits were conducted from April 2008 to August 2009. Bacteria were identified from middle ear fluid collected by tympanocentesis or spontaneous otorrhea swab sampling (< 20% of cases). S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae serotypes were determined and antimicrobial resistance was also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 123 enrolled children, 112 were included in analysis and 48% of the 118 samples were positive for S. pneumoniae (23% (27/118)), H. influenzae (18% (21/118)), Moraxella catarrhalis (6% (7/118)) or Streptococcus pyogenes (3% (4/118)). The most common pneumococcal serotypes were 19F (26%) and 14 (22%). The majority of H. influenzae isolates were encapsulated (18/21), with 13 type b (Hib) representing 62% of all H. influenzae isolate or 11% of all samples (13/118), and there were only 3 non-typeable isolates. Despite high antibiotic resistance, amoxicillin/clavulanate susceptibility was high. No pneumococcal vaccine use was reported. CONCLUSIONS: S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, both frequently antibiotic resistant, were leading causes of bacterial AOM and there was an unexpectedly high burden of Hib in this population unvaccinated by any Hib conjugate vaccine. Conjugate vaccines effective against pneumococcus and H. influenzae could potentially reduce the burden of AOM in this population.
Asunto(s)
Haemophilus influenzae tipo b/aislamiento & purificación , Otitis Media/microbiología , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefotaxima/uso terapéutico , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Femenino , Infecciones por Haemophilus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Haemophilus/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Otitis Media/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Neumocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Succión , Tailandia/epidemiología , Inhibidores de beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
This study aimed to identify the bacterial etiology of empyema thoracis or parapneumonic pleural effusions in Thai children, with a focus on pneumococcus. This hospital-based, descriptive study included children aged < or = 16 years, diagnosed with empyema thoracis or parapneumonic pleural effusion, from whom a pleural fluid (PF) sample was taken between January 2008 and November 2009. PF and blood samples were cultured and PF samples were also tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to assess whether evidence of an infection might be identified among culture-negative samples. Serotyping of Streptococcus pneumoniae-positive samples was performed by molecular techniques and Quellung reaction. In this study, 29 children with empyema thoracis and 42 children with parapneumonic pleural effusion were enrolled. Potentially pathogenic bacteria were cultured in 13/71 samples at local or central laboratories; the most common bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (8 children) and S. pneumoniae (2 children). Molecular techniques detected one or more targeted respiratory pathogens in 18/71 PF samples. S. pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae were identified by PCR in 13 and 6 children, respectively; PCR for S. aureus was not performed. The pneumococcal serotypes identified were 1, 3, 5, 6A/B, 9A/V, 14, 15A, 19F and 23A. This study shows that among Thai children with empyema thoracis and parapneumonic pleural effusions, S. aureus and S. pneumoniae were the most common pathogens identified by culture and PCR, respectively. These findings confirmed that molecular techniques are more sensitive for identification of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae and enhance detection of important bacterial causes of empyema.
Asunto(s)
Empiema/microbiología , Derrame Pleural/microbiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Enfermedades Torácicas/microbiología , Adolescente , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Drenaje , Empiema/epidemiología , Empiema/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Paracentesis , Derrame Pleural/epidemiología , Derrame Pleural/terapia , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/terapia , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Serotipificación , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/terapia , Tailandia/epidemiología , Enfermedades Torácicas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Torácicas/terapiaRESUMEN
It is commonly acknowledged that implementation work is long-term and contextual in nature and often takes years to accomplish. Repeated measures are needed to study the trajectory of implementation variables over time. To be useful in typical practice settings, measures that are relevant, sensitive, consequential, and practical are needed to inform planning and action. If implementation independent variables and implementation dependent variables are to contribute to a science of implementation, then measures that meet these criteria must be established. This exploratory review was undertaken to "see what is being done" to evaluate implementation variables and processes repeatedly in situations where achieving outcomes was the goal (i.e., more likely to be consequential). No judgement was made about the adequacy of the measure (e.g., psychometric properties) in the review. The search process resulted in 32 articles that met the criteria for a repeated measure of an implementation variable. 23 different implementation variables were the subject of repeated measures. The broad spectrum of implementation variables identified in the review included innovation fidelity, sustainability, organization change, and scaling along with training, implementation teams, and implementation fidelity. Given the long-term complexities involved in providing implementation supports to achieve the full and effective use of innovations, repeated measurements of relevant variables are needed to promote a more complete understanding of implementation processes and outcomes. Longitudinal studies employing repeated measures that are relevant, sensitive, consequential, and practical should become common if the complexities involved in implementation are to be understood.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Group B streptococcal disease is one of the most common infections in the first week after birth. In 2002, national guidelines recommended universal late antenatal screening of pregnant women for colonization with group B streptococcus to identify candidates for intrapartum chemoprophylaxis. METHODS: We evaluated the implementation of the guidelines in a multistate, retrospective cohort selected from the Active Bacterial Core surveillance, a 10-state, population-based system that monitors invasive group B streptococcal disease. We abstracted data from the labor and delivery records of a stratified random sample of live births and of all cases in which the newborn had early-onset group B streptococcal disease (i.e., disease in infants <7 days of age) in 2003 and 2004. We compared our results with those from a study with a similar design that evaluated screening practices in 1998 and 1999. RESULTS: We abstracted records of 254 births in which the infant had group B streptococcal disease and 7437 births in which the infant did not. The rate of screening for group B streptococcus before delivery increased from 48.1% in 1998-1999 to 85.0% in 2003-2004; the percentage of infants exposed to intrapartum antibiotics increased from 26.8% to 31.7%. Chemoprophylaxis was administered in 87.0% of the women who were positive for group B streptococcus and who delivered at term, but in only 63.4% of women with unknown colonization status who delivered preterm. The overall incidence of early-onset group B streptococcal disease was 0.32 cases per 1000 live births. Preterm infants had a higher incidence of early-onset group B streptococcal disease than did term infants (0.73 vs. 0.26 cases per 1000 live births); however, 74.4% of the cases of group B streptococcal disease (189 of 254) occurred in term infants. Missed screening among mothers who delivered at term accounted for 34 of the 254 cases of group B streptococcal disease (13.4%). A total of 61.4% of the term infants with group B streptococcal disease were born to women who had tested negative for group B streptococcus before delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for universal screening were rapidly adopted. Improved management of preterm deliveries and improved collection, processing, and reporting of culture results may prevent additional cases of early-onset group B streptococcal disease.
Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Tamizaje Masivo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/diagnóstico , Streptococcus agalactiae , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Vigilancia de la Población , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/transmisiónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to describe prenatal screening, positive test rates, and the administration of indicated interventions for hepatitis B, rubella, syphilis, group B streptococcus (GBS), chlamydia, and gonorrhea in the United States using 2 population-based surveys. STUDY DESIGN: Both surveys abstracted demographic, prenatal, and delivery data from a representative sample of delivering women in 10 states. Analyses accounted for the complex sampling design. RESULTS: Among the 7691 and 19,791 women in the 2 studies, screened proportions before delivery were more than 90% for hepatitis B and rubella, 80% for syphilis, 72-85% for GBS, and less than 80% for chlamydia and gonorrhea. Inadequate prenatal care was the strongest factor associated with no screening. Administration of interventions indicated by positive test results was variable but generally low. CONCLUSION: Improved prenatal screening and administration of indicated treatments or interventions, particularly for syphilis, GBS, chlamydia, and gonorrhea, will further protect newborns from infection.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Chlamydia/transmisión , Gonorrea/transmisión , Hepatitis B/transmisión , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/terapia , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/transmisión , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/transmisión , Sífilis/transmisión , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Diagnóstico Prenatal , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a group of rare hematologic disorders leading to eosinophil-driven tissue damage and dysfunction. Better understanding of HES variants may facilitate improved patient management. OBJECTIVE: To describe disease characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients with idiopathic (I-HES), myeloproliferative (M-HES), lymphocytic (L-HES), and chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (CEL-NOS) among HES case reports and aggregate data where available. METHODS: Relevant articles published between January 1, 2000, and March 20, 2020, were retrieved via PubMed; those reporting secondary, associated/reactive, overlap/single-organ, or familial HES were excluded. RESULTS: Of 188 articles included, 171 contained data on 347 separate HES cases (152 I-HES, 121 M-HES, 62 L-HES, 12 CEL-NOS). Based on individual data, mean age at diagnosis was 43 to 48 years for patients with all HES variants. Males accounted for 90% to 91% of M-HES/CEL-NOS and 55% to 65% of I-HES/L-HES cases. Cardiac symptoms were frequently observed for all HES variants (13%-22% of patients). Respiratory symptoms (I-HES), splenomegaly (M-HES and CEL-NOS), and skin conditions (L-HES) were also frequently observed. Bone marrow, heart, lung, spleen, liver, skin, and lymph nodes were commonly involved. Most patients with I-HES, L-HES, and CEL-NOS received corticosteroids (65%-85%), whereas most with M-HES received imatinib (81%); those with CEL-NOS also received interferon alpha (42%). CONCLUSIONS: Collective analysis of HES case reports supports and extends current understanding of HES variants, highlighting differences in signs and symptoms, organ involvement, and treatment approaches. Improved characterization of HES variants may facilitate the development of novel treatments.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Hipereosinofílico , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Eosinófilos , Humanos , Síndrome Hipereosinofílico/diagnóstico , Síndrome Hipereosinofílico/tratamiento farmacológico , Mesilato de Imatinib , Leucemia , MasculinoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Asthma can occur at any age but the differences in patient characteristics between childhood-, adult-, and late-onset asthma are not well understood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences in patients' characteristics by age at asthma onset. METHODS: From 5 European electronic databases, we created a cohort encompassing adult patients with doctor-diagnosed asthma in 2008 to 2013. Patients were categorized based on their age at asthma onset: childhood-onset (age at onset < 18 y), adult-onset (age at onset 18-40 y), and late-onset asthma (age at onset ≥ 40 y). Comorbidities were assessed at study entry. For each characteristic and comorbidity, odds ratios and age- and sex-adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) comparing asthma-onset categories were estimated per database and combined in a meta-analysis using a random effect model. RESULTS: In total, 586,436 adult asthma patients were included, 81,691 had childhood-onset, 218,184 adult-onset, and 286,561 late-onset asthma. Overall, 7.3% had severe asthma. Subjects with adult-onset compared with childhood-asthma had higher risks for overweight/obesity (ORadj 1.4; 95% CI 1.1-1.8) and lower risks for atopic disorders (ORadj 0.8; 95% CI 0.7-0.95). Patients with late-onset compared with adult-onset asthma had higher risks for nasal polyposis (ORadj 1.8; 95% CI 1.2-2.6), overweight/obesity (ORadj 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.4), gastroesophageal reflux disease (ORadj 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.7), and diabetes (ORadj 2.3; 95% CI 1.8-2.9). A significant association between late-onset asthma and uncontrolled asthma was observed (ORadj 2.8; 95% CI 1.7-4.5). CONCLUSIONS: This international study demonstrates clear differences in comorbidities between childhood-, adult-, and late-onset asthma phenotypes in adults. Furthermore, patients with late-onset asthma had more frequent uncontrolled asthma.