Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 114
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
N Engl J Med ; 387(21): 1947-1956, 2022 11 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36342151

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in defibrillation technology, shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation remains common during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Double sequential external defibrillation (DSED; rapid sequential shocks from two defibrillators) and vector-change (VC) defibrillation (switching defibrillation pads to an anterior-posterior position) have been proposed as defibrillation strategies to improve outcomes in patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation. METHODS: We conducted a cluster-randomized trial with crossover among six Canadian paramedic services to evaluate DSED and VC defibrillation as compared with standard defibrillation in adult patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Patients were treated with one of these three techniques according to the strategy that was randomly assigned to the paramedic service. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included termination of ventricular fibrillation, return of spontaneous circulation, and a good neurologic outcome, defined as a modified Rankin scale score of 2 or lower (indicating no symptoms to slight disability) at hospital discharge. RESULTS: A total of 405 patients were enrolled before the data and safety monitoring board stopped the trial because of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. A total of 136 patients (33.6%) were assigned to receive standard defibrillation, 144 (35.6%) to receive VC defibrillation, and 125 (30.9%) to receive DSED. Survival to hospital discharge was more common in the DSED group than in the standard group (30.4% vs. 13.3%; relative risk, 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33 to 3.67) and more common in the VC group than in the standard group (21.7% vs. 13.3%; relative risk, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.88). DSED but not VC defibrillation was associated with a higher percentage of patients having a good neurologic outcome than standard defibrillation (relative risk, 2.21 [95% CI, 1.26 to 3.88] and 1.48 [95% CI, 0.81 to 2.71], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with refractory ventricular fibrillation, survival to hospital discharge occurred more frequently among those who received DSED or VC defibrillation than among those who received standard defibrillation. (Funded by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; DOSE VF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04080986.).


Asunto(s)
Cardioversión Eléctrica , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Fibrilación Ventricular , Adulto , Humanos , Canadá , Desfibriladores , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Fibrilación Ventricular/mortalidad , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Estudios Cruzados , Análisis por Conglomerados
2.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; : 1-7, 2024 Jun 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38861683

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Rates of prehospital unplanned extubation (UE) range from 0 to 25% and are the result of many factors, including patient movement. Transfer of care of intubated patients to the emergency department (ED) involves significant patient movement and represents a high-risk event for UE. Frequent confirmation of endotracheal tube (ETT) placement is imperative for early recognition of UE and to minimize patient harm. METHODS: Local Practice-Our baseline rate of verbal ETT position confirmation with a member of the ED team during ED transfer of care was 74%. Our goal was to increase this practice to >90% in six months. This project was completed in partnership with Toronto Paramedic Services. Prehospital electronic patient care records (ePCRs) were reviewed weekly to determine the proportion of intubated patients who had ETT placement confirmed in the ED at transfer of care. Interventions-Pre- and post-project paramedic focus groups were conducted to identify potential drivers, change ideas, and project feedback. Three staggered interventions were introduced over five months: (1) memorandums to paramedics, ED chiefs and respiratory therapy leads, (2) individualized paramedic feedback e-mails, and (3) ePCR changes and closing rules. RESULTS: The pre-project focus group identified several potential drivers, such as physical barriers, interprofessional relationships, and communication. ETT confirmation remained ≥90% for the last eight weeks and interventions resulted in special cause variation. Median cases without verbal confirmation between paramedics and ED staff reduced from 5/week (IQR 2.5, 6.5) to 1/week (IQR 0, 2). UE was identified in 0.6% (2/340) of patients with ETT confirmation. The post-project focus group noted improvements in perceived accountability, interprofessional relationships, and satisfaction with interventions. CONCLUSION: Through a series of interventions, we improved the rate of ETT confirmation during ED transfer of care. Although rates of UE were low, improvement in ETT confirmation may lead to faster recognition of UE when it does occur thereby mitigating complications. The observed improvement was sustained after interventions ended.

3.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 28(7): 955-960, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619868

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Current guidelines recommend that patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to hospitals not capable of performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) be transferred to a PCI-capable hospital if reperfusion can be accomplished within 120 min. Most STEMI patients are accompanied by an advanced care paramedic (ACP, equivalent to EMT-P), nurse, or physician who can manage complications should they arise. In our region, stable STEMI patients are transported by primary care paramedics (PCPs, similar scope of practice to advanced EMT) in cases where a nurse, physician, or ACP paramedic is not available. Our goal was to describe adverse events and need for advanced interventions among initially stable STEMI patients during interfacility transfer by PCPs. METHODS: We reviewed ambulance and hospital records of initially stable STEMI patients (as determined by first set of vital signs documented by paramedics) transferred to a PCI-capable hospital by PCPs between March 1, 2014, and December 31, 2019. We identified whether pre-determined adverse clinical events occurred during the transport as well as the potential need for advanced care interventions not within the PCP scope of practice. Adverse events upon arrival in the PCI lab were also identified. RESULTS: Of 346 STEMI patients transferred, 179 met inclusion criteria. The mean age of included patients was 61 years (SD 12.1) and 74.9% (134/179) were male. Median transport interval was 36 min (IQR 3.0). During transport, 47/179 (26.0%) patients experienced pre-defined adverse events; for 16/47 (34%), one or more adverse events was major. Three patients met criteria for ACP interventions. One patient suffered a cardiac arrest and was promptly resuscitated with defibrillation by the PCPs. CONCLUSIONS: We found PCP-interfacility transport of initially stable STEMI patients was safe and associated with a moderate proportion of adverse events, the majority of which did not require an advanced care intervention. These findings may help decision-making to avoid delays transferring stable patients to PCI-capable centers.


Asunto(s)
Transferencia de Pacientes , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Masculino , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Auxiliares de Urgencia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Seguridad del Paciente , Técnicos Medios en Salud , Paramédico
4.
Can J Neurol Sci ; 47(6): 764-769, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32507117

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delayed presentation to the emergency department influences acute stroke care and can result in worse outcomes. Despite public health messaging, many young adults consider stroke as a disease of older people. We determined the differences in ambulance utilization and delays to hospital presentation between women and men as well as younger (18-44 years) versus older (≥45 years) patients with stroke. METHODS: We conducted a population-based retrospective study using national administrative health data from the Canadian Institute of Health Information databases and examined data between 2003 and 2016 to compare ambulance utilization and time to hospital presentation across sex and age. RESULTS: Young adults account for 3.9% of 463,310 stroke/transient ischemic attack/hemorrhage admissions. They have a higher proportion of hemorrhage (37% vs. 15%) and fewer ischemic events (50% vs. 68%) compared with older patients. Younger patients are less likely to arrive by ambulance (62% vs. 66%, p < 0.001), with younger women least likely to use ambulance services (61%) and older women most likely (68%). Median stroke onset to hospital arrival times were 7 h for older patients and younger men, but 9 h in younger women. There has been no improvement among young women in ambulance utilization since 2003, whereas ambulance use increased in all other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Younger adults, especially younger women, are less likely to use ambulance services, take longer to get to hospital, and have not improved in utilization of emergency services for stroke over 13 years. Targeted public health messaging is required to ensure younger adults seek emergency stroke care.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Ambulancias , Canadá/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
5.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 24(1): 94-99, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31038375

RESUMEN

Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia is a rare but often lethal genetic disorder that affects approximately 1 in 10,000 people. It often first manifests as stress or exercise-related syncope or sudden unexplained cardiac death, primarily in the pediatric and young adult population. We present a case of a 6-year-old male who had a sudden unexplained prehospital cardiac arrest after being scared by a domestic animal and who presented in ventricular fibrillation. The patient was subsequently defibrillated with a return of spontaneous circulation. During the course of care, medications with beta-1 and -2 agonist properties were administered, followed by multiple further episodes of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF). Once these medications were discontinued and beta blockers were administered, the patient had no further episodes of PVT/VF and was subsequently discharged from hospital 7 days later, completely neurologically intact. This case suggests the need for caution when considering administering beta agonists in a pediatric cardiac arrest patient with no known history of heart disease who presents in VF or PVT after an incident of extreme stress or strenuous physical activity.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Niño , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Miedo , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Taquicardia Ventricular/complicaciones , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia
7.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 21(2): 252-256, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27791428

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: High quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has produced a relatively new phenomenon of consciousness in patients with vital signs absent. Further research is necessary to produce a viable treatment strategy during and post resuscitation. OBJECTIVE: To provide a case study done by paramedics in the field illustrating the need for sedation in a patient whose presentation was consistent with CPR induced consciousness. Resuscitative challenges are provided as well as potential future treatment options to minimize harm to both patients and prehospital providers. CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old male presented as a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). During CPR the patient began to exhibit signs of life including severe agitation and thrashing of his limbs while CPR was ongoing for ventricular fibrillation prior to defibrillation. Resuscitation became considerably more complicated due to the violent and counterintuitive motions done by the patient during their own resuscitation. Despite the atypical presentation of cardiac arrest the patient was successfully resuscitated employing high quality CPR, standard advanced life support (ALS) care as well as two double sequential external defibrillation shocks. The patient underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for a 100% occlusion of his left anterior descending artery (LAD). The patient returned home 3 days later fully recovered with a Cerebral Performance Score of 1. CONCLUSION: CPR induced consciousness is emerging as a new phenomenon challenging providers of high quality CPR during cardiac arrest resuscitation. Our case report describes the manifestations of CPR induced consciousness as well as the resuscitative challenges which occur during resuscitation. Further research is required to determine the true frequency of this condition as well as treatment algorithms that would allow for appropriate and safe management for both the patient and EMS providers.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Estado de Conciencia/fisiología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/psicología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Signos Vitales/fisiología , Algoritmos , Delirio/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia
8.
Tech Coloproctol ; 21(11): 887-891, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29149427

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In January 2014, a national bowel cancer screening program started in the Netherlands. The program is being implemented in phases until 2019. Due to this program, an increase in patients referred for a colorectal resection for benign, but endoscopically unresectable polyps, is expected. So far, most resections are performed according to oncological principles despite no pre-operative histological diagnosis of malignancy. The aim of this study was to analyze the increase in referred patients during the first year of the screening program and to compare pathological results and clinical outcome of resections of patients undergoing resection for benign polyps before and after implementation of screening. METHODS: Patients referred for colorectal resection without biopsy-proven cancer between January 2009 and January December 2014 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients with endoscopically macroscopic features of carcinoma were excluded. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients were included. Forty-seven patients (61.8%) were operated on in the 5 years prior to implementation of the screening program, and 29 patients (38.2%) were operated during the first year of implementation of the screening program. The overall malignancy rate before the introduction of the program was 14.1 and 6.6% after it had started (p = .469). All resections were performed laparoscopically; the conversion rate was 3.9% (n = 3). The overall mortality rate was 2.7% (n = 2), major complications (Clavien-Dindo > 3b) occurred in 11.8% (n = 9) of patients. The anastomotic leakage rate was 3.9% (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: The number of patients referred for benign polyps tripled after introduction of the screening program. With an overall major morbidity and mortality rate of 11.8%, it seems valid to discuss whether an endoscopic excision with advanced techniques with or without laparoscopic assistance would be preferable in this patient group, accepting a 6.6% reoperation rate for additional oncological resection with lymph node sampling in patients in whom a malignancy is found on histological analysis of the complete polyp.


Asunto(s)
Pólipos del Colon/diagnóstico , Pólipos del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Pólipos del Colon/patología , Colonoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Países Bajos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
9.
Tech Coloproctol ; 21(9): 709-714, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28929306

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early detection of anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery followed by timely reintervention is of crucial importance. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) imaging for AL and the effects of delay in reintervention after a false-negative CT. METHODS: All files from patients who had colorectal surgery with primary anastomoses between 2009 and 2014 were reviewed. The predictive value of CT scanning for AL was determined and correlated with short-term postoperative patient outcomes. In addition, factors predictive of false-negative scans were assessed. RESULTS: Six hundred and twenty-eight patient files were reviewed. In total, a CT scan was performed in 127 patients. Overall, leakage was seen in 49 patients (7.8%). The positive and negative predictive values were 78 and 88%, respectively. Sensitivity was 73% and specificity 91%. In patients with a true-positive CT (n = 24), reintervention followed after a median interval of 0 days (IQR 1), whereas this was 1 day (IQR 2) in the false-negative group (n = 11) (p < 0.05). This was associated with a significantly increased mortality rate (1/24 = 4.2% vs 5/11 = 45.5%) (p < 0.005), an increased length of hospital stay [median 28 days (IQR 26) vs 54 days (IQR 20) (p < 0.05)]. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed reintervention after false-negative CT scanning is associated with a high mortality rate and a significant increase in length of hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica/diagnóstico por imagen , Medios de Contraste , Enema/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fuga Anastomótica/etiología , Fuga Anastomótica/cirugía , Colostomía/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Enema/métodos , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Recto/cirugía , Reoperación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
10.
Am Heart J ; 177: 129-37, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27297858

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest present with pulseless electric activity (PEA) rather than shockable rhythm. Despite improvements in resuscitation care, survival of PEA patients remains dismal. Our main objective was to characterize out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients by initial presenting rhythm and to evaluate independent determinants of PEA. METHODS: A population-based study was conducted using the Toronto Rescu Epistry database with linkage to administrative data in Ontario, Canada. We included patients older than 20 years who had nontraumatic cardiac arrests from 2005 to 2010. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to determine factors predicting the occurrence of PEA vs shockable rhythm vs asystole. RESULTS: Of the 9,882 included patients who received treatment, 24.5% had PEA, 26.3% had shockable rhythm, and 49.2% had asystole. Patients with PEA had a mean age of 72 years, 41.2% were female and had multiple comorbidities, and 53.4% were hospitalized in the past year. As compared with shockable rhythm, PEA patients were older, were more likely to be women, and had more comorbidities. As compared with asystole, PEA patients had similar baseline and clinical characteristics, but were substantially more likely to have an arrest witnessed by emergency medical services (odds ratio 13) or by bystander (odds ratio 3.24). Mortality at 30 days was 95.5%, 77.9%, and 98.9% for patients with PEA, shockable rhythm, asystole, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patient characteristics differed substantially in those presenting with PEA and shockable rhythm. In contrast, the main distinguishing factor between PEA and asystole cardiac arrest related mainly to factors at the time of the cardiac arrest.


Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/fisiopatología , Taquicardia Ventricular/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Ventricular/fisiopatología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Bases de Datos Factuales , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco/fisiopatología , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Ontario/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/epidemiología , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Factores Sexuales , Taquicardia Ventricular/epidemiología , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Fibrilación Ventricular/epidemiología , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia
11.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 31(9): 1603-9, 2016 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27385205

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether implementation of a comprehensive quality improvement program was associated with improved outcomes in patients undergoing oncological colorectal surgery in a non-academic, non-referral community hospital. METHODS: The quality improvement program (QIP) was introduced in January 2011 and consisted of the following interventions: (1) avoidance of postoperative nonsteriodal anti-inflammatory drugs; (2) normovolemia was pursued pre- and postoperatively; (3) non-resectional surgery if possible, in patients over 80 with ASA 3 or 4 classification; and (4) a standardized, postoperative surveillance protocol was introduced, with CRP determination day 2 and 4, and if necessary subsequent abdominal CT with rectal contrast to reduce delay in diagnosis of complications. From a prospectively maintained database of 488 patients undergoing colorectal surgery between 2009 and 2014, postoperative outcomes of patients operated before and after implementation of the program were compared. RESULTS: The severe complication rate (Clavien-Dindo >3b) decreased significantly (25.0 vs. 13.7 %; p < .001) after implementation of the QIP program. The mortality rate dropped from 8.7 to 2.6 % (p = .003). The percentage of anastomotic leakage was 9.6% before QIP implementation and 4.2% after (p = .013). Median length of hospital stay decreased from 9 (IQR 5-19) to 7 days (IQR 4-12) (p < .001). Multivariate analyses showed that surgery after implementation of the program was a strong independent predictor for less major complications (OR 0.54, 95 % CI 0.32-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: A significant decrease in major complications and mortality was observed after introduction of a relative simple quality improvement program.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal/normas , Hospitales Comunitarios/normas , Cuidados Posoperatorios/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Demografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Factores de Riesgo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 20(5): 662-6, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27077941

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients who present in ventricular fibrillation are typically treated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), epinephrine, antiarrhythmic medications, and defibrillation. Although these therapies have shown to be effective, some patients remain in a shockable rhythm. Double sequential external defibrillation has been described as a viable option for patients in refractory ventricular fibrillation. OBJECTIVE: To describe the innovative use of two defibrillators used to deliver double sequential external defibrillation by paramedics in a case of refractory ventricular fibrillation resulting in prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge with good neurologic function. CASE: A 28-year-old female sustained a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Bystander CPR was performed by her husband followed by paramedics providing high-quality CPR, antiarrhythmic medication, and 6 biphasic defibrillations using standard energy levels. Double sequential external defibrillation was applied and a return of spontaneous circulation was attained on scene and maintained through to arrival to the emergency department. Following admission to hospital the patient was diagnosed with long QT syndrome. An implantable cardioverter defibrillator was placed and the patient was discharged with a Cerebral Performance Category of 2 as well as a modified Rankin Scale of 2 after an 18-day hospital stay. The patient's functional status continued to improve post discharge. CONCLUSION: The addition of double sequential external defibrillation as part of a well-organized resuscitation effort may be a valid treatment option for OHCA patients who present in refractory ventricular fibrillation.


Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores , Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Adulto , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Femenino , Humanos
13.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 20(2): 278-82, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26517201

RESUMEN

Lethal cardiac arrhythmias such as ventricular fibrillation and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/pVT) complicate up to 6% of all out-of-hospital STEMIs. Typically, paramedics respond to this by applying defibrillation pads and delivering a shock as soon as possible. A recently introduced "pads-on" protocol directed paramedics to apply defibrillation pads to all STEMI patients (regardless of clinical stability) with the aim of decreasing time to first shock. In this article we present two cases of prehospital STEMI complicated by VF to illustrate times to first shock for the two different protocols. One case each of a STEMI complicated by VF before implementation of the pads-on protocol and after the implementation of the protocol is presented. An important difference in the time to first shock is noted between the two patients with STEMI complicated by VF. While it took 2 min 43 s for the pads-off patient to be defibrillated, only 27 s elapsed before the pads-on patient was defibrillated. These two cases demonstrate that the application of defibrillation pads immediately following the diagnosis of prehospital STEMI has the potential to decrease the time to shock in patients suffering VF/pVT.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/etiología , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Fibrilación Ventricular/complicaciones , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Técnicos Medios en Salud , Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Electrocardiografía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/complicaciones , Factores de Tiempo , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia
14.
Circulation ; 130(21): 1883-90, 2014 Nov 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25399397

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with a poor prognosis and poses a significant burden to the healthcare system, but few studies have evaluated whether OHCA incidence and survival have changed over time. METHODS AND RESULTS: A population-based cohort study was conducted, including 34 291 OHCA patients >20 years of age who were transported alive to the emergency department of an acute-care hospital from April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2012, in Ontario, Canada. Patients with life-threatening trauma and those who died before hospital arrival were excluded. The overall age- and sex-standardized incidence of OHCA patients who were transported alive was 36 cases per 100 000 persons and did not significantly change over the study period. Cardiac risk factor prevalence increased significantly, whereas the rate of most cardiovascular conditions decreased significantly. The 30-day survival improved from 9.4% in 2002 to 13.6% in 2011; 1-year survival improved from 7.7% to 11.8% (P<0.001). Patients hospitalized in 2011 were significantly more likely to survive 30 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.22-1.77]) and 1 year (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.27-1.91]) compared with 2002. A significant interaction between temporal trends in survival improvement and age group was observed in which the improvement in survival was largest in the youngest age groups. CONCLUSIONS: OHCA patients who were transported alive are increasingly likely to have cardiovascular risk factors but less likely to have previous cardiovascular conditions. The overall incidence of OHCA patients transported to hospital alive did not change over the past decade. Short- and longer-term survival after OHCA has substantially improved, with younger patients experiencing the greatest improvement.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Vigilancia de la Población , Tiempo de Tratamiento/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/diagnóstico , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Adulto Joven
15.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 19(2): 191-201, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25296342

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The American Heart Association (AHA) suggests emergency medical service (EMS) providers transporting ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients to a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) center require advanced life support (ALS) skills. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the potential safety and time savings effectiveness of defibrillation-only emergency medical technician/primary care paramedic (EMT-D/PCP) EMS transport to a PCI center in a system where only emergency medical technician-paramedics/advanced care paramedics (EMT-Ps/ACPs) are authorized to bypass non-PCI hospitals. METHODS: We reviewed 89 consecutive patients meeting STEMI criteria transported by EMT-Ds/PCPs per protocol by one of three paths: 1) closest non-PCI center emergency department (ED) with secondary transfer by EMT-Ps/ACPs to a PCI lab, 2) rendezvous with EMT-Ps/ACPs and diversion to a PCI lab, and 3) PCI center ED if it was closest. Actual transport times to the PCI center ED were compared to predicted transport times determined by mapping software had EMT-Ds/PCPs followed a direct path. Lastly, we recorded predefined clinically important events and advanced care interventions. RESULTS: Twenty-seven, 51, and 11 patients followed paths 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Median transport times for path 1 were 6 (IQR 5) minutes to reach the nearest non-PCI center ED and 66 (IQR 45) minutes to the PCI center ED compared to a median predicted 13 (IQR 7) minutes to a PCI center ED had EMT-Ds/PCPs followed a direct path. Median transport time for path 2 was 12 (IQR 8) minutes compared to a median predicted time of 11 (IQR 6) minutes had no EMT-P/ACP rendezvous occurred. Median transport time for path 3 was 7 minutes (IQR 5). Three patients experienced prehospital cardiac arrest; 1 required dopamine, and 4 others received a saline bolus for hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial time savings may occur if EMT-Ds/PCPs bypass non-PCI center EDs with only a small predicted increase (about 7 minutes) in the transport time to the PCI center ED. EMT-P/ACP rendezvous does not appear to substantially increase transport time. Given the relatively low occurrence of clinically important events, our findings suggest that EMT-D/PCP bypass to a PCI center ED may be safe and effective for selected STEMI patients.


Asunto(s)
Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Transferencia de Pacientes , Anciano , Técnicos Medios en Salud , Auxiliares de Urgencia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Atención Primaria de Salud , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
16.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 17(2): 181-6, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23281589

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Little is known about clinically important events and advanced care treatment that patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) encounter in the prehospital setting. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the proportion of community patients with STEMI who experienced a clinically important event or received advanced care treatment prior to arrival at a designated percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) laboratory or emergency department (ED). METHODS: We reviewed 487 consecutive community patients with STEMI between May 2008 and June 2009. All patients were geographically within a single large "third-service" urban emergency medical services (EMS) system and were transported by paramedics with an advanced care scope of practice. We recorded predefined clinically important events and advanced care treatment that occurred in patients being transported directly to a PCI laboratory or ED (group 1) or interfacility transfer to a PCI laboratory (group 2). RESULTS: One or more clinically important events occurred in 92 of 342 (26.9%) group 1 patients and nine of 145 (6.2%) group 2 patients. The most common were sinus bradycardia, hypotension, and cardiac arrest. Additionally, 33 of 342 (9.6%) group 1 and nine of 145 (6.2%) group 2 patients received one or more advanced care treatments. The most common were administration of morphine and administration of atropine. Eight group 1 patients and three group 2 patients received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or defibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically important events and advanced care treatment are common in community STEMI patients undergoing prehospital transport or interfacility transfer to a PCI center. Several patients required CPR or defibrillation. Further research is needed to define the clinical experience of STEMI patients during the out-of-hospital phase and the scope of practice required of EMS providers to safely manage these patients.


Asunto(s)
Apoyo Vital Cardíaco Avanzado/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Auxiliares de Urgencia , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bradicardia/etiología , Bradicardia/terapia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Auxiliares de Urgencia/educación , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotensión/etiología , Hipotensión/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Transferencia de Pacientes , Rol Profesional , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Hernia ; 27(1): 119-125, 2023 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35925503

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Lichtenstein hernioplasty has long been seen as the gold standard for inguinal hernia repair. Unfortunately, this repair is often associated with chronic pain, up to 10-35%. Therefore, several new techniques have been developed, such as the transinguinal preperitoneal patch (TIPP) and the endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) technique. Several studies showed beneficial results of the TIPP and TEP compared to the Lichtenstein hernioplasty; however, little is published on the outcome when comparing the TIPP and TEP procedures. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes after the TIPP vs the TEP technique for inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: A single-center randomized controlled trial was carried out between 2015 and 2020. A total of 300 patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were enrolled and randomized to the TIPP- or TEP technique. Primary outcome was chronic pain (defined as any pain following the last 3 months) and quality of life, assessed with Carolinas comfort scale (CCS) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were: wound infection, wound hypoesthesia, recurrence, readmission within 30 days, and reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were randomized (150 per group). After a follow-up of 12 months, we observed significantly less postoperative chronic groin pain, chronic pain at exertion, wound hypoesthesia, and wound infections after the TEP when compared to the TIPP procedure. No significant differences in quality of life, reoperations, recurrence rate, and readmission within 30 days were observed. CONCLUSION: We showed that the TEP has a favorable outcome compared to the TIPP procedure, leading to less postoperative pain and wound complications, whereas recurrence rates and reoperations were equal in both the groups.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Hernia Inguinal , Laparoscopía , Humanos , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Hernia Inguinal/complicaciones , Herniorrafia/efectos adversos , Herniorrafia/métodos , Hipoestesia/complicaciones , Hipoestesia/cirugía , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Mallas Quirúrgicas/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 16(1): 109-14, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21954895

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many prehospital protocols require acquisition of a single 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) when assessing a patient for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, it is known that ECG evidence of STEMI can evolve over time. OBJECTIVES: To determine how often the first and, if necessary, second or third prehospital ECGs identified STEMI, and the time intervals associated with acquiring these ECGs and arrival at the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 325 consecutive prehospital STEMIs identified between June 2008 and May 2009 in a large third-service emergency medical services (EMS) system. If the first ECG did not identify STEMI, protocol required a second ECG just before transport and, if necessary, a third ECG before entering the receiving ED. Paramedics who identified STEMI at any time bypassed participating local EDs, taking patients directly to the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) center. Paramedics used computerized ECG interpretation with STEMI diagnosis defined as an "acute MI" report by GE/Marquette 12-SL software in ZOLL E-series defibrillator/cardiac monitors (ZOLL Medical, Chelmsford, MA). We recorded the time of each ECG, and the ordinal number of the diagnostic ECG. We then determined the number of cases and frequency of STEMI diagnosis on the first, second, or third ECG. We also measured the interval between ECGs and the interval from the initial positive ECG to arrival at the ED. Results. STEMI was identified on the first prehospital ECG in 275 cases, on the second ECG in 30 cases, and on the third ECG in 20 cases (cumulative percentages of 84.6%, 93.8%, and 100%, respectively). For STEMIs identified on the second or third ECG, 90% were identified within 25 minutes after the first ECG. The median times from identification of STEMI to arrival at the ED were 17.5 minutes, 11.0 minutes, and 0.7 minutes for STEMIs identified on the first, second, and third ECGs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A single prehospital ECG would have identified only 84.6% of STEMI patients. This suggests caution using a single prehospital ECG to rule out STEMI. Three serial ECGs acquired over 25 minutes is feasible and may be valuable in maximizing prehospital diagnostic yield, particularly where emergent access to PCI exists.


