Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Prev Med ; 104: 4-6, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28232101

RESUMEN

In November 2012 Colorado voters approved legalized recreational marijuana. On January 1, 2014 Colorado became the first state to allow legal sales of non-medical marijuana for adults over the age of 21. Since that time, the state has been monitoring potential impacts on population health. In this paper we present lessons learned in the first three years following legal sales of recreational marijuana. These lessons pertain to health behaviors and health outcomes, as well as to health policy issues. Our intent is to share these lessons with other states as they face the prospect of recreational marijuana legalization.


Asunto(s)
Cannabis , Evaluación del Impacto en la Salud , Legislación de Medicamentos , Fumar Marihuana/legislación & jurisprudencia , Recreación , Adulto , Colorado , Comercio , Política de Salud , Humanos
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31208070

RESUMEN

A systematic method was used to review the existing epidemiologic literature and determine the state of the scientific evidence for potential adverse health outcomes in populations living near oil and natural gas (ONG) operations in the United States. The review utilized adapted systematic review frameworks from the medical and environmental health fields, such as Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE), the Navigation Guide, and guidance from the National Toxicology Program's Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT). The review included 20 epidemiologic studies, with 32 different health outcomes. Studies of populations living near ONG operations provide limited evidence (modest scientific findings that support the outcome, but with significant limitations) of harmful health effects including asthma exacerbations and various self-reported symptoms. Study quality has improved over time and the highest rated studies within this assessment have primarily focused on birth outcomes. Additional high-quality studies are needed to confirm or dispute these correlations.


Asunto(s)
Yacimiento de Petróleo y Gas , Industria del Petróleo y Gas , Anomalías Congénitas/epidemiología , Salud Ambiental , Humanos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/epidemiología , Enfermedades Respiratorias/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30012994

RESUMEN

The study objective was to use a preliminary risk based framework to evaluate the sufficiency of existing air data to answer an important public health question in Colorado: Do volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted into the air from oil and gas (OG) operations result in exposures to Coloradoans living at or greater than current state setback distances (500 feet) from OG operations at levels that may be harmful to their health? We identified 56 VOCs emitted from OG operations in Colorado and compiled 47 existing air monitoring datasets that measured these VOCs in 34 locations across OG regions. From these data, we estimated acute and chronic exposures and compared these exposures to health guideline levels using maximum and mean air concentrations. Acute and chronic non-cancer hazard quotients were below one for all individual VOCs. Hazard indices combining exposures for all VOCs were slightly above one. Lifetime excess cancer risk estimates for benzene were between 1.0 × 10-5⁻3.6 × 10-5 and ethylbenzene was 7.3 × 10-6. This evaluation identified a small sub-set of VOCs, including benzene and n-nonane, which should be prioritized for additional exposure characterization in site-specific studies that collect comprehensive time-series measurements of community scale exposures to better assess community exposures.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Atmosféricos/análisis , Industria del Petróleo y Gas/estadística & datos numéricos , Compuestos Orgánicos Volátiles/análisis , Colorado , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Humanos , Salud Pública , Riesgo
4.
Acad Emerg Med ; 25(5): 526-537, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29476688

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cannabis legalization in Colorado resulted in increased cannabis-associated health care utilization. Our objective was to examine cooccurrence of cannabis and mental health diagnostic coding in Colorado emergency department (ED) discharges and replicate the study in a subpopulation of ED visits where cannabis involvement and psychiatric diagnosis were confirmed through medical review. METHODS: We collected statewide ED International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification diagnoses from the Colorado Hospital Association and a subpopulation of ED visits from a large, academic hospital from 2012 to 2014. Diagnosis codes identified visits associated with mental health and cannabis. Codes for mental health conditions and cannabis were confirmed by manual records review in the academic hospital subpopulation. Prevalence ratios (PRs) of mental health ED discharges were calculated to compare cannabis-associated visits to those without cannabis. Rates of mental health and cannabis-associated ED discharges were examined over time. RESULTS: Statewide data demonstrated a fivefold higher prevalence of mental health diagnoses in cannabis-associated ED visits (PR = 5.35, 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.27-5.43) compared to visits without cannabis. The hospital subpopulation supported this finding with a fourfold higher prevalence of psychiatric complaints in cannabis attributable ED visits (PR = 4.87, 95% CI = 4.36-5.44) compared to visits not attributable to cannabis. Statewide rates of ED visits associated with both cannabis and mental health significantly increased from 2012 to 2014 from 224.5 to 268.4 per 100,000 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In Colorado, the prevalence of mental health conditions in ED visits with cannabis-associated diagnostic codes is higher than in those without cannabis. There is a need for further research determining if these findings are truly attributed to cannabis or merely coincident with concurrent increased use and availability.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Abuso de Marihuana/epidemiología , Abuso de Marihuana/psicología , Uso de la Marihuana/psicología , Adulto , Cannabis/efectos adversos , Colorado/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Uso de la Marihuana/legislación & jurisprudencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 36(11): 1292-7, 2015 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26289065

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative risk of invasive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection among non-colonized (NC) patients, intermittently colonized (IC) patients, and persistently colonized (PC) patients. DESIGN: Observational cohort study of patient data collected longitudinally over a 41-month period. SETTING: Department of Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, a tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: Any patient who received ≥5 MRSA nasal swab tests between February 20, 2010, and July 26, 2013. In total, 3,872 patients met these criteria, 0 were excluded, 95% were male, 71% were white, and the mean age was 62.9 years on the date of study entry. METHODS: Patients were divided into cohorts based on MRSA colonization status. Physicians reviewed medical records to identify invasive infection and were blinded to colonization status. Cox and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess the relationship between colonization status and invasive infection. RESULTS: In total, 102 patients developed invasive MRSA infections, 16.3% of these were PC patients, 11.2% of these were IC patients, and 0.5% of these were NC patients. PC patients were at higher risk of invasive infection than NC patients (hazard ratio [HR] 36.8; 95% CI, 18.4-73.6; P<.001). IC patients were also at higher risk than NC patients (HR, 22.8; 95% CI, 13.3-39.3; P<.001). The difference in risk between PC and IC patients was not statistically significant (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 0.94-2.78, P=.084). Alternate analysis methods confirmed these results. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of invasive MRSA infection is much higher among PC and IC patients, supporting routine clinical testing for colonization. However, this risk is similar among PC and IC patients, suggesting that distinguishing between the 2 colonization states may not be clinically important.


Asunto(s)
Portador Sano/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Cavidad Nasal/microbiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Anciano , Colorado , Femenino , Hospitales de Veteranos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA