RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the protective effect of Zero Gravity (ZG) with conventional radiation protection during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Secondly, user experience was surveyed with a questionnaire on ergonomics. METHODS: This was a single centre, prospective, randomised, two arm trial where 71 consecutive elective infrarenal EVAR procedures were randomised into two groups: (1) operator using ZG and assistant using conventional protection (n = 36), and (2) operator and assistant using conventional radiation protection (n = 35). A movable floor unit ZG system consists of a lead shield (1.0 mm Pb equivalent) for the front of the body and 0.5 mm Pb equivalent acrylic shielding for the head and neck. The ZG also includes arm flaps of 0.5 mm Pb equivalent covering the arm up to the elbow. Deep dose equivalent values, Hp(10) were measured with direct ion storage dosimeters (DIS) placed on various anatomical regions of the operator (axilla, chest, abdomen, and lower leg). Personal dose equivalent values, Hp(3) to eye lenses were measured in the operating and assisting surgeon using thermoluminescence dosimeters. The study was registered at the US National Institute of Health #NCT04078165. RESULTS: Protection with the standard protection was superior in chest (0.0 vs. 0.1 µSv), abdomen (0.0 vs. 0.6 µSv), and lower leg (0.4 vs. 2.2 µSv) (p < .001). On the other hand, the ZG system yielded better shielding for the axilla (1.5 vs. 0.0 µSv) and eyes (6.3 vs. 1.1 µSv) of the operator. The use of ZG hampered the deployment of ancillary shields, which is particularly relevant for protection of the assisting surgeon. Users found ZG more cumbersome than conventional garments, it also impaired communication and reduced field of view. CONCLUSION: Both ZG and conventional radiation protection reduced radiation exposure. Conventional protection allows better manoeuvrability at the price of wider exposure of the upper arm and axilla. ZG indirectly impaired protection of the assistant.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Exposición Profesional , Protección Radiológica , Humanos , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Reparación Endovascular de Aneurismas , Dosis de Radiación , Estudios Prospectivos , Plomo , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Radiografía IntervencionalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The exact incidence and outcomes of acute occlusive arterial mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) are unclear as most studies include only patients diagnosed correctly while alive. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, mortality, and diagnostics of AMI by also including patients diagnosed post-mortem. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised patients diagnosed with AMI either alive or post-mortem between 2006 and 2015 within a healthcare district serving 1.6 million inhabitants. Key exclusion criteria were venous or non-obstructive ischaemia. RESULTS: A total of 470 patients were included in the study of which 137 (29%) were diagnosed post-mortem. The most common misdiagnoses on those not diagnosed alive were unspecified infection (n = 19, 17%), gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 13, 11%), and ileus (n = 13, 11%). Of those diagnosed alive (n = 333), 187 (56%) underwent active surgical or endovascular treatment. During the 2006 - 2015 period, the overall incidence of AMI was 3.05 (95% CI 2.78 - 3.34)/100 000 person years and 26.66 (95% CI 24.07 - 29.45) for those aged 70 years or more. The mean autopsy rate during the study period was 29% for the overall population (32% during 2006 - 2010 and 25% during 2011 - 2015) and 18% for those aged 70 years or more. Overall, the 90-day mortality was 83% in all patients. The ninety day mortality decreased, being 87% during the first period (2006 - 2010) and 79% during the second period (2011 - 2015) (p = .029), while at the same time the proportion of patients diagnosed alive rose from 71% to 80% (p = .030) and the number of endovascular revascularisations rose from 1% to 5% (p = .022). CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with AMI are not diagnosed alive, which is reflected in the mortality rates. Post-mortem examinations and autopsy rate data continue to be key factors in epidemiological studies on AMI.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Recent randomised controlled trials demonstrated the benefit of intracranial endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in acute ischaemic stroke. There is no consensus, however, on how to treat concomitant extracranial carotid artery stenosis after EVT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome in patients treated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after EVT, comparing complication rates among patients undergoing CEA for stroke without previous EVT. METHODS: This was a registry study of all patients (n = 3 780) treated with CEA after stroke in Sweden and the capital Helsinki region, Finland, from January 2011 to September 2020. Sixty three patients (1.7%; 0.5% 2011, 4.3% 2019) underwent EVT prior to CEA. The primary outcome was 30 day stroke and death rate. RESULTS: The EVT+CEA group had major stroke as the qualifying neurological event (QNE) in 79%, but just 5.9% had this in the CEA only group (p < .001). Intravenous thrombolysis was administered before EVT in 54% of patients in the EVT+CEA group, but in just 12% in those receiving CEA only (p < .001). The combined stroke and death rate at 30 days for EVT+CEA was 0.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0 - 5.7). One patient had a post-operative TIA, none had post-operative intracerebral or surgical site haemorrhage. CEA was performed within a median of seven days (interquartile range 4, 15) after QNE, and 75% had CEA ≤14 days from QNE. The main reason to postpone CEA was an infarct larger than one third of the middle cerebral artery territory. The stroke and death rate in patients treated with CEA only was 3.7% (95% CI 3.2 - 4.4), CEA was performed a median of eight days after QNE, and in 79.7% in ≤14 days. The three year survival after EVT+CEA was 93% (95% CI 85 - 100), compared with 87% (95% CI 86 - 88) after CEA only. Cox regression analysis adjusting for age showed no increased all cause mortality after EVT+CEA (HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.6 - 2.7, p = .52). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that CEA is safe to perform after previous successful EVT for acute ischaemic stroke. Results were comparable with those undergoing CEA only, despite the EVT+CEA patients having more severe stroke symptoms prior to surgery, and timing was similar.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Estenosis Carotídea , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Isquemia Encefálica/etiología , Isquemia Encefálica/cirugía , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Trombectomía/efectos adversos , Trombectomía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Roughly 10% - 20% of pancreatic cancer patients are candidates for curative intent surgical treatment. In the 2000s, many studies showed similar survival rates comparing pancreatic surgery with or without vein resection and reconstruction. The aim was to identify the best method of venous reconstruction. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 1 375 patients undergoing pancreatectomy between 2005 and 2018 were identified. Patients undergoing a combined pancreatic resection and venous reconstruction were included retrospectively. When tumour infiltration to the portal/superior mesenteric vein was detected, excision and reconstruction with tangential suturing/patch, end to end anastomosis, or a spiral graft from the great saphenous vein was performed. Next, 90 day and long term survival and outcomes across reconstruction techniques were analysed. RESULTS: Overall, 198 patients had venous involvement visible in pre-operative scans or detected during surgery, broken down as follows: 171 (86%) pancreaticoduodenectomy, 12 (6%) total pancreatectomy, and 15 (8%) distal pancreatectomy. In total, 69 (35%) spiral graft reconstructions, 77 (39%) end to end anastomoses, and 52 (26%) tangential/patch reconstructions were performed. Tumour histology revealed pancreatic adenocarcinomas in 162 (82%) patients, intraductal mucinous pancreatic neoplasia in 14 (7%), cholangiocarcinoma in five (3%), neuro-endocrine neoplasia in nine (5%), and eight other diagnoses. Overall, 183 (92%) were malignant and 15 (8%) benign. Two patients died within 90 days, one in hospital and one on post-operative day 38 due to thrombosis of the superior mesenteric vein and intestinal necrosis, a Clavien-Dindo grade 5 complication. In addition, 50 (23%) patients had Clavien-Dindo grade 3 - 4 complications. No differences in complications comparing vein reconstruction techniques or in the long term survival of pancreatectomy patients with or without venous reconstruction were detected. CONCLUSION: The spiral graft technique, used when more advanced venous infiltration occurs, does not increase complications, with outcomes mirroring those accompanying shorter venous resections.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Pancreatectomía/efectos adversos , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Venas Mesentéricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Rupture of an extracranial carotid artery aneurysm (ECAA) is a very rare and life-threatening condition. To obtain a comprehensive view of previous and current management of ruptured ECAAs (rECAAs), we analyzed all cases reported since 1940 and two of our own cases. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review of reports from the MEDLINE database on rECAAs and included two patients treated in our department. RESULTS: A total 58 reports of 74 rECAAs in 74 patients were analyzed. Their mean age was 50 years, and the male/female ratio was 2.2:1. Infection was the most common reported etiology (19 of 74; 26%), followed by connective tissue disorder (13 of 74; 18%), atherosclerosis (9 of 74; 12%), and previous trauma (5 of 74; 7%). For 28 patients (38%), information on the etiology was not available. Of the 74 patients, 24 (32%) had undergone reconstructive surgery, 10 (14%) had undergone endovascular treatment, 17 (23%) had undergone ligation, 2 (3%) had been treated conservatively, and 1 (1%) had died before receiving definite treatment. For 20 patients (27%), information on the treatment received was not available. The complications after reconstruction included carotid blowout (3 of 24 patients; 13%) and cranial nerve deficit (3 of 24 patients; 13%). Two patients (8%) had died of unrelated ECAA causes during long-term follow-up, and one patient (4%) had died of an ECAA-related cause within 30 days. After an endovascular approach, 1 of the 10 patients had developed a cranial nerve deficit. After ligation, five patients (29%) had experienced stroke, three of which were fatal. One conservatively treated patient had experienced no complications and one had died of an ECAA-related cause. CONCLUSIONS: The most common reported etiology for rECAA was infection. Reconstructive surgery was the most common approach and was safer than ligation, which carried a high risk of stroke. Endovascular treatment showed promising results, especially for distally located aneurysms; however, the number of patients has remained low.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Roto/terapia , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/terapia , Tratamiento Conservador/tendencias , Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma Roto/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Roto/etiología , Aneurisma Roto/mortalidad , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/etiología , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/mortalidad , Tratamiento Conservador/efectos adversos , Tratamiento Conservador/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Ligadura , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Across stroke subtypes, carotid artery stroke carries the highest risk of recurrence. Despite initiation of best medical therapy (BMT), some patients suffer recurrent neurological events before undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The aim was to identify clinical predictors of early recurrent events in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (sCS) awaiting CEA on modern BMT. METHODS: The Helsinki Carotid Endarterectomy Study 2 (HeCES2) is a cross sectional, longitudinal, prospective, and consecutive cohort study, which enrolled 500 symptomatic or asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis scheduled for CEA in a tertiary stroke centre. Symptomatic patients were included for this analysis (n = 324). RESULTS: Of all 324 patients with sCS, 39 (12%) had a recurrent cerebrovascular event at a median of six days after the index symptom: four had an ischaemic stroke (1.2%), 16 a hemispheric transient ischaemic attack (TIA; 4.9%), and 19 amaurosis fugax (AFX; 5.9%). The recurrence rate was 4.0 % (n = 13) within 48 h and 9.9% (n = 32) within two weeks. None of the patients (n = 108) presenting with ocular symptoms (AFX or retinal artery occlusion) suffered recurrent hemispheric TIA or stroke. In Cox regression analysis, comorbid hypertension (hazard ratio [HR] 6.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-32.47), hemispheric TIA as the index symptom (HR 3.42, 95% CI 1.70-6.90), the number of prior attacks (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.08-1.15), and high low density lipoprotein/high density lipoprotein ratio (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.09-2.11) were independently associated with an increased risk of recurrent event, while a history of major cardiovascular event (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-0.96) and high serum fibrinogen level (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.86) were associated with a decreased risk. CONCLUSION: More than every tenth patient with sCS experienced an early recurrent cerebrovascular event prior to scheduled CEA, despite optimal medication. However, stroke recurrence was lower than in earlier observational studies, which could be explained by improved care pathways, more aggressive medication, and expedited CEA. All recurrent strokes occurred in patients initially presenting with minor stroke.
Asunto(s)
Amaurosis Fugax/etiología , Estenosis Carotídea/complicaciones , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Anciano , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Femenino , Fibrinógeno/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Lipoproteínas HDL/sangre , Lipoproteínas LDL/sangre , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Preoperatorio , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores Protectores , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Radical excision of retroperitoneal or intra-abdominal soft tissue sarcomas may necessitate vessel resection and reconstruction. The aim of this study was to assess surgical results of retroperitoneal or intra-abdominal sarcomas involving major blood vessels. METHODS: This was a retrospective single centre cohort study and a comprehensive review of literature. Patients with retroperitoneal or intra-abdominal sarcomas treated by the oncovascular team in Helsinki University Hospital from 2010 to 2018 were reviewed for vascular and oncological outcomes. A comprehensive literature review of vascular reconstructions in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma was performed. RESULTS: Vascular reconstruction was performed in 17 patients, 11 of whom required arterial reconstructions. Sixteen of the operations were sarcoma resections; the post-operative diagnosis for one patient was thrombosis instead of the presumed recurrent leiomyosarcoma. Early graft thrombosis occurred in two venous and one arterial reconstruction. Late thrombosis was detected in three (18%). The median follow up was 27 (range 0-82) months. Of the patients with sarcoma resections 5 (31%) died of sarcoma and further 4 (25%) developed local recurrence or new distant metastases. The comprehensive review of literature identified 37 articles with 110 patients, 89 of whom had inferior vena cava reconstruction only. Eight arterial reconstructions were described. Late graft thrombosis occurred in 14%. The follow up was 0-181 months, during which 57% remained disease free and 7% died of sarcoma. CONCLUSION: Vascular reconstructions enable radical resection of retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal sarcomas in patients with advanced disease. The complex operations are associated with an acceptable rate of serious peri-operative complications and symptomatic thrombosis of the repaired vessel is rare. However, further studies are needed to assess the performance of the vascular reconstructions in the long term.
Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/cirugía , Sarcoma/cirugía , Trombosis/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Arterias/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/patología , Espacio Retroperitoneal/irrigación sanguínea , Espacio Retroperitoneal/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sarcoma/sangre , Sarcoma/patología , Trombosis/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Vena Cava Inferior/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In acute portal vein thrombosis (PVT), a six-month anticoagulation treatment achieves complete recanalization in only 35%-45% of patients, but the predictors of poor treatment responses are unclear. We examined treatment outcomes in PVT and aimed to identify predictors of incomplete recanalization and portal hypertensive complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study comprised patients diagnosed with PVT between 2006 and 2015. Key exclusion criteria were liver cirrhosis, malignancy, and age <18. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 145 patients, of whom 132 (92%) were primarily treated with anticoagulation. The 5-year cumulative incidence of complete recanalization was 42% and of portal hypertensive complications, 31%. Independent predictors of insufficient recanalization were sub-acute or chronic thrombosis (hazard ratio (HR) 3.1, 95% CI 1.6-5.8), while acute pancreatitis was a protective factor (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2 - 0.7). Independent predictors of incident portal hypertensive complications were as cites at baseline (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-6.7), sub-acute or chronic thrombosis (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.3), extension of thrombosis to the splenic or mesenteric vein (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2-5.7), myeloproliferative disease (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.5), and anemia (HR 2.1, 95% 1.1-3.9), while acute pancreatitis was a protective factor (HR 0.1, 95% CI 0.03-0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Etiology and age of thrombosis are associated with treatment responses in PVT. The presence of ascites at baseline, etiology, and extent of thrombosis, a non-acute thrombosis and anemia, are associated with the risk of portal hypertensive complications. Etiology and extent of thrombosis should be taken into account when determining the treatment (method) for PVT.
Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis , Trombosis , Enfermedad Aguda , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Pancreatitis/patología , Vena Porta/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Humanos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Stents , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/terapia , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/complicaciones , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/cirugía , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , SíndromeRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Considering carotid endarterectomy (CEA), reporting treatment delay, symptom status, and surgical complication rates separately gives an incomplete picture of efficacy; therefore, the aim was to combine these factors and develop a reporting standard that better describes the number of potentially prevented strokes. With a real life cohort and theoretical inclusion scenarios, the aim was to explore the stroke prevention potential of different carotid practices. METHODS: Landmark studies for symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were revisited. By using published estimates of treatment effect, a simplified calculator was designed to assess the five year stroke prevention rate per 1000 CEAs (stroke prevention potential [SPP], range 0-478), including the presence and recentness of symptoms, sex, increasing stenosis severity, and complication rates. Patients operated on for carotid stenosis at Helsinki University Hospital (HUH) between 2008 and 2016 were collected from a vascular registry (HUSVASC) and categorised according to the model. The local annual complication rate was re-evaluated and added to the model. The HUH patient cohort was incorporated into the SPP model, and changes over time analysed. Finally, theoretical changes in patient selection were compared in order to explore the theoretical impact of patient selection and shortening of the delay. RESULTS: Fifteen hundred and five symptomatic and 356 asymptomatic carotid stenoses were operated on with stroke plus death rates of 3.6% and 0.3%, respectively. The proportion of CEAs performed within two weeks of the index event increased over the follow up period, being 77% in 2016. The SPP increased from 123 in 2008 to 229 in 2016. Theoretically, 350 ischaemic strokes were prevented in the period 2008-16, with 1861 CEAs. CONCLUSIONS: National and international comparison of different CEA series is irrelevant if the inclusion criteria are not considered. A calculator that is easy to apply to large scale high quality registered data was developed and tested. SPP was found to increase over time, which is a probable sign of improved patient selection and an increased number of strokes prevented by the CEAs performed.
Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico , Estenosis Carotídea/mortalidad , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/métodos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/epidemiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/etiología , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/prevención & control , Masculino , Selección de Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Prevención Secundaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Despite modern advances in diagnosis and treatment, acute arterial mesenteric ischaemia (AMI) remains a high mortality disease. One of the key modifiable factors in AMI is the first door to operation time, but the factors attributing to this parameter are largely unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting delay, with special focus on the pathways to treatment. METHODS: This was a single academic centre retrospective study. Patients undergoing intervention for AMI caused by thrombosis or embolism of the superior mesenteric artery between 2006 and 2015 were identified from electronic patient records. Patients not eligible for intervention or with chronic, subacute onset, colonic only, venous, or non-occlusive mesenteric ischaemia were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups according to the first speciality examining the patient (surgical emergency room [SER], surgeon examining the patient first or non-surgical emergency room [non-SER], internist examining the patient first). The primary endpoint was first door to operation time and secondary endpoints were length of stay and 90 day mortality. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients with AMI were included. Fifty patients (62%) died during the first 30 days and 53 (65%) within 90 days. Presenting first in non-SER (vs. SER) was independently associated with a first door to operation time of over 12 h (OR 3.7 [95% CI 1.3-10.2], median time 15.2 h [IQR 10.9-21.2] vs. 10.1 h [IQR 6.9-18.5], respectively, p = .025). The length of stay was shorter (median 6.5 days [4.0-10.3] vs. 10.8 days [7.0-22.3], p = .045) and 90 day mortality was lower in the SER group (50.0% vs. 74.5%, p = .025). CONCLUSIONS: The first specialty that the patient encounters seems to be crucial for both delayed management and early survival of AMI. Developing fast/direct pathways to a unit with both gastrointestinal and vascular surgeons offers the possibility of improving the outcome of AMI.
Asunto(s)
Conducta de Elección , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/cirugía , Isquemia Mesentérica/cirugía , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/cirugía , Derivación y Consulta , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Triaje , Centros Médicos Académicos , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vías Clínicas , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/fisiopatología , Isquemia Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia Mesentérica/mortalidad , Isquemia Mesentérica/fisiopatología , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/mortalidad , Oclusión Vascular Mesentérica/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Especialización , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background and Purpose- Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is recommended within 14 days after carotid artery stroke to prevent recurrence. However, the optimal timing of CEA after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains unclear. We studied the safety of CEA after IVT while taking into account both stroke recurrence and CEA-related complications. Methods- Patients who underwent IVT followed by CEA in Helsinki University Hospital 2005 to 2016 were withdrawn from prospectively collected registers. The incidence of stroke recurrence during the time between IVT and CEA, peri/postoperative stroke, hyperperfusion syndrome or drug-resistant high blood pressure, and 3-month outcome measured by modified Rankin Scale was recorded. Stroke patients treated with CEA without preceding IVT were used as controls. Results- Altogether 128 CEAs with preceding IVT and 777 CEAs for stroke without IVT were identified. The median time from IVT to CEA was 9 days (range, 0-349 days; interquartile range, 16). Seven patients (5.5%) underwent CEA within 24 hours, 20 (15.6%) within 48 hours and 87 (68.0%) within 2 weeks from IVT. Stroke recurrence in IVT-CEA patients was 5.5% at median 4 days after IVT (range, 0-8 days). Outcome from CEAs performed within 48 hours from IVT did not differ from CEAs performed later with respect to peri/postoperative ischemic strokes (5.0% and 3.7%), hemorrhagic strokes (5.0% and 1.9%), neck hematomas (5.0% and 8.3%), myocardial infarctions (0.0% and 0.9%), or 3-month modified Rankin Scale. There was a tendency toward higher incidence of hyperperfusion syndrome in the patients operated within 48 hours from IVT (20.0% versus 6.5%; P=0.070). The CEA-related stroke rate was similar to that of the operation without thrombolysis. Only smoking was significantly associated with peri/postoperative stroke (odds ratio, 21.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-439.58). Conclusions- Time between IVT and CEA was not associated with CEA-related complications. The high rate of stroke recurrence during the waiting time for CEA underscores the importance of shortening surgery delays.
Asunto(s)
Endarterectomía Carotidea/tendencias , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Terapia Trombolítica/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis represents (UEDVT) 2-3% of all deep vein thrombosis. Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) was replaced largely by pharmacomechanical thrombolysis (PMT) in our institution. In this study we compared the immediate and 1-year results as well as the total hospital costs between CDT and PMT in the treatment of UEDVT. METHODS: From 2006 to 2013, 55 patients with UEDVT were treated with either CDT or PMT at Helsinki University Hospital. Of them, 43 underwent thoracoscopic rib resection later to relieve phlebography-confirmed vein compression. This patient cohort was prospectively followed up with repeated phlebographies. CDT was performed to 24 patients, and 19 had PMT with a Trellis™ device. Clinical evaluation and vein patency assessment were performed with either phlebography or ultrasound 1 year after the thrombolysis. Primary outcomes were immediate technical success, 1-year vein patency, and costs of the initial treatment. RESULTS: The immediate overall technical success rate, defined as recanalization of the occluded vein and removal of the fresh thrombus, was 91.7% in the CDT group and 100% in the PMT group (n.s.). The median thrombolytic time was significantly longer in CDT patients than that in PMT patients (21.1 vs. 0.33 hr, P < 0.00001). There were no procedure-related complications. The 1-year primary assisted patency rate was similar in both the groups (91.7% and 94.7%). There were no recurrences of clinical DVT. The hospital costs for the acute period were significantly lower in the PMT group than those in the CDT group (medians: 11,476 and 5,975 in the CDT and PMT groups, respectively [P < 0.00001]). CONCLUSIONS: The clinical results of the treatment of UEDVT with CDT or PMT were similar. However, PMT required shorter hospital stay and less intensive surveillance, leading to lower total costs.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Fibrinolíticos/economía , Costos de Hospital , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/economía , Trombectomía/economía , Terapia Trombolítica/economía , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/economía , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/economía , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Finlandia , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Flebografía/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , Trombectomía/efectos adversos , Trombectomía/métodos , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis Venosa Profunda de la Extremidad Superior/fisiopatología , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Oncología Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Vasculares/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/estadística & datos numéricos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Oncología Médica/métodos , Oncología Médica/tendencias , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) on hypertension in patients with treatment resistant or refractory hypertension. METHODS: This investigator-initiated randomized, double-blind, 1:1 parallel-design clinical trial will include 100 patients with refractory hypertension from 6 tertiary referral hypertension centers in the Nordic countries. A Barostim Neo System will be implanted and after 1 month patients will be randomized to either BAT for 16 months or continuous pharmacotherapy (BAT off) for 8 months followed by BAT for 8 months. A second randomization will take place after 16 months to BAT or BAT off for 3 months. Eligible patients have a daytime systolic ambulatory blood pressure (ABPM) of ≥145 mm Hg, and/or a daytime diastolic ABPM of ≥95 mm Hg after witnessed drug intake (including ≥3 antihypertensive drugs, preferably including a diuretic). RESULTS: The primary end point is the reduction in 24-hour systolic ABPM by BAT at 8 months, as compared to pharmacotherapy. Secondary and tertiary endpoints are effects of BAT on home and office blood pressures, measures of indices of cardiac and vascular structure and function during follow-up, and safety. CONCLUSIONS: This academic initiative will increase the understanding of mechanisms and role of BAT in the refractory hypertension.
Asunto(s)
Barorreflejo , Presión Sanguínea , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Hipertensión/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Corazón/fisiopatología , Humanos , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prótesis e Implantes , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Elderly patients undergoing vascular surgery are at major risk for perioperative cardiac complications. The authors investigated continuous electrocardiographic Holter monitoring in a postoperative setting to determine the degree of postoperative ischemic load and its possible associations with perioperative myocardial infarction. DESIGN: A prospective, observational study. SETTING: One university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 51 patients aged 65 years or older undergoing peripheral arterial surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring with a Holter device was started postoperatively and continued for 72 hours or until discharge. Postural changes were recorded using a 3-axis accelerometer. Standard 12-lead electrocardiography, high-sensitive troponin T measurements, and an inquiry of ischemic symptoms were performed 4 times perioperatively. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcomes were ischemic load (area under the function of ischemic ST-segment deviation and ischemic time) and perioperative myocardial infarction. During 3,262.7 patient-hours of monitoring, 17 patients (33.3%) experienced 608 transient ischemic events, all denoted by ST-segment depression. Of these 17 patients, 5 experienced perioperative myocardial infarction. The mean ischemic load in all patients was 913.2±2,797.3 µV×minute. Ischemic load predicted perioperative myocardial infarction, with an area under receiver operating characteristics curve (95% confidence interval) of 0.87 (0.75-0.99). Ischemic changes occurred most frequently during hours 24 to 60 of monitoring. Ischemia was asymptomatic in 14 of 17 patients (82.4%). CONCLUSION: Postoperative myocardial ischemia was common in peripheral vascular surgery patients and may progress to perioperative myocardial infarction. Ischemic load was a good predictor of perioperative myocardial infarction. Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring solutions for continuous postoperative ischemia detection are warranted in the surgical ward.
Asunto(s)
Electrocardiografía/métodos , Monitorización Neurofisiológica Intraoperatoria/métodos , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Anciano , Electrocardiografía/tendencias , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Monitorización Neurofisiológica Intraoperatoria/tendencias , Masculino , Isquemia Miocárdica/etiología , Isquemia Miocárdica/fisiopatología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prolonged renal ischemia during vascular surgery carries high morbidity and mortality. We report an alternative technique for maintaining renal circulation during suprarenal aortic or renal artery clamping. METHODS: Between October 2007 and May 2012, 16 patients undergoing aorto-renal surgery (13 men, 3 women) were operated using temporary axillorenal bypass. Operations were performed for supra- and juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (11), occlusive aortic disease (2), renal artery stenoses (2), and abdominal myofibroblastic tumor (1). In elective cases, axillorenal bypass was planned, when prolonged renal ischemia was expected based on preoperative information. Preoperative risk factors (renal dysfunction, hypertension, coronary disease, diabetes, smoking) and intraoperative variables (operating time, blood loss, renal ischemia time) were assessed and compared with postoperative kidney function (serum creatinine, urine output, dialysis) and in-hospital or 30-day-mortality. Even though renal blood flow was restored between clampings, the total cumulative ischemia time was used in analysis. Acute renal failure postoperatively was based on RIFLE criteria. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 44% (7) of the patients had normal renal function (S-crea ≤ 100 mmol/L). Renal function was moderately present in 50% (8) (S-crea 100-200 mmol/L) and severely in 6% (1) (S-crea ≥ 200 mmol/L). Median operation time was 393 min (251-535 min) and median renal ischemia time was 24.5 min (range 8-50 min). Transient acute renal dysfunction occurred in 6 (38%) patients, and 4 of them had renal insufficiency preoperatively. Transient renal replacement therapy was needed in 1 (6%) patient only. In 1-month control, postoperative renal function had returned to its baseline level or improved and in-hospital or 30-day mortality was zero. CONCLUSIONS: Temporary axillorenal bypass is a considerable option to minimize renal ischemia time during high-risk vascular surgery.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Abdominales/cirugía , Aorta/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Arteria Axilar/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/cirugía , Arteria Renal/cirugía , Neoplasias Abdominales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Abdominales/fisiopatología , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/fisiopatología , Lesión Renal Aguda/prevención & control , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Aorta/fisiopatología , Enfermedades de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Aorta/fisiopatología , Arteria Axilar/fisiopatología , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Constricción , Femenino , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Isquemia/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Diseño de Prótesis , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Arteria Renal/fisiopatología , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/diagnóstico , Obstrucción de la Arteria Renal/fisiopatología , Circulación Renal , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Baroreceptors are sensory nerve endings in the carotid sinuses and the aortic arch. Notably, a dysfunction in the autonomic nervous system (sympathetic hyperactivity) has been shown to be part of the pathophysiology of chronic hypertension. Baroreflex activation therapy is an invasive treatment modality to decrease blood pressure by stimulating baroreceptors in the wall of the carotid sinus. Preliminary results of baroreflex activation therapy in resistant hypertension and systolic heart failure have been promising. If its effect can be proven in controlled studies, it may serve as an important new tool in the treatment of patients with resistant hypertension at a high risk of cardiovascular complications.