Asunto(s)
Técnicos Medios en Salud , Electrocardiografía/instrumentación , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Anciano , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto del Miocardio/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
19.
Resusc Plus ; 5: 100055, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34223328

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Over 400,000 adults suffer out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) each year in North America. Despite a very high mortality rate, even 10% survival means that a minimum of 3500 people return to their lives and their families. However, their experience of living and their health-related quality of life after such a life-changing event are quite variable, much more complex than just having lived or died, and should not be reduced to crude measures of neurological functioning. METHODS: We conducted 32 in-depth qualitative interviews with survivor/family member dyads at various stages of survival. The interviews focused on the recovery journey, long-term issues most important to them and how measuring such concepts could help. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using constant comparative thematic analysis techniques. RESULTS: During in-depth interviews with more than 30 survivors and caregivers we have heard that despite being a relatively high functioning group, their lives have been deeply affected by their cardiac arrest experience. They speak about the importance of both psychologic and physical recovery, the impact of return to work or changes in work identity and the necessity of support from family members in the recovery process. Spouses/family members also mentioned differences in perspective on their loved one's recovery and how they manage the fear of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: This work purposively brings a unique lens to the concept of cardiac arrest outcomes by placing priority on what is important to survivors and their families and what we may be missing in standard outcomes measures. There is a clear need for a more patient-centred outcome set for this population and our work indicates that psychologic assessment, return to work status and family input are key domains to be considered.

20.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 14(1): 109-17, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19947875

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Many emergency medical services (EMS) systems dispatch nonparamedic firefighter first responders (FFRs) to selected EMS 9-1-1 calls, intending to deliver time-sensitive interventions such as defibrillation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and bag-mask ventilation prior to arrival of paramedics. Deciding when to send FFRs is complicated because critical cases are rare, paramedics often arrive before FFRs, and lights-and-siren responses by emergency vehicles are associated with the risk of en-route traffic collisions. OBJECTIVE: To describe a methodology allowing EMS systems to optimize their own FFR programs using local data, and reflecting local medical oversight policy and local risk-benefit opinion. METHODS: We constructed a generalized input-output model that retrospectively reviews EMS dispatch and electronic prehospital clinical records to identify a subset of Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) call categories ("determinants") that maximize the opportunities for FFR interventions while minimizing unwarranted responses. Input parameters include local FFR interventions, the local FFR "first-on-scene" rate, and the locally acceptable ratio of risk to benefit. The model uses a receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve to identify the optimal mix of response specificity and sensitivity achieved by sending FFRs to progressively more categories of EMS calls while remaining within a defined risk-benefit ratio. The model was applied to a 16-month retrospective sample of 220,358 incidents from a large urban EMS system to compare the model's recommendations with the system's current practices. RESULTS: The model predicts that FFR lights-and-siren responses in the sample could be reduced by 83%, from 93,058 to 16,091 incidents, by confining FFR responses to 27 of 509 MPDS dispatch determinants, representing 7.3% of incidents but 58.9% of all predicted FFR interventions. Of the 93,058 incidents, another 58,275 incidents could be downgraded to safer nonemergency FFR responses and 18,692 responses could be eliminated entirely, improving the specificity of FFR response from 57.8% to 93.0%. CONCLUSIONS: This model provides a robust generalized methodology allowing EMS systems to optimize FFR lights-and-siren responses to emergency medical calls. Further validation is warranted to assess the model's generality.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Empleo , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Incendios , Sistemas de Comunicación entre Servicios de Urgencia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Auxiliares de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Población Urbana
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA