Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Paediatr Open ; 8(1)2024 Sep 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39237270

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence showing that the intranasal and sublingual routes are safe and effective in providing analgesia, no data are available about their day-to-day use in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this study was to assess the frequency of the use of the intranasal and sublingual routes, and the clinical characteristics of the patients receiving analgesia through these routes. METHODS: A multicentre study was performed in the EDs participating in the Pain in Paediatric Emergency Room research group. It included a survey and a retrospective data collection in which the medical records of all patients who received analgesia from 1 April 2022 to 31 May 2022 were collected. RESULTS: 48 centres (91%) answered the survey. The intranasal and sublingual routes were used in 25 centres (52%). 13 centres (27%) used both routes, 9 centres (19%) used only the sublingual and 3 centres (6%) used only the intranasal route.12 centres (48%) participated in the retrospective study. Data about 3409 patients, median age 9 years (IQR 5-12), were collected. Among them, 337 patients (9.6%) received sublingual analgesia, and 87 patients (2.5%) received intranasal analgesia. The intranasal route was employed for injuries in 79 (90.8%) cases, and fentanyl was the drug delivered in 85 (97.7%) cases. The sublingual route was used mainly for injuries (57.3%), but also for abdominal pain (15.4%), musculoskeletal pain (14.5%) and headache (10.7%). Paracetamol, ketorolac and tramadol were administered through this route. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the intranasal and sublingual routes for analgesia in the paediatric ED is still limited.


Asunto(s)
Administración Intranasal , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Manejo del Dolor , Humanos , Administración Sublingual , Estudios Retrospectivos , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Preescolar , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación
2.
Ital J Pediatr ; 49(1): 36, 2023 Mar 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36945023

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute pain is a common symptom in children of all ages, and is associated with a variety of conditions. Despite the availability of guidelines, pain often remains underestimated and undertreated. Paracetamol and ibuprofen are the most commonly used drugs for analgesia in Pediatrics. Multimodal pain management by using a combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen results in greater analgesia. METHODS: An investigation using the Nominal Group Technique was carried out between May and August 2022. Two open (non-anonymous) questionnaires were consecutively sent to a Board of ten clinicians to understand their opinions on the use of the oral paracetamol and ibuprofen association. Answers were examined in a final meeting where conclusions were drawn. RESULTS: The board achieved a final consensus on a better analgesic power of paracetamol and ibuprofen in fixed-dose combination as compared to monotherapy, without compromising safety. Strong consensus was reached on the opinion that the fixed-dose combination of paracetamol and ibuprofen may be a useful option in case of inefficacy of one or other drug as monotherapy, especially in case of headaches, odontalgia, earache, and musculoskeletal pain. The use of the fixed combination may be also considered suitable for postoperative pain management. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the fixed-dose combination may represent advantage in terms of efficacy and safety, allowing a better control of the dose of both paracetamol and ibuprofen as monotherapy, thus minimizing the risk of incorrect dosage. However, the limited evidence available highlights the need for future well designed studies to better define the advantages of this formulation in the various therapeutic areas.


Asunto(s)
Acetaminofén , Dolor Agudo , Analgésicos no Narcóticos , Ibuprofeno , Niño , Humanos , Acetaminofén/administración & dosificación , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Consenso , Combinación de Medicamentos , Ibuprofeno/administración & dosificación , Ibuprofeno/uso terapéutico , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Administración Oral
3.
Epilepsia Open ; 8(2): 685-691, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37042946

RESUMEN

Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a prolonged refractory status epilepticus (SE) that develops among healthy individuals after a febrile infection. FIRES treatment is challenging due to its poor response to antiseizure medications (ASMs) and anesthetic drugs. The use of cannabidiol (CBD) as an adjunctive treatment has been suggested, albeit data about its role in the acute phase is lacking. This report describes the use of purified CBD in the acute phase of two pediatric cases of FIRES and their long-term outcome. Both children were treated with several ASMs, immunomodulators, anesthetics, and nonpharmacological treatment (ketogenic diet). CBD was administered, as an adjunctive treatment, through nasogastric tube about 30 days after onset. SE resolved within 3 days of reaching the target dose and both were seizure-free for 1 year after. Although it is difficult to define the extent to which each previous therapy contributed to recovery, in both cases CBD therapy was a turning point, reinforcing its potential role as add-on treatment in the acute phase of FIRES.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos , Cannabidiol , Epilepsia Refractaria , Encefalitis , Síndromes Epilépticos , Estado Epiléptico , Niño , Humanos , Cannabidiol/uso terapéutico , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia Refractaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Anestésicos/uso terapéutico , Síndromes Epilépticos/tratamiento farmacológico
4.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 7(4)2019 Nov 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31744133

RESUMEN

We report the first case, to our knowledge, in Italy, of a severe combined immunodeficiency patient with a persistent rotavirus infection due to a vaccine derived strain. Rotavirus was detected by enzyme immunoassays and RT-PCR in stool specimens for five months. The persistent infection was resolved after complete immune reconstitution achieved by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. This case underlines the importance of neonatal SCID_screening.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA